BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs Camunda comparison

BMC TrueSight Orchestration

Read 77 Camunda reviews

13,721 Views
4,598 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

BMC TrueSight Orchestration and Camunda are two automation solutions competing in the field of IT and business process automation. Camunda appears to have the upper hand due to its cost-effectiveness and flexible workflow management capabilities, making it a more compelling choice for organizations looking for a balanced solution.

Features: BMC TrueSight Orchestration provides extensive cloud integration, advanced automation features, and a user-friendly interface that allows seamless integration with multiple environments. Camunda offers flexible workflow management with robust BPMN tools, an open-source model, and the ability to easily integrate with different systems using its REST API, making it highly adaptable for various business processes.

Room for Improvement: BMC TrueSight Orchestration could enhance its user interface for better accessibility and offer more comprehensive support for legacy systems. Additionally, expanding its open API capabilities could improve integration with diverse solutions. Camunda may need to improve support for non-technical users through a more intuitive interface and simplify data modeling to make it accessible to a wider range of users. Enhancing customer support for the free version could also drive wider adoption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC TrueSight Orchestration is known for straightforward deployment, especially in cloud environments, and offers responsive support. Camunda provides efficient deployment tailored for business users, with comprehensive documentation and active customer assistance. Both products are flexible in various infrastructures, with TrueSight Orchestration being more cloud-focused while Camunda allows for broader customizability.

Pricing and ROI: BMC TrueSight Orchestration has higher initial setup costs but offers high ROI through extensive functionalities. Camunda’s pricing is more accessible with a favorable ROI, leveraging its strong process automation tools, making it an attractive choice for businesses seeking a cost-effective solution.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs. Camunda Report (Updated: June 2025).

BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs. Camunda

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC TrueSight Orchestration

Ranking in Process Automation

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Camunda

Ranking in Process Automation

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (2nd), Business Process Management (BPM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of BMC TrueSight Orchestration is 0.7%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Camunda is 26.2%, down from 27.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

HarshalDeore

Solutions Architect at Parseq

Ready to use, with no need for customization

We currently operate in a banking domain. It helps to take daily backups of database. The BMC TrueSight helps in following the Reserve Bank guidelines and scheduling the back up as necessary. The solution creates a back-up and re-evaluates all the necessary information, alarming us in case there is a set of missing information. In case the backup fails, it also has an error handling mechanism is present, sending real-time messages and alerts in the form of emails to responsible teams. We have minimized the L1 and L2 activities, currently allowing us to only deal with L3 activities. If there are any errors in terms of backup, the incident is directly raised to Level 3. This automation has helped us save about 5 million pounds. It is also capable of no-manual intervention, where onboarding can be done without any manual assistance. The GUI offered by this solution is currently not available in the market. Whenever the details of customers are entered in the GUI, the process is carried out smoothly in the background without any issues.

Read full review

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling

There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We particularly like the integration functionality of this solution. This product is open API, which means that it can be integrated with any solution from any other brand."

"This solution is scalable."

"The automation helps in payment transactions through BHIM app. The BMC helps in smooth clearance of all payments without using MasterCard or Visa. The solution is ready to use, and there is no need for customization or resources. We can complete integration over cloud and on-premise, and even using mainframes. The automation are secure through BMC TrueSight Orchestration."

"The product has a very good triggering mechanism."

"The best feature of BMC TrueSight Orchestration is the number of integrated mechanisms it provides."

"The best thing about TrueSight is the user interface, which is intuitive and easy to use. It supports accessibility and exporting, so we can output to the format we require. We can use TrueSight to integrate nearly any other product. I can't think of another product that can match this functionality. We also have Microsoft Orchestrator, but it can't match BMC TrueSight Orchestration."

"The initial setup is easy. The deployment was done in an hour."

"We can implement compliance standards with the solution. You can also do patching so that the environment is compliant and secure from external threats and hacking. We can provision multiple systems with the help of predefined templates that the organization has forwarded us. The solution’s users can also integrate multiple products which can be either BMC or non-BMC. There are numerous possibilities that can be done with server automation"

More BMC TrueSight Orchestration pros

"Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment."

"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."

"It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."

"The solution is good for data models."

"The biggest difference between Camunda and Bonita might be that Camunda is simpler and more flexible for setting, though we are at the beginning and need to experiment."

"The most valuable feature is the scheduling."

"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill."

"The graphical interface is very beneficial."

More Camunda pros

Cons

"At present this solution is only available to be hosted on-premises, which can cause network issues when integration with cloud-based software is attempted."

"The solution should move to the cloud. Every application from the BMC is on the container and moving to the cloud. There is also a number of limitations for the smart reporting feature of the TrueSight server which is not working in sync. We did not get any satisfactory reply from BMC on that note. We are not able to do the real-time sync between HSA and non-HSA service reporting tools and the actual application tools."

"BMC TrueSight Orchestration is difficult to understand. It's not very user-friendly."

"Regarding scalability, the architecture does not allow you to add additional servers just able to use two application servers, so it's not scalable."

"It would be helpful if TrueSight could log errors in a better format. I would also like to see more connector support. Let's say I have a third-party vendor that I need to integrate with Ansible. It would be helpful if BMC announced a specific connector for that. I've encountered situations where I need to work with scripts or find another way to integrate a particular product with TrueSight Orchestration. BMC already supports many products. For example, we have a connector for Ansible, but I think it needs to be improved some."

