AgilePoint vs Nintex Process Platform comparison

AgilePoint and Nintex are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. AgilePoint is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0, while Nintex is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.0. AgilePoint holds a 1.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to Nintex’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of AgilePoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

AgilePoint

Read 6 AgilePoint reviews

1,525 Views
854 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Read 25 Nintex Process Platform reviews

2,991 Views
1,974 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

AgilePoint

Nintex Process Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and AgilePoint are competing in workflow automation. While AgilePoint seems to have the upper hand with its extensive features, its higher cost might be justified by these capabilities.

Features: Nintex Process Platform excels with its seamless integration capabilities, advanced workflow automation, and user-friendly design for rapid deployment. AgilePoint is notable for dynamic content management, extensive customization options, and support for multiple deployment environments.

Room for Improvement: Nintex could enhance mobile support, expand integration options, and improve scalability. AgilePoint may benefit from simplifying complex configurations, improving user interface simplicity, and enhancing initial deployment guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex offers a straightforward cloud-based deployment with responsive support teams for quick implementation. AgilePoint provides versatile deployment choices, including detailed assistance for hybrid and on-premises environments, but requires more technical support for complex configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex is recognized for reasonable setup costs and strong ROI through efficient process automation. AgilePoint, while potentially more costly upfront, offers higher ROI for businesses needing extensive customization and adaptability.

To learn more, read our detailed AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AgilePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (21st), Low-Code Development Platforms (19th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (22nd)

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

22nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (22nd), Workload Automation (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of AgilePoint is 1.2%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 1.6%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AgilePoint	1.2%
Nintex Process Platform	1.6%
Other	97.2%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2649213

Chief Technology Officer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Business processes are automated efficiently with a well-designed interface

There is room for improvement in integrations and customizations for AgilePoint and other low-code, no-code solutions. Additionally, the marketing of such products should be more honest. They often claim to solve all process automation needs, but they only handle problems of certain complexity. AgilePoint cannot handle highly complex processes like ERPs.

Read full review

Hafiz Muhammad Usama

Manager Mobility & Digitalization at Fatima group

Have experienced challenges integrating with other systems but have benefited from improved process automation

There are multiple areas that need improvement. Nintex Process Platform needs integration with other platforms such as Salesforce and other CRM platforms. There should be actions available so we can directly integrate with these systems. Additionally, there is a gap in mathematical actions and logical actions. We need to parse data, and if we receive data in JSON, there is no action available in Nintex Process Platform to parse the data and extract data from that JSON string. Such actions and logical actions must be available in Nintex Process Platform to increase its capability. For us, Nintex Process Platform is configurable with SQL Server, but there is no configuration option available with Oracle. We also use Oracle in multiple processes, but we have found no way to directly configure Nintex Process Platform with Oracle. We have to use SQL Server in between. We have to create a link server within SQL Server as a bypass to retrieve or post data into Oracle. There were multiple improvement points available.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."

"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."

"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."

"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."

"The technical support is very good."

"Only Nintex has the feature which allows attachments to an email."

"It is very easy to use events. K2 has useful tools."

"It's easy to configure your set of rules to make the form controls work perfectly, removing manual work and making processes seamless."

"It has a lot of features for creating and managing workflows, as well as for integrating with other applications. Nintex offers features, particularly to ensure a user-friendly experience."

"The workflow engine of K2 is its main strength. Its workflow engine is probably one of the best, and that's the reason why Nintex bought K2. It can clearly handle any complex process or scenario. K2 is almost low-code. It is a no-code or low-code solution. You don't have to read a whole lot of code. It is pretty much GUI based. Their support is also excellent. The biggest advantage of K2 is SmartObjects, which allow you to separate the data from the application. It is a standalone application that allows you to build a data source from different places, which a lot of other applications also do. It is called SmartObjects technology, which is pretty powerful. If I have data from different applications, such as JD and ServiceNow, I can just create a SmartObject based on a data source and use it. I have some forms that have six, seven, or eight applications in a single form with data from different places."

"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."

"We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

Cons

"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."

"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."

"They should add more information about functionality."

"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."

"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"The security features for this solution need to be improved."

"We would like to design parallel workflows and long-running workflows, along with new features for connecting to cloud-based systems."

"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."

"The cost of the solution is high and has room for improvement."

"At times, issues arise in certain scenarios. In such cases, the versioning can become quite difficult. There may be no other way but to restart the entire process or rectify it at that point."

"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows."

"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."

"We'd like to have integration with SharePoint."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the price is reasonable."

"It is more cost-effective than local tools."

"Price-wise, AgilePoint is a cheap tool and a standard application for running analytics in an IT environment."

"I believe the pricing has changed recently. We had purchased one license per server, and it was about $2,000. It was a one-time payment. It's possible that they have recently implemented a new cost structure and now have yearly subscriptions."

"Nintex products are expensive, but valuable. Licensing in on-premise was historically based on a perpetual model, where you’d license per Web front-end. However, they are switching exclusively to a consumption (subscription) model, where you purchase the number of workflows you think you’ll use in your environment, and can scale up from there."

"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."

"It's more suited for enterprise level, not for small or medium-sized businesses (SMBs)."

"The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."

"Prices for licenses of K2 are high."

"Comparatively, it's expensive."

"We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."

"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

14%

University

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AgilePoint?

AgilePoint is worth the money, especially for small teams. However, I am not familiar with their enterprise pricing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AgilePoint?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AgilePoint?

I use AgilePoint for business process automation. Traditionally, approvals and file movements within an organization would require physical documents. AgilePoint digitizes these processes by conver...

See all answers

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs AgilePoint

Compared 22% of the time

OutSystems vs AgilePoint

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs AgilePoint

Compared 7% of the time

Apache Airflow vs AgilePoint

Compared 6% of the time

Appian vs AgilePoint

Compared 6% of the time

More AgilePoint Competitors

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

IBM BPM vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

January 2026

Download AgilePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

January 2026

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Overview

AgilePoint NX is a top-five low-code platform that empowers you to quickly build anything from simple eforms and workflows to complex, multi-tenant SaaS apps, IoT apps, and composite LOB systems without writing code and at a price almost any enterprise can afford.

AgilePoint

Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.

Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.

What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?

No/Low-Code Development: Enables users to develop applications without extensive coding knowledge, simplifying process creation.
System Integration: Offers seamless integration with systems like SharePoint and SAP, enhancing operational efficiency.
Workflow Capability: Facilitates the creation of sophisticated workflows suitable for complex processes.
SmartObjects: Centralizes data management, ensuring streamlined data access and usability.
Visual Designer: Simplifies the design and execution of business processes with an intuitive interface.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Rapid deployment minimizes downtime and accelerates process automation.
Cost Savings: Reduces time spent on manual processes, improving operational costs.
Enhanced Collaboration: Streamlines communication and coordination across departments, leading to better teamwork.
Time Savings: Speeds up routine tasks like approvals and onboarding, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.

Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Caja Laboral, Elbit Systems, Daisy Brand

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Buyer's Guide

AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform

February 2026

Free Report: AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.