Blueriq vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint comparison

Blueriq and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Blueriq is ranked #34, while OpenText is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.3. Blueriq holds a 1.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Blueriq users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Blueriq

Read 2 Blueriq reviews

933 Views
933 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Read 17 OpenText 360 for SharePoint reviews

1,065 Views
1,012 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Blueriq

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 11, 2026

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and Blueriq compete in content management and digital transformation solutions, with OpenText having an edge due to superior integration with SharePoint and comprehensive feature set.

Features: OpenText 360 for SharePoint includes seamless SharePoint integration, advanced document management, and strong security measures, focusing on enhancing SharePoint functionality. Blueriq offers dynamic case management, model-driven development, and rapid application deployment, prioritizing flexibility and customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 for SharePoint benefits from strong support with comprehensive onboarding and integration within Microsoft ecosystems. Blueriq provides flexible deployment options with standout customer support and personalized guidance for digital transformation projects, offering flexibility outside Microsoft-reliant environments.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 for SharePoint's higher initial setup cost comes with considerable ROI through enhanced productivity in SharePoint settings. Blueriq delivers a flexible pricing model with rapid ROI through swift implementation and adaptability, appealing to those preferring tailored solutions over packaged functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Blueriq

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

34th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

24th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Blueriq is 1.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText 360 for SharePoint	1.0%
Blueriq	1.2%
Other	97.8%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

ChrisBiemans

Business Consultant at Ziggo Services B.V.

Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities

We use Everest Blueriq for a food safety organization, that revolves around automating and managing complex processes critical to ensuring food safety and compliance. It involves monitoring containers for pests and diseases before allowing entry into the EU. The platform plays a vital role in…

Read full review

Sasikumar Balachandran

Senior BI Lead at Cognizant

Enhancing user experience and data management with effective central repository capabilities

The area of improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint is that sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in the services, because everything is located in SharePoint, there is a chance that reports start failing or dashboards fail, or the system behaves differently. In future updates, I would want to see widgets available in OpenText 360 for SharePoint to interact with third-party tools. For example, when creating a dashboard, having the ability to embed these directly into SharePoint would be beneficial. Currently, I have to use hyperlinks to access other tools such as Tableau or ClickView. If it were possible to merge everything and bring all information from multiple teams (Cognos, ClickView, AWS) into SharePoint as a centralized place, it would be really helpful. That is what I envision for the integrator part.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."

"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."

"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."

"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."

"We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years."

"OpenText 360 for SharePoint significantly saves time for users by streamlining the tasks of handling, searching, and maintaining documents compared to traditional file servers."

"Overall, I would rate OpenText 360 for SharePoint as ten."

"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."

"The benefits that OpenText 360 for SharePoint has brought to my company include improved turnaround time."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint pros

Cons

"The platform's initial setup process could be better."

"The graphical user interface had to be more user-friendly. It's not as intuitive."

"The GUI should be improved for better user experience. Additionally, while there are standard connectors for automation and approvals in Power Platform, some tasks still need to be handled with API request calls instead of direct connectors, which could be improved."

"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."

"In the future, I would like to see new features in SharePoint for improved project tracking processes."

"The user interface could definitely be improved."

"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved."

"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."

"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It has a reasonable price."

"The solution has a very complex pricing model."

"SharePoint uses a subscription model."

"On-premises version is expensive"

"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Performing Arts

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

Regarding the licensing setup cost and price overall, the licensing costs are reasonable. As an enterprise organization, we have enterprise service level agreements with customers and Microsoft par...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

For SharePoint, the user-friendliness needs to be improved. It is not as simple to use as GitHub, which has a very straightforward interface. I would prefer it to become more minimalistic like GitH...

See all answers

Comparisons

Pega Platform vs Blueriq

Compared 10% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Blueriq

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs Blueriq

Compared 6% of the time

Studio Creatio vs Blueriq

Compared 5% of the time

ARIS BPA vs Blueriq

Compared 5% of the time

More Blueriq Competitors

CMW Tracker vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 8% of the time

Camunda vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 7% of the time

Bizagi vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 7% of the time

Agiloft Workflow and BPM vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

IBM BPM vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

February 2026

Download Blueriq product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

March 2026

Download OpenText 360 for SharePoint product report

Also Known As

Blueriq, Aquima

Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360

Overview

Blueriq offers a sophisticated platform designed for creating adaptive applications with a focus on improving business processes across sectors. It empowers developers to generate solutions that align closely with business needs.

Blueriq stands out by enabling stakeholders to collaboratively innovate through model-driven development. Its platform supports rapid iteration and deployment of applications, allowing for seamless adaptation to changing business workflows. This dynamic tool enhances engagement and operational efficiency, catering specifically to sectors looking for robust process automation and optimization capabilities.

What are Blueriq's most crucial features?

Model-driven development: Enables collaborative application creation using a visual approach.
Rule Engine: Offers efficiency with powerful business logic integration.
Case Management: Enhances workflow automation focused on case-based methods.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with existing technologies to enhance functionality.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines operations, reducing time and resource expenditures.
Flexibility: Easily adapts to process changes for optimal alignment with business advancements.
Scalability: Grows with business needs, ensuring long-term viability.
Cost-Effectiveness: Decreases dependency on custom development, lowering expenses.

Blueriq is implemented across industries such as finance and healthcare, where it drives digitization of processes and enhances case management efficiency. These sectors benefit from its capability to swiftly adapt applications to meet industry-specific regulations and demands, ensuring compliance and competitive advantage.

Blueriq

With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Abn Amro, Aegon, duo, City of Tilburg

iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Automation Anywhere, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.