


Acunetix and Automox are competitors in the cybersecurity and IT operations categories, respectively. Acunetix has the upper hand in vulnerability detection and integration with CI/CD tools, while Automox stands out for its ease of use and cross-platform patch management capabilities.
Features: Acunetix offers comprehensive vulnerability detection, clear reporting, and robust integration with CI/CD tools. It effectively manages vulnerabilities across multiple domains rapidly. Automox provides strong automated patch management, cross-platform compatibility, and supports centralized management of Windows, macOS, and Linux devices, complemented by automation and remote access via worklet scripts.
Room for Improvement: Acunetix users suggest reducing false positives, enhancing automatic subdomain scanning, and improving reporting flexibility. There is also feedback on better integration with more security tools and pricing transparency. Automox could improve patch scheduling, user access management, and third-party platform integration. Users look for more granular notification controls, advanced reporting, and offline environment support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix offers flexible deployment options including on-premises, public cloud, and hybrid cloud, which can complicate the deployment process for some. Its customer service receives mixed reviews about responsiveness and support comprehensiveness. Automox, operating mainly in the cloud, simplifies deployment for cloud-based organizations. Its customer support is generally well-received for quick and helpful responses.
Pricing and ROI: Acunetix has a reputation for being costly, with a domain-based pricing that some users find inflexible, yet users see value in its security enhancement and ROI from time-saving and risk reduction. Automox is generally considered more cost-effective, especially for multi-OS platform needs, often cheaper than competitors, and includes good support in the pricing. Both provide strong ROI by improving security and reducing manual workloads.
We are able to scan all our assets with less human intervention and achieve overall effective outcomes.
It has saved about 90% of our time.
TotalCloud has generated overall savings of 30 to 40 percent across various departments.
It has also been a great tool because we are able to reduce both manual labor and operational expenses by automating patching of roughly 200 Windows servers.
Our team used to spend 10 hours per week just to update these things, and now we're doing it automatically.
We have seen a positive return on investment mainly through time savings, as automating patching and routine endpoint maintenance has reduced manual effort by roughly around twenty to thirty percent for these tasks.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
I have seen a return on investment, as Acunetix helps reduce the man-days and effort needed for scanning bulk applications through automated assessments.
The time needed to complete an assessment is one-third of what it would take for a security assessment because we don't have much manual assessment involved now that we have added automated assessment.
They are helpful, respond to my queries, and can answer any question.
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate customer support a ten.
Qualys' customer service provides quality answers, but the response time is long, even though it is within the SLA.
They are really good because they don't take five days to get back to me; they respond within 24 hours with really good information.
They're very knowledgeable and have given us many channels for support, including email, chat, and documentation.
Overall, the customer support has been good; responses are generally timely, and the support team is helpful when troubleshooting issues or clarifying how a feature works.
For high-severity issues, they reach out within two to three hours, and for critical issues, a response is received within 15 minutes.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
Support staff not being familiar with the problem.
We started our organization about nine months back. We started with about 30 users, and we now have more than 100 users.
Our organization currently uses it to manage over 1200 web applications.
It is absolutely scalable, and I would rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
It's pretty easy to scale because it's SaaS, and adding more devices doesn't require any extra server or anything similar.
Automox scales well for our needs; adding new endpoints is straightforward and the centralized management approach makes it easy to apply consistent policies as the environment grows.
Automox's scalability is excellent, as it scales very well, and it is easy to deploy new agents.
Acunetix can handle increasing workloads and more applications easily.
Invicti Web + API handles growth well, as it scales up easily with more users or more applications to test.
Overall, the support provided has been excellent.
It has a lot of scanning mechanisms, which are agentless APIs, eBPF, and cloud agents, that are highly reliable.
It is a stable solution, which is why we chose it.
It's not crashing or experiencing any downtime.
Ideally, the scanner should automatically detect and scan all subdomains, even if not explicitly defined, ensuring comprehensive vulnerability assessment.
Ideally, updates should be more immediate, enabling quicker implementation of solutions.
Our goal is to integrate all these functions into Qualys, creating a single dashboard for comprehensive security monitoring and management.
From a QA perspective, better visibility into patch history and endpoint changes would make it easier to troubleshoot environment-related issues and track changes over time.
An alert of a security threat could be another type of notification that tells me something is important.
I would add that remote support for iOS could be better, and remote support of Linux is also lacking.
The main concern is related to false positives; Acunetix needs to work on identifying valid and invalid findings.
