AgilePoint vs Nintex Process Platform comparison

AgilePoint and Nintex are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. AgilePoint is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.0, while Nintex is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.0. AgilePoint holds a 1.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to Nintex’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of AgilePoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

AgilePoint

Read 6 AgilePoint reviews

1,675 Views
971 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Read 25 Nintex Process Platform reviews

3,243 Views
2,076 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

AgilePoint

Nintex Process Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and AgilePoint are competing in workflow automation. While AgilePoint seems to have the upper hand with its extensive features, its higher cost might be justified by these capabilities.

Features: Nintex Process Platform excels with its seamless integration capabilities, advanced workflow automation, and user-friendly design for rapid deployment. AgilePoint is notable for dynamic content management, extensive customization options, and support for multiple deployment environments.

Room for Improvement: Nintex could enhance mobile support, expand integration options, and improve scalability. AgilePoint may benefit from simplifying complex configurations, improving user interface simplicity, and enhancing initial deployment guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex offers a straightforward cloud-based deployment with responsive support teams for quick implementation. AgilePoint provides versatile deployment choices, including detailed assistance for hybrid and on-premises environments, but requires more technical support for complex configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex is recognized for reasonable setup costs and strong ROI through efficient process automation. AgilePoint, while potentially more costly upfront, offers higher ROI for businesses needing extensive customization and adaptability.

To learn more, read our detailed AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AgilePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (21st), Low-Code Development Platforms (19th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (23rd)

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (22nd), Workload Automation (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of AgilePoint is 1.3%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 1.6%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AgilePoint	1.3%
Nintex Process Platform	1.6%
Other	97.1%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2649213

Chief Technology Officer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Business processes are automated efficiently with a well-designed interface

There is room for improvement in integrations and customizations for AgilePoint and other low-code, no-code solutions. Additionally, the marketing of such products should be more honest. They often claim to solve all process automation needs, but they only handle problems of certain complexity. AgilePoint cannot handle highly complex processes like ERPs.

Read full review

Hafiz Muhammad Usama

Manager Mobility & Digitalization at Fatima group

Have experienced challenges integrating with other systems but have benefited from improved process automation

There are multiple areas that need improvement. Nintex Process Platform needs integration with other platforms such as Salesforce and other CRM platforms. There should be actions available so we can directly integrate with these systems. Additionally, there is a gap in mathematical actions and logical actions. We need to parse data, and if we receive data in JSON, there is no action available in Nintex Process Platform to parse the data and extract data from that JSON string. Such actions and logical actions must be available in Nintex Process Platform to increase its capability. For us, Nintex Process Platform is configurable with SQL Server, but there is no configuration option available with Oracle. We also use Oracle in multiple processes, but we have found no way to directly configure Nintex Process Platform with Oracle. We have to use SQL Server in between. We have to create a link server within SQL Server as a bypass to retrieve or post data into Oracle. There were multiple improvement points available.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."

"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."

"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."

"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."

"The support is great; I found the support to be excellent with immediate responses whenever I open a ticket."

"It saves time as tasks are automated."

"The solution helped us automate several processes we used to do manually."

"It is very easy to use events. K2 has useful tools."

"The integration capabilities have been very useful."

"It is very easy to use."

"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."

"The strength of this solution lies in its connectors and the accessibility of an open API. The presence of an open API allows users to create custom connectors if necessary, provided there is access to the source API documentation. Additionally, the platform features a straightforward yet highly effective forms tool. This tool not only seamlessly integrates with the workflow functionality but also facilitates the transmission of information to the document generation tool. This comprehensive integration is particularly noteworthy when compared to alternatives such as Oracle, which tends to rely on more complex and separate logic for similar functionalities. A key strength of Nintex lies in its user-centric approach to help documentation. The materials are designed to be easily understood, avoiding complex terminology. In cases where technical terms are used, they are linked to articles for further clarification. This contrasts with platforms like Microsoft and Oracle, which may employ technical jargon without clear explanations. Nintex further supports its users through a robust online community, fostering collaboration and shared insights. Additionally, Nintex University offers online training across all applications, following a role-based structure. Unlike some other platforms, Nintex's training is thoughtfully broken down into shorter courses, focused on specific roles. This approach ensures that users can efficiently access the information they need without navigating through extensive and potentially irrelevant content, as may be the case with Oracle's training structure."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

Cons

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."

"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."

"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."

"They should add more information about functionality."

"It's very tedious to manage."

"We would like to have access to an on-premises solution. In our country, we have a relationship with Central Bank of Egypt, which do noes not allow cloud solutions to be used. They should offer an on-prem solution with a flexible price license."

"Difficult to include external partners with the solution deployed on-premise."

"Nintex seems to be very server intensive. It is one of the reasons that we are moving to a different product on the SharePoint 2016 platform."

"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows."

"Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise."

"The solution needs more RPA and AI features."

"The security features for this solution need to be improved."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe the pricing has changed recently. We had purchased one license per server, and it was about $2,000. It was a one-time payment. It's possible that they have recently implemented a new cost structure and now have yearly subscriptions."

"Price-wise, AgilePoint is a cheap tool and a standard application for running analytics in an IT environment."

"It is more cost-effective than local tools."

"I think the price is reasonable."

"Comparatively, it's expensive."

"The annual support costs are expensive."

"Nintex Workflow is more expensive than Microsoft's native products, but it is still considered moderately priced when compared to higher-end products such as K2."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

"Nintex is around INR 200 per license in India, which is much cheaper. Smaller organizations are always looking for cost-effective solutions, and Nintex provides local solutions with very low pricing."

"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."

"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."

"For the initial hundred users, the cost is $21,000 per year, which I find too high."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

15%

University

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AgilePoint?

AgilePoint is worth the money, especially for small teams. However, I am not familiar with their enterprise pricing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AgilePoint?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AgilePoint?

I use AgilePoint for business process automation. Traditionally, approvals and file movements within an organization would require physical documents. AgilePoint digitizes these processes by conver...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for K2?

Our organization is a fertilizer company where we develop workflows regarding processes occurring at the plant. Most of them are safety projects, and a few other projects include off-boarding proje...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs AgilePoint

Compared 25% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs AgilePoint

Compared 6% of the time

OutSystems vs AgilePoint

Compared 5% of the time

Apache Airflow vs AgilePoint

Compared 4% of the time

Triaster vs AgilePoint

Compared 3% of the time

More AgilePoint Competitors

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

IBM BPM vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

ARIS BPA vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

February 2026

Download AgilePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

March 2026

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Overview

AgilePoint NX is a top-five low-code platform that empowers you to quickly build anything from simple eforms and workflows to complex, multi-tenant SaaS apps, IoT apps, and composite LOB systems without writing code and at a price almost any enterprise can afford.

AgilePoint

Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.

Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.

What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?

No/Low-Code Development: Enables users to develop applications without extensive coding knowledge, simplifying process creation.
System Integration: Offers seamless integration with systems like SharePoint and SAP, enhancing operational efficiency.
Workflow Capability: Facilitates the creation of sophisticated workflows suitable for complex processes.
SmartObjects: Centralizes data management, ensuring streamlined data access and usability.
Visual Designer: Simplifies the design and execution of business processes with an intuitive interface.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Rapid deployment minimizes downtime and accelerates process automation.
Cost Savings: Reduces time spent on manual processes, improving operational costs.
Enhanced Collaboration: Streamlines communication and coordination across departments, leading to better teamwork.
Time Savings: Speeds up routine tasks like approvals and onboarding, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.

Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Caja Laboral, Elbit Systems, Daisy Brand

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Buyer's Guide

AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform

March 2026

Free Report: AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.