Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration vs StreamSets comparison

Axway and IBM are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Axway is ranked #56, while IBM is ranked #24 with an average rating of 9.5. Axway holds a 0.8% mindshare in DI, compared to IBM’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Axway users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Axway AMPLIFY Application I...

Read 4 Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration reviews

2,365 Views
1,797 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

StreamSets

Read 21 StreamSets reviews

4,142 Views
3,189 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Axway AMPLIFY Application I...

StreamSets

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration and StreamSets compete in data integration and management. StreamSets has the upper hand due to its robust features for complex data workflows, while Axway AMPLIFY attracts cost-conscious buyers with its pricing and support strengths.

Features: Axway AMPLIFY offers seamless cloud integration, strong API management tools, and enterprise-scale solutions, focusing on extensive API functionality. StreamSets stands out with advanced data tracking, flexible handling of structured and unstructured data, and Change Data Capture, catering to complex data management needs.

Room for Improvement: Axway AMPLIFY may benefit from simplifying its deployment process and enhancing its documentation for optimal performance. StreamSets could improve by addressing user interface concerns, enhancing portal response times, and expanding coding support for complex data scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: StreamSets provides a flexible deployment model with robust customer support, ensuring smooth integration and operation. Axway AMPLIFY offers straightforward deployment with comprehensive documentation but requires dedicated management for optimal performance, focusing more on guided implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Axway AMPLIFY offers competitive pricing, appealing to enterprises requiring API-centric solutions with strong ROI potential. StreamSets, though pricier, justifies its cost with significant returns through comprehensive data handling efficiency, making it suitable for data-intensive environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration vs. StreamSets Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration vs. StreamSets

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axway AMPLIFY Application I...

Ranking in Data Integration

56th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

StreamSets

Ranking in Data Integration

24th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StreamSets is 1.1%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
StreamSets	1.1%
Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration	0.8%
Other	98.1%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

GuirinoCiliberti

Principal Solution Architect at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

The solution is robust and affordable, but it needs to improve its scalability and visibility of integrations

The initial setup is easy. It is very simple to start with. The last release from Axway provided many ways to simplify and speed up integration. The solution is deployed on the cloud and on-premises. We use Google, Amazon, and Azure as our cloud providers. The time taken for deployment is very short because the tool is robust.

Read full review

SrinivasanSankar

Enterprise Solutions Architect at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Enables effective batch loading with visual interface and enterprise support

One issue I observed with StreamSets is that the memory runs out quickly when processing large volumes of data. Because of this memory issue, we have to upgrade our EC2 boxes in the Amazon AWS infrastructure. I had to switch to a new EC2 box, even though the processor was not fully utilized. It would be beneficial if StreamSets addressed any potential memory leak issues to prevent unnecessary upgrades. Additionally, it would be a great enhancement if StreamSets could produce a lineage graph to visualize how the data has passed through the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is that API Gateway is extremely flexible for any feature, such as connecting to Active Directory to pull the users and their authentication information."

"The product is robust."

"Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration is very easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is that API Gateway is extremely flexible for any feature, such as connecting to Active Directory to pull the users and their authentication information. There are three ways to connect to Active Directory, and the reason for this is that the computing environments of our customers are very different. Every feature in API Gateway has got multiple methodologies for accomplishing those tasks, which is important because customers are constantly changing their security models, IT models, networks, etc. API Gateway is very flexible. It is not a one size fits all sort of situation where it is very rigid, and you can only use these pull-down menus, and that's all it ever does. It is much more open than that. It can give you fabulous reports on your users, usage, security issues, and the data sets that are going through there. You'll suddenly have visibility on the movement of data within or between your organization and other organizations. The other thing is that you're connecting API to API, which is machine to machine. The things that were done manually in an Excel spreadsheet before exchanging data through email are now done machine to machine and server to server. It speeds up the velocity of your business."

"Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration is quite a stable solution."

"The Ease of configuration for pipes is amazing. It has a lot of connectors. Mainly, we can do everything with the data in the pipe. I really like the graphical interface too"

"The scheduling within the data engineering pipeline is very much appreciated, and it has a wide range of connectors for connecting to any data sources like SQL Server, AWS, Azure, etc. We have used it with Kafka, Hadoop, and Azure Data Factory Datasets. Connecting to these systems with StreamSets is very easy."

"The ability to have a good bifurcation rate and fewer mistakes is valuable."

