No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

BMC AMI Ops vs Tidal by Redwood comparison

Why PeerSpot?
Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

JAMS Scheduler
Sponsored
Ranking in Workload Automation
2nd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
56
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
BMC AMI Ops
Ranking in Workload Automation
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.7
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Mainframe Management (1st)
Tidal by Redwood
Ranking in Workload Automation
18th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of JAMS Scheduler is 3.6%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BMC AMI Ops is 2.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tidal by Redwood is 3.4%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Workload Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
JAMS Scheduler3.6%
BMC AMI Ops2.4%
Tidal by Redwood3.4%
Other90.6%
Workload Automation
 

Featured Reviews

SP
Developer at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees
Centralized scheduling has improved automation and reduces manual monitoring for complex workflows
The best features JAMS Scheduler offers are centralized job scheduling, dependency management, and monitoring. I also appreciate the alerts and retry options because they help us handle failures without constantly checking jobs manually. Centralized scheduling makes it easier to manage all our jobs from one place instead of maintaining multiple schedulers or scripts. Dependency management is especially useful for chaining workflows because JAMS Scheduler can automatically trigger the next job only when the required previous step completes successfully. Another useful feature is the monitoring and alerting. If a scheduled job fails or runs longer than expected, we can quickly identify it and take action, which is particularly helpful for production support and reducing manual monitoring. JAMS Scheduler has helped quite a bit with identifying common job failures, missed schedules, dependency issues, and execution errors. The alerts and job history make it easier to identify the failure point and take corrective action without manually checking every workflow. JAMS Scheduler's code-driven automation has been useful for handling more complex scheduling logic and workflows that go beyond simple time-based triggers. It is important for us because we can combine scripts, dependencies, conditions, and parameters to support different production scenarios without creating too much manual intervention.
FA
Senior Cloud & Infra Engineer at TTX
Automation has streamlined cloud file workflows and now reduces monitoring effort with smart alerts
It is really hard to say if there are any improvement areas or not, but every software has improvement areas that should be found out. As of now, I do not have anything in mind, so it would be difficult to specify. I do not have any small improvements or wishes for future updates at this time. There are a couple of features in BMC AMI Ops, and it has plenty of features, but it is really difficult to understand as a new BMC AMI Ops user. We should go through a couple of training sessions to understand the various features available in the define mode, monitoring mode, agent mode, and all of these aspects. It is a bit difficult to track everything, but there are always certain improvement areas in software.
Steve Mikula - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Scheduling Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Very reliable processing engine, and scheduling is flawless—crucial elements in our financial transaction processing
Because we've been on it for 20 years, it's pretty easy for us to automate jobs with Tidal at this point. It has become second nature. It's pretty simplistic to set up and get going, although there are different levels of complexity you can have within the product. It depends on how simple you want to keep it. If you just keep it: Job A, Job B, Job C, Job D, that becomes pretty simple. But when you start integrating some complex calendars that use sub-calendars—and you can go three, four, or five deep to set up schedules—it becomes more complicated. The beauty of it is you can go as deep as you need to. We can get really complex or we can keep it simple. We have some use cases for both scenarios. The thing that I like the most is the reliability of the engine. The actual scheduling part of the product is pretty much flawless, but the stability of the product is what I find to be reassuring. We are a financial company, we move billions of dollars a day, and if we don't have our transactions processed in a timely manner we can be penalized and our clients can be penalized. It can have a serious financial impact.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"JAMS saves us on the order of thousands of hours per year."
"The fact that we no longer need to use Excel spreadsheets is huge."
"The most valuable feature of JAMS is its user-friendly interface, especially after upgrading from version six to seven."
"By using JAMS, we have gained a lot more efficiencies in terms of all of those to streamline it, and there is no necessary need for having an overnight engineer just keeping an eye on all of this."
"We have over 50 jobs running daily to manage all the integration of our systems and we don’t have to monitor these jobs; they just run, JAMS centralizes the management of jobs in our environment, has streamlined our monitoring, saves us about four hours a week in troubleshooting time, and has helped free up about eight hours a week of IT staff time."
"By using JAMS, my company has seen benefits such as getting to know about Google products and the latest features that are newly launched by Google, and they help me in building my projects portfolio and engaging with knowledge."
"I find the historical tracking feature of JAMS invaluable for reviewing past events."
"JAMS Scheduler has positively impacted our organization by allowing us to avoid building custom tools and use something that is more enterprise-ready."
"MainView has enabled me, in the past, to solve production problems faster, or even avoid them preemptively with warnings."
"BMC AMI Ops has impacted my organization very positively, primarily in terms of timing, with positive outcomes including reduced downtime and improved efficiency of our manpower."
"BMC AMI Ops positively impacted my organization during the evaluation phase, with the main benefit being improved visibility into the mainframe environment by providing a clear view of alerts and system status."
"BMC AMI Ops has positively impacted my organization because previously, for the resolution of any case, it was taking a lot of time, and by using it, we can identify issues more quickly."
"BMC AMI Ops has positively impacted my organization in multiple ways, especially in automation, as we do not have to manually run or search for or run scripts."
"Batch smoothing our 4HRA and implementation of group capacity profiles has allowed us to run sub-capacity and lower our MLC."
"BMC AMI Ops provides real-time monitoring, including alert and event management, allowing for quick investigation of system conditions, and this real-time capability is incredibly useful as it helps ensure our production is up and running while quickly identifying resource consumption issues."
"Overall, it has helped make our operations more stable and reduced the time spent on identifying the initial cause of some issues."
"Tidal Automation by Redwood is a user-friendly solution."
"Tidal Automation’s most valuable feature is customization. It can work and connect with any app."
"What had been manual controls have become automated controls, by using this tool to replace a number of schedulers."
"We use the solution for cross-platform, cross-application workloads. The solution’s ability to manage and monitor these workloads is very easy and accurate. We have file dependencies for running jobs. The job does not start until a file exists on a completely different server, then where the job will run. So, it is cross systems."
"The core of the product is great and I would certainly recommend it."
"For us, the calendaring system is very robust. Some of the teams have very specific requests for when they need jobs to run. That's been really valuable, because a lot of times, when people run scripts, if they run on a holiday, they're going to fail... A couple of times a month it probably saves us work and the necessity of logging in from home and checking to make sure everything's okay."
"You will enjoy the features of it; it is a great tool."
"We use the solution for cross-platform and cross-application workloads. That's one of the core reasons we chose it. It's one of a few things in the industry that can be used for cross-platform integration."
 

