Bacula Enterprise vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP comparison

Bacula Systems and NetApp are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. Bacula Systems is ranked #19 with an average rating of 10.0, while NetApp is ranked #27 with an average rating of 9.5. Bacula Systems holds a 1.2% mindshare in CB, compared to NetApp’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Bacula Systems users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Bacula Enterprise

Read 10 Bacula Enterprise reviews

4,976 Views
2,787 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Read 64 NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reviews

9,473 Views
2,368 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Bacula Enterprise

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Bacula Enterprise and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP are competing solutions in the data management space. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP seems to have the upper hand due to its superior scalability and integration, which may be seen as more valuable features despite Bacula's cost advantages.

Features: Bacula Enterprise offers comprehensive backup and recovery capabilities, compatibility with various operating systems, and the benefits of open-source flexibility. It provides extensive data protection, making it ideal for enterprises with diverse IT environments. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP delivers cloud-native features, seamless integration with cloud services, and strong data mobility, particularly supporting multi-cloud strategies. Its robust cloud adaptation is a key selling point, tailored for modern infrastructures.

Room for Improvement: Bacula Enterprise may require improvements in ease of initial setup, enhanced user interface, and expanded support for hybrid environments. Additionally, more streamlined customization options could enhance user experience. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP could improve by optimizing pricing transparency, expanding regional availability, and refining automation features to simplify deployment processes further.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bacula Enterprise offers a straightforward deployment process, although the initial setup might pose challenges. Its support system is solid but often necessitates customization efforts. In contrast, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP provides a streamlined, cloud-focused deployment coupled with comprehensive support, benefiting organizations with immediate cloud integration and ensuring operational continuity.

Pricing and ROI: Bacula Enterprise is known for its attractive pricing, offering a high return on investment for budget-sensitive enterprises. Its cost-effective structure is appealing for companies aiming to manage expenses. On the other hand, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, despite a higher initial investment, yields compelling ROI through enhanced cloud functionalities and efficiency gains, appealing to enterprises prioritizing long-term operational savings over upfront costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bacula Enterprise

Ranking in Cloud Backup

19th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (28th)

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Ranking in Cloud Backup

27th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (3rd), Cloud Storage (9th), Public Cloud Storage Services (11th), Cloud Software Defined Storage (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Bacula Enterprise is 1.2%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Bacula Enterprise	1.2%
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP	1.1%
Other	97.7%

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

Davilson Aguiar

Analista Tecnologia Banco de Dados at Centro de Gestão da Tecnologia da Informação

Very cost-effective and well organized with good compression

It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company. A managerial user who wants more information beyond the operational technician should be able to access it. It could include greater transparency regarding the volume of data trafficked on the network, as well as the expectation of deduplication. A more practical strategy could come with a backup policy model as a suggestion for both large and small companies. A simple suggestion is to visually implement the backup time as far as your physical media.

Read full review

reviewer5948293

Principal Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Offers performance control and cloud integration while supporting data management with granular flexibility

The scalability of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is interesting. We have thought about it, but we haven't used it. I think the scalability is something you scale up rather than respond to peak demand. It wouldn't help with outages either; the scaling is manual, and there are no processes we've used to automate that for unexpected scenarios. We like the scalability; it's enough for what we're planning to use, but we haven't used any advanced features. The standard platform is NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, which is their cloud service. In fact, that's probably the most experience I have with NetApp. I've experienced it on-premise, but kind of secondhand.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the special plugins such as SAP HANA databases, Microsoft SQL, and various types of virtualization."

"The support is outstanding and world-class."

"The most valuable feature is the support for Linux servers."

"Bacula Enterprise, so far, has never let us down with their service and support."

"The solution has extensive documentation and a very active community."

"We have been using it for several years and we are very satisfied with how easy it is to configure and set up and run backups."

"Bacula is very solid, very stable, and very scalable."

"Technical support is excellent in my opinion."

More Bacula Enterprise pros

"Another feature which gets a lot of attention in our environment is the File Services Solutions in the cloud, because it's a completely, fully-managed service. We don't have to take care of any updates, upgrades, or configurations."

"Lastly, the API and web services are fairly good. That is an important feature too. We write some code to do different things. We have code that runs to make sure that everything is being backed up as we say it is and we try to also detect places where we may have missed a backup."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it makes our data readily available and we don't have to go through a lot of trouble to access it."

"The most valuable features are tiering to S3 and being able to turn it on and off, based on a schedule."

"We calculated that we are saving $1,000,000 across three years."

"Cloud Volumes ONTAP is great because of the storage efficiencies that it provides."

"It's helped us to dive into the cloud very fast; we were able to adopt it very fast, run our environment very efficiently, save money with deduplication and compression, and our staff did not have to learn new systems because they could keep all the same processes and knowledge they had before."

"The ability for our users to restore data from the Snapshots is very valuable."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pros

Cons

"The interface needs to be easier for adding new devices to be managed."

"We would like to see an improvement in the functionality of the GUI."

"Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability."

"Relying solely on a desktop is a bit frustrating as its GUI isn't exactly responsive."

"We are looking for a unique interface that can rule both enterprise and open source editions. Such a thing does not yet exist."

"The initial setup could be a bit easier."

"Bacula needs a graphical user interface because, for administrators, the command-line interface is okay, but for the average user it is not very easy."

"It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company."

More Bacula Enterprise cons

"It needs better reporting. Right now, we had to put everything one to the other just to figure out what could be the issue."

"Me gustaría verlos mejorar la perspectiva de inicio y búsqueda en los paneles. Esto permitiría una mejor visualización de los contenidos que se capturan en la herramienta."

"The navigation on some of the configuration parameters is a bit cumbersome, making the learning curve on functions somewhat steep."

