Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Act-On Software vs IMImobile IMIcampaign comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Act-On Software
Ranking in Marketing Automation
15th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.7
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IMImobile IMIcampaign
Ranking in Marketing Automation
32nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
9.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Marketing Automation category, the mindshare of Act-On Software is 2.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IMImobile IMIcampaign is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Marketing Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Act-On Software2.1%
IMImobile IMIcampaign0.7%
Other97.2%
Marketing Automation
 

Featured Reviews

it_user82449 - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Systems Manager at a consultancy with 501-1,000 employees
The adaptive nurturing, segmentation, multiple lead scoring rules, and simple CRM integration stood out the most.
The CRM integration with Act-On is better with Salesforce and had more value for sales representatives than it did with Microsoft Dynamics CRM; that was MS CRM's downfall. Act-On Anywhere is a nice feature for general users, but the tracking in CRM is lost, and Marketing team subject lines do not carry over on the email templates.
reviewer2069073 - PeerSpot reviewer
Tech Leader at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Great bulk upload and two-way SMS
I mainly use IMIcampaign to send SMS messages IMIcampaign's best features are bulk upload and send and the ease of adding customers. Its two-way SMS channel is also valuable. IMIcampaign's ability to deliver to other countries could be improved. It also has a limit of 160 characters on SMS and…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Before I joined, my company used a larger, more expensive but more popular software, and after switching to this, my team can still do everything it needs to for cheaper."
"Act-On has an outstanding customer support team and they escalate issues to their technical teams before the frustration level."
"It is now much easier for us to send and segment emails, analyze our results and make smarter decisions."
"Act-On is simple to use and it makes campaign development a breeze."
"Our organization was operating blindfolded before implementing Act-On."
"IMIcampaign's best features are bulk upload and send and the ease of adding customers."
 

Cons

"The CRM integration with Act-On is better with Salesforce and had more value for sales representatives than it did with Microsoft Dynamics CRM; that was MS CRM's downfall."
"One area of improvement would be ability to use dynamic content fields. It is available, but not to the fullest extent where it would help me."
"IMIcampaign's ability to deliver to other countries could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"IMIcampaign is more expensive than Salesforce Marketing Cloud."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Marketing Automation solutions are best for your needs.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise1
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

NYU, Tableau, Xerox, ASPCA, Lego Education, Hoopla, Avery Dennison and SolarWorld.
EE, O2, Schneider National
Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, HubSpot, Adobe and others in Marketing Automation. Updated: February 2026.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.