"StreamSets’ data drift resilience has reduced the time it takes us to fix data drift breakages. For example, in our previous Hadoop scenario, when we were creating the Sqoop-based processes to move data from source to destinations, we were getting the job done. That took approximately an hour to an hour and a half when we did it with Hadoop. However, with the StreamSets, since it works on a data collector-based mechanism, it completes the same process in 15 minutes of time. Therefore, it has saved us around 45 minutes per data pipeline or table that we migrate. Thus, it reduced the data transfer, including the drift part, by 45 minutes."

"The most valuable would be the GUI platform that I saw. I first saw it at a special session that StreamSets provided towards the end of the summer. I saw the way you set it up and how you have different processes going on with your data. The design experience seemed to be pretty straightforward to me in terms of how you drag and drop these nodes and connect them with arrows."

"StreamSets Transformer is a good feature because it helps you when you are developing applications and when you don't want to write a lot of code. That is the best feature overall."

"What I love the most is that StreamSets is very light. It's a containerized application. It's easy to use with Docker. If you are a large organization, it's very easy to use Kubernetes."

"This product was a lot easier to use than the one we had before it, and it took us half an hour and we were set up and running it the first time."

More StreamSets pros

Cons

"The most important point to improve is the capability to deploy in large enterprises."

"Because it is so flexible, you really need someone who knows Axway Gateway or has been through the training and is certified. Just because you know APIs doesn't mean you're going to walk into that API Gateway and understand what to click on. If you're going to get something done quickly, you need to find an engineer from a company who has some experience with it. It is easy to learn, but if you're doing on-the-job training, it is going to take you longer to get your project accomplished."

"The product must improve its visibility and scalability."

"The problem is the registry to configure the systems, and it's not really scalable for companies with offices worldwide."

"Because it is so flexible, you really need someone who knows Axway Gateway or has been through the training and is certified."

"There aren't enough hands-on labs, and debugging is also an issue because it takes a lot of time. Logs are not that clear when you are debugging, and you can only select a single source for a pipeline."

"One area for improvement could be the cloud storage server speed, as we have faced some latency issues here and there."

"StreamSets should provide a mechanism to be able to perform data quality assessment when the data is being moved from one source to the target."

"The documentation is inadequate and has room for improvement because the technical support does not regularly update their documentation or the knowledge base."

"One thing that I would like to add is the ability to manually enter data. The way the solution currently works is we don't have the option to manually change the data at any point in time. Being able to do that will allow us to do everything that we want to do with our data. Sometimes, we need to manually manipulate the data to make it more accurate in case our prior bifurcation filters are not good. If we have the option to manually enter the data or make the exact iterations on the data set, that would be a good thing."

"They need to improve their customer care services. Sometimes it has taken more than 48 hours to resolve an issue. That should be reduced. They are aware of small or generic issues, but not the more technical or deep issues. For those, they require some time, generally 48 to 72 hours to respond. That should be improved."

"If you use JDBC Lookup, for example, it generally takes a long time to process data."

"We've seen a couple of cases where it appears to have a memory leak or a similar problem."

More StreamSets cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is not expensive."

"API Gateway is priced on the number of transactions you run through it. API Gateway is free, and you can install as many API Gateways as you like or are necessary for your network. For example, if all of the data is inside your network or firewall, you may just need one API Gateway. If you have external customers trying to come into your organization through your firewall, you're going to need one API Gateway outside the firewall and one inside the firewall. If you have a lot of remote offices, you may want to put API Gateway in some of those offices as well. They only charge you for your usage of it. In other words, the number of transactions going through it. That's a good benefit."

"Users need to pay an annual licensing fee for the solution."

"Its pricing is pretty much up to the mark. For smaller enterprises, it could be a big price to pay at the initial stage of operations, but the moment you have the Seed B or Seed C funding and you want to scale up your operations and aren't much worried about the funds, at that point in time, you would need a solution that could be scaled."

"We use the free version. It's great for a public, free release. Our stance is that the paid support model is too expensive to get into. They should honestly reevaluate that."

"It has a CPU core-based licensing, which works for us and is quite good."

"We are running the community version right now, which can be used free of charge."

"There are two editions, Professional and Enterprise, and there is a free trial. We're using the Professional edition and it is competitively priced."

"I believe the pricing is not equitable."

"StreamSets is an expensive solution."

"The pricing is too fixed. It should be based on how much data you need to process. Some businesses are not so big that they process a lot of data."

More StreamSets pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with StreamSets?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for StreamSets?

We are using StreamSets for batch loading.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering StreamSets?

