No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] vs ScienceLogic comparison

Broadcom and ScienceLogic are both solutions in the IT Operations Analytics category. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of ScienceLogic users who would recommend it.
ScienceLogic
Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews
  • 7,778 Views
  • 700 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] and ScienceLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, New Relic, Dell Technologies and others in IT Operations Analytics.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IT Operations Analytics Report (Updated: May 2026).
Buyer's Guide
IT Operations Analytics
May 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA Digital Operational Inte...
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ScienceLogic
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Event Monitoring (7th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (29th), Server Monitoring (14th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (19th), IT Operations Analytics (9th), Cloud Monitoring Software (13th), AIOps (13th)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user1273302 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user1273302
Global Head of Monitoring at AXA Investment Managers
Good performance, efficiency, and focuses on monitoring
When you choose a solution, you compare the bad points and the good points with the requirements that are needed. DOI does have some bad points. The real bad part is that it's impossible to be integrated on-premise. Broadcom chose to build only on the Cloud. In the beginning, I first started to check on-premise solutions to integrate in the future with Cloud models. So when we chose DOI, we knew the bad point was its obligation to use the Cloud or the SaaS model. But it's not a bad point now because Cloud and SaaS computing is the future of IT. But it's too early to really know about the security and what the other companies are seeing and changing. Monitoring information is critical for a company - information about the IPs, names that we keep, and some technical information. Also critical is the security of the monitoring itself. Broadcom manages the security of the data well. If you have securable monitoring and your team is already using Century or other products, DOI is not a good choice because DOI is not open-source. DOI is a static solution so you will not have access to the code. It is difficult with Sharepoint, too. If you are not in the habit of managing your static Broadcom relationship, it's not easy. The support is in India and it's already closed by the midday shift. The Broadcom support is very bad. I had a previous integration of Broadcom and their static software. But I was able to manage the support. But for new customers, it's quite difficult to create this relationship. Please keep in mind, Broadcom is a very huge company and when you're small or medium, about 1,000 or so employees, if you don't have the team, monitoring will be difficult. If you start a new company or are a startup, don't use Broadcom software. You don't have the weight to negotiate with Broadcom. It's not a bad point with DOI, just a bad point with the Broadcom relationship. But if you only choose DOI, keep in mind that the product is not only its technical capabilities, but also it's support relationship with the enterprise. We already plan to integrate automatic recognition in future releases. Now we don't use a major part of the automatic recognition. The plan is to create or automatically correct some command execution or re-run of the image and to integrate the VPN. The next step is to use the automatic recognition and to bypass the human intervention and to have automatic intervention of the critical system.
Read full review
Pallagani Siva Koteswararao - PeerSpot reviewer
Pallagani Siva Koteswararao
Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy
Comprehensive monitoring streamlines operations with room for user support enhancement
I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support team. Whenever we encounter difficulties, I raise vendor cases and am eager to deepen my understanding of those cases. Additionally, I want to learn more about ScienceLogic's dashboards, which display crucial metrics about collectors, their health, and devices aligned to them. The dashboard should be more detailed. Regarding improvements to ScienceLogic's technical support, my last company was IBM in India, and I worked on IBM MQ monitoring until my last day. I engaged with the LogicMonitor support team for MQ-level incidents, but these issues remained unresolved even after 10 to 15 days. On my last working day, I assisted with one such vendor case, and I am unsure if that issue was ever resolved. ScienceLogic's technical support should respond more efficiently in terms of time. During my time working on MQ-level cases, including a power pack upgrade that did not fix the issues faced, I provided all necessary steps with the help of the middleware team. However, there were still gaps that needed addressing.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We chose DOI because during the proof of concept, the integration of all of our asset management and monitoring payments took three days, which was very short, very quick, and very efficient compared to other solutions where we spent around three or four weeks on integration."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the machine learning and the algorithm. We tried seven solutions. The good points of DOI are performance and efficiency under machine learning systems."
"ScienceLogic was good at proactively identifying problems and could turn a 45-minute outage into a 20-minute outage or even catch early warning signs and solve issues in advance."
"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."
"The customer service and support has been the best of any vendor I have had experience dealing with in my professional history."
"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."
"It has allowed us to grow, as we’re able to offer new services to our customers that they didn't have in the past, opening a whole new door of monitoring offerings to our customers and what we can provide for them on top of what we already are providing."
"The product provides agentless monitoring which is based on SNMP so there's no need to install the monitoring agent on each and every server."
"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities."
"This is the best tool ever which allowed us to consolidate from various monitoring solutions such as HPOV, CA and SCOM."
More ScienceLogic pros
 

Cons

"The Broadcom support is very bad."
"It's impossible to be integrated on-premise. Broadcom chose to build only on the Cloud."
"One important area we feel could be improved is the UI. It takes a lot of clicks to do very simple tasks."
"The UI takes a bit to learn but once you get past that it gets the job done."
"Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial."
"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."
"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."
"ScienceLogic should provide detailed documents to customer as the current documents are not sufficient."
"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."
"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."
More ScienceLogic cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."
"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."
"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."
"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."
"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."
"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."
"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."
"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."
More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise24
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?
I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for ScienceLogic?
Our usual use case of ScienceLogic is as a strategic monitoring tool for all the customers in our company, and because of that reason, all the accounts and projects are migrated from other monitori...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL]
Compared 51% of the time
More CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] Competitors
LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic Logo
LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic
Compared 6% of the time
Datadog vs ScienceLogic Logo
Datadog vs ScienceLogic
Compared 5% of the time
WhatsUp Gold vs ScienceLogic Logo
WhatsUp Gold vs ScienceLogic
Compared 5% of the time
Nagios XI vs ScienceLogic Logo
Nagios XI vs ScienceLogic
Compared 4% of the time
Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic Logo
Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic
Compared 4% of the time
More ScienceLogic Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IT Operations Analytics
May 2026
CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] reportDownload CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
ScienceLogic
April 2026
ScienceLogic reportDownload ScienceLogic product report
 

Overview

CA Digital Operational Intelligence enables IT operations teams to make smarter, faster decisions for enhancing user experience and improving IT service quality and capacity through cross-domain contextual intelligence. Built on an open, powerful engine, it is the leading advanced analytics solution in the market that provides users with comprehensive insights by ingesting and analyzing a diverse data set including metric, topology, text and log data. The machine learning–driven analytics, along with out-of-the-box visualization and correlation, helps drive a superior user experience and deliver significant operational efficiencies.

Broadcom

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?
  • Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
  • PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
  • Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
  • Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
  • Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
  • Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
  • Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
  • Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

ScienceLogic
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell
Buyer's Guide
IT Operations Analytics
May 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, New Relic, Dell Technologies and others in IT Operations Analytics. Updated: May 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.