No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security comparison

BlackBerry and Microsoft are both solutions in the Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) category. BlackBerry is ranked #18, while Microsoft is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0. BlackBerry holds a 2.4% mindshare in EMM, compared to Microsoft’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 78% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Sponsored
Microsoft Intune
Read 378 Microsoft Intune reviews
  • 36,644 Views
  • 17,589 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
BlackBerry Enterprise Mobil...
Read 24 BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite reviews
  • 1,761 Views
  • 1,444 Comparison Views
78% willing to recommend
Microsoft Enterprise Mobili...
Read 13 Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security reviews
  • 1,585 Views
  • 951 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite and Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security are both leading solutions in the enterprise mobility market. Microsoft is seen as the superior product due to its extensive features, which users feel justify the price.

Features: BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite is known for secure device and application management, robust communication services, and straightforward deployment. Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security offers comprehensive integration with other Microsoft services, advanced security measures, and scalability. Users find Microsoft's feature set more extensive and better integrated.

Room for Improvement: BlackBerry needs to improve its integration capabilities, simplify its configuration processes, and enhance feature variety. Microsoft users highlight the need for enhanced customer support, a more intuitive setup process, and reduction of complexity in deployment steps.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlackBerry is noted for a straightforward deployment process and dependable customer support. Microsoft faces criticism for occasional complexity in deployment but compensates with strong customer support once services are up and running. Microsoft's support quality helps navigate deployment challenges.

Pricing and ROI: BlackBerry is competitive in terms of initial setup costs and offers a good return on investment according to user reviews. Microsoft, despite higher upfront costs, delivers superior long-term value through comprehensive features and integration capabilities. Users believe the higher expense is justified by the enhanced performance and scalability.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs. Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security Report (Updated: June 2026).
Buyer's Guide
BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs. Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security
June 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune
Sponsored
Ranking in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
378
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (2nd), Remote Access (2nd), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (1st)
BlackBerry Enterprise Mobil...
Ranking in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)
18th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Enterprise Mobili...
Ranking in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)
16th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 22.7%, down from 33.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite is 2.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security is 1.8%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Intune22.7%
Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security1.8%
BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite2.4%
Other73.1%
Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)
 

