Apache Airflow vs OpenText Process Automation comparison

Apache and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Apache is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.5. Apache holds a 2.6% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Apache Airflow

Read 41 Apache Airflow reviews

6,159 Views
6,097 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

OpenText Process Automation

Read 10 OpenText Process Automation reviews

2,279 Views
1,937 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apache Airflow

OpenText Process Automation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Apache Airflow and OpenText Process Automation are pivotal in the tech environment, competing in automation and process management. Apache Airflow gains an advantage with robust integrations and a strong community focus, particularly in data orchestration, while OpenText Process Automation excels in business process management with its standardized features.

Features: Apache Airflow integrates seamlessly with numerous technologies and offers a Python-based approach ideal for customization. Its community-driven updates ensure enhancements and provide a strong framework for automation and scaling. OpenText Process Automation, on the other hand, provides standard BPMN models for handling complex business processes, offering a low-code environment to streamline processes and enhance operational efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Apache Airflow could benefit from an improved user interface and better scheduler reliability. Enhancements in real-time job management and cloud integrations are also needed. OpenText Process Automation requires better compatibility with modern systems and could improve in mobile compatibility and updating its user interface for better user engagement and efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apache Airflow offers versatility through its deployment on public and hybrid clouds and relies heavily on community support, which is bolstered by extensive documentation. OpenText Process Automation provides enterprise-level support and smooth deployment through its hybrid options, highlighting its advantage in structured customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Apache Airflow, as a free, open-source solution, delivers high ROI by reducing operational costs despite some production overheads. OpenText Process Automation, which operates on a user-based perpetual licensing model, may be costly, but its extensive capabilities justify the expense for organizations looking for comprehensive enterprise solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Airflow vs. OpenText Process Automation Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Apache Airflow vs. OpenText Process Automation

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Airflow

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Process Automation

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

26th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Apache Airflow is 2.6%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Process Automation is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Apache Airflow	2.6%
OpenText Process Automation	1.1%
Other	96.3%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2754210

Administrator at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees

Open workflows have simplified data ingestion and curation but still need better UI and scheduler resilience

I think there could be improvements or enhancements in Apache Airflow in terms of having a better UI experience. The UX can be done a bit better. The web interface of Apache Airflow has helped me in tracking and troubleshooting since I'm operational and part of the operational side of Apache Airflow. Mostly, I go into the logs of the web server and scheduler to check what's happening in the back-end instead of looking at the front-end. The UI can give errors related to pipelines, but it can be more improved if we get errors related to import errors and scheduling errors. These areas can be improved. Other than a better UI experience, I would want to see improvements in the scheduler. Sometimes, for user-made mistakes, the scheduler goes down. I experienced this issue and I'm not sure whether it got fixed right now or not. If a user is building a data pipeline in Apache Airflow and a user makes a mistake in their code, that makes the scheduler go down and eventually Apache Airflow goes down. That is not what is expected. If that gets fixed, then it can do wonders.

Read full review

Senthil Natarajan

Chief Operating Officer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

The solution enables automation of supply chain and invoice processing with comprehensive integration and workflow capabilities

The main valuable features of OpenText AppWorks are the BPM modules. There is the standard BPM modeler and a case modeler. These are two strong features from the workflow layer. Additionally, the integration capability of the solution is beneficial. With these features, we are able to use OpenText AppWorks for automating supply-chain-related problems, vendor process automations, and invoice automations. We have built almost twenty-plus types of solutions and implemented around three hundred fifty-plus implementations. The solution also allows us to integrate it with our ERP system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For low to middle scaled tasks, Apache Airflow could be a substitute for Control-M."

"The solution is flexible for all programming languages for all frameworks."

"Since it's widely adopted by the community, Apache Airflow is a user-friendly solution."

"Apache Airflow is a stable and flexible platform."

"The best feature is the customization that can be done using Python."

"We have been quite satisfied with the stability of the solution."

"Development on Apache Airflow is really fast, and it's easy to use with the newer updates. Everything is in Python, so it's not hard to understand. They also have a graphical view, so if you are not a programmer and you are just an administrator, you can easily track everything and see if everything is working or not."

"I found the following features very useful: DAG - Workload management and orchestration of tasks using."

