CA App Synthetic Monitor vs Dynatrace comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Broadcom and Dynatrace are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Broadcom is ranked #75, while Dynatrace is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.8. Broadcom holds a 0.6% mindshare in APM, compared to Dynatrace’s 4.9% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Dynatrace users who would recommend it.

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Read 3 CA App Synthetic Monitor reviews

2,055 Views
2,034 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Dynatrace

Read 363 Dynatrace reviews

45,567 Views
30,986 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Dynatrace

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Dynatrace and CA App Synthetic Monitor are competitors in the field of application performance monitoring. Dynatrace seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive monitoring features and higher ROI, despite its higher learning curve and cost.

What features are offered by Dynatrace in comparison to CA App Synthetic Monitor?

Dynatrace offers comprehensive monitoring with strong AI capabilities and detailed analytics. It provides real-time insights and application performance tracking. CA App Synthetic Monitor specializes in synthetic transaction monitoring and provides performance metrics specifically for transaction insights.

What areas of improvement can be found in Dynatrace in comparison to CA App Synthetic Monitor?

Dynatrace users indicate a need for better user-friendliness and enhanced integration capabilities. Additionally, there is feedback for reducing its steep learning curve. For CA App Synthetic Monitor, better documentation and more extensive reporting features are necessary. Users also suggest adding richer features beyond its focused offering.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Dynatrace in comparison to CA App Synthetic Monitor?

Dynatrace's deployment is more complex and requires careful setup but is supported well by customer service. CA App Synthetic Monitor offers easier deployment but has mixed reviews regarding customer support. The straightforward deployment of CA App Synthetic Monitor contrasts with less robust support compared to Dynatrace.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Dynatrace in comparison to CA App Synthetic Monitor?

Dynatrace is seen as expensive but provides a high ROI, making its cost justified by the extensive features and benefits. CA App Synthetic Monitor offers competitive pricing but yields a less significant ROI compared to Dynatrace. Users feel CA App Synthetic Monitor provides good value for its narrowly focused capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Dynatrace Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Dynatrace

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

75th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Dynatrace

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

363

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (7th), Mobile APM (3rd), Container Monitoring (2nd), AIOps (1st), AI Observability (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of CA App Synthetic Monitor is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dynatrace is 4.9%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Dynatrace	4.9%
CA App Synthetic Monitor	0.6%
Other	94.5%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

reviewer2286675

System Administrator at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

A reliable solution for SSL offloading and to encrypt outside traffic

If you are responsible for monitoring the logs in F5, it isn't very easy. The format is complicated compared to different vendors. For example, Fortinet and Cisco have feasible formats for sending and fetching logs. Suppose I'm monitoring the logs and everything, and when I am retrieving logs from F5, I want to know whether it is regular traffic or any abnormality is happening. The logs itself is not user-friendly. It may not give you a clear way of what's happening. You have to go through different websites and work on it. You have to waste so much time on it.

Read full review

Vinothkumar Sugumar

Senior Software Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Unified dashboards have provided end-to-end visibility and now streamline API latency troubleshooting

I think Dynatrace can be improved in dashboard creation, as this is the face of a product. Although Dynatrace may have many things, new users typically do not know the whole power of the product. To onboard new people, it would be beneficial to provide template dashboards or suggested dashboards. Organizations working with microservice architecture will follow some templates, so suggesting simple, hand-picked features that are really helpful could make a difference. Quick configurable and customizable templates would be very useful. Whenever they come into the product, they can use this template and feel that their product is applied to it. Immediately, they will think everything is online and can improve easily. This base can be provided in template form. Since Dynatrace has a lot of features now, the AI integration makes it simple, but the product itself is very huge. To understand and utilize it, maybe it would be good to index the essential features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From our experience, it really helps managers in measuring application SLAs and viewing historical performance data."

"Each had strengths in one area or another, but CA covered the majority of our needs end-to-end."

"This gives us the capability to proactively monitor performance, but also give valuable insights to the user behaviour."

"I am able to customize my dashboard based on the test requirement and it helps me to focus on the area that really needs close monitoring."

"Dynatrace supports our pretty high SLAs with rock-solid stability, letting us run up to 50 updates over three years with almost no issues while they constantly improve and add new capabilities every two weeks."

"Our development group has started using Dynatrace extensively. It helps them find bottlenecks caused by code."

"The main benefits have been getting to root cause on certain issues, being able to deploy applications faster because of the way that you can troubleshoot those issues, so delivering products to our business and driving revenue have improved."

"Dynatrace helped us with root cause analysis of poor performing components of our applications."

"Dynatrace provides visibility into the application and its performance from the user to back-end services."

"There is time savings, people's times have been cut in half using this solution because we were previously doing a lot of that manual work, now it's a lot more automated, and the data is just there."

More Dynatrace pros

Cons

"The RBMS component is limited as you can only record using Internet Explorer."

"Pricing makes little sense. We had examples where it would be cheaper to have two basic accounts than one intermediate."

"One significant complaint I have raised with Dynatrace as a consultant is the availability of raw data for logs. While this capability exists, it is quite costly."