Featured Reviews

OluwashileAdeniyi - PeerSpot reviewer
OluwashileAdeniyi
Senior Infrastructure Security Engineer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees
Centralized endpoint security has improved and supports hybrid work and BYOD policies
Regarding what I dislike about Microsoft Intune and its downsides, I would say that more Mac controls are needed because we have limited Mac and Linux control. When comparing controls and policies between Windows, Mac, and Linux, Windows has almost everything you can think of, while Mac and Linux have limited types of control. You cannot implement certain things on Mac and Linux that you can on Windows. The limited controls are a major issue. Additionally, if Microsoft could find a way to embed servers into Microsoft Intune, that would be beneficial. Microsoft Intune is not really designed for servers or Windows servers. It is more tailored towards Windows 11 and Windows 10 operating systems. Windows servers are not fully supported. Enterprise organizations usually have both servers and endpoints, which are users' workstations. For servers, most people look for other solutions such as SCCM, which is Configuration Manager. However, SCCM is what Microsoft Intune is trying to replace. Both SCCM and Microsoft Intune belong to Microsoft. Microsoft is trying to transition organizations into Microsoft Intune, the native cloud solution. However, because this update is still in process, servers are not fully compatible with Microsoft Intune and cannot be managed by it. The current policy that has emerged from issues with clients is what they call co-management, which is relatively new, and I do not know if adoption is significant. Many legacy or older customers who have been using these products for decades still have SCCM. When it is time for them to manage their Windows devices, they use what is called cloud attach. Cloud attach is a term whereby your SCCM is connected to your Microsoft Intune. Most people do not know about it, but I have deployed it for several organizations. Cloud attach and co-management work together so that your device is in SCCM, but some policies are pushed from Microsoft Intune. It is like two different solutions working hand in hand. That is what they call co-management. Microsoft Intune does not bring all of your endpoint and security management tools into one place, which is the goal and how it should be. However, as I mentioned, servers are not included. If we talk about end users, Microsoft Intune does bring all your devices together. In a typical enterprise environment, you have end users with workstations, laptops, company-issued phones, and bring your own devices. You can create policies for all of these. However, for the backend, your servers do not have much coverage. Servers are not really covered by Microsoft Intune in that way.
Read full review
reviewer1310304 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer1310304
IT Mobility Support Analyst at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Helpful technical support, and performs well, but initial setup could be simplified
They are constantly improving the scalability of BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite. More collaborative features are being developed. I know they have integrations with a lot of other vendors and applications, and it's constantly growing. Our company has approximately 3,000 users. I would say we have ten people for actual administrative roles with Blackberry.
Read full review
AD
Abhijit-Deshpande
Manager IT at Konverge.AI
User experience improves efficiency while awaiting improved application performance
The solution is meeting my requirements. I don't have any direct inputs here, except that stability of the application can be improved. Sometimes it gets hung or restarts multiple times in the background, which consumes battery life. If stability can be improved, it will generally help everyone. These solutions are usually a little expensive. If costs can come down, that will generally help the masses. A reduction of around 30-35% would make it more prompting for people to take that extra jump. Due to budget constraints, I have seen people not going for Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security because even if the commercials get discounted for the first year, subsequent years see significant price increases.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Fortunately, now everything is streamlined into a single, unified platform."
"It works pretty well for us."
"A valuable feature is user enrollment, where users can enroll their devices in their organizations themselves."
"I like the tool's integration with Apple. Anyone who creates an ID in Intune will get an Apple ID."
"Microsoft Intune is a cost-saving solution, reducing IT department workload and allowing for faster device provisioning compared to traditional methods."
"Microsoft Intune solutions, especially Microsoft Intune and Microsoft 365, have positively impacted my organization by improving endpoint security, enabling centralized device management, supporting remote work efficiently, reducing manual administrative effort through automation, and enhancing compliance and collaboration across the enterprise environment."
"One of our clients migrated the model workplace based on Intune, achieving a 78 percent cost reduction, which is quite a lot."
"The initial setup is not overly complex or difficult."
More Microsoft Intune pros
"The functionality with UEM and BlackBerry Works, the shared calendar, is a massive improvement for us."
"It was a big improvement to activate applications with one authentication. That was a big plus for the user experience."
"Cylance, their newest antivirus product, is the most valuable feature for us so far."
"The containerization of the BlackBerry Dynamics is the most important thing for us. It allows us to keep personal and corporate data separate on a personal device. It allows us to wipe the corporate data while leaving all the personal data in place."
"It gives us the ability to have a container and the most secure possible application."
"If a device is stolen, you have the power to remove all of the contents remotely. You can do this very quickly."
"If you create such a setup, a secure setup, you will have a really fine solution."
"Every version upgrade has been straightforward."
More BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite pros
"The most valuable feature is it's a collaboration tool that we can dump all things in at the same time, and we don't have to go to different locations to search for documents that we want to share among 40 people."
"The product is a unified solution and you don't require to purchase tools from different vendors. The system analyzes behavior and activity and takes steps for protection."
"Integration between our departments has been the most valuable."
"The solution is scalable."
"Basically, the solution ensures that computers are safe and secure."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The solution is very good at securing files. For example, if I forward a secure document, it's blocked from others, as I can send it with restrictions in relation to who can open it."
"Microsoft Mobility and EMS include Intune for Mobility, which provides mobile device management and mobile application management. With mobile device management, you can control the entire device in an organization."
More Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security pros
 

