Arbor DDoS vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection comparison

The compared NETSCOUT and Broadcom solutions aren't in the same category. NETSCOUT is ranked #3 in DDOS , with an average rating of 9.1, and holds a 6.1% mindshare in the category. Broadcom is ranked #26 in ATP , and holds a 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of NETSCOUT users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Arbor DDoS and Symantec Advanced Threat Protection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Radware, Cloudflare, NETSCOUT and others in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection.

To learn more, read our detailed Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare

Mindshare comparison

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Arbor DDoS	6.1%
Cloudflare	12.4%
Imperva Application Security Platform	8.0%
Other	73.5%

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection	2.0%
Palo Alto Networks WildFire	7.0%
Microsoft Defender for Office 365	6.4%
Other	84.6%

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

M.A. Faisal

General Manager at bKash Limited

Advanced protection has secured critical web workloads and provides clear traffic visibility

From a security perspective, there remains a security loophole, as some browsers in the market can bypass the Turnstile solution, which requires approximately 40 seconds to do so. From a performance perspective, this is acceptable. We also tried Google reCAPTCHA, and that can also be bypassed. From a security perspective, I would say neither solution is completely secured. Regarding uptime, we have faced a couple of incidents due to Cloudflare in recent years, so I cannot say we receive 100% uptime for our region. We sometimes face challenges, including downtime and other issues. As a result, we are not receiving 100% uptime from Cloudflare's solution. Since most of our customers are in this region, we need alternatives. We need something more competitive than Cloudflare. Unfortunately, in Bangladesh, Cloudflare has three points of presence already, and we cannot find any other solution provider in Bangladesh as an alternative, which presents another challenge. Competitor solutions have more attack signatures, which ensure better security compared to Cloudflare's predefined configurations. Customers do not have options to modify any configuration parameters in Cloudflare, whereas other competitor solutions, such as F5 Distributed Cloud, allow customers to tune configurations according to their requirements. Cloudflare could improve in this area. Additionally, regarding visibility, Cloudflare has static visibility, but they could adopt dynamic graph features for their customers.

Read full review

reviewer1331304

Director Of Research And Development at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees

Automated threat intelligence and flow-based mitigation have improved our DDoS defense

A very useful feature in Arbor DDoS is its ability to send flow spec announcements to routers. For example, if it is clear that a Layer 3 or Layer 4 attack is occurring and the attack pattern is identified through source and destination IP addresses and ports, you can generate flow spec filters. These filters are transferred through BGP to border routers, which automatically build filters, mitigating the attack even at the network's boundary and preventing it from reaching the TMS. This allows the TMS to focus on other tasks. This is a highly effective feature that can mitigate huge volumetric attacks; for example, we experienced a 32-gigabit attack, and all those 32 gigabits were dropped by our border routers, not by Arbor DDoS itself. The flow spec announcement was generated by Arbor DDoS, and as far as I know, the same technology is used by Radware, but it comes under a different feature and a different license. At the time, we were told that flow spec mitigation was an additional very expensive license to purchase from Radware, while Radware included everything in one package.

Read full review

Dennis O'Reilly

Cyber SecOps Principal at Dotcom Security

Provides end-to-end antivirus protection and has good stability

Symantec Endpoint Protection provides end-to-end protection. Along with antivirus protection, it has a lot of key areas, including intrusive prevention, firewall features, and application and device control. It can integrate with other Broadcom solutions, such as Symantec Messaging Gateway and Symantec DLP. If you want to send an email, it gets scanned through endpoint protection and DLP. We get all Symantec functionality in a single pane.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CloudFlare has positively improved my site's speed, performance and security."

"Their free account offers an awful lot of functionality and savings alone, before you get on to the minimal $20 a month for a Pro account which comes with its own great list of features."

"This solution has improved the security of our organization."

"Many websites require an SSL certificate because they sell stuff and want SSL. Cloudflare comes with an SSL certificate built in. It's automatic. You sign yourself up for Cloudflare, and an SSL certificate automatically protects your website. You don't necessarily need a certificate if you have a connection between your website and your host, the server, Cloudflare, and the host."

"From a technical point of view, Cloudflare is the best CDN."

"The DDoS protection is the most valuable aspect of the solution."

"CloudFlare provides an answer to a variety of issues, so it gives you very high value for your money."

"It's a reasonably priced solution that meets customers' needs and it's not too difficult to deploy."

More Cloudflare pros

"We found what we wanted in Arbor DDoS; it met our expectations as IT users of different types of complex environments and fit our needs."

"The solution looks into volumetric attacks and gets them resolved."

