BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs Seqrite Endpoint Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?

BlackBerry and Seqrite are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. BlackBerry is ranked #34, while Seqrite is ranked #44. BlackBerry holds a 1.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Seqrite’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of Seqrite users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity and Seqrite Endpoint Security compete in the cybersecurity category. BlackBerry Cylance appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced threat detection capabilities.

Features: BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity provides AI and machine learning-based virus protection, uses low CPU resources, and offers robust endpoint protection against zero-day threats. Seqrite Endpoint Security includes strong data loss prevention, application control, and innovative XDR features.

Room for Improvement: BlackBerry Cylance users seek a better user interface, more detailed threat information, and integration with industrial solutions. Seqrite Endpoint Security needs user management, stability, and support responsiveness improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlackBerry Cylance is flexible in deployment across cloud and on-premises environments, with mixed feedback on customer service. Seqrite Endpoint Security offers similar deployment options and generally positive customer service feedback, though support communication could improve.

Pricing and ROI: BlackBerry Cylance's pricing is slightly high, but users find value in its security features. Seqrite Endpoint Security is more affordable, appealing to budget-conscious customers. Both solutions report significant ROI through improved security and reduced incident response times.

To learn more, read our detailed BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.8%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is 1.8%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seqrite Endpoint Security is 0.9%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.8%
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity	1.8%
Seqrite Endpoint Security	0.9%
Other	93.5%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Sooraj Makkancherrry

Security Operations Manager at Philips

Doesn't have daily updates, which is important for healthcare IT

I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immediately due to medical device protocols and validation testing. I wish support would try to understand our issues better instead of giving this standard response. The machine learning feature they use often tells us to upgrade the agent or add things to the exclusion list, which isn't unacceptable. It's a very good and new technology as a tool and antivirus. But sometimes, it doesn't work properly with our medical devices and products, quarantining files it shouldn't even after we add them to exclusions. This is tricky for us.

Read full review

ManishKumar14

DGM IT at Seth Anandram Jaipuria Group of Educational Institutions

Centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use

Seqrite Endpoint Security protects individual machines, servers, and emails against malware, viruses, and spam attacks The solution is centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use. It allows you to patch your required reports. The solution provides central deployment, remote deployment,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the main benefits of the solution is its intelligence to correlate the events into an incident."

"These days it's machine-learning technology and behavior-based analytics features that make us more secure."

"Stability is a primary factor, and then there's the ease of distribution and policy management; Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very easy to work with, and we're quite happy with them."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks saves time in various ways, although the user interface is fairly standard."

"Cortex is the best solution for avoiding security breaches, malware attacks, and other kinds of security issues."

"Traps is quite a stable product. Once it was properly deployed and configured, you have nothing to be worried about."

"If you are looking for security, mainly for advanced threat prevention from ransomware and malware attacks, I would recommend Cortex."

"We have a complete overview of all our PCs and it's very easy to handle and to use the interface. It has a lot of benefits for us."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"Does malware analysis. Blocks WannaCry and other attacks that have come out."

"The stability of the solution is awesome."

"The stability is perfect, and it is leaps and bounds beyond our previous solution by McAfee."

"I find the actual overall endpoint malware protection the most valuable feature of CylancePROTECT."

"We are quite security-focused. Blackberry Protect as an endpoint solution for our service really delivers what we are expecting."

"The non-daily requirement to update signatures is the most valuable feature. From a functional point of view, it is pretty spot on. For instance, we compared an algorithm from five years ago to today's algorithm, and it was 98% accurate. It has the ability to detect and mitigate. In the industrial environment that we work in, there's what we call OT versus IT. You are IT Central, but this is OT. Generally, we don't have the same level of skillset as IT individuals or IT professionals have. This particular product doesn't require you to be a computer scientist to be able to understand its proprietary algorithm and to be able to deploy, use, and work within it. It integrates well with a robust SIEM or SOAR solution, and it plays nice with others. We use other detection solutions like CyberX or site provision with Cisco, and it plays nice. That's one of the things we really liked about it."

