Broadcom Service Virtualization vs IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Broadcom and IBM are both solutions in the Service Virtualization category. Additionally, 92% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Broadcom Service Virtualiza...

Read 97 Broadcom Service Virtualization reviews

5,443 Views
3,810 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM Rational Test Virtualiz...

Read 4 IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Broadcom Service Virtualiza...

IBM Rational Test Virtualiz...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Broadcom Service Virtualization and IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Tricentis, Parasoft and others in Service Virtualization.

To learn more, read our detailed Service Virtualization Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Service Virtualization

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Service Virtualiza...

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (1st)

IBM Rational Test Virtualiz...

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Q&A Highlights

it_user189042

Project Manager at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Feb 13, 2015

Do you have a comparison of IBM vs. CA Service Virtualization?

if you look for service virtualization tools you should check out Tricentis Orchestrated Service Virtualization Suite too. it supports following techniques without programming a single line of code: -) model based business flow definition to enable functional testers for test automation (with a technical single point of maintenance of XSDs, WSDLs...) -) stateful behaviour -) asynchronous business flows (mainly used for JMS, MQ systems) -) End2End testing with more than 20 UI technolgies (Mainframe, HTML, JAVA, Win32 etc) -) test data driven frontend automation & backend service simulation (single point of test data maintenance) --) this solves test data issues... -) and many more unique features Check it out here http://www.tricentis.com/tricentis-tosca-testsuite/orchestrated-service-virtualization/

See all answers

Featured Reviews

DivyaMohan

Senior Project Manager at Infosys

Can be used for the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance

We use it for the virtualization of third-party APIs for performance testing. Our second use case is related to the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, which is used for insurance clients In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party…

Read full review

Rekha Chotara

IT Analyst at Tata Consultancy Services

Using service virtualization, we are able to accelerate the testing and development activity

As per my working experience over the last three and half years with RIT/RTVS, I would consider the two following areas of improvement: * Reporting: In the recent release of RCPT, the "Usage graph" feature is included, but that still needs improvements in terms of UI and timeline filtering criteria. * Implementing custom functions is a bit of a tedious job, as ECMAscript does not support some of the standard JavaScript functions. Also, the Script editor window is not user-friendly .

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Clients were able to save $700k and three million GBP in the first year of using the solution."

"We needed one tool to do it all, and this fit the bill."

"Easy to understand ways of creating stubs."

"CA Service Virtualization is totally number one in the market, no one comes close to this."

"The solution helps us develop applications faster."

"We used a lot of other solutions, but switched to CA Service Virtualization because this one tool can cover all of our requirements."

"The time savings it's provided us are huge."

"DevTest supports multiple testing environments so you can configure it to use one testing environment or 20, and you can change it for use in any other environments with the flick of a button."

More Broadcom Service Virtualization pros

"We have improved productivity about 90%."

"IBM RTVS has many useful features, but support for IBM MQ over this tool is unbeatable."

"Indeed, I would recommend it; one major reason being that this product not only has a robust infrastructure implementation, it also has good technical support supporting standards from IBM."

"It has very easy and good validation techniques used for SWIFT, XSD, and WSDL validations."

"It is very stable, rock-solid, and there is a possibility of about 20-32% cost savings."

"As we have used most of the MQ stub, "MQ recording" is the most useful feature."

Cons

"The automated generation of tests could be improved. Right now, we have to generate them all ourselves."

"I'd like to see more of the newer technologies included in there, looking mainly from a mobile perspective, possibly, so you can virtualize some of the aspects that we're going to be doing for mobile testing."

"We once faced issues when we moved from 4.2 to 4.7 or 5. They completely changed the UI and there is very little support for backward compatibility."

"I would like to see improvements in the naming conventions. The current naming conventions of CA Service Virtualization are hard to use."

"The GUI can be hard to navigate."

"The cost is an area that needs improvement. There are a couple of other tools which provide support for performance testing with the base version itself, but Broadcom needs a separate component to support virtualization for performance testing. This is a costly component."

"DevTest is pretty massive. It's hard to tell what different parts of it can be used to do different things. They should modulize it more."

"For Virtualization, when the file size is too large (more than 1 GB) it takes more time for deployment and some times the tool hangs."

More Broadcom Service Virtualization cons

"One of the biggest disappointments for me and my team was dependency on various patches, or so call clients for every single technology."

"Reporting: In the recent release of RCPT, the "Usage graph" feature is included, but that still needs improvements in terms of UI and timeline filtering criteria."

