AgilePoint vs QuickBase comparison

AgilePoint and Quickbase are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. AgilePoint is ranked #21 with an average rating of 9.0, while Quickbase is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.4. AgilePoint holds a 1.3% mindshare in RADS, compared to Quickbase’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of AgilePoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Quickbase users who would recommend it.

AgilePoint

Read 6 AgilePoint reviews

1,675 Views
620 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QuickBase

Read 81 QuickBase reviews

2,699 Views
1,781 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

AgilePoint

QuickBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

AgilePoint and QuickBase are both powerful tools for application development. QuickBase seems to have the upper hand due to its robust features.

Features: AgilePoint offers integration capabilities, a low-code development environment, and competitive pricing. QuickBase is known for its ease of use, strong customization options, and flexibility for diverse operational needs.

Room for Improvement: AgilePoint needs to enhance user training resources, improve usability, and address some deployment issues. QuickBase requires better scalability, more advanced workflow options, and improvements in customer support responsiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AgilePoint is noted for a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. QuickBase offers ease of deployment but has less responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: AgilePoint is praised for its competitive setup cost and good ROI. QuickBase is perceived as more expensive but valued for delivering strong ROI due to its comprehensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed AgilePoint vs. QuickBase Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AgilePoint vs. QuickBase

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AgilePoint

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

21st

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (17th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (23rd)

QuickBase

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

16th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

12th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Employee Time Tracking Software (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of AgilePoint is 1.3%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QuickBase is 2.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
QuickBase	2.2%
AgilePoint	1.3%
Other	96.5%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2649213

Chief Technology Officer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Business processes are automated efficiently with a well-designed interface

There is room for improvement in integrations and customizations for AgilePoint and other low-code, no-code solutions. Additionally, the marketing of such products should be more honest. They often claim to solve all process automation needs, but they only handle problems of certain complexity. AgilePoint cannot handle highly complex processes like ERPs.

Read full review

Morgan Victor

Software Test Engineer at Roche

Automation has transformed project and inventory workflows and improves revenue forecasting

The best features QuickBase offers include being a no-code software, meaning it is very easy to use even for new users. It also provides life cycle management, workflow management, and dashboards. The dashboards and workflow management help my team significantly, as they have a drag-and-drop interface and prebuilt templates, which play a pivotal role in creating custom applications. Those features also help provide the ability to manage the entire application life cycle with QuickBase easily. Integration has been very seamless with our overall IT stack. The user interface is very user-friendly and intuitive, which makes it very easy to use, together with the no-code aspect. Any kind of personnel can use this tool easily.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."

"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."

"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."

"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."

"Allows users have anytime/anywhere access."

"QuickBase is an excellent product and it is very easy to get support."

"QuickBase has positively impacted my organization by allowing business level resources without significant technical experience to create workflows and databases when our IT resources are limited."

"Technical support is really good, and I would rate it a nine out of ten."

"QuickBase has positively impacted my organization by resolving our purchase order and inventory management issues, helping us in revenue management and forecasting revenue, and making data-driven decisions easily while saving significant time and cost."

"The usability of QuickBase largely depends on how you design your workflows within the platform. If you keep them simple and straightforward, it can be a highly usable product."

"I run my own business and the solution allows me to invoice and pay for additional resources. It has helped me in terms of invoicing, quoting, and doing recruitment measures."

"It has helped streamline and simply track status and collection of data from suppliers and other internal departments."

More QuickBase pros

Cons

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."

"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."

"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."

"They should add more information about functionality."

"The product works constantly to modernize the platform and they have made quite a lot of strides in that. I would like them to add additional features that would help us make API calls."

"The table size limits are small for really large apps."

"QuickBase can be improved, as some high-level integration can be tricky to develop without advanced understanding of the APIs and other functions."

"I would like to see the reporting enhanced because some of them are not easy to generate."

"This rule: The Maximum is 60 rules. We need to provide more in order to improve."

"Its UI needs improvement. They should improve it and make it a little bit more modern. We should also be able to have more real-time information that connects with other software platforms. It has an open API, but it doesn't always connect with some of the other platforms that we would like to utilize. These are probably two of the biggest things for us, and hopefully, they will keep ensuring that in the future, they continually build QuickBase to be a little bit more efficient in that regard."

"The user interface of Quick Base is complex."

"There is room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness."

More QuickBase cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is more cost-effective than local tools."

"Price-wise, AgilePoint is a cheap tool and a standard application for running analytics in an IT environment."

"I think the price is reasonable."

"I believe the pricing has changed recently. We had purchased one license per server, and it was about $2,000. It was a one-time payment. It's possible that they have recently implemented a new cost structure and now have yearly subscriptions."

"Quickbase is probably not the cheapest app out there. That said, it is worth its weight in gold. There is no other app that I know of in the market today that can do what Quickbase does."

"The product is cheap when compared to other products."

"It is probably about 300 per license per person. There is just the licensing cost. There are no additional costs."

"The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year."

"The pricing for QuickBase is pretty straightforward, It is based on a per user/per month licensing fee."

"The solution is expensive and geared toward enterprise-level clients."

"You have to negotiate the price because it varies based on the number of users you have, as well as how much cloud storage space you need."

"We felt the pricing and licensing for QuickBase were easy enough to understand, fair and competitive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

15%

University

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

17%

Marketing Services Firm

Construction Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	40
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	28

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AgilePoint?

AgilePoint is worth the money, especially for small teams. However, I am not familiar with their enterprise pricing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AgilePoint?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AgilePoint?

I use AgilePoint for business process automation. Traditionally, approvals and file movements within an organization would require physical documents. AgilePoint digitizes these processes by conver...

See all answers

What do you like most about QuickBase?

The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?

I did not have any involvement with pricing, setup cost, or licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QuickBase?

The table size limits are small for really large apps. While I agree that there needs to be a cap on the size, it would be nice to adjust it up when needed. Also, the cost can be a bit prohibitive,...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs AgilePoint

Compared 25% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs AgilePoint

Compared 6% of the time

OutSystems vs AgilePoint

Compared 5% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs AgilePoint

Compared 4% of the time

Apache Airflow vs AgilePoint

Compared 4% of the time

More AgilePoint Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs QuickBase

Compared 7% of the time

ServiceNow vs QuickBase

Compared 5% of the time

OutSystems vs QuickBase

Compared 5% of the time

Pega Platform vs QuickBase

Compared 5% of the time

Adobe ColdFusion vs QuickBase

Compared 4% of the time

More QuickBase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

February 2026

Download AgilePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

QuickBase

March 2026

Download QuickBase product report

Also Known As

No data available

Quick Base, TSheets

Overview

AgilePoint NX is a top-five low-code platform that empowers you to quickly build anything from simple eforms and workflows to complex, multi-tenant SaaS apps, IoT apps, and composite LOB systems without writing code and at a price almost any enterprise can afford.

AgilePoint

Trusted by more than half of the Fortune 100, QuickBase is a low-code platform for building, customizing, and integrating custom business applications. With more than 6,000 customers and 500,000 active users, QuickBase is the technology of choice for organizations that want to empower business users to solve their own challenges while maintaining the governance and security of an enterprise-quality app development system.

Quickbase

Sample Customers

Caja Laboral, Elbit Systems, Daisy Brand

Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office

Buyer's Guide

AgilePoint vs. QuickBase

March 2026

Free Report: AgilePoint vs. QuickBase

Find out what your peers are saying about AgilePoint vs. QuickBase and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AgilePoint vs. QuickBase report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.