Azure Site Recovery vs HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] comparison

Microsoft and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery as a Service category. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Azure Site Recovery

Read 26 Azure Site Recovery reviews

2,472 Views
890 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

HPE GreenLake for Disaster ...

Read 3 HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Azure Site Recovery

HPE GreenLake for Disaster ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 12, 2025

Azure Site Recovery and HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery aim to provide robust solutions in disaster recovery. Azure Site Recovery has an advantage in efficient pricing and strong support, while HPE GreenLake offers a comprehensive feature set that may appeal to those seeking flexibility despite a higher cost.

Features: Azure Site Recovery offers seamless integration with other Azure services, efficient failover, and consistent recovery processes. HPE GreenLake provides extensive scalability with on-premises resource control, flexibility for versatile disaster recovery, and a comprehensive feature set that caters to businesses needing expansive resource management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Site Recovery provides a cloud-based deployment model that simplifies setup complexities. It supports its users with robust online customer service channels. HPE GreenLake offers customizable deployment with strong on-premises support, appealing to organizations that require personalized service and infrastructure control.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Site Recovery is recognized for its competitive pricing model with strong ROI, offering a budget-friendly solution for many businesses. HPE GreenLake tends to have higher initial costs, but its service depth may justify the investment for companies prioritizing comprehensive features and long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Disaster Recovery as a Service Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery as a Service

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,928 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Site Recovery

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (3rd)

HPE GreenLake for Disaster ...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Ashadeep Parida

IT Manager at NTT DATA

Long-term user praises cost savings and reliability of disaster recovery solutions

There is only one thing to note: the agent has to be up-to-date when SCCM or any third-party tools are doing patching activities. If their agent version is mismatched and the health status is critical, you will not be able to perform your Azure Site Recovery. Recently, I worked with a mass issue related to Recovery Services Vault, and the VM support engineers are taking a lot of time to extend support to the customer. When you raise a call, they wait too long, and even if you request an engineer to set up a call for severity B cases, they are not ready to communicate over the phone, preferring email instead.

Read full review

Wayne Cross

Director of cyber security at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Identifies additional capacity and automates onboarding

I think HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery is doing a good job overall, but there's room for improvement. It should pay more attention to different business models. As a law firm, our requirements differ greatly from those of insurance companies or banks. Our timelines and capacity recovery needs are unique. The solution should create specific verticals focused on contracts that suit our environment. The concept is great, but the execution could be better for the legal vertical. For example, when we need capacity, it usually takes too long to get it. This might be okay for banks or insurance companies, but it's too slow for a law firm. The tool needs to understand how different industries work and what drives our specific requirements.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems."

"The solution is secure, reliable, and scalable."

"What I love about Azure Site Recovery is its simplicity for basic configurations."

"Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."

"A major benefit is that you do not want to pay any more for huge costs to build a DR site."

"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."

"The setup is quite easy, just requiring the creation of a vault."

"The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up."

More Azure Site Recovery pros

"The most valuable feature of HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery for us is its ability to identify when we need additional capacity and automate onboarding. Our law firm's data needs can be unpredictable, so the tool's management of long-term data capacity strategies is crucial. They monitor when we reach around 80 percent capacity and ensure that additional capacity is provided within the required time frame, which is important for us."

"I now have one portal where I can manage my servers, my storage, my networking, and also my data protection and disaster recovery. It is now all integrated into one portal."

"The most valuable features are simplicity and that recovery can take a few seconds."

Cons

"The tool should improve synchronization."

"When it runs, it runs well but when it doesn't run, the solution needs to make it clearer as to why and what the troubleshooting process is. All this would be possible if the error logging was streamlined a bit."

"The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved."

"Azure Site Recovery does not support shared disk options."

"Recently, I worked with a mass issue related to Recovery Services Vault, and the VM support engineers are taking a lot of time to extend support to the customer."

"I would like to see more security features."

"We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor."

"I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call."

More Azure Site Recovery cons

"I think HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery is doing a good job overall, but there's room for improvement. It should pay more attention to different business models. As a law firm, our requirements differ greatly from those of insurance companies or banks. Our timelines and capacity recovery needs are unique."

"In HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery, until now, if I remember well, there is only VMware to VMware. Recently, they added Azure, but it does not have the full flexibility yet for it to go from anywhere to anywhere. There is room for improvement."

"I would like to have the ability to deploy the appliances and protect some VMs on the cloud."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They have a license to pay."

"Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."

"I'm not sure about the Azure Site Recovery pricing, but my organization gets monthly bills from providers."

"It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."

"The tool's licensing is yearly and not expensive."

"Azure Site Recovery is neither very expensive nor very cheap."

"The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."

"Azure Site Recovery is affordable."

"Pricing is straightforward. The thresholds are well documented, so you know exactly where your tiers are. The price is very clear if you decide to go for a certain capacity. The pricing is also clear if you want to move to the next threshold. So that aspect is very straightforward and not an issue."

"It is not cheap, but it is much more cost-efficient compared to Zerto because the entry point of the number of VMs to be protected is lower compared to Zerto. It is more interesting to get started with GreenLake for Disaster Recovery because of the lower entry price point."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Site Recovery?

Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Site Recovery?

A major advantage is that you do not want to pay any more for huge costs to build a DR site. It is very flexible and will save your cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Site Recovery?

The flexibility of Azure Site Recovery regarding integration with different IT environments is limited; it is purely an Azure platform service for business continuity, not meant for integration wit...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery?

It is not cheap, but it is much more cost-efficient compared to Zerto because the entry point of the number of VMs to be protected is lower compared to Zerto. It is more interesting to get started ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery?

It satisfies my needs because I am using VMware to VMware. It is using Zerto technology in the backend, and knowing that with Zerto, you can go from any cloud to any cloud or on-premises VMware. Yo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery?

I use it for disaster recovery needs. I have a main data center and then another disaster recovery site, which is technically one server to protect my mission-critical VMs.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 15% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 11% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 11% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 5% of the time

More Azure Site Recovery Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery

February 2026

Download Azure Site Recovery product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL]

January 2026

HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] report

Download HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] product report

Overview

Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

Microsoft

HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] provides a robust platform tailored for ensuring continuous data protection and seamless business continuity. With its reliable features, it is designed to minimize downtime and streamline recovery processes for diverse environments.

Tailored for enterprises needing efficient disaster recovery solutions, HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] integrates seamlessly into existing infrastructures. It reduces complexities associated with traditional data backup systems by offering a comprehensive approach to IT resilience. Businesses benefit from flexible scalability and enhanced data security, making it a strategic choice for maintaining business operations.

What are the key features of HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL]?

Automated Orchestration: Streamlines disaster recovery processes with automated workflows to ensure rapid response and minimal manual intervention.
Scalability: Designed to grow with enterprise needs, allowing for flexible resource allocation based on demand.
Data Compression: Enhances storage efficiency and reduces latency by compressing data for efficient transfer and storage.

What benefits and ROI should be expected?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces the need for physical infrastructure, leading to significant savings in capital expenditures.
Minimal Downtime: Ensures quick recovery of services, minimizing business interruption and revenue loss.
Enhanced Security: Provides robust security features to protect data during transfer and storage, safeguarding sensitive information.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, where data integrity is critical, HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] is often implemented to ensure reliable data protection and rapid recovery. Its application extends to e-commerce and manufacturing sectors, providing flexible recovery solutions tailored to specific business demands.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery as a Service

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Commvault, Microsoft and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.