No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs Parasoft Virtualize comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Service Virtualiza...
Ranking in Service Virtualization
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
97
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Parasoft Virtualize
Ranking in Service Virtualization
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Service Virtualization category, the mindshare of Broadcom Service Virtualization is 26.7%, down from 33.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft Virtualize is 25.7%, up from 17.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Service Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Broadcom Service Virtualization26.7%
Parasoft Virtualize25.7%
Other47.6%
Service Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

DM
Senior Project Manager at Infosys
Can be used for the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance
We use it for the virtualization of third-party APIs for performance testing. Our second use case is related to the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, which is used for insurance clients In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party…
SP
Solutions Architect at InfoStretch
Easy to set up and scale but needs more data virtualization capabilities
I'm working with a service organization and I'm working for a client and that client requires this solution. That's why we use it. Basically, we are just a customer and end-user. The solution is easy to set up and a good tool for the service virtualization so far. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten. If the product could do more things, I'd give it higher marks.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Ability to vary the responses very easily (randomize, pick-lists, etc.)."
"I would advise others who are looking for a similar solution to go for this product."
"This product helps some of our customers achieve agility and delivery effectiveness."
"For us, the most valuable feature is that it gives us the ability to virtualize a lot of our integrated systems."
"Service virtualization is the most valuable feature because we can create end-to-end services without actual hardware, so that saves a lot of cost and money."
"From financials, we're seeing millions of dollars worth of savings, and we're also seeing time to market gains just based on the fact that we're not dependent or delayed by back end systems and other environments that traditionally caused us delays."
"The CAI aka Pathfinder is a great capability and will help the organization to achieve SV goals and expand the SV to different systems without many firewall changes or changes in the existing environment setup."
"We needed one tool to do it all, and this fit the bill."
"Service Virtualization has provided a way to move forward where we do not find any way to go."
"Using Virtualize, this dependency has been removed completely, allowing the test team to provision many more orders in shorter time, enabling them to test much more, much faster."
"We decided to use the Parasoft solution because it's more powerful and very easy to use."
"The solution is easy to set up and a good tool for the service virtualization so far."
"Parasoft Virtualization allowed us to create a simulated environment and test the code before entering the testing cycle."
"Parasoft's product is easier to operate, and drives the user to make the right decisions and complete the work efficiently."
"We now have the ability to test our complex applications completely detached from integration middleware, which improves the reliability, speed, cost, and simplicity of testing."
"Easy testing environment creation. No need to have deep development/infrastructure knowledge."
 

Cons

"I would really like more relevant online documentation."
"I really want to see more of the "express" kind of model, where you get a little bit for free. I'd love to be able to see you be able to edit and author tests without having to be connected to a licensed server. And then, if you want to go and execute tests, then you go and connect to the server... I think it would unblock people to be able to do a lot more work from home or from remote places, where they can't really connect to the server."
"I would give the technical support a 50-50 rating, the reason being, for some of the custom solutions we have to depend on the tool."
"I'd like to see more of the newer technologies included in there, looking mainly from a mobile perspective, possibly, so you can virtualize some of the aspects that we're going to be doing for mobile testing."
"​From a reporting perspective I think we would like to have a more user-friendly approach."
"We had to implement an external service catalog. We put it in ServiceNow. I would like to see an integrated service catalog."
"Customer service in Italian is not very useful."
"I would like to see a completely web-oriented automated test case design (currently need to use desktop application called DevTest Workstation)."
"It is somewhat complex regarding its configuration setup with different technologies."
"It should have more fine-grained authorization."
"This product is too expensive when scaling."
"An area of improvements would be Data Repository, as in current stage it is difficult to manage data from this aspect."
"When Virtualize is running on a (virtual) machine with limited memory, over time it might consume more and more memory and (worst case) stall."
"Only about the memory, if you don't meet the minimum RAM required, performance is not stable."
"Performance enhancement for large payloads."
"It would be ideal if the product offered more in terms of data virtualization or have a separate product that could be combined with this one that could offer a bit more in order to cover more of our requirements."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
"There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."
"I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Construction Company
13%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Construction Company
15%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise98
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
 

Also Known As

ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization
Parasoft Service Virtualization
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 
Alaska Airlines, Cox Automotive, Comcast, Lufthansa, Samsung, WoodmenLife, Caesars Entertainment, Capital One, REI
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Service Virtualization vs. Parasoft Virtualize and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.