Adobe Workfront vs Hive comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Adobe and Hive Technology are both solutions in the Project Management Software category. Adobe is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while Hive Technology is ranked #35. Adobe holds a 1.8% mindshare in PMS, compared to Hive Technology’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Adobe users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hive Technology users who would recommend it.

Adobe Workfront

Read 42 Adobe Workfront reviews

6,442 Views
4,252 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Hive

Read 2 Hive reviews

1,487 Views
1,279 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Adobe Workfront

Hive

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Adobe Workfront and Hive compete in the project management software space. Hive seems to have an edge due to its features that justify its pricing, even with Adobe Workfront's competitive pricing and robust support.

Features: Adobe Workfront offers comprehensive project tracking, integration capabilities for large organizations, and detailed project metrics. Hive stands out with real-time collaboration tools, customizable workflows, and flexible teamwork features, enhancing team efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Adobe Workfront provides a structured deployment model with comprehensive support suitable for complex enterprise environments. Hive offers quicker deployment and intuitive onboarding but with less structured support.

Pricing and ROI: Adobe Workfront requires a higher initial investment with substantial ROI through detailed project management features. Hive provides lower setup costs, positioning it as a cost-effective solution for smaller teams seeking rapid deployment, with swift return benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Adobe Workfront vs. Hive Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Workfront vs. Hive

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Workfront

Ranking in Project Management Software

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Asset Management (1st)

Hive

Ranking in Project Management Software

35th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Adobe Workfront is 1.8%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hive is 0.6%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Adobe Workfront	1.8%
Hive	0.6%
Other	97.6%

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

AdityaGupta1

Adobe Workfront Specialist at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Have faced limitations in functionality and dependability while trying to streamline project management workflows

One of the best things about Adobe Workfront is that we can immediately track each project. We can keep track of all tasks with the help of milestones that we can add to a project. We can monitor everything effectively. The utilization and workload balancer allows us to clearly see if a person is over-utilized or if they are not getting utilized to at least 80 or 90%. This enables better tracking and work assignment with improved clarity. We use custom dashboards in Adobe Workfront to see all statuses. The integration capabilities with other software are quite good, with straightforward connectivity. We have HTTP connectors if we need to connect with external systems via APIs. If we have any API endpoint for any external tool, we can connect it with Adobe Workfront using Fusion. Reporting is a major part of Adobe Workfront, making it not just a workflow management tool but also a tool where we can get data and present it to executives through comprehensive reporting.

Read full review

Sachin Shukre

Sr Manager at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Provides efficiency in metadata storage and implementation

Many applications perform similarly to Hive, offering metadata implementations. I'm looking into their advancements, such as aggregated joins and MBT joins. Hive's virtual implementations are evolving, and tools like Snowflake offer specific use case advancements. In future releases, the Bloomfilter function should be a part of Hive. Windowing functions should also be there. I would also like to see AI implementation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"As per a user survey, 90% of respondents believe that Workfront has increased operational discipline."

"Adobe Workfront is a very broad platform, and when examining its primary function, it excels at project management and collaborative work management, with flexibility that allows it to be used for many things beyond overall project management in terms of general metadata compiling."

"Various departments that we have to collaborate with, have indicated that they are much more efficient with their work because they are able to see exactly where everything is and what's coming."

"The usability of the system has been great, it was by far the easiest product to use based on the products that we reviewed and the adoption with the use of the product has been great in terms of people understanding the system."

"The tool is very user-friendly."

"Logging hours is not painful, there are several choices to input them."

"When compared with other project management tools or workflow tools, Adobe Workfront is far better than other tools in the market now."

"Workfront is innovative and these were plenty of features that I found valuable while working at Logitech. Workfront had this feature of Project Schedule Templatization. This saves time and effort and even leads to the standardization of processes that are well-assorted. The Intelligent Graphical Interfaces of Workfront allow one to look at a specific type of resource and a specific phase for a specific family of products. You can get quite granular with the data and even zoom in or out of the timeline. It also categorizes projects according to classes and portfolios so that over time, you can more easily understand what are the various metrics involved in producing a specific portfolio Another important feature is Workfront allowing you to validate milestones and investigate the project. This also helped me to understand which projects are performing well and whether it was beneficial to invest in the same. The IT and the app configuration is quite secure and it is one of the benefits. One more valuable feature is the integration of communication systems inside Workfront. This helps you differentiate between normal business emails and project-specific conversations. This is also known as ‘queues’ and I absolutely find this feature extremely powerful."

More Adobe Workfront pros

"It is a good solution for us when it comes to metadata implementation. It's beneficial to have metadata stored in Hive."

"It excels in handling diverse data formats and is particularly beneficial for constructing a data lake for companies with mixed data types, such as videos and structured data."

Cons

"In Adobe Workfront, there is a limit of 2,000 users that can be shown on a page. I would suggest increasing this to something around 10,000 so end users can search all objects more efficiently."

"I would say that the stability, honestly, has gone down since the Adobe acquisition, and the quality when they roll out their updates."

"Customer Service: 5/10 - it is sometimes tough to get an advanced technician to review tickets."

"My experience with reporting in Adobe Workfront so far is that the reporting could be better."

"Sometimes response times are longer than I would like."