More Apache Airflow pros

"We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenText AppWorks, especially those incorporating low-code functionalities, have had a significant positive impact. In some cases, we've observed a remarkable reduction in development time, ranging from 50 to 75 percent. The MTP model and life cycle have facilitated rapid development cycles."

"In terms of the scalability and the handling of complexity, the customers are satisfied, and we also have confidence in the solution to achieve whatever implementations are required."

"We really appreciate the process automation and how can you create human tasks as one of your processes."

"The good part of OpenText AppWorks is that all of its components are together in one platform, including integration capability, UI capability, and workflow capability."

"From a business perspective, the most valuable aspect lies in the optimization of processes."

"AppWorks is a very quick development platform with low-coding capability and strong integration with third-party systems."

"Its customer support is reliable and easy to approach."

"OpenText AppWorks has standard features such as system-to-system and human-to-human integrations, but what I find most valuable in the solution is its monitoring feature that tells you more about your processes, how to restart and how to stop each process, etc."

More OpenText Process Automation pros

Cons

"There is a need for more features on experimental evolution steps."

"Apache Airflow could be improved with the addition of more frameworks."

"The dashboard is connected into the BPM flow that could be improved."

"There is an area for improvement in onboarding new people. They should make it simple for newcomers. Else, we have to put a senior engineer to operate it."

"The platform's stability needs improvement, particularly regarding occasional interruptions due to networking issues."

"I have some issues with the solution's communication."

"We have experienced some bugs in Airflow. For example, the solution did not mention all the errors regarding why a process did not work."

"There is a minor issue with the manual work in Airflow, as everyday activities are managed manually. There is no dashboard for us to check all the Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs); a dashboard would help us analyze the work better."

More Apache Airflow cons

"The solution needs to continue to enhance the low-coding feature within the product itself."

"The integration could improve."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."

"AppWorks could be improved by including BPM simulation."

"A room for improvement in OpenText AppWorks is its user interface. It should have mobile compatibility because right now, you still have to make two applications with a user interface for Android and a user interface for iOS, so if OpenText AppWorks can provide one UI that can be used across all devices, that would make the solution better. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of OpenText AppWorks is a better UI in terms of the look and feel. Another feature I'd like to see in the next version of the solution is mobile compatibility because, at the moment, you have to make your application mobile-ready or compatible with mobile devices because there's no provision for it in OpenText AppWorks."

"AppWorks is pretty expensive."

"OpenText needs improvements in its integration model to align with newer integration types."

"OpenText AppWork's low-code capabilities can be enhanced by integrating them with AI offerings like Aviator."

More OpenText Process Automation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cheap."

"The pricing for the product is reasonable."

"We use a community edition of Apache Airflow. It is open source and free."

"The pricing is on the higher side."

"We are using the open-source version of Apache Airflow."

"For the time being, it doesn't cost anything."

"The solution is free if you use Amazon AWS."

"It is an open-source solution."

More Apache Airflow pricing and cost advice

"The price is on the higher side."

"AppWorks is pretty expensive."

"There is a user-based perpetual license."

"The licensing cost varies based on several factors, such as the size of the customer and the domain URL."

"Pricing for OpenText AppWorks, specifically in the Indian market, is reasonable, but I'm not aware if it's still reasonable outside of India. The licensing cost is based on the number of licenses and the number of users. OpenText AppWorks has different licensing options."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Insurance Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	24

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Airflow?

We don't experience issues with pricing as Apache Airflow is part of a larger platform. It is a sub-feature and not an individual purchase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Airflow?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText AppWorks?

From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model. They have to go with a perpetual model, which makes it look crazy initially. But over a period, i...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText AppWorks?

They can improve the UI capability. Recently, they launched a low-code platform, called entity modeling, which they can enhance further. It would be beneficial if OpenText ( /products/data-express-...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OpenText AppWorks?

