AWS Backup vs NetApp SaaS Backup comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and NetApp are both solutions in the SaaS Backup category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while NetApp is ranked #32. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.7% mindshare in B, compared to NetApp’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

AWS Backup

Read 29 AWS Backup reviews

5,729 Views
2,635 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

NetApp SaaS Backup

Read 5 NetApp SaaS Backup reviews

778 Views
778 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Backup

NetApp SaaS Backup

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

AWS Backup and NetApp SaaS Backup compete in the data protection area. NetApp SaaS Backup is seen as more advantageous due to its comprehensive feature set, providing strong capabilities for diverse environments.

Features: AWS Backup offers centralized backup for AWS services, automated scheduling, and ease of use with long-term retention policies. NetApp SaaS Backup covers SaaS applications such as Office 365 and G Suite, providing strong data recovery and sophisticated search capabilities, alongside comprehensive data source support.

Room for Improvement:AWS Backup could improve by expanding its feature set beyond AWS services and enhancing compatibility with non-AWS environments. Its user interface can be made more intuitive, and recovery options could be broadened for diverse requirements. NetApp SaaS Backup might benefit from simplifying its setup process, improving cost-efficiency for small to medium-sized businesses, and offering more streamlined integration with other cloud services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:AWS Backup offers easy deployment through native AWS integration and reliable support for AWS-centric solutions. NetApp SaaS Backup requires a more complex setup due to its multi-cloud environment support but provides robust customer service suited for enterprises needing cross-platform solutions.

Pricing and ROI:AWS Backup is competitively priced for AWS-focused companies, ensuring high ROI through cost-effective operations and smooth integration with existing AWS infrastructure. While NetApp SaaS Backup has a higher setup cost, the broad range of functionalities and the ability to cover diverse data sources offer significant ROI, particularly for businesses with varied platforms.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Backup vs. NetApp SaaS Backup Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Backup vs. NetApp SaaS Backup

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Backup

Ranking in SaaS Backup

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (20th)

NetApp SaaS Backup

Ranking in SaaS Backup

32nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the SaaS Backup category, the mindshare of AWS Backup is 3.7%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp SaaS Backup is 1.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

SaaS Backup Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Backup	3.7%
NetApp SaaS Backup	1.2%
Other	95.1%

SaaS Backup

Featured Reviews

Chukwudi Uzoma

Head Of IT, Infrastructure at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Automated backups have strengthened governance and compliance while simplifying recovery

AWS Backup offers several valuable features. I think the fact that it is an AWS organization-wide service is significant. It is a centralized management system that allows me to manage AWS Backup policies, retention periods, and monitoring from a single place instead of configuring these backups for each AWS service. This helps with governance and control. Another feature I appreciate is the integration with AWS Organization, which allows backup policies to be applied consistently across multiple accounts, which is very important for large organization environments where governance and compliance are critical. I also appreciate the automated backup plans that reduce operational overhead and ensure resources are protected without relying on manual intervention. Additionally, cross-account and cross-region backup support improves resilience against accidental deletion, ransomware, or regional outages. The compliance and reporting features help provide visibility into backup status, recovery points, and policy adherence, making audits much easier.

Read full review

reviewer1512921

Product Manager - Netapp at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Simplifies backup, restore, and clone management across disparate applications and infrastructures

It's a simple solution to use. It's simple to configure everything that you need — configure your backups. It gives you an option to backup to the cloud or backup to on-premise, or to backup to cloud storage. For example, if a customer is running on Azure NetApp files or on something cloud-based that they want to back up, they have the option of bringing their own licensing and cloud controls and NetApp will give them the storage to back up for as long as they want. When deleting backups, the controls are very intuitive so not just anyone can delete the backups, only the administrator is able to do that. Backing up and restoring is simple. It's easy. It's one click of a button. It's quite good, I like it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution has an effective overwrite feature."

"The advantage that AWS Backup has over competitors is that it's very simple."

"The snapshots we take through AWS Backup are very effective."