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the remediation and detection modules, which are currently about eighty percent fully functional."
"We have spoken to the technical support on a few occasions. They have only ever provided us with minimal information."
"One big problem with Microsoft is that they're changing the names of the products quite often, or they're quite consistently doing so. Intune is now Endpoint administration. Constantly switching the user interface or the administrative interface makes it quite hard to keep pace. If you are on a two-week holiday and you come back and look at the same screen you have looked at for the last couple of months, it looks different, which is annoying. Changing things around all the time doesn't make it easy."
"Almost every day during the initial deployment, I would chat with technical support for solutions. They did not give me a suitable solution to solve the false positive alarms."
"I find the solution quite old school with not many features."
"Reporting in Microsoft Intune presents challenges because the built-in reports are often too basic."
"Improvements are needed in Microsoft Intune's enterprise app management, including support for more applications in app patching, boot batching, and discovery. I also hope the cost of Remote Help will decrease because it's a much-needed Intune function. Our customers need that capability, or they will buy it from a third party at a premium."
"Intune has no remote control function for mobile phones to solve issues remotely for users."
More Microsoft Intune cons
"More devices supported like iOS, Android, and API so it can support various platforms to enhance the experience."
"It didn’t help us because we ran into lot of issues, and BlackBerry support couldn’t figure out the issues in a timely fashion."
"I would like more support for Google Chromebook operating system, so I could manage it."
"They could improve their QA. There are many times where something will be released, a new client will be released, and something gets broken. Or they do a release and they don't take into consideration how some people may be using parts of it. Even though it's supported, they release something and it breaks it because they weren't aware of it. The biggest thing for me right now is, I would like to see improvement in their QA. I'm tired of getting broken software."
"The interface could be improved."
"The entry level support needs improvement, but a lot of it has to do with the fact that we do not have premium support. Therefore, we have to go through Level 1 support for any issues."
"From the past to the present, before mobility location, we frequently required a restart."
"The only thing is that the UEM service is a little slow. We have a product production environment, and a test environment and both of them are a little slow. When you are using the UEM Web interface, it takes time to load."
More BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite cons
"Sometimes the application gets hung or restarts multiple times in the background, consuming battery life."
"The licensing is quite expensive."
"The MDM part of the engine could be better."
"The licensing can be messy at times."
"The auditing and reporting could be updated and upgraded."
"Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security is expensive."
"There are certain shortcomings in the licensing model of the product where improvements are required."
"They should improve dedicated solutions because they offer everything, but you always end up missing something."
More Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Intune's pricing is reasonable considering its benefits and the high costs it helps avoid."
"There is a license required to use this solution. However, it was part of a bundle package. Microsoft Intune is far less expensive than other solutions, such as Workspace ONE."
"Microsoft Intune is expensive."
"It is not expensive."
"No one can compete with Microsoft when it comes to price, and the features it is offering."
"Consider the Microsoft Enterprise Mobility Suite rather than choosing specific sub-components, e.g. only Microsoft Intune."
"Microsoft Intune has a user-based subscription model. You can go for a monthly or a yearly payment."
"We work with the subscription rather than a server license. I think it's economical this way because we don't have to have a server license for that, and I think that works in our favor."
More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice
"We are paying $200 annually. You also need to have a hardware server or a license for the server so there could be some additional fees added on to that."
"In my opinion, we're paying an awful lot for what we get, compared to other vendors. I don't deal with the pricing, but it does seem to be a bit pricey for the things that we get, especially, when you compare them to other vendors, such as VMware, Citrix, who have all bought up other players in this space. VMware offers AirWatch free as part of their packages."
"We pay about $6 a year for the solution. There are no extra costs on top of that. You save a lot of money when you use this product."
"Sometimes, it is very hard to get an overview because there are so many different suites to find out what is the right thing for new customers."
"We currently pay by the year, but the licenses are calculated on a monthly basis."
"With the new licensing model, there seems to be a significant increase in cost, which makes it difficult to push forward and talk with the business."
"For the number of licenses, I believe it was approximately $500,000 per year, or for three years."
"The licensing costs are paid on a yearly basis because we just renewed the license. If you have some big issue, they will also charge you."
More BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite pricing and cost advice
"The solution is cost-effective."
"The increase in the prices of the product might not be the actual problem, but things become complex with some new plans that were introduced by Microsoft recently."
"We have to pay 10 dollars per user. I would rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."
"I would rate pricing at eight out of ten. It is a bit higher because of the security features that Microsoft provides."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Construction Company
14%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Pharma/Biotech Company
14%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business191
Midsize Enterprise63
Large Enterprise185
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise19
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?
Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...
See all answers
What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?
Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...
See all answers
How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?
Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security?
The technical support from Microsoft could be better. Because there are many changes in Microsoft, and most support c...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security?
I have been selling Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security for more than 10 years.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security?
Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security is a basic part of all of our projects because it's a very important basis f...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune Logo
Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune
Compared 10% of the time
IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune Logo
IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune
Compared 10% of the time
Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune Logo
Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune
Compared 6% of the time
Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune
Compared 4% of the time
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune Logo
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune
Compared 4% of the time
More Microsoft Intune Competitors
Workspace ONE UEM vs BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite Logo
Workspace ONE UEM vs BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite
Compared 16% of the time
Jamf Pro vs BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite Logo
Jamf Pro vs BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite
Compared 11% of the time
SOTI MobiControl vs BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite Logo
SOTI MobiControl vs BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite
Compared 10% of the time
IBM MaaS360 vs BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite Logo
IBM MaaS360 vs BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite
Compared 9% of the time
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) vs BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite Logo
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) vs BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite
Compared 3% of the time
More BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite Competitors
Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security Logo
Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security
Compared 17% of the time
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security Logo
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security
Compared 12% of the time
Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security Logo
Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security
Compared 12% of the time
SOTI MobiControl vs Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security Logo
SOTI MobiControl vs Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security
Compared 9% of the time
Samsung Knox vs Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security Logo
Samsung Knox vs Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security
Compared 4% of the time
More Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Intune
June 2026
Microsoft Intune reportDownload Microsoft Intune product report
Buyer's Guide
BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite
June 2026
BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite reportDownload BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security
June 2026
Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security reportDownload Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security product report
 