I could supply it with maybe a Swagger file or a JSON file, and Acunetix would pick it up, scan all the endpoints according to the OWASP Top Ten, and give me remediation and actionable remediation reports.
Acunetix should have better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps.
In our case, replacing the tool will give us better functionalities without increasing the cost compared to what we pay today for the competitor.
Qualys TotalCloud is expensive, but it offers a premier solution with no headaches.
Qualys TotalCloud offers good pricing that is affordable and competitive with the market.
Automox's price is very cost-effective and affordable.
The pricing cost is affordable for small and mid-sized organizations, and when compared to Checkmarx, it is significantly affordable, as Checkmarx is quite expensive.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.
This view of risk helps reduce the work we would have to do to combine multiple sources to prioritize risk.
It will help cybersecurity professionals monitor the cloud and find vulnerabilities.
We are enjoying the new feature, FlexScan, which is valuable for Internet-facing VMs.
One of the best features I appreciate about Automox is automated patching.
It has also improved our security posture since automated patching has allowed vulnerabilities to be patched automatically.
It has very strong patch automation, particularly in automated OS patching, third-party patching, policy-based rollout, patch scheduling, and vulnerability remediation.
Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.
The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.
The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Qualys TotalCloud | 1.2% |
| Invicti Web + API | 1.3% |
| Automox | 0.6% |
| Other | 96.9% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 38 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
Qualys TotalCloud enhances security posture across cloud environments with continuous monitoring, vulnerability management, and risk visualization, ensuring efficient threat assessment and automated remediation for improved cyber risk reduction.
Qualys TotalCloud offers a robust suite of security tools essential for organizations managing multi-cloud infrastructures. By integrating cloud accounts and automating workflows, it supports AWS, Azure, and GCP, offering comprehensive vulnerability management and zero-day detection. The platform's user-friendly design, combined with its extensive risk management and unified threat assessment capabilities, enables organizations to prioritize and remediate vulnerabilities effectively. TruRisk Insights provides clear insights on cyber risks, while the automation options streamline patch management and scanning processes. API integration across IaaS and SaaS environments further enhances resource allocation efficiency and saves time, addressing misconfigurations across cloud environments.
What are the most important features of Qualys TotalCloud?Qualys TotalCloud is deployed in sectors needing rigorous vulnerability management, such as finance and healthcare. Companies utilize it to secure multi-cloud environments like AWS, Azure, and GCP, focus on compliance, and integrate security into CI/CD pipelines to detect and remedy threats pre-deployment.
Automox offers automated patch management with cloud-native architecture, cross-platform compatibility, and ease of use. It provides real-time visibility and streamlines operations across Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it ideal for complex IT environments.
Automox empowers organizations with features like Worklets and remote management, enhancing security and efficiency through customizable patching policies, PowerShell script execution, and detailed reporting. It's primarily used for automated patch management, patch remediation, and compliance maintenance across diverse systems, ensuring cybersecurity and reducing vulnerabilities. Enhancements are desired for user access control, policy synchronization, and integration with tools like Tenable. Support for offline patching, rollback features, enhanced reporting, and notification customization are in demand. Improvements in cost effectiveness and multi-group policy applications are also suggested.
What are the key features of Automox?
What benefits and ROI can users expect when evaluating Automox?
In industry applications, Automox is widely used for managing and updating vast fleets of devices, particularly in sectors requiring stringent cybersecurity measures. It ensures seamless operations through its centralized automation and management capabilities, making it essential for organizations handling extensive IT networks.
Acunetix is a robust web application security testing tool offering rapid scanning, user-friendly interfaces, and accurate vulnerability detection with minimal false positives. It supports both cloud and on-premises deployment, making it versatile for various security needs.
Acunetix is distinguished by its capability to identify critical vulnerabilities such as cross-site scripting and SQL injection with high precision. It integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools, supporting continuous scanning and large-scale application management. The centralized dashboard and detailed automated reporting streamline operations. Despite its benefits, users suggest improvements like reducing false positives, flexible pricing, and enhanced API scanning. Better integration with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps is sought, alongside more comprehensive customization and faster scanning. Mobile application scanning and improved team collaboration tools are also desired.
What features make Acunetix stand out?Acunetix is widely implemented across industries undertaking web application security assessments, including those requiring penetration testing and vulnerability assessment. It ensures applications meet security protocols and complies with standards while fitting into CI/CD workflows for secure pre-release checks.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.