Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Check Point Remote Access VPN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.4
Check Point Harmony SASE users report cost savings, improved security, and productivity, with benefits often outweighing expenses despite ROI challenges.
Sentiment score
7.9
Check Point VPN ensures secure remote work, offering stability, quick ROI, improved efficiency, and cost-saving benefits for companies.
We are saving 40% of our time, which is good.
It reduces the dependency on being physically present in the office and enhances the overall user experience, saving time and maintaining security.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.1
Check Point Harmony SASE's customer service is professional and knowledgeable, but response times vary, especially for complex issues.
Sentiment score
6.3
Check Point Remote Access VPN support is praised for expertise and responsiveness, though response times may vary occasionally.
The support team needs to be more effective and responsive to clear issues more promptly.
Contacting the Technical Assistance Centers (TACs) initially can be difficult, but once I get in touch with the TAC team, it is easy to solve problems.
The timing of technical support does not always align with our working hours.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Check Point Harmony SASE is easily scalable and deployable, highly rated for performance and security across diverse organizations.
Sentiment score
7.3
Check Point Remote Access VPN is scalable and adaptable, supporting growth with effective infrastructure adjustments and license additions.
The scalability of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is good, and I can add more users and devices easily as my organization grows.
I would rate it nine out of ten for scalability.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Check Point Harmony SASE is reliable with minimal downtime, praised security, minor bugs, and ratings of seven to ten.
Sentiment score
7.0
Check Point Remote Access VPN is highly stable and reliable, with consistent performance and improvements noted after updates.
Even the support team does not have a proper solution for this issue.
There are some lags and glitches with connectivity, so I would rate the stability as between seven or eight out of ten.
After the last improvement, I can say it is much more stable now.
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point Harmony SASE needs interface, networking improvements, better integration, enhanced features, documentation, and support for diverse user needs.
Check Point Remote Access VPN needs frequent updates, better Linux integration, improved usability, and enhanced security features for non-Windows systems.
An example of when the support cycle took longer than expected was when I had a ticket open for nearly six to seven months regarding a simple issue.
A local data center in Turkey would enhance the product, as currently, our Internet traffic goes to another country, which is problematic for us.
The connectivity issue can be improved as at times it lags when connecting to their server.
Deploying these solutions requires higher technical expertise than other solutions.
Check Point Remote Access VPN can be improved by having more granular options to steer traffic, like easier configurations for split tunneling, which is currently complex.
Our key technical supports come during hours that are not aligned with our working hours, which sometimes affects our access to support.
 

Setup Cost

Check Point Harmony SASE offers flexible pricing, valuable for larger organizations, but requires a minimum of 50 users.
Check Point Remote Access VPN offers competitive pricing, with affordable licensing and robust security, making it valuable for enterprises.
Cost efficiency is a consideration, as SASE products are not the cheapest security products.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is that it is a rental service, but I find it satisfactory.
It is a bit expensive.
It is competitively priced, and we have chosen it for its market leadership in the firewall space.
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing are straightforward, though the setup is a bit expensive.
In terms of pricing, Check Point Remote Access VPN is not the most cost-effective option compared to other vendors.
 

Valuable Features

Check Point Harmony SASE offers secure VPN, multi-factor authentication, Zero Trust, and robust threat protection for efficient and streamlined management.
Check Point Remote Access VPN offers easy setup, strong security, and reliable connectivity, enhancing secure remote operations and productivity.
The firewall management is the most valuable feature for me.
Whenever user bot activity is detected, it automatically sends an email, eliminating the need for me to constantly check the device.
The best key features of Harmony are stabilization, private access, and Internet access.
The functionality enables secure access for remotely connecting users, which is necessary for our operations.
The end-to-end endpoint security provided by Check Point Remote Access VPN impacts our organization by ensuring compliance and enhancing security.
One of the best features is split tunneling, which allows steering what traffic is sent from the VPN tunnel.
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
7th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (6th), Firewalls (16th), Anti-Malware Tools (8th), ZTNA as a Service (5th), ZTNA (5th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (7th)
Check Point Remote Access VPN
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
71
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is 2.0%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Check Point Remote Access VPN is 3.8%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer8099174 - PeerSpot reviewer
Secure access with an intuitive design and straightforward controls
In terms of improvement, Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed insights into network activity. Additionally, expanding integration options with a broader range of third-party tools would be beneficial for seamless compatibility with various existing systems. As for additional features in the next release, it would be great to see advanced threat detection and response capabilities integrated into the platform. This would further enhance security by proactively identifying and mitigating potential threats. Additionally, improved mobile device management features and more comprehensive user behavior analytics would be valuable additions to meet evolving cybersecurity needs.
Anant Suman - PeerSpot reviewer
Remote administration is enabled with secure and user-friendly access
The main purpose of the product is for firewall purposes that we are using, and the VPN provides secure access for remote connections. It adds simplicity, as the solution is simple enough, with an easy interface. The functionality enables secure access for remotely connecting users, which is necessary for our operations.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Perimeter 81?
Even after restarting, it tries to quickly reestablish connection which is very helpful.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Perimeter 81?
It's essential to consider the organization's specific requirements and budget. Here are some general recommendations: * Evaluate your needs * Understand pricing models * Request a quote * Compare ...
What needs improvement with Perimeter 81?
In terms of improvement, Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed insights into network activity. Additionally, expanding integration options wit...
What needs improvement with Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?
One area that could be improved is the complexity of setting up Check Point Remote Access VPN, particularly with features like multi-factor authentication, single sign-on, and identity awareness. D...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?
We are resellers of Check Point products in our country, and our customers use Check Point Remote Access VPN to keep their organization data clean and safe when users access remotely through the cl...
 

Also Known As

Check Point Quantum SASE
Check Point Remote Access VPN, Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aqua Security, Cognito, Multipoint, Kustomer, Postman, Meredith
Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Check Point Remote Access VPN and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.