Cons

"The client is horrible. Every time JAMS puts out a survey on what they can improve, I always say, "The client: When you are setting up jobs, it is quite horrible." The response has been, "Well, we are just using the Windows foundation," and I am like, "Why isn't it only your product?" We can get around it now that we know its quirks, but it is not the most user-friendly of tools out there. The UI is completely unintuitive. We had to go and open up a support ticket with JAMS just to get something back. It is not user-friendly at all."
"The main dislike about JAMS Scheduler is that nowadays in this AI world, the UI they provide is not user-friendly."
"They recently switched to subscription-based pricing, which increased."
"The documentation is not super... It's not as quick and slick as I'd like it to be."
"The monitoring of the JAMS product and its performance is an area of concern for me."
"With no programming experience, I find JAMS code-driven automation challenging due to the required PowerShell scripting."
"I would enhance the compatibility feature of JAMS because sometimes when the server is under high load, it does not inform us and we cannot get answers."
"I would like to see the ability to interface with Microsoft group-managed service accounts, but they're still in the research phase. They need to ensure everything's legit and safe. The report designer and dashboards could also be improved. We're running 7.3, so I don't know if they have updated the reporting in 7.5, but I think the reports and dashboards could be better."
"While BMC AMI Ops handles workloads effectively, it struggles under very high workloads, occasionally providing inaccurate information, suggesting that this is an area for improvement."
"I gave it a 7.5 because I think it still needs improvement, and we can reduce more downtime for these things."
"Regarding needed improvements, by default, when we open a viewpoint, we don't see the jobs in a linear way."
"An expansion for distributed systems would be great, but probably not workable."
"I give it a nine because the tool is very complete and very good, but I think it could be a bit more explanatory when I need to create new views and screens; there is some documentation missing."
"My experience with BMC AMI Ops was limited, but during this evaluation, I believe it could be improved by making some features easier for new users to understand, probably with better guidance or more practical examples."
"BMC AMI Ops can be improved by offering a more modern user interface and better dashboard customization."
"I would like to see more AI in BMC AMI Ops, such as an AI feature that lets you keep track of storage in some way, perhaps some kind of automatic disk cleanup."
"For the most part, the drill-down and the logging are really good. But if we take an Informatica job, for example: We have the ability, and the operators have the ability, to actually drill down and see, at a session level, where the failure is. There is, unfortunately, no way to extract that into an actual output email or failure email. It's not that that information is not available, but extracting it into an email would be a nice-to-have."
"The biggest improvement they need to work on is doing better QA checks before they release new patches and service packs. We do find that you can't trust getting the new product right away, as they have to get some bug fixes out. They do tend to have some bugs in the first iteration."
"Setting up the initial product was a little hard."
"When we patch to the next version, there is often a little thing that breaks. It has rarely been a big deal, but I always seem to have to follow up on one tiny issue. It would help if they had some better QA testing of their patches."
"I know they are working on it, but there needs to be better reporting. Currently, there are only three or four reports that we can get off of the system. That needs to be improved. They already have a solution to this in the new version. I.e., a schedule of all the jobs running for one day, specifically calling out what dependencies that job relies on. It would be like a flow chart of how the day's jobs would run."
"The drill-down into details using the Graphical Views feature is a bit difficult and not that helpful. If you want to go into the details, you have to go to the Job Activity. Graphical Views is not that easy for getting that kind of information."
"From an administrative point of view, I wouldn't give really high marks to the solution."
"The current user interface of Tidal Software is functional. However, it can be improved to make it more intuitive and user-friendly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I haven't been involved in the financial side for several years, but we buy one host and unlimited agents, and we get a reasonable price for that. We're happy with the amount we pay and the scalability it provides."
