Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bacula Enterprise vs Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup comparison

Bacula Systems and Hornetsecurity are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Bacula Systems is ranked #24 with an average rating of 10.0, while Hornetsecurity is ranked #30 with an average rating of 9.0. Bacula Systems holds a 1.1% mindshare in BRS, compared to Hornetsecurity’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Bacula Systems users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Hornetsecurity users who would recommend it.
Bacula Enterprise
Read 10 Bacula Enterprise reviews
  • 3,340 Views
  • 1,904 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Ba...
Read 31 Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup reviews
  • 2,738 Views
  • 2,026 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup and Bacula Enterprise are two leading solutions in the backup industry. User reviews suggest that while Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup excels in pricing and support, Bacula Enterprise stands out for its comprehensive features.

Features: Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup is known for its simplicity, straightforward functionality, and efficient operation. Bacula Enterprise offers versatility, extensive feature sets, and can accommodate more complex backup needs. Bacula Enterprise appears to offer more advanced features versus Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup's ease of use.

Room for Improvement: Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup could improve scalability and integration options, along with enhancing its advanced features. Bacula Enterprise needs a more intuitive learning curve, better documentation, and simplified user interfaces. Bacula Enterprise may require more technical expertise for optimal utilization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup offers quick and hassle-free deployment with strong customer support. Bacula Enterprise's deployment is more complex, often requiring significant technical knowledge, but its customer support is responsive and knowledgeable. Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup has the edge in ease of deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup is competitively priced, providing good value for its features and strong ROI. Bacula Enterprise, while potentially higher in cost, justifies this with its extensive capabilities and satisfactory ROI. Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup is favorable for budget-conscious buyers, whereas Bacula Enterprise is preferred for its richer feature set despite a potentially higher investment.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Bacula Enterprise vs. Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Bacula Enterprise vs. Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bacula Enterprise
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
24th
Ranking in Cloud Backup
16th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Ba...
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
30th
Ranking in Cloud Backup
28th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (18th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Bacula Enterprise is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Bacula Enterprise1.1%
Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup0.9%
Other98.0%
Backup and Recovery
 

Featured Reviews

Davilson Aguiar - PeerSpot reviewer
Davilson Aguiar
Analista Tecnologia Banco de Dados at Centro de Gestão da Tecnologia da Informação
Very cost-effective and well organized with good compression
It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company. A managerial user who wants more information beyond the operational technician should be able to access it. It could include greater transparency regarding the volume of data trafficked on the network, as well as the expectation of deduplication. A more practical strategy could come with a backup policy model as a suggestion for both large and small companies. A simple suggestion is to visually implement the backup time as far as your physical media.
Read full review
Asif Usmani - PeerSpot reviewer
Asif Usmani
Regional Sales Manager at S2
Lacks multi-platform support and physical infrastructure but excels in storage optimization
We use it for VM backup and Office 365 backup I find the solution to be user-friendly and easy to manage and deploy. It provides storage for Office 365, which is beneficial, and the deduplication technology is excellent, especially in optimizing storage capacity compared to others. In terms of…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It brought many advantages - such as the learning curve being very light."
"Bacula is pretty stable."
"It works great and it provides you with several standard tools to restore your backup, even after a big failure."
"It is easy to scale Bacula Enterprise even if your system is growing tremendously in data and servers."
"The solution has extensive documentation and a very active community."
"Bacula is very solid, very stable, and very scalable."
"The most valuable feature is its ease of use; it works great and it provides you with several standard tools to restore your backup, even after a big failure."
"The most valuable features are the special plugins such as SAP HANA databases, Microsoft SQL, and various types of virtualization."
More Bacula Enterprise pros
"The ability to test the backups without having to manually mount the VHDs after restore allows us to check the integrity of the backups."
"VM backup and the item level recovery are the most valuable features."
"This solution is stable."
"Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup's most valuable features include its user-friendly interface and the ability to perform data compression updates, which enhance overall efficiency and effectiveness."
"Valuable features for us include quick recovery, compression, and deduplication."
"It is an excellent product. It is easy to deploy, stable, and fast. Their support is excellent."
"The initial setup was very straightforward, as the software installs easily, is very easy to configure and has a nice GUI."
"Give it a try as it's very easy to setup and works like charm."
More Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup pros
 

