No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AWS Auto Scaling vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.8, while OpenText is ranked #44 with an average rating of 7.5. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.4% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
AWS Auto Scaling
Read 22 AWS Auto Scaling reviews
  • 1,113 Views
  • 1,046 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
OpenText Business Process M...
Read 6 OpenText Business Process Monitoring reviews
  • 825 Views
  • 809 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText Business Process Monitoring and AWS Auto Scaling are two prominent solutions in business process management and scaling infrastructure. AWS Auto Scaling seems to have the upper hand in flexibility and scalability, making it preferred despite higher costs.

What features are offered by OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

OpenText Business Process Monitoring offers detailed analytics, customized monitoring, and comprehensive process oversight. AWS Auto Scaling provides automatic adjustment of resources, integration with various AWS services, and high scalability.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

OpenText Business Process Monitoring needs a more intuitive setup process, better integration with third-party tools, and improved user interface. AWS Auto Scaling could benefit from improved documentation, more granular scaling options, and better cost transparency.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

OpenText Business Process Monitoring's deployment process is more complex and time-consuming, but it offers supportive customer service. AWS Auto Scaling has quick and straightforward deployment, with generally satisfactory resources and support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

OpenText Business Process Monitoring users find the pricing reasonable given its features, though achieving ROI can take time. AWS Auto Scaling involves higher initial costs but delivers quick ROI due to its efficient scaling capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring Report (Updated: April 2026).
Buyer's Guide
AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring
April 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 885,880 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Auto Scaling
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
15th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Business Process M...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
44th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AWS Auto Scaling is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
AWS Auto Scaling0.4%
OpenText Business Process Monitoring0.5%
Other99.1%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Ishaka Michael Efe - PeerSpot reviewer
Ishaka Michael Efe
DevOps Engineer Intern at HNG Tech
Automation has simplified traffic management and improved workload efficiency
I'm not really sure what improvements I would want to see in AWS Auto Scaling because I haven't really used it extensively or explored most of it. To the extent that I've used it so far, I think it is very good. I can't really say for certain what should be improved because I haven't really explored it a lot. However, what I've been using it for has been very good. If there could be training for AWS Auto Scaling, that would be fine. If you could add more training on how to use it correctly and on the functions that I haven't used before or some people have not really used before, that would help. If there could be more documentation and training on it, that would be beneficial.
Read full review
Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewer
Aphiwat Leetavorn.
CTO at Marco Technology
Proactive monitoring boosts system reliability but requires improved protocol support and script customization
Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations. Creating a proactive request requires a specific skill set, so a template for scripts that work across various protocols should be recommended. The dashboard of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is good enough, but in my operational environment, it is not sufficient. Therefore, I have had to customize everything beyond the package, utilizing Prometheus and Grafana to render more dashboards.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Our internal business applications are hosted in AWS Auto Scaling."
"AWS Auto Scaling is cost-effective and very useful for businesses."
"It can scale."
"AWS Auto Scaling is very good for managing traffic and creating new instances when necessary."
"The setup is not very complex."
"I like the graphs provided by the tool."
"The automation aspect where you can automate it to whatever you want is what I value the most about Auto Scaling."
"The good thing about Autoscaling is that it provides the capacity to minimize downtime. So, it gives you the assurance of stability and robustness within your system."
More AWS Auto Scaling pros
"The solution is very good at showing users ways to use a user action on a website and to see the performance."
"The stability has been very good over the years."
"Ability to monitor multiple application protocols."
"The tool team was sort of aware of those tools to deal with. And, that helped us to deliver the project on time."
"The main benefits of using OpenText Business Process Monitoring for my company include anomaly detection and proactive analysis, which enhance our monitoring capabilities."
"What I find most valuable is that it has synthetic monitoring that you can run from different geographies and identify, as it’s more proactive monitoring than reactive monitoring, so it'll alert customers before they find out things are not working, and proactive monitoring is very helpful to most of our customers."
"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed."
"Product allows business analysts to create the application with very little software development time needed."
 