"In terms of Arbor DDoS's reporting and analytics, Arbor DDoS is superior to Radware, especially when comparing it to the Radware model which I used previously."

"We use almost all the features of Arbor DDoS, but it really depends on the customer’s requirements, so I can’t specify exactly which features we use. However, many customers appreciate the basic DDoS protection, especially those without specific protection needs. For example, financial companies benefit from the cloud DDoS protection. It’s a straightforward solution that effectively meets their needs."

"Arbor has the ability to learn and self-create the appropriate profile for each customer, ensuring that false positives are kept to a minimum."

"Inside this product, there are many different configurations for protection, and we have one of the best experiences with it, specifically with the Atlas product."

"It prevents all unwanted or malicious traffic, using the Threat Intelligence feeds."

"With Arbor, when we see DDoS attacks, it is fully mitigating the attacks."

More Arbor DDoS pros

"The great advantage in using this product is it creates multiple services."

"The most valuable feature is NetFlow threat protection."

"It has certainly helped out our audit efforts because we each stay compliant in terms of various security standards."

"This is a good solution, and whatever our requirement is, all of the features are there."

"They manage to solve detection quite nicely, with rather elaborate detection compared to other providers, and Symantec also provides a useful set of information linked to each of the attacked computers."

"Overall, the product supports everything already feature-wise, because it has email protection, monitoring detection, network intrusion detection, and advanced threat protection."

"What I like most about Symantec Advanced Threat Protection is its notification capability."

"Currently we have 800-plus nodes connected with this solution, without any issues. The solution is scalable."

More Symantec Advanced Threat Protection pros

Cons

"It would be helpful if the solution could continue evolving to compete with the other solutions on the market."

"Technical support is not well developed. While there are good engineers, Cloudflare does not offer hands-on technical support to fix customer problems but rather a self-service model."

"The product needs to improve its automation."

"Support response time could be improved."

"The one feature that is paid is the custom nameservers instead of using the default ones, I want to use a custom one."

"There might be helpful if there was some web application firewall feature."

"It should be easier to collect the logs with companies like Sumo. However, based on my discussions with the salespeople, I understand that's how they make their money. With the enterprise product, they want people doing those kinds of enterprise features to do the logging. They want them to pay a lot of money, and that's where I have an issue with them. That should be a default. You should be able to get the log no matter what. The logging should be universal."

"The reporting can definitely be improved to offer a lot more explanation on something that may have happened or has actually happened."

More Cloudflare cons

"The implementation should be made easier."

"The look and feel of the management console is a little old, excessively simple. If you compare it with other solutions, the look and feel of the console is like you're using technology from five or six years ago. It doesn't show all the technology that is actually behind it. It looks like an older solution, even though it is not."

"With Arbor DDoS, its integration issues with other technologies or other vendors' technologies is an area of concern that could be improved."

"An improvement to Arbor DDoS would be to make evaluation licenses and virtual machines available."

"I would also like more visibility into their bad actor feeds, their fingerprint feeds. We try to be good stewards of the internet, so if there are attacks, or bad actors within our networks, if there were an easier way for us to find them, we could stop them from doing their malicious activity, and at the same time save money."

"The following areas need improvement: opening and tracking support tickets, online support resources, software upgrades/updates and replacement media, and event management guidelines."

"This is a disadvantage of Arbor DDoS, as it operates merely as a flow collector, generating alerts only after a violation occurs."

"We need a SaaS model for the solution."

More Arbor DDoS cons

"It's a strange situation where the infrastructure of the consumer or customer is behind some kind of firewall and they have always used some kind of customized proxy. In this situation, the ATP has a very tough time to pass the information to the cloud and back. To fix, it requires a more elaborate and complex configuration for that particular case."

"The administration interface needs a lot of improvement. It should be UI based, and simple. They need to improve it. It's pretty much not that friendly compared to what we were using as Bitdefender before. It's okay but is improving, actually."

"The product's support services need improvement."

"The endpoint protection looks old."

"The support has dropped down to a five out of ten."

"The administration interface needs a lot of improvement. It should be UI-based and simple."

"It also needs network-based threat protection for shared folders and files."

"The support for new OSs and older OSs could be a little tighter. They need to be more upfront about what protection services they're going to provide on new OSs. I haven't seen the Windows 11 version out yet. It is either already released in Beta, or the Beta will be released soon. There could be a little bit more advanced updates on what they're doing to help protect Windows 11 environments. They can let us know in advance so that we know it is going to be protected. We can't roll out the new OS without putting end-point protection on it. So, they should tell us what is their support model for that, and what are they doing to protect Windows 11. They're not telling me, and that's a criticism. The same issue is applicable to all the other antivirus tools. It is not just Symantec; all of them have this problem."