"The solution is stable."

"It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pros

"The solution is centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"The solution effectively detects malicious files and blocks sign-ins."

"The solution is stable."

"With Seqrite, it is completely protected, and we have full control over what is happening on the end user's laptop."

"We were excited about the cloud-based management features of Seqrite and were looking to use the same."

"The overall performance of the server and the dashboard are the most interesting aspects of the solution."

"The solution's current features include antivirus, web filtering, file activity monitoring, PAM, firewall, IDS/IPS, and DLP. Though I'm not familiar with the whole solution, it is good."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pros

Cons

"I am facing issues with customer support for Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, so I am not satisfied with customer support."

"Cortex XDR could be improved with more GUI features."

"It takes time to scan the servers and devices."

"It is not easy to sell Cortex XDR, not because it isn't a good tool. Its marketing needs to be improved."

"A potential area of improvement for Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is the cost."

"Cortex does not offer an on-premises solution. However, some customers would prefer not to be on the cloud. It would be ideal if it could offer something on-prem as well."

"They are charging for Network Traffic Analyzer (NTA) services, so if the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better."

"Traps doesn't work with McAfee. You need to remove McAfee to install Traps. This is very common, and its nothing that should be an issue. Some antivirus engines recognize Traps as an threat component, so maybe they need to shake hands somewhere."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The problem is, for me, sometimes it creeps into the computers and into the servers that we want to get running."

"For example, the interface and the Cylance Optics need to be improved a fair bit."

"CylancePROTECT could be improved in its technical support and communication."

"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's price should be more competitive."

"If they can improve the technical support SLA, that aspect of the product will be much appreciated."

"The AI of CylancePROTECT has room for improvement. I'm on a trial license of SentinelOne, and its AI is much better than what's on CylancePROTECT."

"The stability could be improved."

"The product needs to continue to offer better alerts, in particular around false positives, and it needs to reduce them from happening."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity cons

"User management is not that good currently, and so we have trouble with handling user management."

"Deployment of Seqrite Endpoint Security is generally straightforward. The only complexity we encounter is that, since it is cloud-based, there can be delays in updating the endpoint's status."

"The stability is zero, Seqrite doesn't work, and the company doesn't accept the problems."

"I don't feel that the scalability part of Seqrite Endpoint Security is better than the other products in the market."

"The solution could improve by providing better security and a cloud base version."

"The solution needs to improve stability."

"We would like the solution to have integration with other security solutions so that we can have a single base for monitoring all the security incidents and concerns."

"The interface is slow."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price was fine."

"This is an expensive solution."

"Compared to CrowdStrike, Cortex XDR is an expensive solution."

"Licensing for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR can be costly, especially when it comes to a hundred users. A license is required for each user, and the subscription must be renewed on a yearly basis."

"The cost depends on your chosen license type, like Pro or other licenses."

"Its pricing is kind of in line with its competitors and everybody else out there."

"Our license will require renewal in August, after which the maintenance will continue as usual."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is an expensive solution."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"Shop around for sure and be assured the price you pay will be close to other solutions available, but even at a slight mark-up from the other solutions, you are getting real endpoint protection versus nothing more than a cheap security blanket that might keep you warm at night."

"This cost of the license is approximately $5 USD monthly per user."

"The initial end-point cost may seem a little high (~$55/device/year) but when you look at the total peace of mind that the solution provides, with no reboots for updates, and negligible performance impact, it is well worth it."

"It is expensive, but not unreasonable."

"Review closely how many endpoints you actually need before buying into a pricing level. Deal and deal with the VAR of your choice."

"Our licensing cost for the solution is around $4,000 for six months. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The solution provides me with competitive pricing."

"The tool is not that expensive."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pricing and cost advice

"My company needs to purchase a yearly subscription for the licensing costs for Seqrite Endpoint Security."

"I give the cost of the solution a seven out of ten."

"Licensing fees are on a yearly basis. Compared to other solutions, this solution is cheaper."

"The license isn't expensive."

"The licensing fee is 200 Bangladeshi Taka per client per year."