"BMC TrueSight Orchestration could improve by providing some visibility on how the workflows are progressing."

"The architecture of this solution needs improvement, it is very complicated. It creates a lot of problems in our environment. Most of the time I am trying to find and solve the problem."

"The solution is not user-friendly."

More BMC TrueSight Orchestration cons

"In the latest version, there are certain workflow nodes that are missing. Camunda should bring those back, or rather, develop them quickly."

"Community support is basically what I'm looking for. Other than that, it is okay for now."

"The solution's pricing and scalability could be improved."

"The product's initial setup phase is difficult for beginners."

"The deployment model could be improved for easier implementation. More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup."

"There should be a multi-tenant solution for the platform where it supports multiple organizations on one platform instead of having to spin up multiple clusters for each organization. There should be an easy way to integrate different departments into one platform without having to operate multiple platforms. The operations should be easier with the enterprise solution. It should not create more overhead for the operations people."

"Camunda Platform's customer support could be improved because their response is quite slow."

"The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw."

More Camunda cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a huge cost saving with BMC TrueSight compared to other solutions."

"Licensing is available in different ways and depends on data being consumed by users and nodes being operated."

"Regarding pricing, it comes with the package when you buy the server automation. But it's made depending on some agreements for companies, of which I don't know the clause."

"Licensing is per lot, or per agent — one agent is one license."

"We are using the open-source version, free of charge. We didn't bother with the enterprise features."

"Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."

"Camunda is a cheaply priced product, making it one of its major USPs."

"Camunda Platform is an open-source product."

"We're using the open-source version for now."

"The product's price depends on the number of processes that need to be automated or where the orchestration part needs to be used. The product is affordable for medium and large enterprises."

"There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly the same as in the enterprise version."

"It is good for a startup. When we started, its price was fair, but the way we are using it to orchestrate microservices makes it expensive. When you are growing as a company, you would have more microservices, and you would have more users. There is an exponential effect when you are growing in terms of the number of conditions, processes, and users because they bill you per process. So, the price was increasing very quickly for us, and it was very difficult."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

19%

Insurance Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BMC TrueSight Orchestration?

The automation helps in payment transactions through BHIM app. The BMC helps in smooth clearance of all payments without using MasterCard or Visa. The solution is ready to use, and there is no need...

What needs improvement with BMC TrueSight Orchestration?

We are aiming for AI automation and look for support from BMC. The features are currently missing but we are hoping for some upgrade in this matter.

What is your primary use case for BMC TrueSight Orchestration?

BMC TrueSight is majorly used for database backup and auto remediation for the networks. It is also used for server provisioning.

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

Control-M vs BMC TrueSight Orchestration

Comparisons

Compared 73% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs BMC TrueSight Orchestration

Compared 27% of the time

More BMC TrueSight Orchestration Competitors

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 10% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Product Reports

BMC TrueSight Orchestration

Download BMC TrueSight Orchestration product report

Download Camunda product report

Also Known As

TrueSight Orchestration, Atrium Orchestrator

Camunda BPM

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

BMC

Overview

IT process automation can significantly lower the cost of IT delivery and reduce the risk associated with manual interactions. BMC Atrium Orchestrator automates common, repeatable tasks to improve quality of service across the board.

Move from reactive, manual handling of requests to a fully automated system
Deliver consistent task and automation workflow results
Automate data collection for audit compliance
Align with best practices
Free up IT resources

BMC

Camunda drives business process automation and AI orchestration, enhancing efficiency and innovation without compromising security and governance. Trusted by major brands like Atlassian, it seamlessly integrates systems and human tasks for impactful digital transformation.

Camunda is renowned for fostering collaboration between business and IT, empowering over 700 organizations across diverse sectors to manage and improve business-critical processes. With its flexible architecture, Camunda supports BPMN, CMMN, and DMN standards, allowing for efficient modeling and smooth integration with environments via REST APIs. This open-source platform offers extensive customization and combines enterprise features such as process history tracking and decision table editing, supporting both technical and non-technical users in achieving efficient automation strategies. While performance and scalability issues exist, especially in the cloud, Camunda remains a top choice for companies like ING and Vodafone.

What are Camunda's standout features?

Lightweight, scalable architecture: Facilitates smooth business process automation.
BPMN, CMMN, DMN support: Ensures comprehensive process modeling capabilities.
REST API integration: Enables seamless connectivity with different environments.
Open-source customization: Offers flexibility for adapting to specific needs.
Enterprise features: Includes process history, graphical modifications, and decision table editing.

What benefits can users expect from Camunda?

Increased efficiency: Streamlined automation processes boost productivity.
Collaboration: Facilitates synergy between IT and business teams.
Competitive advantage: Enables organizations to stay ahead through innovation.
Customization: Adapts to precise business process requirements.
Scalability: Expands with organizational growth demands.

In sectors like banking and government, Camunda's fast prototyping and workflow automation capabilities optimize processes such as client onboarding and investment banking workflows. It enhances social governance tasks, credit flows, and enterprise integration, while also being used in insurance and telecom for automating repetitive tasks and improving efficiency. Organizations utilize Camunda for training and service management, showcasing its versatility across industries.

Sample Customers

Ameritas, Buckeye Partners, KNAB, Dex Media, News UK

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs. Camunda