AgilePoint vs Nintex Process Platform comparison

AgilePoint and Nintex are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. AgilePoint is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.3, while Nintex is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.2. AgilePoint holds a 0.4% mindshare in BPM, compared to Nintex’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of AgilePoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

AgilePoint

Read 6 AgilePoint reviews

320 Views
225 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

2,490 Views
1,518 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

AgilePoint

Nintex Process Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and AgilePoint are competing in workflow automation. While AgilePoint seems to have the upper hand with its extensive features, its higher cost might be justified by these capabilities.

Features: Nintex Process Platform excels with its seamless integration capabilities, advanced workflow automation, and user-friendly design for rapid deployment. AgilePoint is notable for dynamic content management, extensive customization options, and support for multiple deployment environments.

Room for Improvement: Nintex could enhance mobile support, expand integration options, and improve scalability. AgilePoint may benefit from simplifying complex configurations, improving user interface simplicity, and enhancing initial deployment guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex offers a straightforward cloud-based deployment with responsive support teams for quick implementation. AgilePoint provides versatile deployment choices, including detailed assistance for hybrid and on-premises environments, but requires more technical support for complex configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex is recognized for reasonable setup costs and strong ROI through efficient process automation. AgilePoint, while potentially more costly upfront, offers higher ROI for businesses needing extensive customization and adaptability.

To learn more, read our detailed AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AgilePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

30th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (26th), Low-Code Development Platforms (22nd)

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (9th), Workload Automation (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of AgilePoint is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 2.2%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Ayush S

Automation Developer at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Provides efficient process management features, but it needs more integration capabilities

We use AgilePoint for an idea submission application for our business processes. It allows managers to review and update the approved idea on the dashboard AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management. We can integrate it with many applications including Microsoft, UiPath, and other…

Read full review

Damilola Adeleye

Business Automation Developer at Polaris Bank Nigeria Plc

Straightforward interface and user-friendly

There are a lot of apps in K2, but what I really found that needs improvement is the management section of K2, especially the management server and the admin page where you can manage processes, add users, set security fees, and add licenses. The reason for this is because the part that is the section of administration, particularly the management called rows, has multiple rules, as many as you want. For instance, you may have around 200 rules, and when you view them, only the first ten are displayed, and you have to click next to see the next ten and so on until you get to the hundredth rule. On that page, as of today, we only have what we call to fetch, where you can search for a particular rule you're looking for, or else you have to keep clicking until you get to the final page you want. So that's a bit challenging.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."

"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."

"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."

"The workflow engine of K2 is its main strength. Its workflow engine is probably one of the best, and that's the reason why Nintex bought K2. It can clearly handle any complex process or scenario. K2 is almost low-code. It is a no-code or low-code solution. You don't have to read a whole lot of code. It is pretty much GUI based. Their support is also excellent. The biggest advantage of K2 is SmartObjects, which allow you to separate the data from the application. It is a standalone application that allows you to build a data source from different places, which a lot of other applications also do. It is called SmartObjects technology, which is pretty powerful. If I have data from different applications, such as JD and ServiceNow, I can just create a SmartObject based on a data source and use it. I have some forms that have six, seven, or eight applications in a single form with data from different places."

"The solution helped us automate several processes we used to do manually."

"The capacity to integrate with external platforms. It's great to be able to call web services or other external services."

"It is a scalable product."

"It provides data accuracy with fewer failures."

"With an extensive list of integrations with LOB data, your workflows can extend far beyond SharePoint, driving adoption of SharePoint."

"It's easy to configure your set of rules to make the form controls work perfectly, removing manual work and making processes seamless."

"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

Cons

"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."

"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."

"They should add more information about functionality."

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."

"There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently."

"The security features for this solution need to be improved."

"It's very tedious to manage."

"Built-in reporting on-prem is limited and clunky at best."

"Converting a document from PDF to MS Word, or vice versa, needs to be improved."

"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."

"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."

"There is room for improvement in the user experience in the forms."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the price is reasonable."

"I believe the pricing has changed recently. We had purchased one license per server, and it was about $2,000. It was a one-time payment. It's possible that they have recently implemented a new cost structure and now have yearly subscriptions."

"It is more cost-effective than local tools."

"Price-wise, AgilePoint is a cheap tool and a standard application for running analytics in an IT environment."

"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."

"Nintex products are expensive, but valuable. Licensing in on-premise was historically based on a perpetual model, where you’d license per Web front-end. However, they are switching exclusively to a consumption (subscription) model, where you purchase the number of workflows you think you’ll use in your environment, and can scale up from there."

"Nintex is around INR 200 per license in India, which is much cheaper. Smaller organizations are always looking for cost-effective solutions, and Nintex provides local solutions with very low pricing."

"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

"Nintex Workflow is more expensive than Microsoft's native products, but it is still considered moderately priced when compared to higher-end products such as K2."

"We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."

"The enterprise version has some additional features that I would like to use, but the price is not fair."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

Government

University

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AgilePoint?

AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AgilePoint?

AgilePoint is worth the money, especially for small teams. However, I am not familiar with their enterprise pricing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AgilePoint?

There is room for improvement in integrations and customizations for AgilePoint and other low-code, no-code solutions. Additionally, the marketing of such products should be more honest. They often...

See all answers

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power Apps vs AgilePoint

Compared 21% of the time

Mendix vs AgilePoint

Compared 15% of the time

Appian vs AgilePoint

Compared 12% of the time

ServiceNow Now Platform vs AgilePoint

Compared 12% of the time

Camunda vs AgilePoint

Compared 12% of the time

More AgilePoint Competitors

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 20% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Appian vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

May 2025

Download AgilePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

May 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Overview

AgilePoint NX is a top-five low-code platform that empowers you to quickly build anything from simple eforms and workflows to complex, multi-tenant SaaS apps, IoT apps, and composite LOB systems without writing code and at a price almost any enterprise can afford.

AgilePoint

Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.

Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.

What are some key features?

Easy Maintenance - Simplifies ongoing management and updates.
Low-Code Development - Enables quick application creation with minimal coding.
Extensive Integration - Connects with diverse data sources through SmartObjects technology.
Drag-and-Drop Interface - Offers a user-friendly, visually intuitive design for creating workflows.
Automatic Workflow Triggers - Allows for seamless automation of predefined actions.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystems - Ensures compatibility with SharePoint and Office 365.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Affordability - Offers cost-effective solutions for businesses.
Customizability - Provides tailored solutions that meet specific needs.
Support - Beneficial for addressing issues and optimizing performance.
Rapid Development - Facilitates quick project turnaround due to its pre-built constructs.

Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Caja Laboral, Elbit Systems, Daisy Brand

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Buyer's Guide

AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform

April 2025

Free Report: AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.