"I think the challenge now is more in terms of keeping an air gap. The notion that it is in the cloud, easy to break, etc. The challenge now is mostly about the air gap and how we can protect that in the cloud."

"When it comes to a critical or a read-write-intensive application, it doesn't provide the performance that some applications require, especially for SAP. The SAP HANA database has a write-latency of less than 2 milliseconds and the CVO solution does not fit there. It could be used for other databases, where the requirements are not so demanding, especially when it comes to write-latency."

"Multipathing for iSCSI LUNs is difficult to deal with from the client-side and I'd love to see a single entry point that can be moved around within the cluster to simplify the client configuration."

"In terms of improvement, I would like to see the Azure NetApp Files have the capability of doing SnapMirrors. Azure NetApp Files is, as we know, is an AFF system and it's not used in any of the Microsoft resources. It's basically NetApp hardware, so the best performance you can achieve, but the only reason we can't use that right now is because of the region that it's available in. The second was the SnapMirror capability that we didn't have that we heavily rely on right now."

"The key feature, that we'd like to see in that is the ability to sync between regions within the AWS and Azure regions. We could use the cloud sync service, but we'd really like that native functionality within the cloud volume service."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a perpetual license."

"This is an open-source solution."

"The pricing of this solution is definitely higher than what the typical Azure Files and AWS solutions charge, but given the features and the stability NetApp has provided, we are okay with it. We are not complaining about the pricing."

"The AWS consumer-based pricing model makes it easy for developers to use their credit cards to spin up virtual servers immediately."

"For enterprise customers, it's a very cost effective. But in the SMB segment, yeah, pricing is a little bit challenge for your time."

"We find the pricing to be favorable due to the educational sector we belong to."

"Once we deploy the pay as you go model, we cannot convert this product as a BYOL model. This is a concern that we have."

"It is not a cheap solution because we need to pay for the license and pay for Azure resources as well."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable."

"I know the licensing is a bit on the high-end. That's when we had to downsize our MetroCluster disks and just migrate to disks that were half used. We migrated into those just to reduce maintenance costs."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

University

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	53

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bacula Enterprise?

Bacula is more expensive than various other solutions. It’s almost completely commercial now. Products like Veeam software are much more expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bacula Enterprise?

Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bacula Enterprise?

The last scenario in which I used Bacula was for a customer who needed some open-source tool which could support encryption at that time. We managed to convince the customer to use Bacula to deploy...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is actually quite reasonable in price compared to other native cloud storage options. For example, a customer using 100 TB of AWS storage would not benefit from deduplica...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

It would be nice to see technology supporting the Elastic Fabric Adapter on Amazon AWS, therefore getting RDMA technology for more low-latency connections.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

I use NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP mostly in customer companies.

See all answers

Comparisons

Bareos vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

QNAP Backup Solution vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

More Bacula Enterprise Competitors

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 7% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 5% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 4% of the time

Amazon FSx vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 4% of the time

CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 3% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

July 2026

Download Bacula Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

July 2026

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP product report

Also Known As

No data available

ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO

Overview

Bacula Enterprise offers robust backup solutions with extensive plugins for services like SAP HANA and Microsoft SQL, supporting multi-platform environments. It's valued for scalability, transparent licensing, and effective data recovery.

Bacula Enterprise serves organizations with diverse IT landscapes by providing scalable backup solutions tailored for platforms like Linux servers. Its extensive documentation and community support ensure smooth operation and reliability. Users appreciate features including deduplication, compression, and centralized management, contributing to efficient data protection for industries such as banking and healthcare. The setup process can be complex for some, and there is demand for a more intuitive interface, improved mobile support, and better GUI functionality. Despite initial setup challenges, Bacula Enterprise remains a trusted tool for data management with flexible resource utilization and security features.

What are the key features of Bacula Enterprise?

Extensive Plugins: Supports SAP HANA, Microsoft SQL, enhancing integration.
Multi-Platform Compatibility: Works seamlessly across different IT environments.
Scalability: Adapts to growing organizational needs efficiently.
Transparent Licensing: Offers cost-effective solutions with clear pricing.
Data Deduplication: Optimizes storage by eliminating redundant data.
Centralized Management: Streamlines data handling processes across systems.

What benefits should users seek in reviews of Bacula Enterprise?

Ease of Use: Simplifies complex backup procedures for technical teams.
Resource Optimization: Maximizes efficiency in data storage and retrieval.
Reliable Data Recovery: Ensures data can be restored effectively when needed.
Versatile Configuration: Supports easy customization for specific needs.

In sectors like banking, healthcare, and government, Bacula Enterprise handles large data volumes and secures backup tasks with encryption. Its multi-platform support is crucial for heterogeneous systems, executing scheduled tasks and data protection protocols efficiently, while fulfilling industry-specific compliance and reliability requirements.

Bacula Systems

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.

NetApp

Sample Customers

NASA, SwissCom, Navisite, Turner Studios, Bank Austria, Caixa Bank, SdV Plurimedia, Leibniz University Hannover, Zeta Global, Tricore, NetLog, Siemens, LocaWeb, wbsGo, itesys, Queens School of Computing, Escrypt.

1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. AIG 6. Apple 7. Bank of America 8. Barclays 9. Bayer 10. Berkshire Hathaway 11. BNP Paribas 12. Cisco 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15.ConocoPhillips 16. CVS Health 17. Dell 18. Deutsche Bank 19. eBay 20. Eli Lilly 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. Freescale Semiconductor 24. General Electric 25. Google 26. Honeywell 27. IBM 28. Intel 29. Intuit 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kellogg's 32. KeyCorp 33. Liberty Mutual 34. L'Oréal 35. Mastercard

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

August 2026

Free Report: Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Find out what your peers are saying about Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP report.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.