


Automox and Ivanti Endpoint Manager are two competitive products in endpoint management. Users are happier with the pricing and ease of deployment of Automox, but Ivanti Endpoint Manager outperforms in feature set and overall value, making users feel it is worth the higher price.
Features: Automox users highlight its cloud-based management, automation capabilities, and user-friendly interface. Ivanti Endpoint Manager offers comprehensive patch management, robust security features, and advanced scalability options.
Room for Improvement: Automox users request more integrations, better reporting, and enhanced customer support. Ivanti Endpoint Manager users want a simpler setup process, improved performance, and a more intuitive user interface.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Automox receives praise for its straightforward and quick cloud deployment. Ivanti's deployment is more complex, but users appreciate its extensive customer support.
Pricing and ROI: Automox offers more attractive pricing and achieves quicker ROI based on user reviews. Ivanti Endpoint Manager, though pricier, is deemed worth the cost due to its extensive features.
Everything we've gained from it makes my job easier day after day, and I see value in it as an engineer.
Microsoft Intune not only saves costs by reducing the number of personnel needed but also offers a comprehensive solution for managing laptops, applications, security, individual access, and enrollment.
With Microsoft Intune, tasks such as device provisioning, policy deployment, application delivery, and compliance enforcement require less manual effort than in more traditional management models.
It has also been a great tool because we are able to reduce both manual labor and operational expenses by automating patching of roughly 200 Windows servers.
Our team used to spend 10 hours per week just to update these things, and now we're doing it automatically.
I have seen a return on investment with Ivanti Endpoint Manager, as users now spend less time configuring devices and can access emails and SharePoint sites on mobile devices, allowing them to check their mails while traveling and saving time and increasing ease of use.
When a support ticket is submitted, it directly reaches someone with Intune support expertise.
When I contacted Microsoft, they had the same expertise, if not more, which is phenomenal because I felt heard and my problem was solved.
Sometimes, the support provided is excellent, and the representative is knowledgeable, while other times, the service needs improvement.
They are really good because they don't take five days to get back to me; they respond within 24 hours with really good information.
They're very knowledgeable and have given us many channels for support, including email, chat, and documentation.
The customer support for Automox is very responsive and proactive.
It's always better to jump on a call and share screen, which they are willing to do rather than just going through a list of troubleshooting steps.
Their technical support is generally good in terms of quality and speed.
They provided detailed information that helped me convince the security team to approve the necessary port openings.
The scalability of Microsoft Intune is ten out of ten.
Ideally, we want to automatically segregate devices based on user properties like primary use, but currently, dynamic groups seem limited to device properties.
It supports organizations with 200 endpoints and those with more than 15,000 endpoints.
It's pretty easy to scale because it's SaaS, and adding more devices doesn't require any extra server or anything similar.
Automox is very scalable because it has continued to handle my organization's growth.
Ivanti Endpoint Manager is scalable for my organization.
I rate the scalability of Ivanti Endpoint Manager around seven to eight because it offers options to manage the devices effectively, requiring only the addition of licenses.
Ivanti Endpoint Manager is indeed scalable.
We have not experienced downtime, bugs, or glitches.
It appears Microsoft Intune undergoes changes without informing customers.
In my experience, Microsoft Intune is a stable platform as it is a cloud-based service, and updates are regularly delivered by Microsoft.
It's not crashing or experiencing any downtime.
Regarding stability and reliability, I have never seen the server go down or any functionality taken offline.
Due to the large number of devices in our environment, when we load the console for the first time, it takes a while to update the database.
For stability, once you get the system up and running, it's consistently stable without any lagging, crashing, or downtime.
Features like unlocking devices sometimes fail, and the support offered for other operating systems is insufficient.
There are communication issues, so you might start working with a feature without knowing if it will be deprecated six months from now.
Many third-party companies offer single-pane-of-glass reporting that shows you what your update environment looks like, how your patch is doing, application status, etc., but Intune's reporting is not intuitive.
