AgilePoint vs QuickBase comparison

AgilePoint and Quickbase are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. AgilePoint is ranked #21 with an average rating of 9.0, while Quickbase is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3. AgilePoint holds a 1.0% mindshare in RADS, compared to Quickbase’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of AgilePoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Quickbase users who would recommend it.

AgilePoint

Read 6 AgilePoint reviews

1,287 Views
515 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QuickBase

Read 75 QuickBase reviews

2,015 Views
1,350 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

AgilePoint

QuickBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

AgilePoint and QuickBase are both powerful tools for application development. QuickBase seems to have the upper hand due to its robust features.

Features: AgilePoint offers integration capabilities, a low-code development environment, and competitive pricing. QuickBase is known for its ease of use, strong customization options, and flexibility for diverse operational needs.

Room for Improvement: AgilePoint needs to enhance user training resources, improve usability, and address some deployment issues. QuickBase requires better scalability, more advanced workflow options, and improvements in customer support responsiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AgilePoint is noted for a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. QuickBase offers ease of deployment but has less responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: AgilePoint is praised for its competitive setup cost and good ROI. QuickBase is perceived as more expensive but valued for delivering strong ROI due to its comprehensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed AgilePoint vs. QuickBase Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AgilePoint vs. QuickBase

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AgilePoint

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

21st

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (19th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (23rd)

QuickBase

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

18th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

13th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Employee Time Tracking Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of AgilePoint is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QuickBase is 1.9%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
QuickBase	1.9%
AgilePoint	1.0%
Other	97.1%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2649213

Chief Technology Officer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Business processes are automated efficiently with a well-designed interface

There is room for improvement in integrations and customizations for AgilePoint and other low-code, no-code solutions. Additionally, the marketing of such products should be more honest. They often claim to solve all process automation needs, but they only handle problems of certain complexity. AgilePoint cannot handle highly complex processes like ERPs.

Read full review

RahulSharma15

Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

Empowers content management and application creation without SQL

The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals. There is room for improvement in front-end functionalities. I cannot deploy and use front-end features anywhere; they must be deployed inside Quick Base. The introduction of hooks would allow for easier deployment elsewhere, such as GitHub. Additionally, their APIs have limitations, such as reliance on XML for backend APIs, which restricts their utility.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."

"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."

"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."

"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."

"It is low-code. We are able to go in and create apps quickly. It is very helpful for the size of our company. We're a mid-size company, and at this moment, we don't need anything externally. We don't have to go out and consult a consulting firm to build something from the ground up. So, the ease of that and being able to get development quickly up and running has been good for us."

"One of the valuable features of Quick Base is its ability to function as a content management system without the need for SQL."

"Technical support is really good, and I would rate it a nine out of ten."

"The product is easy to use."

"The need for little to no code knowledge has been huge."

"QuickBase reminds me when a software license or a hardware support contract is near expiration so that I can initiate our company's procurement process in time and not miss a deadline."

"Allows users have anytime/anywhere access."

"The usability of QuickBase largely depends on how you design your workflows within the platform. If you keep them simple and straightforward, it can be a highly usable product."

More QuickBase pros

Cons

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."

"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."

"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."

"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."

"They should add more information about functionality."

"Its UI needs improvement. They should improve it and make it a little bit more modern. We should also be able to have more real-time information that connects with other software platforms. It has an open API, but it doesn't always connect with some of the other platforms that we would like to utilize. These are probably two of the biggest things for us, and hopefully, they will keep ensuring that in the future, they continually build QuickBase to be a little bit more efficient in that regard."

". For example, we need a third-party to create and save a document in PDF, MS Word, or MS Excel format. The document saving capability is probably the feature that we most often have to procure from an outside provider."

"I would like to see better options for producing paper reports from Quick Base, rather than viewing things exclusively on screen."

"I would like to see the reporting enhanced because some of them are not easy to generate."

"The mobile app has improved, but it still needs work."

"The improved developer interface in some areas can be difficult to use for complex items."

"Third-party integration -- they are working on it and I find their brand-new still-in-beta Webhooks very promising."

"Unfortunately, there is still no new report formatting available natively, and would still require 3rd party developers to help with that. ."

More QuickBase cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe the pricing has changed recently. We had purchased one license per server, and it was about $2,000. It was a one-time payment. It's possible that they have recently implemented a new cost structure and now have yearly subscriptions."

"It is more cost-effective than local tools."

"Price-wise, AgilePoint is a cheap tool and a standard application for running analytics in an IT environment."

"I think the price is reasonable."

"The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year."

"The pricing for QuickBase is pretty straightforward, It is based on a per user/per month licensing fee."

"You have to negotiate the price because it varies based on the number of users you have, as well as how much cloud storage space you need."

"The solution is expensive and geared toward enterprise-level clients."

"Quickbase is probably not the cheapest app out there. That said, it is worth its weight in gold. There is no other app that I know of in the market today that can do what Quickbase does."

"It is probably about 300 per license per person. There is just the licensing cost. There are no additional costs."

"We felt the pricing and licensing for QuickBase were easy enough to understand, fair and competitive."

"The product is cheap when compared to other products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

15%

University

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

University

Comms Service Provider

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AgilePoint?

AgilePoint is worth the money, especially for small teams. However, I am not familiar with their enterprise pricing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AgilePoint?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AgilePoint?

I use AgilePoint for business process automation. Traditionally, approvals and file movements within an organization would require physical documents. AgilePoint digitizes these processes by conver...

See all answers

What do you like most about QuickBase?

The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?

Pricing could be cheaper. I rate it around a seven out of ten. Mainly larger companies use it, which influences the pricing structure.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QuickBase?

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs AgilePoint

Compared 19% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs AgilePoint

Compared 10% of the time

OutSystems vs AgilePoint

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs AgilePoint

Compared 8% of the time

Apache Airflow vs AgilePoint

Compared 7% of the time

More AgilePoint Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs QuickBase

Compared 11% of the time

ServiceNow vs QuickBase

Compared 9% of the time

OutSystems vs QuickBase

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs QuickBase

Compared 7% of the time

Mendix vs QuickBase

Compared 6% of the time

More QuickBase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

January 2026

Download AgilePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

QuickBase

January 2026

Download QuickBase product report

Also Known As

No data available

Quick Base, TSheets

Overview

AgilePoint NX is a top-five low-code platform that empowers you to quickly build anything from simple eforms and workflows to complex, multi-tenant SaaS apps, IoT apps, and composite LOB systems without writing code and at a price almost any enterprise can afford.

AgilePoint

Trusted by more than half of the Fortune 100, QuickBase is a low-code platform for building, customizing, and integrating custom business applications. With more than 6,000 customers and 500,000 active users, QuickBase is the technology of choice for organizations that want to empower business users to solve their own challenges while maintaining the governance and security of an enterprise-quality app development system.

Quickbase

Sample Customers

Caja Laboral, Elbit Systems, Daisy Brand

Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office

Buyer's Guide

AgilePoint vs. QuickBase

December 2025

Free Report: AgilePoint vs. QuickBase

Find out what your peers are saying about AgilePoint vs. QuickBase and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AgilePoint vs. QuickBase report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.