We primarily use OpenText AppWorks ( /products/opentext-appworks-reviews ) for automating supply chain-related problems, vendor process automations, and invoice automations. We have our own product...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Apache Airflow

Compared 20% of the time

IBM BPM vs Apache Airflow

Compared 9% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Apache Airflow

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Step Functions vs Apache Airflow

Compared 5% of the time

Bizagi vs Apache Airflow

Compared 5% of the time

More Apache Airflow Competitors

Appian vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 8% of the time

Pega Platform vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Business Automation Workflow vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 6% of the time

Camunda vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Process Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache Airflow

June 2026

Download Apache Airflow product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Process Automation

June 2026

Download OpenText Process Automation product report

Also Known As

Airflow

No data available

Overview

Apache Airflow is a Python-based platform that simplifies task scheduling, workflow orchestration, and monitoring of ETL processes with a user-friendly UI and integration capabilities.

Apache Airflow facilitates workflow automation through its open-source framework, offering extensive customization and scalability. Users benefit from its visual DAG representation, event-based scheduling, and task retry functionality. Frequent updates and rich integration features allow seamless interaction with platforms like AWS and Google Cloud, while Python-friendly configurations enable robust error handling and notifications. Despite requiring improvements in integration and documentation, its application spans industries such as technology, finance, and entertainment, supporting tasks like data ingestion and synchronization.

What are the key features of Apache Airflow?

User-Friendly UI: Simplifies monitoring and management of ETL tasks.
Visual DAG Representation: Offers clear visualization of task dependencies.
Event-Based Scheduling: Automates workflow actions based on specific triggers.
Task Retry Capabilities: Enhances reliability through automatic task retries.
Python-Based Customization: Allows flexible and extensive feature customization.
Open-Source: Supports continuous updates and integration capabilities.

What benefits should users consider in judging Apache Airflow?

Workflow Automation: Streamlines and enhances efficiency in process execution.
Error Handling: Improves task reliability with effective error management.
Integration with Cloud Platforms: Enhances flexibility with AWS and Google Cloud compatibility.
Scalability: Supports growing infrastructural needs with ease.

Apache Airflow's deployment in industries like technology, finance, and entertainment is primarily focused on automating ETL processes, managing media workflows, and orchestrating data transformation tasks. It effectively integrates with tools such as SQL scripts and Databricks, enabling organizations to manage data pipelines efficiently in both cloud and on-premises environments.

Apache

OpenText Process Automation offers a low-code environment for efficient development, enhanced by strong integration, dynamic case management, and OCR technology to streamline business processes across industries.

OpenText Process Automation provides a comprehensive platform for improving business processes with features that allow for significant time reduction through a low-code development environment. It integrates seamlessly with third-party systems, enabling dynamic case management and effective monitoring capabilities. By incorporating OCR technology, it enhances efficiency and lowers costs. Users benefit from its centralized architecture, which brings together diverse tools to streamline operations. Its BPM modules support automation in supply chain and vendor processes, leading to widespread implementation. Known for its stability and scalability, it also receives positive feedback for its reliable support. However, there are areas needing enhancement, such as improved low-code features, better integration, and a desire for a unified UI with better mobile compatibility. There is a call for an archival function to address database growth and concerns about pricing and performance related to the BPMN 2.0 model. Potential improvements include AI integration and enhanced modeling in the low-code platform.

What are the key features?

Low-Code Development: Enables user-friendly development and faster deployment.
Third-Party Integration: Works well with systems like SAP and Salesforce.
OCR Technology: Streamlines processes by enhancing efficiency and reducing costs.
Dynamic Case Management: Adapts to complex workflows and changing conditions.
Centralized Architecture: Integrates multiple tools, streamlining operations.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Efficiency: Significantly reduces development time.
Cost-Effectiveness: Lowers operational costs through process optimization.
Scalability: Grows alongside organizational demands without performance loss.
Reliability: Offers stable operations with robust support.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly links with existing systems to enhance functionality.

OpenText Process Automation is implemented in industries like insurance, banking, and manufacturing for tasks such as invoice processing, accounts payable, cash management, and supply chain automation. It enables integration with systems like SAP and Salesforce, offering on-premises or cloud deployment, enhancing workflows and document orchestration.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Agari, WePay, Astronomer

Red Deer County, DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance, Bangkok Airways, PBS, CIZ (Netherlands Ministry of Health), The Dutch Ministry of Defence, Mercer

Buyer's Guide

Apache Airflow vs. OpenText Process Automation

June 2026

Free Report: Apache Airflow vs. OpenText Process Automation

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Airflow vs. OpenText Process Automation and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache Airflow vs. OpenText Process Automation report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.