"It is a cheaply priced product."

"The solution has reasonable pricing. There is one pricing without any hidden charges. They have to pay once a year or three years."

"The pricing is reasonable."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	50
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	57

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 16% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 8% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 8% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 7% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 5% of the time

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Competitors

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 11% of the time

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 10% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 9% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Seqrite Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

October 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

October 2026

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity product report

Buyer's Guide

Seqrite Endpoint Security

October 2026

Download Seqrite Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Blackberry Protect

Seqrite End Point Security, Seqrite EPS

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity leverages AI and machine learning for efficient malware detection and zero-day threat protection, offering robust endpoint security with high detection accuracy and low false positive rates.

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity delivers advanced threat protection with AI-driven algorithms and machine learning. Its lightweight design ensures low system resource usage, making it both efficient and effective. It's recognized for centralized management, easy deployment, and a clean interface, providing comprehensive endpoint protection against diverse threats. The integration of features like CylanceOPTICS and behavioral monitoring enhances security insights. While the system excels in malware detection, enhancements are needed in areas like user interface design, reporting, deeper threat analysis, and integration with third-party systems. Support and pricing improvements could also increase competitiveness.

What are the key features of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity?

AI and Machine Learning: Utilizes cutting-edge technology for malware and threat detection.
Zero-Day Protection: Safeguards against emerging threats without the need for constant updates.
Centralized Management: Simplifies deployment and management across devices.
CylanceOPTICS: Provides advanced security insights and behavioral monitoring.
Low Resource Usage: Ensures efficient operation with minimal system impact.

What benefits should users expect from BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity?

High Detection Accuracy: Reduces risk with minimal false positives.
Efficient Resource Management: Enhances performance with its lightweight design.
Proactive Threat Defense: Protects against a wide range of threats with centralized management.
Advanced Insights: Offers unique features for detailed security analysis.

Organizations deploy BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity for threat analytics, log management, and endpoint protection. As an antivirus replacement, it protects against zero-day malware, ransomware, and various threats. Its AI algorithms detect anomalies, minimizing risks in both internet-connected and isolated environments. Many businesses incorporate it into wider security strategies, appreciating its centralized management and proactive defense capabilities.

BlackBerry

Seqrite Endpoint Security provides comprehensive endpoint protection with features like inventory management, antivirus defense, and ransomware prevention. It ensures seamless device and application control, offering centralized management for hybrid environments across Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Seqrite Endpoint Security, known for its centralized management system, is designed to safeguard endpoints with advanced antivirus, malware detection, and ransomware prevention capabilities. It facilitates effective governance for hybrid work environments, providing robust inventory and asset management. While offering advanced device and application control across Windows, Mac, and Linux, Seqrite integrates XDR and EDR functionalities along with web protection and policy implementation.

What are the key features of Seqrite Endpoint Security?

Inventory and Asset Management: Track and manage hardware and software assets effectively.
Ransomware Backup: Provides backups to secure data against ransomware attacks.
Advanced EDR and XDR: Offers extended and endpoint detection and response.
File Monitoring: Monitors file activities to ensure data integrity.
External Device Control: Manages device usage and access.
Web Protection: Safeguards against online threats with secure browsing.
DLP Features: Monitors data access and usage to prevent data loss.

What benefits should be looked for?

Ease of Management: Streamlined management with a user-friendly interface.
Policy Implementation: Fast and effective application of security policies.
Cost-Effective Plans: Provides affordable options for varied businesses.
Centralized Management: Simplifies the management of multiple devices.

In industries like IT, healthcare, and finance, Seqrite Endpoint Security finds usage for securing endpoint devices and ensuring compliance with industry standards. Its centralized cloud-based management supports robust access control and governance, suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises in managing endpoint security challenges.

Seqrite

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit

Gadre, Bharat Vikas Group, Fernandez Hospital, Fabtech Projects & Engineering, KIMS Hospital, National Steel And Agro Industries, Sardar Patel University, Sterling Wilson, Chowgule Industries

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

September 2026

Free Report: BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.