More Symantec Advanced Threat Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When you compare Cloudflare DNS to other solutions, such as Akamai, the price is reasonable."

"Cloudflare's pricing is not much higher and is good for middle-level organizations."

"The tool is a premium product, so it is very expensive."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"I give the price a five out of ten."

"The pricing depends on the usage, but the cheapest would be around 5,000 USD a month."

"The product's pricing is minimal compared to other products."

"A free version of the solution is available."

More Cloudflare pricing and cost advice

"The price is a little high."

"As far as I know, they are the best in this sector, in DDoS protection. They know it, I know, because their service prices are too high. They provide cloud DDoS protection for ISPs, but that is also too expensive."

"Arbor is striking a good balance between pricing and what they deliver."

"Arbor's products are very expensive. Their competitors are cheap when compared with Arbor."

"The price of this solution is a little high in the African market, it should be lower."

"I'm a technical guy. But I know it's expensive compared to its competitors. After you have the on-premise solution, for your solution to be effective you have to subscribe to an "upper level," so there's another cost. There is also a subscription to cloud services, which is another cost."

"The pricing of the solution is cheap."

"Regarding pricing, I would rate it as average. Arbor DDoS offers good value for money with our DDoS filter device. For higher protection needs, Arbor’s CloudMeter’s DDoS mitigation or hardware devices might be more expensive, but customers who need them are usually prepared for the cost and the additional resources required."

More Arbor DDoS pricing and cost advice

"The pricing of this solution is inexpensive and affordable."

"The price is quite expensive."

"Symantec Advanced Threat Protection's pricing is comparable."

"Symantec Endpoint Protection has an average price."

"Pricing is good. It is nice to have a great product at a fair price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	26

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

Cloudflare. We are moving from Akamai prolexic to Cloudflare. Cloudflare anycast network outperforms Akamai static GR...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Cloudflare DNS or Quad9?

Cloudflare DNS is a very fast, very reliable public DNS resolver. It is an enterprise-grade authoritative DNS service...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudflare DNS?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Cloudflare are a bit on the higher side overall.

See all answers

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

I would say if it’s an ISP that will build a scrubbing center, Netscout/Arbor is a good solution. In all other soluti...

See all answers

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arbor DDoS?

The prices for Arbor DDoS are expensive. The licensing is subscription-based. From our sales department, they discuss...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Advanced Threat Protection?

One area for improvement could be the pricing model. Future releases could further enhance integration capabilities w...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Symantec Advanced Threat Protection?

Our primary use case for the product is to provide advanced threat protection to our clients, primarily in the bankin...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Symantec Advanced Threat Protection?

Symantec ATP has proven to be a reliable and effective solution. I rate it a nine out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Quad9 vs Cloudflare

Compared 31% of the time

Akamai vs Cloudflare

Compared 4% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Cloudflare

Compared 3% of the time

Fastly vs Cloudflare

Compared 2% of the time

Link11 vs Cloudflare

Compared 1% of the time

More Cloudflare Competitors

Radware DDoS vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 11% of the time

Corero vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 7% of the time

A10 Thunder TPS vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiDDoS vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 5% of the time

NetWitness Platform vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 4% of the time

More Arbor DDoS Competitors

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 9% of the time

Trellix Network Detection and Response vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Check Point Infinity vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 5% of the time

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 4% of the time

More Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare

August 2026

Download Cloudflare product report

Buyer's Guide

Arbor DDoS

August 2026

Download Arbor DDoS product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

July 2026

Symantec Advanced Threat Protection report

Download Symantec Advanced Threat Protection product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare DNS

Arbor Networks SP, Arbor Networks TMS, Arbor Cloud for ENT

No data available

Overview

Cloudflare enhances web performance and security with features like CDN caching and DDoS mitigation while providing easy DNS management and intuitive setup through its user-friendly dashboard.

Cloudflare is recognized for its comprehensive web security and performance solutions. Speed improvements are achieved through caching mechanisms and DDoS protection, combining ease of DNS management with flexible page rules. The robust analytics and threat insight tools provide valuable data, assisted by a user-friendly dashboard allowing quick setup and configuration. An API offers dynamic DNS settings ensuring low latency and high performance across the globe.

What are Cloudflare's key features?

CDN Caching: Enhances website speed through content delivery network caching.
Web Application Firewall: Protects websites from online threats.
DDoS Mitigation: Shields against distributed denial-of-service attacks.
DNS Management: Offers easy-to-use and flexible domain management.
SSL Certificates: Ensures secure connections between users and servers.
Analytics: Provides insights with robust analytics tools.

What benefits and ROI should users evaluate?