"We need extended support for some of the agents, the one-agent technologies under Managed. We've got some old legacy platforms that don't have one-agent support yet."

"We sometimes have to run plugins on docker containers."

"As the product is evolving quickly and product features are added on a monthly basis, a more transparent roadmap would be more than welcome."

"When integrating this solution with any third party applications, there is an additional cost to pay. This can make the solution very costly to use."

"The dashboarding in Dynatrace is not very good. We have used other monitoring tools like AppDynamics. We are also using AppDynamics for some of our products. If I compare Dynatrace with those monitoring tools, the dashboarding is not as good. If I have to create a dashboard it takes me time, the experience is not that good."

"With Linux or Windows, it automatically takes care of everything, so there's no need for you to do any manual config changes. But when it comes to AIX - because I implemented it two weeks back - you have to go back to kind of an AppMon approach, where you instrument agents for .NET applications. So if Dynatrace could make those changes and make it automated, that would be one of the biggest action items."

"The dashboarding process and creating measures and metrics, it needs to be made a little bit easier and more simplified. "

More Dynatrace cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Always gives good ROI and total cost of ownership."

"A Dynatrace partner will always be willing to give you a trial. Go through the trial to see if there is a benefit for your company."

"This is an expensive solution, but it is also worth the money."

"The product is really fast to implement and gives customers instant value. This is important, because it reduces costs on the implementation."

"Do a PoC and see if you like it."

"There is a license issue where if we increase the memory we have to up the licenses. I was unaware of that going in. I thought it was scalable without all the paperwork behind the scenes. "

"Pricing is based on the number of servers monitored, so for big applications, it is a bit expensive."

"Licensing is a bit complicated for Dynatrace, and pricing is dependent on how much your organization invests."

More Dynatrace pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

16%

Construction Company

12%

University

Financial Services Firm

17%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	81
Midsize Enterprise	50
Large Enterprise	303

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Any advice about APM solutions?

The key is to have a holistic view over the complete infrastructure, the ones you have listed are great for APM if you need to monitor applications end to end. I have tested them all and have not f...

See all answers

What cloud monitoring software did you choose and why?

While the environment does matter in the selection of an APM tool, I prefer to use Dynatrace to manage the entire stack. Both production and Dev/Test. I find it to be quite superior to anything els...

See all answers

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 20% of the time

OpenText SiteScope vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

LogicMonitor vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 4% of the time

More CA App Synthetic Monitor Competitors

Datadog vs Dynatrace

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Dynatrace

Compared 4% of the time

New Relic vs Dynatrace

Compared 3% of the time

Avantra vs Dynatrace

Compared 3% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Dynatrace

Compared 3% of the time

More Dynatrace Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

October 2026

Download CA App Synthetic Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Dynatrace

November 2026

Download Dynatrace product report

Also Known As

CA ASM

No data available

Overview

CA App Synthetic Monitor provides proactive monitoring of web applications and services to ensure performance and availability. It allows businesses to identify and resolve problems before they impact users.

By simulating user interactions and analyzing application performance, CA App Synthetic Monitor enables businesses to maintain optimal service levels. This cloud-based solution offers a comprehensive view of application health through real-time monitoring and alerts, facilitating quick identification of performance bottlenecks and outages. It helps IT teams enhance user experience by predicting potential issues and optimizing resource allocation. Its flexibility and scalability cater to a range of business needs.

What are key features of CA App Synthetic Monitor?

Real-Time Monitoring: Continuous monitoring of web applications to detect issues quickly.
Global Reach: Simulate user transactions from multiple locations worldwide.
Custom Alerts: Set up customized alerts for specific performance thresholds.
Detailed Reporting: Access in-depth analysis of application performance metrics.
Scalability: Easily scalable to match growing business demands.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Improved User Experience: By identifying issues early, end-users encounter fewer disruptions.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces downtime-related costs through early detection and resolution.
Enhanced Reliability: Ensures application reliability and reduces service outages.
Time Saving: Automates performance checks to save time for IT teams.

Industries such as e-commerce, finance, and IT services implement CA App Synthetic Monitor to ensure their software systems remain performant under various conditions. For e-commerce, it assures checkout processes run smoothly. Financial sectors use it to guarantee secure and reliable transaction handling. IT services leverage its capabilities to maintain service level agreements, ensuring customer satisfaction in digital interactions.

Broadcom

Dynatrace is advancing observability for today’s digital businesses, helping to transform the complexity of modern digital ecosystems into powerful business assets. By leveraging AI-powered insights, Dynatrace enables organizations to analyze, automate, and innovate faster to drive their business forward. To learn more about how Dynatrace can help your business, visit www.dynatrace.com, visit our blog and follow us on LinkedIn and X @dynatrace.

Dynatrace

Sample Customers

Lexmark

TD Bank, Zurich North America, Accenture, Macquarie, United Airlines, Raymond James, BT, Vodafone, Air France-KLM, TELUS, American Airlines, Air Canada, ADT, Virgin Money

Buyer's Guide

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Dynatrace

November 2026

Free Report: CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Dynatrace

Find out what your peers are saying about CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Dynatrace and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Dynatrace report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.