No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] vs ScienceLogic comparison

Why PeerSpot?
Broadcom and ScienceLogic are both solutions in the IT Operations Analytics category. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of ScienceLogic users who would recommend it.
ScienceLogic
Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews
  • 11,308 Views
  • 1,131 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] and ScienceLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, New Relic, Palantir and others in IT Operations Analytics.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IT Operations Analytics Report (Updated: September 2026).
Buyer's Guide
IT Operations Analytics
September 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA Digital Operational Inte...
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ScienceLogic
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (23rd), Server Monitoring (9th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (17th), IT Operations Analytics (10th), Cloud Monitoring Software (14th), AIOps (11th)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user1273302 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user1273302
Global Head of Monitoring at AXA Investment Managers
Good performance, efficiency, and focuses on monitoring
When you choose a solution, you compare the bad points and the good points with the requirements that are needed. DOI does have some bad points. The real bad part is that it's impossible to be integrated on-premise. Broadcom chose to build only on the Cloud. In the beginning, I first started to check on-premise solutions to integrate in the future with Cloud models. So when we chose DOI, we knew the bad point was its obligation to use the Cloud or the SaaS model. But it's not a bad point now because Cloud and SaaS computing is the future of IT. But it's too early to really know about the security and what the other companies are seeing and changing. Monitoring information is critical for a company - information about the IPs, names that we keep, and some technical information. Also critical is the security of the monitoring itself. Broadcom manages the security of the data well. If you have securable monitoring and your team is already using Century or other products, DOI is not a good choice because DOI is not open-source. DOI is a static solution so you will not have access to the code. It is difficult with Sharepoint, too. If you are not in the habit of managing your static Broadcom relationship, it's not easy. The support is in India and it's already closed by the midday shift. The Broadcom support is very bad. I had a previous integration of Broadcom and their static software. But I was able to manage the support. But for new customers, it's quite difficult to create this relationship. Please keep in mind, Broadcom is a very huge company and when you're small or medium, about 1,000 or so employees, if you don't have the team, monitoring will be difficult. If you start a new company or are a startup, don't use Broadcom software. You don't have the weight to negotiate with Broadcom. It's not a bad point with DOI, just a bad point with the Broadcom relationship. But if you only choose DOI, keep in mind that the product is not only its technical capabilities, but also it's support relationship with the enterprise. We already plan to integrate automatic recognition in future releases. Now we don't use a major part of the automatic recognition. The plan is to create or automatically correct some command execution or re-run of the image and to integrate the VPN. The next step is to use the automatic recognition and to bypass the human intervention and to have automatic intervention of the critical system.
Read full review
Michael Wenn - PeerSpot reviewer
Michael Wenn
CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd
Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement
There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We chose DOI because during the proof of concept, the integration of all of our asset management and monitoring payments took three days, which was very short, very quick, and very efficient compared to other solutions where we spent around three or four weeks on integration."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the machine learning and the algorithm. We tried seven solutions. The good points of DOI are performance and efficiency under machine learning systems."
"ScienceLogic is a good tool, with strong SaaS-based monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments, and it covers many technologies from a monitoring perspective with solid AIOps and event management features."
"The product provides agentless monitoring which is based on SNMP so there's no need to install the monitoring agent on each and every server."
"The best feature is how customizable the platform is, as it can be integrated into various systems and processes and customized to the client's liking."
"ScienceLogic has given us the ability to generate tickets directly from monitoring events."
"Technical Support: The best I've ever experienced."
"We chose the ScienceLogic platform because it really met and exceeded all of the requirements that we had put forth in the RFI."
"The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring."
"A major benefit is eliminating visibility gaps, which motivates me to consolidate tools."
More ScienceLogic pros
 

Cons

"It's impossible to be integrated on-premise. Broadcom chose to build only on the Cloud."
"The Broadcom support is very bad."
"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."
"As we have increased the amount of devices and the range of those devices we have run in to scaling issues which will most likely cause us to stand up a brand new instance of ScienceLogic to meet our needs."
"There are often bugs in new releases."
"Before ScienceLogic, our monitoring was fairly difficult to do. We were kind of limited in our capabilities."
"Use the professional services proposed solution to support private MIBs, we are encountering what appears to be poling time outs, which creates false positives."
"Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial."
"They should improve their support process and add chat."
"Reporting is still a gigantic pain point, we invest a lot of cycles in manufacturing reports off-board -#notfun."
More ScienceLogic cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."
"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."
"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."
"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."
"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."
"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."
"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."
"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."
More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Outsourcing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise27
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?
I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for ScienceLogic?
Our usual use case of ScienceLogic is as a strategic monitoring tool for all the customers in our company, and because of that reason, all the accounts and projects are migrated from other monitori...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL]
Compared 45% of the time
More CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] Competitors
LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic Logo
LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic
Compared 5% of the time
Datadog vs ScienceLogic Logo
Datadog vs ScienceLogic
Compared 4% of the time
WhatsUp Gold vs ScienceLogic Logo
WhatsUp Gold vs ScienceLogic
Compared 3% of the time
Nagios XI vs ScienceLogic Logo
Nagios XI vs ScienceLogic
Compared 3% of the time
Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic Logo
Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic
Compared 3% of the time
More ScienceLogic Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IT Operations Analytics
September 2026
CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] reportDownload CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
ScienceLogic
August 2026
ScienceLogic reportDownload ScienceLogic product report
 

Overview

CA Digital Operational Intelligence enables IT operations teams to make smarter, faster decisions for enhancing user experience and improving IT service quality and capacity through cross-domain contextual intelligence. Built on an open, powerful engine, it is the leading advanced analytics solution in the market that provides users with comprehensive insights by ingesting and analyzing a diverse data set including metric, topology, text and log data. The machine learning–driven analytics, along with out-of-the-box visualization and correlation, helps drive a superior user experience and deliver significant operational efficiencies.

Broadcom

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?
  • Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
  • PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
  • Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
  • Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
  • Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
  • Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
  • Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
  • Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

ScienceLogic
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell
Buyer's Guide
IT Operations Analytics
September 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, New Relic, Palantir and others in IT Operations Analytics. Updated: September 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.