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager
Good for Enterprise, Good Mobile Messaging, Ubitexx Ubi-Suite
Enterprise Mobility + Security E3, Enterprise Mobility + Security E5, MS Enterprise Mobility + Security
 

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?
  • Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
  • Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
  • Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
  • Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
  • Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.
What benefits and ROI can users expect?
  • Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
  • Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
  • Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
  • Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite is a comprehensive platform offering secure and flexible mobile device management, catering to high-security requirements for a seamless integration between personal and corporate data.

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite delivers a secure environment for mobile device management, providing reliable email access, internet, and personal information management. Its containerization feature helps separate personal and corporate data while facilitating device management flexibility. With a user-friendly interface, Cylance integration, and centralized control, it combats stability issues and strives for better integration with Microsoft tools alongside support for Chromebooks and Apple devices.

What are the key features of BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite?
  • Security and Data Separation: Enhances protection and confidentiality by using containerization.
  • Secure Email Access: Ensures reliable access to emails within a protected environment.
  • Cylance Integration: Eliminates VPN management burdens with advanced antivirus capabilities.
  • Device Management Flexibility: Allows centralized control over a range of mobile devices.
What benefits should users consider when evaluating BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite?
  • Enhanced Security: Offers robust protection for mobile devices and data.
  • Reliability: Consistent access to essential communication tools like email and internet.
  • Productivity: Facilitates the use of collaboration and productivity applications securely.
  • Data Control: Maintains strict separation and privacy between personal and corporate data.

In finance and other sectors, BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite supports organizations in managing secure email, collaboration, and mobile devices, addressing high-security needs in both corporate-owned and BYOD scenarios. Enhancements in the QA process and smoother device onboarding further its appeal as a trusted choice.

BlackBerry

Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security empowers organizations by offering seamless integration and robust data protection, supporting centralized identity management and collaboration.

Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security integrates tools like Windows Defender and Advanced Threat Protection for high security, supporting multi-factor authentication and centralized identity management. Its scalability and unification of Microsoft products boost operational efficiency. Offering mobile application management, it ensures protection and user compliance satisfaction. Challenges include complex licensing and the need for better network-level protection and technical support. Users experience memory consumption issues and stability concerns. Improved remote features and user-friendly license management are necessary.

What are the key features of Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security?
  • Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with Microsoft products, enhancing efficiency.
  • Robust Data Protection: Utilizes Windows Defender and Advanced Threat Protection for security.
  • Multi-factor Authentication: Ensures secure access to systems.
  • Centralized Identity Management: Simplifies user management across platforms.
  • Mobile Application Management: Protects mobile apps while ensuring compliance.
What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security?
  • Operational Efficiency: Enhanced via integration with Microsoft tools.
  • Data Security: Strong protective measures secure sensitive information.
  • User Compliance: Ensures satisfaction with safeguard measures.
  • Scalability: Grows with business needs, handling an increasing number of devices and data.

Organizations in sectors like finance and healthcare implement Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security for mobile device management, file protection, and endpoint security. By integrating services such as Intune and Azure, they manage devices and communications securely, ensuring compliance with regulations. EMS is essential in managing mail, Office apps, and facilitating effective collaboration.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway
Ashcourt Rowan, EMC Professional Services, Itochu, MBDA, North Hennepin Community College, PGGM, Rohde & Schwarz, US Navy
Mars, Whole Foods, Land O'Lakes, Dow
Buyer's Guide
BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs. Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security
June 2026
Free Report: BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs. Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security
Find out what your peers are saying about BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs. Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs. Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security report.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.