Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Check Point Remote Access VPN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.3
Check Point Harmony SASE boosts security, productivity, and efficiency while reducing costs, enhancing remote work and incident management.
Sentiment score
8.2
Check Point VPN provided essential remote work capabilities, ensuring business continuity and delivering ROI from 40% to 100%.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) blocked access to those URLs at the network level before users could click through.
We are saving 40% of our time, which is good.
It reduces the dependency on being physically present in the office and enhances the overall user experience, saving time and maintaining security.
In this case, everything is pre-inbuilt, allowing me to easily create new users and share their details so they can connect to Check Point VPN and access internal servers.
Since implementing Check Point Remote Access VPN, I have seen a return on investment as it saves me money and allows users to easily access internal resources from home.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
Check Point Harmony SASE receives mixed feedback, with users praising support responsiveness but noting occasional delays and escalation needs.
Sentiment score
5.4
Check Point VPN support is highly rated for expertise and responsiveness, though some mention slower responses and difficult direct contact.
I would rate support 10 out of 10.
After updating firmware, data utilization was visible for a few days before collapsing again.
Contacting the Technical Assistance Centers (TACs) initially can be difficult, but once I get in touch with the TAC team, it is easy to solve problems.
The timing of technical support does not always align with our working hours.
While the support team is generally good, it takes at least three to four days to address ticket issues.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Check Point Harmony SASE offers scalable, cloud-native network security ideal for dynamic workforces, with easy expansion and implementation.
Sentiment score
6.9
Check Point Remote Access VPN offers scalable solutions for enterprises, accommodating growth with mesh networks and WireGuard tunnels.
The cloud-native model ensures we are not tied to any specific location or hardware, which has been a great game changer in terms of agility.
The scalability of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is good, and I can add more users and devices easily as my organization grows.
I would rate it nine out of ten for scalability.
Currently, 130 users can connect simultaneously, and it is very reliable and efficient.
I feel confident that Check Point Remote Access VPN can scale effectively if our organization grows, as it can handle additional users and traffic.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Check Point Harmony SASE is praised for reliability and security, though some experience occasional connectivity issues and suggest optimizations.
Sentiment score
7.5
Check Point Remote Access VPN is stable across macOS and Windows, with minor issues mostly due to external factors.
Even the support team does not have a proper solution for this issue.
There are some lags and glitches with connectivity, so I would rate the stability as between seven or eight out of ten.
After the last improvement, I can say it is much more stable now.
Check Point Remote Access VPN is stable and has been reliable for my users.
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point Harmony SASE needs enhanced customization, integration, user interface, performance, and advanced features to improve overall efficiency.
Check Point Remote Access VPN users seek streamlined installation, enhanced scalability, better integration, improved UI, and advanced feature support.
An example of when the support cycle took longer than expected was when I had a ticket open for nearly six to seven months regarding a simple issue.
A local data center in Turkey would enhance the product, as currently, our Internet traffic goes to another country, which is problematic for us.
One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers.
Deploying these solutions requires higher technical expertise than other solutions.
Check Point Remote Access VPN can be improved by having more granular options to steer traffic, like easier configurations for split tunneling, which is currently complex.
Check Point Remote Access VPN could improve by automatically switching between my two ISPs when one goes down.
 

Setup Cost

Check Point Harmony SASE offers flexible, clear pricing, starting at $30 per license, suitable for larger organizations with discounts available.
Check Point Remote Access VPN offers competitive pricing with yearly costs, though additional licenses can increase expenses.
Cost efficiency is a consideration, as SASE products are not the cheapest security products.
It is a bit expensive.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is that it is a rental service, but I find it satisfactory.
It is competitively priced, and we have chosen it for its market leadership in the firewall space.
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing are straightforward, though the setup is a bit expensive.
The pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Check Point Remote Access VPN are a bit low compared to my previous solution.
 

Valuable Features

Check Point Harmony SASE offers unified security with Zero Trust Network Access, centralized management, and user-centric design for enhanced productivity.
Check Point Remote Access VPN provides secure, efficient remote connectivity with seamless integration, intuitive interface, and enhanced security features.
The firewall management is the most valuable feature for me.
The Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) feature is a major highlight as it gives users seamless and secure access to internal resources without requiring a full-blown VPN, which improves both security and user experience.
The best key features of Harmony are stabilization, private access, and Internet access.
The functionality enables secure access for remotely connecting users, which is necessary for our operations.
The end-to-end endpoint security provided by Check Point Remote Access VPN impacts our organization by ensuring compliance and enhancing security.
The visibility offered by Check Point Remote Access VPN has benefited my organization as it detects unauthorized access attempts, immediately alerting me via a pop-up for any threat protection issues.
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
7th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
61
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (6th), Firewalls (15th), Anti-Malware Tools (6th), ZTNA as a Service (4th), ZTNA (2nd), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (5th)
Check Point Remote Access VPN
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
74
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is 2.3%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Check Point Remote Access VPN is 3.9%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
 

Featured Reviews

Nasseer Qureshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Delivers seamless and secure remote access while enhancing security posture
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers strong features, but there are areas that could be improved. One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers. It works with standard SAML and SSO, but we would prefer deeper integrations with solutions such as Ping for more advanced identity-based policies. Additionally, a mobile-specific client or lightweight agent would be helpful for securing access from smartphones, especially in BYOD environments. We would appreciate more granular reporting and analytics, including better drill-down capabilities to investigate specific users or app activity. The logs are comprehensive, but filtering them can sometimes feel messy. The user interface on the management portal could be more intuitive, especially when managing multiple sites or remote offices. Some of the policy configuration steps are nested and could be streamlined.
NareshKumar9 - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable remote access boosts productivity and connectivity for home-based users
In my opinion, the best feature that Check Point Remote Access VPN offers is its reliability, as there has been no downtime till now. The reliability of Check Point Remote Access VPN has positively impacted my daily operations by reducing my support tickets, particularly when users face connection issues due to ISP downtimes. Check Point Remote Access VPN has positively impacted my organization by providing users access to the internal network, allowing us to capture all activities through our network. The visibility offered by Check Point Remote Access VPN has benefited my organization as it detects unauthorized access attempts, immediately alerting me via a pop-up for any threat protection issues.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Perimeter 81?
Even after restarting, it tries to quickly reestablish connection which is very helpful.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Perimeter 81?
It's essential to consider the organization's specific requirements and budget. Here are some general recommendations: * Evaluate your needs * Understand pricing models * Request a quote * Compare ...
What needs improvement with Perimeter 81?
In terms of improvement, Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed insights into network activity. Additionally, expanding integration options wit...
What needs improvement with Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?
I think Check Point Remote Access VPN can be improved as it's more of an annoyance for a good number of the clients because it doesn't save their credentials. Even if it's just timed out, you sort ...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?
My main use case for Check Point Remote Access VPN is for remote employee access.
 

Also Known As

Check Point Quantum SASE
Check Point Remote Access VPN, Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aqua Security, Cognito, Multipoint, Kustomer, Postman, Meredith
Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Check Point Remote Access VPN and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.