"However, some peripheral features need vast improvement, namely the reporting and the dashboard areas."

"User friendliness: I would rate it somewhere around 5/10 in terms of user-friendliness. It can be simpler to build stubs and middle-ware based test cases compared to the solution given by RTVS."

"They need to move it to the cloud."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."

"I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."

"There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."

"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."

"The product has a free trial available, which has saves on the initial investment costs."

"IBM RTVS is not that expensive compare to other giants, but it is still much ahead of some other tool having less features."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Answers from the Community

it_user189042

Project Manager at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Feb 13, 2015

Do you have a comparison of IBM vs. CA Service Virtualization?

2 out of 11 answers

it_user190035

Works at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Feb 12, 2015

Hi, I am looking for similar information as well. If you have any content, please could you let me know where to find it please? Thanks very much Regards Anish

Read full answer

it_user174312

QA Director at Bridgetree

Feb 12, 2015

I unfortunately have not used the IBM software. I do have experience with CA LISA and some with Parasoft but I don't know the IBM product well enough to vote. However there is a company called Voke that does studies and comparisons of them. You could do a google search for Voke and Lisa and IBm and service virtualizaton and likely find that study on white paper. I will check as well.

Read full answer

See all 11 answers

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

25%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	98

No data available

Comparisons

Parasoft Virtualize vs Broadcom Service Virtualization

Compared 30% of the time

OpenText Service Virtualization vs Broadcom Service Virtualization

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Broadcom Service Virtualization

Compared 15% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs Broadcom Service Virtualization

Compared 15% of the time

ReadyAPI Virtualization vs Broadcom Service Virtualization

Compared 11% of the time

More Broadcom Service Virtualization Competitors

OpenText Service Virtualization vs IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL]

Compared 40% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

Parasoft Virtualize vs IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

More IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Service Virtualization

October 2026

Download Broadcom Service Virtualization product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL]

October 2026

IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL] report

Download IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL] product report

Also Known As

ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization

Green Hat, IBM RTVS

Overview

Broadcom Service Virtualization enhances testing and development by offering extensive protocol support and the ability to simulate services without hardware, driving efficiency and cost reduction.

Broadcom Service Virtualization allows for the virtualization of web services, MQ, and databases without the need for physical hardware, supporting parallel development and reducing costs. It integrates well with other tools like Jenkins and Selenium, ensuring seamless development processes. The platform supports early testing and mitigates backend dependencies, promoting agility in software development lifecycles. However, improvements in usability, additional technology integrations, better scalability, and comprehensive documentation are desired by users. Enhancements in error messaging and automated testing functionalities are also highlighted as areas for growth.

What are the key features of Broadcom Service Virtualization?

Extensive Protocol Support: Facilitates connection with diverse systems for comprehensive testing.
Quick Simulation Setup: Allows rapid creation of virtual environments for testing.
Customizable Automation: Offers flexible scripting and automation to fit specific testing needs.
Recording Functionalities: Captures service behaviors for detailed analysis and development.
Integration with Tools: Easily connects with Jenkins and Selenium to enhance testing pipelines.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Cost Reduction: Minimizes expenses by eliminating the need for physical hardware.
Early Testing: Enables earlier access to virtual services, enhancing development speed.
Parallel Development: Supports concurrent work streams, improving project timelines.
Dependability Mitigation: Reduces reliance on third-party and mainframe services, stabilizing testing environments.
Scalability: Adapts to growing needs, supporting larger and more complex projects.

In industries where early testing and independent development environments are necessary, such as banking, insurance, and telecommunications, Broadcom Service Virtualization is frequently employed. It enables teams to overcome dependencies on non-owned or unreliable services, enhancing development pipelines. This support for performance engineering and agile methodologies ensures that high-traffic APIs and mainframe services are tested under realistic conditions, ultimately facilitating continuous delivery practices.

Broadcom

Testing environments are often expensive and can have limited availability. IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server helps you shift testing to the left by removing dependencies on components that are unavailable or already in use. These components are simulated at the API layer, supporting a wide variety of technologies, allowing your team to test the riskiest elements earlier in the delivery lifecycle.

IBM

Sample Customers

Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil,

Sandhata Technologies Ltd., Qantas Airways

Buyer's Guide

Service Virtualization

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Tricentis, Parasoft and others in Service Virtualization. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Service Virtualization vendors.

We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.