Qlik Replicate and Alteryx Designer compete in the data management and analytics tools category. Qlik Replicate has an upper hand in complex data replication tasks due to its advanced Change Data Capture capabilities, whereas Alteryx Designer shines in user-friendly data preparation and analytics.
Features: Qlik Replicate offers comprehensive Change Data Capture capabilities enabling efficient real-time data integration while minimizing impact on source databases. It simplifies data manipulation and transformation without needing extensive ETL processes. Alteryx Designer excels with its intuitive drag-and-drop interface, providing robust data preparation tools and automation features suitable for users with varying technical expertise. It supports a wide range of data sources and formats, ideal for users needing a straightforward approach to analytics.
Room for Improvement: Qlik Replicate needs to improve its user-friendliness and error management, particularly enhancing error message handling and hybrid deployment configurations. Better support and clearer pricing transparency are also needed. Alteryx Designer should work on reducing its high cost and improving data processing speed and efficiency. Better integration capabilities and more intuitive documentation are also areas for enhancement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Replicate offers flexible deployment options, supporting public cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments, but faces challenges with customer service responsiveness. Alteryx Designer, primarily used on-premises, supports private and hybrid cloud deployments but could benefit from more robust cloud integration. While its customer service is straightforward, it is often noted as costly and occasionally slow for non-English support.
Pricing and ROI: Qlik Replicate’s cost can be prohibitive for small businesses, with licensing tied to data sources and endpoints, yet it offers a strong ROI by lowering maintenance and operational costs in data-heavy applications. Alteryx Designer also has a high price tag, particularly affecting scalability for smaller businesses. Its automation features provide time-saving benefits, delivering substantial ROI despite its price, making broad adoption challenging due to its cost.
I conducted a cost comparison with the AWS service provider, and this option is much cheaper than the Kinesis service offered by AWS.
Customers have seen ROI with Qlik Replicate because they get their data for analysis faster, enabling quicker decision-making compared to traditional data sourcing methods.
There are areas where they need to improve response time and overall competence.
Even priority tickets, which should be resolved in minutes, can take days.
Having a technical account manager coordinate with us proved beneficial during these interactions.
Support response times could be improved as there are sometimes delays in receiving replies to support cases.
The system could be scaled to include more sources and functions.
We successfully scaled several of our Oracle RDBMS systems simultaneously, including PeopleSoft HR and our network access request systems.
We have tracked INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE operations effectively, capturing pre-update and post-update images, maintaining real-time replicas of information without needing to reprocess requests or datasets.
I believe that having updated documentation is crucial as we encountered a scenario while going through documentation that had not been updated since 2024, which introduced risks since we rely on accurate documentation for task imports and endpoint re-credentialing considerations before reaching out to customer support.
It is a core-based licensing, which, especially in the banking industry, results in the system capacity being utilized up to a maximum of 60%.
Currently, there are limited transformations available in Qlik Replicate which could be expanded.
It's cheaper than Palantir, but even Alteryx is too much for small clients.
For Qlik Replicate, the setup cost includes the requirement of a server, which represents the hardware cost that must be covered.
Licensing is calculated based on the machine's total capacity rather than actual usage.
The main valuable aspect is the simplicity of use across all features.
The log-based CDC engine of Qlik Replicate is the most valuable feature for us. It reads our source changes directly from the database log, providing a lightweight approach that ensures our databases, such as Oracle databases, are not burdened with additional queries.
This occurs in near real-time, with replication happening within seconds at the target location.
Data retrieved from the system can be pushed to multiple places, supporting various divisions such as marketing, loans, and others.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Alteryx Designer | 1.5% |
| Qlik Replicate | 1.7% |
| Other | 96.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution for replicating data from one source database to another for business intelligence software. It offers data manipulation and transformations, replication without impacting source databases, and ease of use without needing ETL. The solution is stable and user-friendly, with detailed logging and support.
Qlik Replicate has improved the organization by allowing each team to replicate their data into a single-source data location. The most important feature of Qlik Replicate is its ability to replicate and update records without needing a programmer.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
