No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs Parasoft Virtualize comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Service Virtualiza...
Ranking in Service Virtualization
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
97
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Parasoft Virtualize
Ranking in Service Virtualization
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Service Virtualization category, the mindshare of Broadcom Service Virtualization is 27.7%, down from 35.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft Virtualize is 26.0%, up from 17.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Service Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Broadcom Service Virtualization27.7%
Parasoft Virtualize26.0%
Other46.3%
Service Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

DM
Senior Project Manager at Infosys
Can be used for the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance
We use it for the virtualization of third-party APIs for performance testing. Our second use case is related to the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, which is used for insurance clients In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party…
SP
Solutions Architect at InfoStretch
Easy to set up and scale but needs more data virtualization capabilities
I'm working with a service organization and I'm working for a client and that client requires this solution. That's why we use it. Basically, we are just a customer and end-user. The solution is easy to set up and a good tool for the service virtualization so far. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten. If the product could do more things, I'd give it higher marks.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool always had some additional features included in each of its releases and it fixed the bugs of the previous release."
"We viewed CA Service Virtualization as a game changer, giving us the ability to add test environment virtualization in order to reduce test cycles for our clients."
"CA Service Virtualization has helped us advance the development cycle when third-party interfaces are not available to us."
"One of the things I like about it is it actually does what it claims to do."
"You can create virtual services from a live recording or you can even take raw traffic and convert that into request/response pairs, and you can create an entire virtual service from just those simple little files, and that's super awesome when that all works out."
"Testing using Service Virtualization saved huge amounts."
"CA provides very good support for their product, and was extremely helpful in both of the organizations where I installed the product."
"The most valuable feature is definitely how quickly you can get up and mock something that’s not completely done."
"Parasoft Virtualize helped us in accelerating application delivery by allowing us to test early."
"Service Virtualization has provided a way to move forward where we do not find any way to go."
"We decided to use the Parasoft solution because it's more powerful and very easy to use."
"The initial setup is quite easy to manage."
"We now have the ability to test our complex applications completely detached from integration middleware, which improves the reliability, speed, cost, and simplicity of testing."
"Using Virtualize, this dependency has been removed completely, allowing the test team to provision many more orders in shorter time, enabling them to test much more, much faster."
"The technical support is very good, with short lines and short response times from well-skilled technical employees."
"Parasoft Virtualization allowed us to create a simulated environment and test the code before entering the testing cycle."
 

Cons

"CA SV takes up lot of your system resources."
"I would really like more relevant online documentation."
"Scalability is the reason I rated it as 8/10. We’re going through some challenges with scalability right now."
"Further integration into non-CA test suites will be beneficial."
"UI Testing and Reporting Features."
"Customer service in Italian is not very useful."
"Competitors have more user friendly user interfaces and some have front end systems which are easy to toggle and manipulate."
"It was purchased from another larger corporate project and just kind of sat there, paid for but on the shelf."
"It is somewhat complex regarding its configuration setup with different technologies."
"Performance enhancement for large payloads."
"JMS Queue Monitoring: When deploying the TIBCO JMS monitor, we saw an approximately 50% failure rate in detecting the desired event."
"It should have more fine-grained authorization."
"An area of improvements would be Data Repository, as in current stage it is difficult to manage data from this aspect."
"It would be ideal if the product offered more in terms of data virtualization or have a separate product that could be combined with this one that could offer a bit more in order to cover more of our requirements."
"When Virtualize is running on a (virtual) machine with limited memory, over time it might consume more and more memory and (worst case) stall."
"This product is too expensive when scaling."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
"I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
"There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."
"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Marketing Services Firm
9%
Construction Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
26%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Wholesaler/Distributor
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise98
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
 

Also Known As

ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization
Parasoft Service Virtualization
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 
Alaska Airlines, Cox Automotive, Comcast, Lufthansa, Samsung, WoodmenLife, Caesars Entertainment, Capital One, REI
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Service Virtualization vs. Parasoft Virtualize and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.