Avada Software Infrared360 vs Oracle BI Applications comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Avada Software and Oracle solutions aren't in the same category. Avada Software is ranked #74 in APM , and holds a 0.5% mindshare in the category. Oracle is ranked #15 in BBM , and holds a 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Avada Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Avada Software Infrared360

Read 13 Avada Software Infrared360 reviews

4,495 Views
2,203 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle BI Applications

Read 6 Oracle BI Applications reviews

1,254 Views
1,191 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Avada Software Infrared360

Oracle BI Applications

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Avada Software Infrared360 and Oracle BI Applications based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Dynatrace, Datadog and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Avada Software Infrared360

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (74th), Business Activity Monitoring (6th), Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) (12th), Server Monitoring (34th)

Oracle BI Applications

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (15th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Integration solutions, they serve different purposes. Avada Software Infrared360 is designed for Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability and holds a mindshare of 0.5%, up 0.3% compared to last year.
Oracle BI Applications, on the other hand, focuses on Business-to-Business Middleware, holds 3.0% mindshare, up 1.5% since last year.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Avada Software Infrared360	0.5%
Splunk AppDynamics	5.0%
Dynatrace	4.9%
Other	89.6%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Business-to-Business Middleware Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Oracle BI Applications	3.0%
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform	9.8%
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite	9.6%
Other	77.6%

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

Walter Kuhn

ICT Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Role-based access to queues, giving us more insights into problems

* We now have the possibility of getting a central perspective on all tenants. * We have defined access roles for developers. Therefore, they can 'read in' their queues on the development and testing stages. With special roles, they may also write. This improves our development and testing cycle. * For operative systems, we have restricted the access. Still, selected people can react if something is happening in the various BOQs.

Read full review

Rodolfo Patiño

SubDirector of Project Management at DISH

Great reporting and graphics but integration needs to be improved

One area for improvement would be integration. We've had problems with bottlenecks when creating the data warehouse because we didn't have all the information available. Integration also isn't as easy with Oracle BI as with other tools like Power BI or Tableau. In the next release, I'd like Oracle to include the ability to integrate with information that comes from large sources.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product has a small footprint on our system, they're very knowledgeable of MQ, which we use, and the features that they provide for monitoring our MQ system are just really, really good."

"IR360 does not require a large team to manage our entire middleware estate and allows the leveraging of a logical model of reuse."

"I highly recommend Infrared360 for an all-in-one IBM MQ tool."

"The administration piece makes it very easy to do MQ administration. It gives us a lot more flexibility and capabilities."

"The ability for development teams to have access to their MQ queues has freed us up as administrators to do things other than chase down an application’s message for research purposes."

"We have easily created use case testing harnesses for specific flows that incorporate various message types."

"It has role-based access to queues, giving us more insights into problems."

"Administration, Monitoring, and Delegation are the most valuable features of the solution."

More Avada Software Infrared360 pros

"It's web-based so that I can have multiple users accessing the same data. It provides ease of use and its formatting means we can use the data, export it to Excel, and we manipulate the data afterward if we need to."

"It has a very robust dashboard and ad-hoc reporting."

"The most valuable features are the reporting and the graphics."

"Oracle BI has improved our organization by having a more robust solution than Oracle Discoverer."

"Calculations are a little bit faster, and it can do the on-the-run calculations much better than other reporting platforms, so you don't need any other specific tool and can use Microsoft Office to start doing things with these reports."

"There is a multitude of already developed objects that allow you to create and/or improve existing reports in a reasonably easy way."

"The pre-built data models are great, as is rapid implementation so that you can use all of the pre-developed Oracle features rather than doing the heavy lifting."

Cons

"We desire a dashboard that could accumulate BOQ lengths per tenant on one screen for all tenants."

"We definitely need a better overview in terms of a dashboard giving us insights."

"We are still working with the FTE/MFT subscription monitoring and reporting functionality. That is an area in which we would like to see further development taking place."

"The UI can be cumbersome - but we are still using the Viper interface and we have not had the time to check out the Alloy interface which is supposed to be much improved."

"The user interface could be sexier and more ergonomic. The competing products have similar problems."

"Some of the graphics in the interface could be improved. It's pretty basic. Some interfaces are not up to what you're used to seeing on other, more Windows-like tools."

"One area where they could improve is with their documentation. Some sections are not up to date with new release information and providing additional samples in some areas would be very helpful."

"It was really unstable when it was first released on 11.1.1.7.1 back in May of 2013, but it has slowly become more stable over time."

"It is very cumbersome and slow for making any changes. It doesn't have that many visuals to show different graphs and charts. It should have more visuals. It also doesn't support HTML5, which is useful for interactive sessions and reporting with dashboard etc. We are phasing it out because we need a newer platform that provides us more flexibility and more designs. Our use case is just to get the utility type of monthly reports, and we need visuals, customizations, columns, and certain sections on the report to show performance and other things. They are not updating their BI Publisher product, which was known as XML Publisher before Oracle bought it. It could be because they don't have that many clients using it. We are using it because we have this solution for years."

"The initial setup was difficult because not all the information was included in the implementation model."

"It is very cumbersome and slow for making any changes."

"The initial setup was complex and it took a lot of time to set up the infrastructure."

