Bizagi vs Genpact Cora SeQuence comparison

"I like all of the features. I like that you can simulate the processes and add the time standard."

"The tool helps to improve business processes and have better KPIs. Also, it is easy to use. Our developers find it easy to learn."

"The visualizations and attachments provided by the product are valuable."

"The main feature of Bizagi is the speed to which we can automate processes and how we can modify them without a strong impact on the end users."

"The solution offers a free version of their product."

"The most valuable feature is the organizational modeling capability."

"I like the integration part, and I also like how they use the database, such as the data when they implement all the data side, and how you can easily integrate it with their widgets."

"The most valuable feature is the simulation."

"It is very stable. There is no downtime."

"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."

"Bizagi has been aggressively adding features to maintain its market-leading position, however, in some cases, this has impacted the stability of certain product builds."

"The free version could be better. Some of the templates and all the functionalities aren't available in the free version. I've been trying to check some maps, for example, organizational maps or a model on organization hierarchy. Apparently, there seems to be no template. You have to create your own. I am not sure if there are templates, but I've not really seen any. I think that there's room for improvement."

"Difficult to export in formats other than PDF."

"Agriculture, Industry."

"The on-premise software has some bugs."

"I'm not really satisfied with the reporting aspect."

"The solution is a bit heavy on resources and has slowed down my computer."

"Its performance needs to be improved. The main thing is that it is limited, especially in terms of the response times. When the processes become a bit large, it is very awkward to work with the Bizagi modeler. When you have already modeled but start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. When you rearrange lanes or have new structures, it goes rather squiggly up and down and so on, which could be improved. The visual outputs of the DIREPs of the process models are pixelated and have a bad image quality. It is a PNG or JPEG, and you cannot export it as a PDF. When you have rather large processes, you should be able to arrange them hierarchically. Currently, it is not supported. If you use sub-processes and inflate a process, suddenly the arrangement is totally different, and although you know the process, you have to look where is it now. You need a good understanding of the levels of your processes before you start in Bizagi. It can have automatic support for optimal presentation. In BPM, you should have it from the top left to the bottom right. However, in most cases, people don't know how they should arrange it. Therefore, it would be nice to have a suggestion system for different arrangements to be able to better present the process."

"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."

"The setup and configuration is complex."

"Its price is reasonable."

"I think that its price is reasonable."

"If they can freeze the pricing in a contract, I advise them to do so."

"The paid version costs us about $20,000 for 100 users annually."

"It is only necessary to pay for licenses when ready to deploy applications to production."

"Make sure that your requirements are explicitly defined from the outset. This will help you choose the right setup and licensing for your needs."

"It has a very high price. Many clients complain about the price for maintaining the application on Bizagi."

"The Bizagi modeler can be downloaded free of charge."