"We primarily use the solution as a backup for snapshots so that the data will not get corrupt or lost, and it secures our data for us."

"Overall, AWS Backup provides value in terms of time and money through its periodic backup capabilities."

"AWS Backup is most beneficial because we can manage the service, centralize, and automate the data without missing any essential information."

"AWS Backup has positively impacted my organization by helping with compliance and reporting, which is usually a headache for any organization."

"The replication in the recovery region is the most valuable feature."

More AWS Backup pros

"I would recommend it because it makes it simple to manage backups from Office 365."

"NetApp SaaS Backup is a good product that serves multiple purposes."

"The interface, customization, and security are superb."

"The most valuable feature is stability."

"The most valuable feature is the simplicity in configuration and use."

"The most valuable features are the support for both NAS and NFS."

"It's a user-friendly solution."

"Over the time that we have used it, NetApp SaaS was a good solution and it performed well."

More NetApp SaaS Backup pros

Cons

"The AWS Backup backend reporting is a major area that needs improvement. We would be very excited if we can see some reporting, such as trends. We do understand that there are reports available for S3 Bucket, in which the AWS backend stores the data. However, if we can receive holistic reporting, then it would be very helpful for us."

"It could be less expensive."

"For additional functionalities, it should be more intelligent, like more AI-capabilities."

"There are multiple enhancements needed in terms of compatibility with all database services, as AWS Backup is currently limited to specific ones."

"There could be a centralized dashboard with a reporting feature notifying us of daily backup status."

"The initial setup of the solution is complex."

"If AWS could also add some hybrid cloud features to AWS Backup, that would be a significant improvement. For example, currently, AWS Backup only backs up to the S3 and Amazon Cloud, and you can only restore from the Amazon Cloud only. However, some people have hybrid environments. They have some workloads on-premises and some workloads in the cloud."

"There are some limitations to partial backup in AWS Backup."

More AWS Backup cons

"There are several things that cannot be backed up as a full system, but rather only as a shared file. It isn't compatible with all applications and databases."

"I would like to see the graphical user interface improved to include all of the functionality because there are some things that you need to use the command-line interface for."

"The features need to be updated to support the latest hardware, as it changes every year."

"For newcomers or people who have less experience, it's a complex solution that could be simplified somewhat."

"There are still a few things on SharePoint that they need to correct in terms of how they backup and restore."

"Better integration with third-party databases and applications is needed."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS is more expensive than some competitors like Azure."

"AWS Backup is a very cheap solution."

"Price-wise, I rate the solution a six out of ten. One only has to pay for the storage cost of AWS solutions, which is the standard cost provided by AWS."

"Its price is much cheaper than some vendors but more expensive than others."

"The clients pay for the whole AWS bundle. It is an affordable solution."

"There is a lot of flexibility with the services and pricing. The price is reasonable when compared to other products. This is very good for us."

"The pricing is decent."

"AWS Backup is free of cost, but we need to pay for the backup storage being used."

More AWS Backup pricing and cost advice

"The licensing was based on a three-year subscription and the price is good compared so some other vendors."

"My understanding of the costs is that the price is fair, and not too expensive."

"The pricing is more or less the same as what we'd get from Veeam on Office 365, so it's fine."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SaaS Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	17

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Backup?

Pricing for AWS Backup is based on storage and backup frequency. Although it is reasonable, it requires monitoring, especially with long retention periods.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Backup?

AWS Backup could be improved by adding better visibility and reporting features. A more detailed dashboard is required for this service. Another improvement would be faster restore times for large ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Backup?