"Technical Support is not great. I do not have much to complain about, as I only had a few questions with no response."

"As far as costs are concerned, as their current version of SQL Server is now on a Linux platform, it's now become something that we are starting to look at it."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Because the licensing is at the QMGR level, you need to have at least a small cushion of licenses for occasional enterprise needs."

"Avada Software's licensing metric is very good because the license fees are based on the number of connections (which have not increased for us very much over the years) rather than the CPU processing power (which increases significantly whenever our hardware is upgraded) or the number of users (which has increased for us a lot since our original purchase)."

"Our internal budget calculation model incorporates the pricing per endpoint for any new projects. However, as our footprint for distributed queue managers shrinks as part of our shared middleware hub deployment, the initial licensing and support costs have been reduced over the last five years."

"Start small, then increase licensing later as per your demand."

"As with any case study that we’ve ever done, it’s not so much a problem with the application or security or anything of that nature. It’s basically the cost infrastructure. Compared to other solutions, it’s one of the more costly solutions out there. It’s the biggest concern nowadays that upper management has."

"It is expensive. It is more than 100K for support. You pay for support on top of the standard licensing, which is on a yearly basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 12% of the time

Dynatrace vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 7% of the time

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 6% of the time

Aurea CX Messenger vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 5% of the time

IBM B2B Integrator vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 5% of the time

More Avada Software Infrared360 Competitors

IBM B2B Integrator vs Oracle BI Applications

Compared 16% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs Oracle BI Applications

Compared 16% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs Oracle BI Applications

Compared 15% of the time

IBM B2B Cloud Services vs Oracle BI Applications

Compared 15% of the time

Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs Oracle BI Applications

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle BI Applications Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Avada Software Infrared360

October 2026

Download Avada Software Infrared360 product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BI Applications

October 2026

Download Oracle BI Applications product report

Also Known As

Infrared360

No data available

Overview

Avada Software Infrared360 is a comprehensive monitoring solution designed for businesses to effectively manage their enterprise middleware environments, providing robust support for operational processes.

Avada Software Infrared360 acts as a powerful middleware management tool, offering real-time monitoring and detailed insights into system operations. Designed for seamless integration, it ensures users can troubleshoot and optimize their infrastructure efficiently. With its flexible architecture, users gain centralized control over their middleware systems, making it an invaluable asset for maintaining operational continuity.

What features make Avada Software Infrared360 valuable?

Real-Time Monitoring: Enables live tracking of middleware environments to quickly identify issues.
Centralized Management: Offers a unified platform to oversee all deployments, reducing complexity.
Customizable Dashboards: Allows personalization for enhanced visibility tailored to user needs.
Historical Analytics: Provides data analysis over time to improve system performance and planning.

Which benefits or ROI can users expect from Avada Software Infrared360?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines operations through centralized and real-time management.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes system functionality and reduces downtime with immediate issue resolution.
Cost Reduction: Decreases expenses related to managing middleware systems by improving resource allocation.
Scalability: Supports growth by accommodating expanding middleware requirements without significant re-investment.

Avada Software Infrared360 is particularly effective in industries where large-scale middleware management is crucial, such as finance and telecommunications. These sectors benefit from its robust monitoring capabilities and real-time insights, enabling them to maintain high levels of service and operational efficiency.

Avada Software

Oracle BI Applications is a powerful suite designed for comprehensive business intelligence analysis. It integrates key functionalities to streamline data insights and decision-making, making it ideal for enterprises seeking robust analytics capabilities.

Oracle BI Applications provides pre-built analytical solutions optimized for integrating with various Oracle and third-party data sources. It is crafted to help organizations better understand operational data, offering deep insights into numerous business processes. The applications support user-friendly dashboards and ad-hoc reporting, enhancing the ability to turn data into actionable intelligence across departments.

What are the key features of Oracle BI Applications?

Pre-Built Analytical Content: Offers ready-to-use reports and dashboards for rapid deployment.
Data Integration: Seamlessly connects with Oracle and third-party data systems.
Intuitive Dashboards: Provides customizable dashboards for detailed data visualization.
Flexible Reporting: Enables ad-hoc reporting capabilities for tailored analysis.
Role-Based Access: Supports secured data access respecting user roles and responsibilities.

What benefits should be highlighted in reviews?

Enhanced Decision-Making: Improves data-driven strategies with comprehensive insights.
Time Savings: Reduces time spent on data preparation with pre-built features.
Scalability: Grows with business demands, accommodating increased data loads.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes operational costs through efficient analytics.
Industry Adaptability: Flexible enough to meet specific sector needs.

Oracle BI Applications are implemented across industries including finance, healthcare, and retail. In finance, they enable precise financial forecasting by integrating diverse data. Healthcare organizations use it for patient data analysis, leading to improved care initiatives. Retailers leverage it for inventory management and consumer behavior analysis, enhancing operational effectiveness.

Oracle

Sample Customers

USBank, Southwest Airlines, Visiting Nurse Services of New York, Aon Hewitt, Parker Hannifin, Cantonal Bank of Zurich (ZKB), Hagemeyer NA, and many others

Cox Enterprises, Lochbridge

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Dynatrace, Datadog and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.