Cons

"It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company."
"We would like to see an improvement in the functionality of the GUI."
"Bacula needs a graphical user interface because, for administrators, the command-line interface is okay, but for the average user it is not very easy."
"Bacula needs a graphical user interface because, for administrators, the command-line interface is okay, but for the average user it is not very easy."
"The interface needs to be easier for adding new devices to be managed."
"The initial setup could be a bit easier."
"A more user-friendly interface (GUI) can be developed."
"We are looking for a unique interface that can rule both enterprise and open source editions. Such a thing does not yet exist."
More Bacula Enterprise cons
"Basically, how it works is that you have a single local drive, and then you have a cloud backup. It'd be nice if you could rotate the single local backup drive. As of now, you can't."
"The software does have occasional problems with shadow copy but restarting the services rectifies this."
"It would be good to if they would expand the functionality to be able to backup normal servers without Hyper-V."
"Availability of physical server backup would be an added advantage."
"Backup speed and comparisons between versions used to be slow on big VMs but that was improved greatly later on."
"The cloud backup and VMware support (now available in the latest releases), could do with some improvement."
"We use Linux guests on Hyper-V clusters and we really need the file level restore on these VMs (ext3 and 4 file systems) functionality."
"To improve Altaro, I would like to see the ability to choose more than one backup location at a time."
More Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an open-source solution."
"We have a perpetual license."
"There is a free version for Hosts with 2 VMs."
"Altaro had the best prices and ROI in the whole bunch that we evaluated."
"Altaro VM Backup is affordably priced. It is a best value for its price and has almost every feature that an expensive, popular product offers."
"The pricing is okay,"
"VMware is a little pricey, but it is a good solution and priced similar to other products."
"Its yearly maintenance fee is fairly high for me to renew for upgrades and support."
"​By implementing the solution at multiple locations, significant cost savings were achieved."
"The price is great for the utility you get and the licensing has never caused any issues with my company."
More Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
University
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bacula Enterprise?
Bacula is more expensive than various other solutions. It’s almost completely commercial now. Products like Veeam software are much more expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Bacula Enterprise?
Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Bacula Enterprise?
The last scenario in which I used Bacula was for a customer who needed some open-source tool which could support encryption at that time. We managed to convince the customer to use Bacula to deploy...
See all answers
What do you like most about Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup?
The most valuable feature of Altaro VM Backup is its ability to backup and restore various types of data, including Active Directory, application servers, and SQL Server databases.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup?
The pricing and licensing cost is challenging since most competitors offer cheaper pricing, making it difficult to penetrate the market with the current pricing strategy.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup?
The solution needs multi-platform support as it is currently only available for VMware and Hyper-V. It also lacks support for physical servers and workstations. Additionally, they should add more p...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Bareos vs Bacula Enterprise Logo
Bareos vs Bacula Enterprise
Compared 19% of the time
Veeam Data Platform vs Bacula Enterprise Logo
Veeam Data Platform vs Bacula Enterprise
Compared 8% of the time
UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise Logo
UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise
Compared 6% of the time
QNAP Backup Solution vs Bacula Enterprise Logo
QNAP Backup Solution vs Bacula Enterprise
Compared 5% of the time
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Bacula Enterprise Logo
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Bacula Enterprise
Compared 4% of the time
More Bacula Enterprise Competitors
Veeam Data Platform vs Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup Logo
Veeam Data Platform vs Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup
Compared 12% of the time
NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup Logo
NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup
Compared 8% of the time
Acronis Cyber Protect vs Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup Logo
Acronis Cyber Protect vs Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup
Compared 5% of the time
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup Logo
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup
Compared 4% of the time
BDRShield vs Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup Logo
BDRShield vs Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup
Compared 4% of the time
More Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Backup and Recovery
February 2026
Bacula Enterprise reportDownload Bacula Enterprise product report
Buyer's Guide
Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup
March 2026
Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup reportDownload Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Altaro VM Backup
 

Overview

Bacula Enterprise is a highly scalable, especially robust and secure data backup and recovery software. Its unique low cost subscription model empowers data centers to truly escape data volume price traps. With a high degree of flexibility and customizability, Bacula offers native integration with a wide range of hypervisors, databases, file systems, cloud interfaces and containers. High numbers of enterprise organizations worldwide (incl. NASA, Bank of Austria, Swisscom or Sky PLC) have adopted Bacula Enterprise backup software in mission critical environments because of its advanced features and ability to handle high data volume at very low cost.

Bacula Systems

Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup is a powerful, reliable and easy-to-use backup and replication solution for Microsoft Hyper-V and VMware virtual machines (VMs) and physical Windows servers, to protect against enterprise data loss. The award-winning solution provides robust, streamlined and enterprise-level functionality.

Reduce downtime and data loss: Thanks to Continous Data Protection (CDP) and WAN-optimized replication, your backup files are available in just minutes in the event of a data loss scenario and you can continue working as usual. The solution’s unique Augmented Inline Deduplication also gives you massive savings on your backup storage and dramatically reduces costs.

Hornetsecurity
 

Sample Customers

NASA, SwissCom, Navisite, Turner Studios, Bank Austria, Caixa Bank, SdV Plurimedia, Leibniz University Hannover, Zeta Global, Tricore, NetLog, Siemens, LocaWeb, wbsGo, itesys, Queens School of Computing, Escrypt.
Thomson Reuters, Microsoft, Amazon, Harvard University, MIT, Peugeot, Xerox
Buyer's Guide
Bacula Enterprise vs. Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup
March 2026
Free Report: Bacula Enterprise vs. Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup
Find out what your peers are saying about Bacula Enterprise vs. Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Bacula Enterprise vs. Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors and best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.