Cons

"The product could add more features for managing instances."
"The product’s security features need improvement."
"The solution must improve automation."
"The tool must include AI features."
"The only area of improvement is the speed at which servers are launched."
"The solution is not out-of-the-box and you have to study to use it. It should be more easier to use."
"Setting up the configuration involves too much work for the cloud engineer."
"We can have more auto scaling algorithms implemented in AWS Auto Scaling."
More AWS Auto Scaling cons
"It doesn't have SNMP, the standard communication protocol for sending alerts."
"Support has experienced high turnover recently due to HP acqusition of the former Mercury Interactive product."
"Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations."
"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less."
"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect."
"Customer support is pretty average and can use some improvement."
"The product has been discontinued."
"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is good. I have not had any customers that have complained about the price."
"AWS Auto Scaling's price is high."
"AWS Auto Scaling is a pay-per-use and pay-as-you-use service."
"AWS Auto Scaling is an expensive solution."
"The product has moderate pricing."
"The product is expensive."
"AWS Auto Scaling is a cheap solution."
"On a three-year license package, it was a good deal."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
885,880 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Educational Organization
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Performing Arts
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise11
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Auto Scaling?
The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. W...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Auto Scaling?
I'm not sure about the pricing aspect of AWS Auto Scaling or the cost of it.
See all answers
What needs improvement with AWS Auto Scaling?
I'm not really sure what improvements I would want to see in AWS Auto Scaling because I haven't really used it extensively or explored most of it. To the extent that I've used it so far, I think it...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?
I find OpenText Business Process Monitoring quite expensive, and while it feels expensive, I see it as an affordable investment overall.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?
Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations. Creating a proactive requ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?
The idea behind OpenText Business Process Monitoring since the beginning is very good, as it is proactive. We do not wait until the system crashes or misbehaves; we put the application request into...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs AWS Auto Scaling Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs AWS Auto Scaling
Compared 16% of the time
Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs AWS Auto Scaling Logo
Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs AWS Auto Scaling
Compared 13% of the time
Akamai mPulse vs AWS Auto Scaling Logo
Akamai mPulse vs AWS Auto Scaling
Compared 12% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs AWS Auto Scaling Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs AWS Auto Scaling
Compared 10% of the time
More AWS Auto Scaling Competitors
Dynatrace vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring Logo
Dynatrace vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring
Compared 21% of the time
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring Logo
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring
Compared 15% of the time
Knoa EPM vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring Logo
Knoa EPM vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring
Compared 13% of the time
Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring Logo
Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring
Compared 11% of the time
More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
March 2026
AWS Auto Scaling reportDownload AWS Auto Scaling product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
March 2026
OpenText Business Process Monitoring reportDownload OpenText Business Process Monitoring product report
 

Also Known As

AWS Auto-Scaling
Micro Focus Business Process Monitor, HPE Business Process Monitor
 

Overview

AWS Auto Scaling monitors your applications and automatically adjusts capacity to maintain steady, predictable performance at the lowest possible cost. Using AWS Auto Scaling, it’s easy to setup application scaling for multiple resources across multiple services in minutes. The service provides a simple, powerful user interface that lets you build scaling plans for resources including Amazon EC2 instances and Spot Fleets, Amazon ECS tasks, Amazon DynamoDB tables and indexes, and Amazon Aurora Replicas. AWS Auto Scaling makes scaling simple with recommendations that allow you to optimize performance, costs, or balance between them. If you’re already using Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling to dynamically scale your Amazon EC2 instances, you can now combine it with AWS Auto Scaling to scale additional resources for other AWS services. With AWS Auto Scaling, your applications always have the right resources at the right time.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

OpenText Business Process Monitoring is an Application monitoring software.

Proactively and consistently monitor business processes to identify performance issues before they affect users.

Review affected service level agreements.

BPM provides consistent, predictable measurements that help you associate the business impact with its root cause.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service
Buyer's Guide
AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring
April 2026
Free Report: AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
885,880 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.