"Definitely check how many single processes you want to run and count them as jobs. That is how you would work out your pricing on JAMS. For example, if you're running a number of commands and you can put them all into one script and run that script, you can count that as one job."
"For what it does, the product is priced very well."
"JAMS is priced competitively compared to similar solutions and offers flexible licensing options to cater to user needs."
"Our licensing is pretty cheap because we have a state solution. So, we pay only $1,000 a year."
"JAMS is close to the lower end of the pricing models for enterprise scheduling solutions. They are much cheaper than Control-M, as well as some other products that I've used. I also don't know of another solution where you can actually get true, unlimited licensing, where you can have as many instances and as many agents as you want."
"It's certainly a lot cheaper than Tivoli and Control-M. In comparison to them, you get a lot more bang for your buck. You get pretty much the whole functionality and more, in some cases, when compared to Control-M, but at a fraction of the price."
"In the end, you'll find that it's really worth the price. There is some sticker shock, but it's worth every dime."
"If you already use other products from BMC, you might be able to get a package deal from BMC's sales department."
"This solution is a bit expensive in the current world where everybody is trying to cut down on certain things."
"We are satisfied with the pricing of Tidal. It's in the moderate range and it feels very achievable for us."
"...it is a pretty affordable scheduler tool that lets us do a lot. You get a lot of bang for the buck... The licensing model is hugely flexible."
"The solution’s licensing model in terms of its flexibility and transparency regarding costs is pretty good. A person can buy the license, and if you decide to stop support, you can do that but still have the product. So, it's not like you're paying constantly to keep that license alive. Certainly, you want to keep support going too. Once you buy it, you own it. It's not like I have to keep paying somebody to keep using it."
"The solution has no hidden costs. It helps me to plan forward into the future. I know that I can add another 100 or a thousand jobs, and that's how much it will cost me today."
"There have been pricing increases, but with the reduction that our company obtained from Tidal this year, the pricing has become very acceptable for this type of product."
"We think the pricing is very fair. We have been happy with the pricing compared to some of the other solutions in the space."
"The new prices that we've received seem reasonable and comparable to the marketplace."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Construction Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Construction Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Construction Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise18
Large Enterprise30
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise13
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise38
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JAMS?
My experience with pricing for JAMS Scheduler was good. The pricing was reasonable, and the vendor only charged us fo...
What needs improvement with JAMS?
JAMS Scheduler can be improved by sectioning off credentials and also the web functionality and setting that up.
What is your primary use case for JAMS?
My main use case for JAMS Scheduler is to trigger integrations as well as send out alerts and reports. For sending al...
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
I have worked from 1973 with all kind of systems in large enterprises across the world. And have experience with all ...
What needs improvement with BMC AMI Ops?
Regarding BMC AMI Ops, I appreciate the way it is today; since I am a mainframe professional, I appreciate its style ...
What is your primary use case for BMC AMI Ops?
My main use case for BMC AMI Ops is for monitoring and small adjustments in the mainframe environment, where I use th...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
BMC MainView, BMC Automated Mainframe Intelligence, Ops Monitoring, Ops Automation for Batch ThruPut
Tidal Workload Automation, Cisco Workload Automation, Tidal Enterprise Scheduler
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Teradata, Arconic, General Dynamics, Yum!, CVS Health, Comcast, Ghiradelli, & Boston’s Children’s Hospital
Dillard's
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC AMI Ops vs. Tidal by Redwood and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.