No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Armis vs Nucleus Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 23, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Armis
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
IoT Security (1st), Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (2nd), Cyber-Physical Systems Protection (1st)
Nucleus Security
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
14th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (27th), Vulnerability Management (41st), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Armis is 3.1%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nucleus Security is 3.2%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Armis3.1%
Nucleus Security3.2%
Other93.7%
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Akhilesh Mishra - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Lead Pre-Sales at M.TECH Solutions India Pvt. Ltd.
Comprehensive visibility has transformed how I secure and prioritize risks across connected devices
The best features Armis offers include vulnerability management for OT and IoT devices, providing risk prioritization, and offering protection across all connected assets. Armis cyber exposure management is very good as it provides continuous visibility, risk prioritization, and protection across all connected assets. Armis has positively impacted my organization by providing asset discovery for both OT and IoT, as well as threat visibility for OT and IoT devices along with vulnerability information, including the CVE number so that I can fix the threat on OT and IoT devices. Most of the time, focus is on IT devices and attention is not paid to OT and IoT. Armis facilitates focus on OT and IoT as well, closing the gap that often exists. Armis makes life easier for customers by providing visibility of OT and IoT, as well as threat visibility. Armis has a user-friendly interface, is very useful for customers, provides quality support, and has a global presence allowing easy access for both customers and Armis representatives. The console is user-friendly. Armis handles compliance requirements in my industry very well and is useful.
Use Nucleus Security?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
896,510 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Construction Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise8
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Armis?
AI is one improvement I noted for Armis, and I may have other examples as well.
What is your primary use case for Armis?
My main use case is to identify all the devices in my network, connect to them, and identify the exposure alerts for those devices. I only have to discover all the devices, connect to them, and ide...
What advice do you have for others considering Armis?
I advise that if you want cybersecurity, then you can mostly explore this tool. Armis is very useful. Instead of other tools, it will be very helpful and the AI feature is very great.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nucleus Security?
I have a good experience with that, so we don't have much problem dealing with pricing, setup, and licensing.
What needs improvement with Nucleus Security?
I think it can be improved by making it more practical, integrated, and easier for teams to apply in real-world workflow from a healthcare perspective. The main improvements I can see right now are...
What is your primary use case for Nucleus Security?
I have been using Nucleus Security for the past few years in my company, particularly in the healthcare field.I use Nucleus Security especially for understanding radiation safety, nuclear medicine,...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Samsung Research America, IDT Corporation, Gett
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Armis vs. Nucleus Security and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
896,510 professionals have used our research since 2012.