If asked, I definitely recommend StreamSets to other users. My overall rating for the solution is nine.

See all answers

Comparisons

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration

Compared 9% of the time

ETL Solutions Transformation Manager vs Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration

Compared 6% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration

Compared 5% of the time

dbt vs Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration

Compared 5% of the time

SAS Data Integration Server vs Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration

Compared 5% of the time

More Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration Competitors

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics vs StreamSets

Compared 9% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs StreamSets

Compared 6% of the time

SSIS vs StreamSets

Compared 5% of the time

Confluent vs StreamSets

Compared 5% of the time

Spring Cloud Data Flow vs StreamSets

Compared 5% of the time

More StreamSets Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

July 2026

Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration report

Download Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration product report

Buyer's Guide

StreamSets

July 2026

Download StreamSets product report

Also Known As

Integrator, Axway Integrator, AMPLIFY Application Integration

No data available

Overview

Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration is a dynamic platform valued for its flexible API Gateway, integrating with multiple systems and enhancing data efficiency while ensuring robust security.

With its adaptive API Gateway, Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration facilitates seamless data movement across diverse computing environments. It connects to systems like Active Directory and provides detailed reports, enhancing data management and security. Its features in machine-to-machine communication, file transfer, and API usage contribute to its stable and efficient performance. Despite its strengths, it requires skilled personnel for optimal use and improvements in management and visibility, particularly for global enterprises.

What are the key features of Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration?

API Gateway Flexibility: Adapts to different environments and security models.
Seamless Active Directory Integration: Facilitates secure and efficient user authentication.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers extensive insights into usage and security issues.
Enhanced Machine-to-Machine Communication: Boosts data transfer efficiency.
Robust File Transfer Capabilities: Ensures reliable and fast data movement.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating Axway AMPLIFY?

Improved Transaction Speed: Speeds up data transfers between systems.
Enhanced Security: Provides advanced authentication and authorization controls.
Increased Integration Efficiency: Connects disparate systems smoothly.
Cost Consideration: Users note the solution's expenses compared to benefits.

Industries like automotive use Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration for projects involving application connectivity across regions. It supports dealer and logistics integrations, as well as bridging internal systems with platforms such as Salesforce, leveraging its policy engine to ensure secured data access and control, thereby enhancing transaction speed and security.

Axway

StreamSets streamlines data pipeline creation, connecting data from multiple sources to destinations like cloud platforms with minimal coding. Its centralized platform and intuitive design enhance ETL and data migration processes.

StreamSets integrates seamlessly with analytics platforms, offering tools such as Data Collector and Control Hub to facilitate data ingestion, transformation, and machine learning integrations. Its user-friendly interface and ready connectors aid in configuring complex data pipelines. With built-in data drift resilience and scheduling options, users experience efficient, scalable data management, despite challenges like latency in cloud storage and interface enhancement needs. Users often employ StreamSets for batch loading, real-time data processing, and smart data pipeline management, offering comprehensive data integration solutions.

What are the key features of StreamSets?

Data Collector: Enables streamlined data collection and processing.
Control Hub: Centralizes management of data pipelines.
Minimal Coding: Simplifies pipeline configuration with limited code requirement.
Data Drift Resilience: Adapts to changes in data patterns effectively.

What benefits should users look for?

Time-Saving: Efficient processes reduce manual effort.
Scalability: Easily manages large datasets.
Integration: Connects with leading analytics and cloud platforms.
Real-Time Processing: Supports continuous data delivery for timely insights.

In industries like finance and technology, StreamSets supports data migration, machine learning integrations, and analytics by simplifying data transformation and enhancing decision-making capabilities through its robust pipeline management.

IBM

Sample Customers

BHF-BANK, BNP Paribas, Continental Corporation Automotive Group, Clearstream MFT, Federal Office of Information Technology, Systems and Telecommunication (FOITT), DHL, Union Nationale de Mutualit_s Socialistes, ZF Group, La Poste, Gassco, IdenTrust, Perugia Hospital, International Post Corporation, Bundesagentur fªr Arbeit (BA), IHC Health Solutions, Lenovo, Genzyme

Availity, BT Group, Humana, Deluxe, GSK, RingCentral, IBM, Shell, SamTrans, State of Ohio, TalentFulfilled, TechBridge

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration vs. StreamSets

August 2026

Free Report: Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration vs. StreamSets

Find out what your peers are saying about Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration vs. StreamSets and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration vs. StreamSets report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.