

SmartBear TestComplete and BrowserStack compete in the software testing tools category. TestComplete has the upper hand in automation testing due to its diverse feature set, while BrowserStack excels in manual testing across multiple devices.
Features: TestComplete offers diverse features like a test editor, debugger, and powerful object browser. It supports dynamic find methods and data-driven testing. BrowserStack is known for its manual testing capabilities and supports a variety of devices with an intuitive interface.
Room for Improvement: TestComplete could improve in areas like web and mobile testing frameworks and better object mapping. The licensing system and memory usage are also noted concerns. BrowserStack is critiqued for slow connectivity, high pricing, and limited local testing support. Improvements could be made in GPS testing and platform integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TestComplete supports on-premises and some cloud deployments, with mixed reviews on customer service. BrowserStack offers diverse deployment, including hybrid options, with satisfactory support yet some responsiveness issues.
Pricing and ROI: TestComplete's high pricing includes node-locked and floating licenses, with ROI linked to efficient automation. BrowserStack is expensive but more budget-friendly, offering per-user licenses with ROI dependent on usage scale.
Pipeline executions that used to take eight hours have been reduced to one hour, enhancing continuous deployment and providing quicker feedback cycles.
I think its biggest benefit is how it integrates with our CI/CD, not necessarily giving access to developers for test devices.
I have seen a return on investment with BrowserStack, specifically a 50% reduction in human capacity.
Once set up, only one person is needed to handle all tasks, reducing the requirement for multiple personnel.
BrowserStack customer support is excellent, with knowledgeable staff assisting throughout onboarding, setup, and understanding our needs to provide tailored solutions.
BrowserStack's scalability is enhanced by its auto-scaling capabilities on AWS.
They reproduce the same scenario, and then we create the bug ticket for them to fix.
BrowserStack is quite stable for me because it offers many different devices, is always up to date, and has a nice user interface with good user experience.
Sometimes there is slowness in the network, especially when working with AWS-based hosting.
BrowserStack is very expensive and they keep increasing their cost, which is absolutely ridiculous, especially when someone like LambdaTest is coming through for literal thousands of dollars less, with the same services.
Going forward, one way BrowserStack could improve is by incorporating AI concepts to create tests automatically from provided URLs or user intentions, generating scripts without needing users to write automation scripts.
I think false positives are an area where BrowserStack can improve, as I have often seen things working fine on actual devices, but on BrowserStack devices, issues arise due to network slowness or AWS region connectivity problems that cause lag.
While using SmartBear TestComplete, we are fine with the current capabilities, however, it would be beneficial to improve some performance aspects, especially the image comparison feature.
pricing was that it was a bit on the higher side, around three hundred dollars per user per month.
The device farm is one of the positive impacts we have seen from using BrowserStack. We get to run our automation against their full suite of devices, which alleviates the uplift of manual testing.
BrowserStack has positively impacted my organization by helping us reduce the human capacity by 50%, with that reduction mostly being in manual testing efforts.
BrowserStack has positively impacted my organization primarily through time savings because it is very easy to use and replicates physical devices for testing, which is crucial since we usually do not have physical devices.
The most valuable feature of SmartBear TestComplete for me is the image comparison functionality.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| BrowserStack | 4.7% |
| SmartBear TestComplete | 5.0% |
| Other | 90.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
BrowserStack offers a cloud-based testing solution that facilitates comprehensive cross-platform testing for web and mobile apps, allowing efficient testing across devices, browsers, and operating systems without the need for physical hardware.
It provides integration with project management tools and enables parallel and cross-browser testing, enhancing collaboration with an intuitive interface. Support for real devices offers better insight compared to simulators and helps in reducing manual efforts through automation capabilities. Companies benefit from BrowserStack's vast device range that ensures efficient testing and improved quality at a reduced cost.
What are BrowserStack's key features?In industries like software development and IT services, BrowserStack aids businesses in testing compatibility, performance, and responsiveness across platforms, addressing issues like UI challenges and ensuring legacy application support on older systems. Companies utilize it to refine app quality, using tools such as Selenium and APM for comprehensive test automation.
SmartBear TestComplete offers automation testing across desktop, web, and mobile platforms with robust object identification and cross-browser compatibility. It features seamless integration with CI tools and supports diverse tech stacks, enhancing efficiency through modular testing and data-driven capabilities.
SmartBear TestComplete is known for its Object Browser and Object Spy, providing deep inspection and interaction within applications. It supports third-party tool integration, particularly CI platforms, enhancing testing consistency through name mapping and modular testing. Despite its high pricing and need for enhancement in COM and ActiveX support and mobile testing, it offers record-and-playback features, self-healing capabilities, and cross-browser compatibility, making it a choice for regression and automation. Users leverage it for testing in environments including Windows, with exploration into a Flutter-based mobile context. Improvements are desired in object mapping, headless testing, and programming language support, while challenges exist in UI usability and virtual machine licensing.
What are the key features of SmartBear TestComplete?SmartBear TestComplete is implemented in industries requiring comprehensive testing solutions, including those performing regression and functionality testing across platforms. Its integration and behavior automation support CI/CD pipelines, while desktop, web, and mobile applications are tested for UI automation and backend database functionality, showing its adaptability to industry-specific needs.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.