Enhanced Security: Strengthening web security with DDoS and firewall protection.
Speed Improvement: Faster content delivery with CDN caching.
Operational Simplicity: Simplifies website optimization through a user-friendly interface.
Scalable Solutions: Scales with global reach, lowering latency for improved performance.
Cost Efficiency: Offers layers of valuable functionality with pricing options.

Cloudflare finds utility across industries for DNS management and defense mechanisms. Its content delivery network assures fast content distribution and fortified security. Businesses integrate features like web application firewalls, load balancing, end-to-end SSL, and zero trust to protect websites from cyber threats while ensuring resilience and reliable performance.

Cloudflare

Arbor DDoS offers a comprehensive defense system against DDoS attacks, integrating a user-friendly GUI and advanced threat mitigation technologies for enhanced network protection.

Arbor DDoS is recognized for its ability to manage high-volume DDoS attacks efficiently, providing extensive protection through real-time traffic analysis and automated threat detection. It utilizes advanced techniques such as blackhole and BGP Flowspec for effective threat management. Arbor's cloud signaling allows users to handle and mitigate volumetric attacks while maintaining service availability. Though it provides robust security features, users note potential improvements in auto-mitigation, scalability, and AI integration. Challenges like an outdated graphical interface, hardware stability, and false positives need addressing to further enhance its usability and integration with third-party systems.

What are the key features of Arbor DDoS?

User-Friendly GUI: Provides an intuitive interface for ease of use.
Effective Mitigation: Combats high-volume DDoS attacks effectively.
Predefined Filters: Simplifies threat management with pre-configured settings.
Real-Time Traffic Analysis: Offers insights into traffic patterns and potential threats.
Automated Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates threats without manual intervention.
Able to Handle High-Volume Attacks: Ensures extensive protection even under large-scale attacks.
Packet Capture and Integration: Facilitates comprehensive security analysis.
Cloud Signaling: Enhances attack traffic management through hybrid deployments.

What benefits should users expect from Arbor DDoS?

Enhanced Protection: Safeguards networks from diverse DDoS threats.
Improved Service Availability: Maintains business operations without disruptions.
Timely Reporting: Delivers detailed attack reports for proactive prevention.
AI Capabilities: Leverages AI for smarter threat mitigation strategies.
Comprehensive Security: Combines on-premise and cloud deployments for optimal defense.

Internet service providers and telecom companies commonly adopt Arbor DDoS to protect their networks and infrastructure from DDoS attacks. It is also implemented in financial and government sectors to ensure web application security and maintain high availability. Arbor DDoS supports a hybrid approach, utilizing both on-premise and cloud solutions to manage traffic efficiently and sustain service quality during attacks.

NETSCOUT

Symantec Advanced Threat Protection provides comprehensive security measures, offering real-time threat analysis and endpoint protection to defend against both traditional and emerging threats, ensuring a secure and resilient online environment.

Symantec Advanced Threat Protection integrates seamlessly with existing IT infrastructures to enhance email security, incident management, and network monitoring. With advanced detection capabilities including Zero-Day protection, its stable performance and straightforward setup are appealing. The system also streamlines application control and integrates effectively with SIEM products. Despite requiring enhancements in graphical threat visualization, network-based threat protection, and support for platforms like Windows 11, it remains a robust choice for comprehensive protection against cyber threats.

What features does Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offer?

Real-time Threat Analysis: Instantly detects and analyzes threats as they emerge.
Click-time URL Protection: Prevents malicious URL clicks.
Endpoint Security: Provides robust defense for endpoints.
NetFlow Threat Protection: Analyzes network traffic for threat detection.
Zero-Day Protection: Protects against unknown vulnerabilities.
SIEM Integration: Seamlessly works with SIEM products for enhanced monitoring.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Protects against both traditional and emerging threats.
Simple Deployment: Easy setup and stable performance simplify integration.
Comprehensive Documentation: Offers in-depth guidance and data analysis.
Email and Network Protection: Strengthens defenses on critical fronts.
Multi-Platform Support: Effective for cloud and hybrid deployments.

In financial sectors, Symantec Advanced Threat Protection is widely used to shield endpoint devices and secure email communications. Its capabilities are crucial for safeguarding workstations and servers, providing antivirus, malware, and network threat protection to ensure client data in banking and finance remains safe from advanced threats.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Trusted by over 9,000,000 Internet Applications and APIs, including Nasdaq, Zendesk, Crunchbase, Steve Madden, OkCupid, Cisco, Quizlet, Discord and more.

Xtel Communications

ECI

Buyer's Guide

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

August 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Radware, Cloudflare, NETSCOUT and others in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.