"We have experienced multiple problems as a result."

"Workfront still has a lot of growing to do in the proofing and review areas of the application. Additionally, the document review process is way too clunky and needs to be streamlined."

"Certain regions experience latency issues when dealing with large quantities of projects, which could be improved from Adobe's side."

More Adobe Workfront cons

"In future releases, I would also like to see AI implementation."

"For smaller datasets, it may not be as suitable, and its performance might not be optimal."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are partners with Adobe, so we get the licensing at a cheaper rate."

"Adobe purchased Workfront in the past year, and they're putting work into developing the platform, so I expect the price to rise. It isn't cheap, but it's reasonable for the value it provides. It isn't Monday.com where you pick a license with a set price, and you've got a project manager."

"Speaking about pricing, I wouldn't recommend it to a smaller company because I do think the price point is higher than other solutions that can work."

"Adobe Workfront is an expensive solution."

"The pricing of Workfront is completely license based."

"The pricing is a barrier to implementation. It is expensive compared to other competitors. Speaking about licensing, they have a private manager license for $1000, which you can use for administration as well. Then they offer a worker license for $500, and then a reviewer or contributor license which is free."

"It is an open-source solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

18%

University

16%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	30

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workfront?

The per-user cost in the ultimate plan of Adobe Workfront is approximately $1,232 when purchasing 800 to 1,000 licenses. The ultimate plan includes Fusion, which is an excellent automation tool. In...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Workfront?

The platform could benefit from additional customization features. The external lookup field, which allows custom API calls to fill data, is limited to two thousand results, which is insufficient f...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Workfront?

We specifically implement Adobe Workfront for other clients as Deloitte is a partner of Adobe. We work with different clients to implement Workfront and streamline marketing resource management wit...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Jira vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 6% of the time

Wrike vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 5% of the time

Asana vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Project Server vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 3% of the time

More Adobe Workfront Competitors

Jira vs Hive

Compared 27% of the time

Planisware vs Hive

Compared 15% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs Hive

Compared 9% of the time

Basecamp vs Hive

Compared 6% of the time

Airtable vs Hive

Compared 6% of the time

More Hive Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Workfront

September 2026

Download Adobe Workfront product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

August 2026

Download Hive product report

Also Known As

AtTask, Workfront DAM

No data available

Overview

Adobe Workfront provides customizable tools for project management, including dashboards and reports, promoting efficient workflows and team collaboration.

Adobe Workfront supports organizations with features like real-time data access, creative tool integration, and automated processes. It facilitates resource allocation and project tracking with role-based access control, making it a versatile platform for diverse methodologies. While its interface is user-friendly, some areas like reporting and custom fields could use simplification and faster system scalability.

What are Adobe Workfront's key features?

Customizable dashboards and reports: Facilitate data-driven decision-making with personalized insights.
Workflows and automation capabilities: Streamline processes and enhance productivity with Fusion.
Integration with creative tools: Seamlessly connect with CRM and DAM for synchronized operations.
Secure role-based access: Protect sensitive data while ensuring appropriate access levels.

What benefits or ROI should users expect from Adobe Workfront?

Improved project efficiency: Optimize resource planning and task management.
Enhanced collaboration: Ensure smooth communication within distributed teams.
Centralized project tracking: Maintain clear visibility on campaign progress and performance.
Streamlined approval processes: Reduce bottlenecks with automated workflows.

In marketing, Adobe Workfront is implemented for managing project timelines and resources, integrating with CRM and DAM tools. Companies streamline workflows to improve campaign planning and performance. By utilizing agile methodologies, they maintain a centralized hub for tracking and collaboration, enabling more efficient project completion.

Adobe

Hive is a project management tool focused on streamlining team collaboration and enhancing productivity through its unique blend of task tracking, communication, and data visualization capabilities.

Hive addresses the demands of teams with its robust project management features. It brings together task automation, time tracking, and in-app communication to facilitate smoother operations. Its analytics provide insights to optimize team performance, making it ideal for businesses looking to improve efficiency. While it offers a comprehensive set of tools, users suggest enhancing its mobile application and expanding integration options.

What are Hive's most important features?

Task Automation: Automate repetitive tasks to save time and reduce errors.
Time Tracking: Monitor the time spent on tasks for effective resource management.
In-App Messaging: Communicate directly within the platform to minimize email reliance.
Analytics and Reporting: Access detailed insights for informed decision-making.
Gantt Charts: Visualize project timelines to track progress efficiently.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Productivity: Streamlined workflows lead to more efficient task completion.
Improved Communication: A centralized platform for all project discussions.
Resource Optimization: Better time management and resource allocation.
Data-Driven Decisions: Comprehensive reports support strategic planning.

Hive has been adopted across industries like marketing, tech development, and consulting. Marketing teams leverage its campaign tracking features, while tech developers use task automation to manage complex projects. Consulting firms benefit from its robust analytics for client reporting.

Hive Technology

Sample Customers

Advance Autoparts, Emerson, Covario, Cisco, Caroma, TREK, Sapient Nitro, ATB, LexisNexis, CarPhone Warehouse

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Workfront vs. Hive

September 2026

Free Report: Adobe Workfront vs. Hive

Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe Workfront vs. Hive and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Adobe Workfront vs. Hive report.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.