AWS Backup is used to centrally manage backups for services like EBS volumes, RDS databases, and sometimes EFS, primarily for data protection and compliance purposes. In one specific project, multi...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Commvault Cloud vs AWS Backup

Compared 10% of the time

Rubrik vs AWS Backup

Compared 7% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs AWS Backup

Compared 7% of the time

Cohesity DataProtect vs AWS Backup

Compared 7% of the time

N2W vs AWS Backup

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS Backup Competitors

Commvault Cloud vs NetApp SaaS Backup

Compared 37% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud vs NetApp SaaS Backup

Compared 35% of the time

Cloud Rewind (formerly Appranix) vs NetApp SaaS Backup

Compared 14% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs NetApp SaaS Backup

Compared 7% of the time

More NetApp SaaS Backup Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Backup

June 2026

Download AWS Backup product report

Buyer's Guide

SaaS Backup

May 2026

Download NetApp SaaS Backup product report

Overview

AWS Backup provides centralized management of backups with automated scheduling and cross-region support. It ensures easy restoration and policy-based automation for error reduction while integrating seamlessly with AWS services for efficient data management.

AWS Backup is a cloud-native solution offering a unified platform for managing backups across different AWS services. It supports lifecycle policies, point-in-time recovery, and security vaults. The service is cost-effective with a pay-as-you-go model and is designed for scalability and flexibility. Users benefit from features like snapshots, tagging, and custom plans, which enhance data management strategies. The system supports monitoring, reporting, and compliance to streamline operations, with the ability to manage multiple resources efficiently.

What are the key features of AWS Backup?

Centralized Management: Streamlines backup operations across AWS services.
Automated Scheduling: Efficiently manages backup tasks without manual intervention.
Cross-Region and Cross-Account Support: Enhances data protection and accessibility across regions.
Lifecycle Policies: Enables policy-driven automation to reduce errors.
Point-in-Time Recovery: Facilitates quick data restoration to specific timeframes.
Integration with AWS Services: Provides seamless interaction with other AWS tools.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Pay-as-you-go model reduces upfront and operational costs.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data needs without additional infrastructure.
Data Protection: Advanced features ensure high security and compliance.
Operational Streamlining: Automated tasks and reporting improve efficiency.

AWS Backup is implemented across industries to protect EBS volumes, RDS databases, and more, focusing on data protection and compliance. Organizations utilize it in managing retention policies, disaster recovery, and encryption in hybrid environments, benefiting from tiered storage and efficient backup management.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

NetApp SaaS Backup provides streamlined backup solutions, supporting NAS and NFS with user-friendly configuration options. Offering reliable data protection and recovery, it integrates with Azure for custom licensing.

NetApp SaaS Backup stands out for its ease of use and stability, allowing users to back up data to cloud storage or on-premises environments. It supports Azure NetApp integration, ensuring seamless licensing use and cloud control. While backup and restoration are efficient, users suggest enhancements in GUI integration, regional support, and hardware updates. Its widespread use spans consultants and organizations focusing on data protection and file sharing.

What are the key features of NetApp SaaS Backup?

NAS and NFS Support: Facilitates diverse data management.
Customizable Interface: Offers simplicity and personalization in configuration.
Data Security: Ensures secure backup and restoration.
Azure Integration: Uses existing licenses and cloud services.
Efficient Backup/Restoration: Promotes easy data recovery.

What benefits should users evaluate in reviews?

User Friendliness: Simplified configuration for all users.
Operational Stability: Consistent backup reliability across environments.
Admin Controls: Secure management with backup deletion limited to administrators.
Cost-Effective Licensing: Facilitates use without additional costs.

In industries where data protection is critical, NetApp SaaS Backup serves as a reliable tool for consultants and organizations managing backup operations. Its use with SATA drives and integration with tape backup systems makes it versatile, though some opt for alternatives like Commvault. Industries implementing NetApp can benefit from its robust backup and recovery features, although improvements in specific areas like SharePoint support are recognized.

NetApp

Sample Customers

TransferWise

Node4, Profi Engineering Systems

Buyer's Guide

AWS Backup vs. NetApp SaaS Backup

June 2026

Free Report: AWS Backup vs. NetApp SaaS Backup

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Backup vs. NetApp SaaS Backup and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Backup vs. NetApp SaaS Backup report.

See our list of best SaaS Backup vendors.

We monitor all SaaS Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.