No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs Parasoft Virtualize comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Service Virtualiza...
Ranking in Service Virtualization
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
97
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Parasoft Virtualize
Ranking in Service Virtualization
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Service Virtualization category, the mindshare of Broadcom Service Virtualization is 25.7%, down from 26.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft Virtualize is 22.8%, up from 19.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Service Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Broadcom Service Virtualization25.7%
Parasoft Virtualize22.8%
Other51.5%
Service Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

DM
Senior Project Manager at Infosys
Can be used for the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance
We use it for the virtualization of third-party APIs for performance testing. Our second use case is related to the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, which is used for insurance clients In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party…
SP
Solutions Architect at InfoStretch
Easy to set up and scale but needs more data virtualization capabilities
I'm working with a service organization and I'm working for a client and that client requires this solution. That's why we use it. Basically, we are just a customer and end-user. The solution is easy to set up and a good tool for the service virtualization so far. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten. If the product could do more things, I'd give it higher marks.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"CA technical support and DevTest community people love to respond and come up with a number of suggestions, which is really appreciated."
"We have already created and switched over 10,000 test cases from manual to automated execution, so our QA team can now focus more on complex manual test cases."
"Its integration capabilities with other external tools and technologies - such as Selenium, JDBC, external JARs (which can be placed in /HotDeploy and used) - is quite impressive, as is its wide range of support for various protocols, such as FTP, FTPS, HTTP to TCP, etc."
"We used a lot of other solutions, but switched to CA Service Virtualization because this one tool can cover all of our requirements."
"Very easy to create virtual services for test, Dev and training environments."
"Testing using Service Virtualization saved huge amounts."
"The ability to create virtual services and deploy them as Docker containers, and include them in our Jenkins build pipelines, is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature, and really SV's main feature, is the versatility of available protocols that cover a very large number of cases."
"Parasoft's product is easier to operate, and drives the user to make the right decisions and complete the work efficiently."
"Service Virtualization has provided a way to move forward where we do not find any way to go."
"Parasoft Virtualization allowed us to create a simulated environment and test the code before entering the testing cycle."
"We now have the ability to test our complex applications completely detached from integration middleware, which improves the reliability, speed, cost, and simplicity of testing."
"Easy testing environment creation. No need to have deep development/infrastructure knowledge."
"Parasoft Virtualize helped us in accelerating application delivery by allowing us to test early."
"The solution is easy to set up and a good tool for the service virtualization so far."
"Using Virtualize, this dependency has been removed completely, allowing the test team to provision many more orders in shorter time, enabling them to test much more, much faster."
 

Cons

"The initial installation and coming in and bringing it into your organization, it can be a little disruptive, but once you create some real strategies around how to deploy the solution in your platform, the gains far out weight what the delays would have been or the challenges would have been in getting it up and going."
"Stability issues do arise if there is not enough system memory."
"CA SV takes up lot of your system resources."
"Reporting needs to be improved for both manual and performance testing."
"The REST test step could include other methods."
"The GUI can be hard to navigate."
"Stability’s one area that needs work; it's good, but the challenge is that scaling at a very high level is slightly problematic at this point in time."
"The workstation component has a very out-dated UI and is in dire need of a facelift."
"Performance enhancement for large payloads."
"JMS Queue Monitoring: When deploying the TIBCO JMS monitor, we saw an approximately 50% failure rate in detecting the desired event."
"When Virtualize is running on a (virtual) machine with limited memory, over time it might consume more and more memory and (worst case) stall."
"It is somewhat complex regarding its configuration setup with different technologies."
"It would be ideal if the product offered more in terms of data virtualization or have a separate product that could be combined with this one that could offer a bit more in order to cover more of our requirements."
"An area of improvements would be Data Repository, as in current stage it is difficult to manage data from this aspect."
"This product is too expensive when scaling."
"Only about the memory, if you don't meet the minimum RAM required, performance is not stable."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
"There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."
"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
"I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
25%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Construction Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
23%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Construction Company
15%
Outsourcing Company
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise98
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
 

Also Known As

ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization
Parasoft Service Virtualization
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 
Alaska Airlines, Cox Automotive, Comcast, Lufthansa, Samsung, WoodmenLife, Caesars Entertainment, Capital One, REI
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Service Virtualization vs. Parasoft Virtualize and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.