

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management and Azure Monitor compete in the application performance monitoring category. Users find Azure Monitor more favorable due to its robust features and value.
What features are offered by Broadcom DX Application Performance Management in comparison to Azure Monitor?Broadcom DX Application Performance Management offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, real-time analytics, and favorable pricing. Azure Monitor provides extensive integration options, superior scalability, and a broad set of features as highlighted by user reviews.
What areas of improvement can be found in Broadcom DX Application Performance Management in comparison to Azure Monitor?Improvements suggested for Broadcom DX Application Performance Management include enhancing its alerting system and reducing complexity. Azure Monitor users indicate the need for better documentation, a more intuitive setup process, and minor feature enhancements. Feedback shows a slightly better current state for Azure Monitor.
How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management in comparison to Azure Monitor?Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is straightforward to deploy but has mixed reviews on customer service responsiveness. Azure Monitor requires more initial setup but is praised for its customer support and comprehensive guidance, making it seem favorable in this aspect.
What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Broadcom DX Application Performance Management in comparison to Azure Monitor?Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is noted for its cost-effectiveness and delivering good ROI, though some users feel it can be expensive. Azure Monitor, despite higher upfront costs, is viewed as offering significant ROI due to its extensive features and capabilities, making it a worthwhile investment.
Azure Monitor helps prevent impacts on their system.
Performance management solutions like Broadcom DX Application Performance Management are important for cost reduction and performance reviews.
However, the second-line support is good.
Users end up getting no resolution from their team because they're outsourced vendors, and they don't have deeper expertise over any of the products they are referring to.
I would rate the support for Azure Monitor as a seven.
It is difficult to access the right person, and incidents sometimes need escalation.
In the early years, we needed support often, but due to accumulated experience with Broadcom DX Application Performance Management, we haven't needed to escalate any issues recently.
With APM, you can go heavy or you can go light. It just depends on what you want, what your use case is, and how reactive you want to be to system load or resilient to failure.
Azure Monitor is very scalable; there are no issues with scalability for different kinds of businesses.
The solution does not offer much flexibility in scalability.
Azure Monitor is working fine, yet I face a costing issue as if there are a lot of logs collected in the workspace or in the center, it becomes very costly.
Stability is one of the strong points.
My perspective is more based on an Application Insights agent running on a service or an app service and sending the telemetry via the agent, and also doing the filtering of telemetry at the agent level so you are not having a ton of telemetry.
The cost skyrockets once you start using it, and there are complaints that the actual cost of the Kubernetes cluster was less than the cost they were incurring for Azure Monitor.
The challenges with Azure Monitor are that it's initially complex to set up because you need multiple components.
It is also difficult to access the right person in support, and sometimes incidents need to be escalated, taking several contacts to resolve.
Improving the feature set to match competitors like Cisco and Dynatrace would be beneficial.
When I export logs into the application, workspace, log analytic workspace, and into Sentinel to read reports, I need to add storage, which increases the cost.
The challenge arises during annual renewals, as the price increase can be significant, around twenty percent or more, which customers find difficult to understand.
The pricing is in the middle range.
The alerting features definitely help in reducing operational downtime for my customers by allowing us to get notifications in advance and take active actions.
I also appreciate the ability to measure feature activity, see what types of devices they are on, follow specific use cases, and measure the amount of traffic going to a particular application.
Resource monitoring is essential.
The most valuable feature of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is the dashboard, which captures all the traces and generates alerts for performance monitoring.
We have very good dashboards that are very useful for getting all the parameters of the application.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Azure Monitor | 2.4% |
| Broadcom DX Application Performance Management | 1.3% |
| Other | 96.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 27 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 24 |
| Large Enterprise | 124 |
Azure Monitor delivers comprehensive monitoring across applications and cloud resources, integrating seamlessly with Azure services to enhance performance tracking and telemetry analysis.
Azure Monitor extends monitoring capabilities for applications, infrastructure, and security, featuring easy integration with Azure and third-party tools. It supports dynamic alerting and telemetry, offering log analytics and metrics gathering. Users benefit from its alert system and intuitive dashboards, making it a preferred choice for multi-cloud and infrastructure monitoring across diverse IT environments. While users seek improved query building and interface navigation, they appreciate its scalability and cost-effectiveness.
What key features does Azure Monitor offer?Azure Monitor sees widespread use for infrastructure and application monitoring across industries. Companies rely on it for performance tracking and incident management, often integrating it with Application Insights for enriched data analysis. Organizations use it to monitor servers and cloud services, utilizing its capabilities in DevOps practices and during cloud transformation processes for analyzing database metrics and ensuring efficient application functioning.
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management offers proactive alerting, transaction tracing, and root cause analysis. It enhances end-user experience management through efficient dashboards and customizable reporting, extending monitoring over Java and .NET applications.
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management delivers comprehensive monitoring and performance insights across cloud and Java applications. It proactively addresses issues with tools like Introscope for rapid error identification and Customer Experience Manager for end-user management. The software's dashboards consolidate performance data in real-time, helping organizations enhance debugging and incident management. Its low overhead and integration with service tools make it well-suited for production environments. However, it faces potential improvements in areas such as UI updates, agent management, automation, and seamless integration with new technologies.
What are the standout features?Organizations in logistics, banking, and e-commerce implement Broadcom DX Application Performance Management to monitor performance across crucial environments. Their usage involves enhancing performance, debugging, and proactive incident management for cloud and Java apps, with management dashboards supporting greater transparency in crash analytics and server health checks, ultimately improving user experience.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.