Azure Site Recovery vs HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] comparison

Microsoft and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery as a Service category. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Azure Site Recovery

Read 24 Azure Site Recovery reviews

1,009 Views
755 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

HPE GreenLake for Disaster ...

Read 3 HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Azure Site Recovery

HPE GreenLake for Disaster ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 1, 2025

Azure Site Recovery and HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery compete in the disaster recovery solutions category. Azure Site Recovery stands out for its pricing and support, while HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery is notable for its advanced features, making it suitable for those prioritizing comprehensive functionalities.

Features: Azure Site Recovery offers integration with existing Azure services, providing excellent scalability and reliability. It is also known for its cloud-native architecture, seamless connection with other Azure offerings, and efficient automation tools. HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery is recognized for robust on-premises integration and flexibility, tailored recovery solutions for diverse environments, and a comprehensive feature set that allows for sophisticated disaster recovery configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Site Recovery provides a straightforward cloud-based deployment process that is quick and efficient, coupled with responsive support. HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery involves a more comprehensive setup catering to complex scenarios, offering personalized support suited for intricate requirements.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Site Recovery is recognized for its competitive pricing, making it ideal for businesses seeking cost-effective solutions with an efficient return on investment. Although HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery has a higher initial cost, it is valued for its long-term ROI, especially benefiting enterprises needing sophisticated disaster recovery setups.

To learn more, read our detailed Disaster Recovery as a Service Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery as a Service

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Site Recovery

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (2nd)

HPE GreenLake for Disaster ...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

RituparnaBhattacharya

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at MIC Global

The time-saving aspects allow us to write PowerShell scripts to automate failover processes

First of all, we initially faced a challenge as Azure Site Recovery was not supporting shared disk options on SQL clusters with VMs, which are important for a Windows cluster mode. Additionally, the setup is quite easy, only requiring the creation of a vault. Its time-saving aspects allow us to write PowerShell scripts to automate failover processes.

Read full review

Wayne Cross

Director of cyber security at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Identifies additional capacity and automates onboarding

I think HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery is doing a good job overall, but there's room for improvement. It should pay more attention to different business models. As a law firm, our requirements differ greatly from those of insurance companies or banks. Our timelines and capacity recovery needs are unique. The solution should create specific verticals focused on contracts that suit our environment. The concept is great, but the execution could be better for the legal vertical. For example, when we need capacity, it usually takes too long to get it. This might be okay for banks or insurance companies, but it's too slow for a law firm. The tool needs to understand how different industries work and what drives our specific requirements.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Despite the cost concerns and downtime management, I would still recommend Azure Site Recovery."

"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."

"The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up."

"What I love about Azure Site Recovery is its simplicity for basic configurations."

"Provides generally good performance, from protection to production to failover to data recovery."

"Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore."

"We use the tool for business continuity purposes."

"We use the solution across hospitality and healthcare domains. We use it for custom development. It helps us develop a seamless omnichannel for the healthcare industry."

More Azure Site Recovery pros

"I now have one portal where I can manage my servers, my storage, my networking, and also my data protection and disaster recovery. It is now all integrated into one portal."

"The most valuable feature of HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery for us is its ability to identify when we need additional capacity and automate onboarding. Our law firm's data needs can be unpredictable, so the tool's management of long-term data capacity strategies is crucial. They monitor when we reach around 80 percent capacity and ensure that additional capacity is provided within the required time frame, which is important for us."

"The most valuable features are simplicity and that recovery can take a few seconds."

Cons

"I would like to see more security features."

"The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved."

"I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call."

"The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing."

"When it runs, it runs well but when it doesn't run, the solution needs to make it clearer as to why and what the troubleshooting process is. All this would be possible if the error logging was streamlined a bit."

"One area for improvement with Azure is helping customers predict usage more accurately."

"The tool should improve synchronization."

"The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required."

More Azure Site Recovery cons

"I would like to have the ability to deploy the appliances and protect some VMs on the cloud."

"I think HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery is doing a good job overall, but there's room for improvement. It should pay more attention to different business models. As a law firm, our requirements differ greatly from those of insurance companies or banks. Our timelines and capacity recovery needs are unique."

"In HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery, until now, if I remember well, there is only VMware to VMware. Recently, they added Azure, but it does not have the full flexibility yet for it to go from anywhere to anywhere. There is room for improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm not sure about the Azure Site Recovery pricing, but my organization gets monthly bills from providers."

"They have a license to pay."

"The tool's licensing is yearly and not expensive."

"Azure Site Recovery is neither very expensive nor very cheap."

"Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."

"Azure Site Recovery is affordable."

"It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."

"The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."

"Pricing is straightforward. The thresholds are well documented, so you know exactly where your tiers are. The price is very clear if you decide to go for a certain capacity. The pricing is also clear if you want to move to the next threshold. So that aspect is very straightforward and not an issue."

"It is not cheap, but it is much more cost-efficient compared to Zerto because the entry point of the number of VMs to be protected is lower compared to Zerto. It is more interesting to get started with GreenLake for Disaster Recovery because of the lower entry price point."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Site Recovery?

Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Site Recovery?

The price of Azure Site Recovery was reasonable compared to other data costs. It was not the expensive part of our costs, but, as always, there is room to make it cheaper.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Site Recovery?

To be honest, I didn't use it directly. As far as I know, there weren't any significant problems with Azure Site Recovery. Although pricing for data solutions can always be cheaper, site recovery w...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery?

It is not cheap, but it is much more cost-efficient compared to Zerto because the entry point of the number of VMs to be protected is lower compared to Zerto. It is more interesting to get started ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery?

It satisfies my needs because I am using VMware to VMware. It is using Zerto technology in the backend, and knowing that with Zerto, you can go from any cloud to any cloud or on-premises VMware. Yo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery?

I use it for disaster recovery needs. I have a main data center and then another disaster recovery site, which is technically one server to protect my mission-critical VMs.

See all answers

Comparisons

Zerto vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 18% of the time

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 18% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 16% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 16% of the time

Rubrik vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 8% of the time

More Azure Site Recovery Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery

May 2025

Download Azure Site Recovery product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL]

May 2025

HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] report

Download HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] product report

Overview

Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

Microsoft

HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] provides a robust platform tailored for ensuring continuous data protection and seamless business continuity. With its reliable features, it is designed to minimize downtime and streamline recovery processes for diverse environments.

Tailored for enterprises needing efficient disaster recovery solutions, HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] integrates seamlessly into existing infrastructures. It reduces complexities associated with traditional data backup systems by offering a comprehensive approach to IT resilience. Businesses benefit from flexible scalability and enhanced data security, making it a strategic choice for maintaining business operations.

What are the key features of HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL]?

Automated Orchestration: Streamlines disaster recovery processes with automated workflows to ensure rapid response and minimal manual intervention.
Scalability: Designed to grow with enterprise needs, allowing for flexible resource allocation based on demand.
Data Compression: Enhances storage efficiency and reduces latency by compressing data for efficient transfer and storage.

What benefits and ROI should be expected?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces the need for physical infrastructure, leading to significant savings in capital expenditures.
Minimal Downtime: Ensures quick recovery of services, minimizing business interruption and revenue loss.
Enhanced Security: Provides robust security features to protect data during transfer and storage, safeguarding sensitive information.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, where data integrity is critical, HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] is often implemented to ensure reliable data protection and rapid recovery. Its application extends to e-commerce and manufacturing sectors, providing flexible recovery solutions tailored to specific business demands.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery as a Service

May 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Microsoft, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.