An alert of a security threat could be another type of notification that tells me something is important.
I would add that remote support for iOS could be better, and remote support of Linux is also lacking.
It could also leverage AI, which would help in autonomous patch prioritization and risk remediation.
It lacks features like easy connection to remote computers and has a complicated software deployment process.
I would suggest improvements in the console interface of the Ivanti Endpoint Manager as it appears outdated, reminiscent of the early 2000s.
When we offboard a user, sending the wipe command or lock command is slightly slower than Workspace ONE.
Introductory professional services, like a fast-track service, were included with our E5 membership, and there have been no additional costs.
The Intune suite and add-ons, such as batch management and remote help, are costly.
It costs approximately forty euros per user per month.
Automox's price is very cost-effective and affordable.
The transition to a Software-as-a-Service model led to significant price increases without corresponding enhancements in the platform.
Ivanti Endpoint Manager charges a flat fee for the implementation and product purchase, followed by yearly maintenance
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows that it is competitive.
Intune excels in configuration and compliance management for Windows 10, ensuring devices receive timely updates and adhere to organizational standards.
Dynamic groups allow us to set conditions for automatic membership, eliminating the need for user intervention or manual review and ensuring a seamless workflow.
Windows Autopatch is the most valuable because it removes the burden of patch management.
One of the best features I appreciate about Automox is automated patching.
It has also improved our security posture since automated patching has allowed vulnerabilities to be patched automatically.
It has very strong patch automation, particularly in automated OS patching, third-party patching, policy-based rollout, patch scheduling, and vulnerability remediation.
It provided essential features needed for our operations, including endpoint management and remote control.
From the features perspective, distribution packages is the best feature in the Ivanti Endpoint Manager.
The most valuable feature of the Ivanti Endpoint Manager is the Windows update patching.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Intune | 23.8% |
| Ivanti Endpoint Manager | 2.2% |
| Automox | 1.1% |
| Other | 72.9% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 182 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 62 |
| Large Enterprise | 183 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.
Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.
What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.
Automox offers automated patch management with cloud-native architecture, cross-platform compatibility, and ease of use. It provides real-time visibility and streamlines operations across Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it ideal for complex IT environments.
Automox empowers organizations with features like Worklets and remote management, enhancing security and efficiency through customizable patching policies, PowerShell script execution, and detailed reporting. It's primarily used for automated patch management, patch remediation, and compliance maintenance across diverse systems, ensuring cybersecurity and reducing vulnerabilities. Enhancements are desired for user access control, policy synchronization, and integration with tools like Tenable. Support for offline patching, rollback features, enhanced reporting, and notification customization are in demand. Improvements in cost effectiveness and multi-group policy applications are also suggested.
What are the key features of Automox?In industry applications, Automox is widely used for managing and updating vast fleets of devices, particularly in sectors requiring stringent cybersecurity measures. It ensures seamless operations through its centralized automation and management capabilities, making it essential for organizations handling extensive IT networks.
Ivanti Endpoint Manager is a comprehensive tool known for its efficient software deployment, patch management, and remote management capabilities. It is recognized for cost-effectiveness and flexibility, particularly suitable for handling extensive deployments with customizable settings.
Ivanti Endpoint Manager streamlines endpoint lifecycle management, including tasks such as patching, asset monitoring, software distribution, and OS deployment. Its intuitive interface aids in device enrollment and management. Reporting tools offer detailed insights into security threats while integration with platforms like Power BI supports compliance. The system is favored in hybrid environments for automating processes, maintaining policy compliance, and enabling remote control and provisioning. Its use of lightweight agents minimizes system disruption, although challenges remain in agent deployment and software management.
What are some key features of Ivanti Endpoint Manager?Industries implement Ivanti Endpoint Manager primarily for asset tracking, automating device provisioning, and ensuring software compliance. It is common among organizations managing complex network environments and those seeking to enhance data gathering and endpoint control. Despite some limitations, its real-time diagnostics through Ivanti Neurons appeal to users managing diverse setups.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.