Carbonite Server vs Rubrik comparison

OpenText and Rubrik are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #56, while Rubrik is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9. OpenText holds a 1.0% mindshare in BRS, compared to Rubrik’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Rubrik users who would recommend it.

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

3,168 Views
2,218 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Rubrik

Read 96 Rubrik reviews

18,134 Views
13,056 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

Rubrik

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Rubrik and Carbonite Server both compete in the backup and data protection category. Rubrik appears to have the upper hand due to higher customer satisfaction scores, particularly for ease of use and advanced features.

Features: User reviews highlight Rubrik's live mount, automated workflows, and scalability. Carbonite Server is noted for its straightforward disaster recovery solutions, reliable data restoration capabilities, and simplicity. Rubrik is preferred for more advanced and scalable functionalities, whereas Carbonite Server is favored for user-friendliness.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Rubrik could improve in offering more competitive pricing for smaller enterprises and enhancing support for certain legacy systems. Carbonite Server users wish for better integration with cloud services, more granular backup options, and advanced feature depth.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rubrik is highlighted for smooth deployment and strong customer support, with quick setup times and responsive assistance. Carbonite Server is also easy to deploy but has mixed reviews regarding customer support, with delays and less comprehensive assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Rubrik is seen as a high-investment solution with significant long-term ROI, especially for larger organizations utilizing its full suite of features. Carbonite Server offers a lower upfront cost, appealing for budget-conscious businesses, though it may deliver a lower ROI due to its limited feature set. Rubrik presents higher value in feature richness, while Carbonite Server appeals to those with tighter budgets.

To learn more, read our detailed Carbonite Server vs. Rubrik Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. Rubrik

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

56th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

44th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Rubrik

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

3rd

Ranking in Cloud Backup

3rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Carbonite Server is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rubrik is 3.4%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Rubrik	3.4%
Carbonite Server	1.0%
Other	95.6%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Chris Puddy

Backup, storage and disaster recovery technical specialist at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

A reliable backup product which needs little management

For most technical users the setup and initial deployment are fairly straightforward and once deployed it 99% of the time looks after itself. Installation of the agents is similar to most other products in that it has an install wizard to guide you, the accompanying documentation is also very useful to assist wherever you are in the agent install and policy setup process. Normally our customers' IT team does the deployment of agents, however, this isn't a daunting task unless you are dealing with multiple servers to protect the product. On a server-by-server basis, the deployment doesn't take long. From the MSP side of things, the infrastructure sitting behind the scenes doesn't take too much to install, configure and maintain.

Read full review

Kammara Bheemanna

Information Technology Specialist at LIGHTHOUSE DOCUMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC

Technical support has improved my data management process but I encounter GUI and cost challenges

The solution is available in the Azure Marketplace, but approaching directly is more cost-effective. The Marketplace approach incurs additional platform and reporting costs. We initially built Rubrik at host level and DB level. We encountered latency issues when reverting back, with numerous snapshots available. This resulted in increased costs and occupied spaces. I performed manual deletion of snapshots and verified with the Rubrik team for confirmation. The GUI reporting functionality lacks flexibility. For instance, obtaining specific server reports considering drive space and backup quantities is not possible, as it only provides overall reporting.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is very simple to use and I will recommend it to anybody."

"The advice that I have for people looking into using Carbonite Server is that it seems reliable and easy to use."

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

"It does not slow down your computer or use a lot of resources as it works."

"The solution is a free engine to help work with the container."

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

More Carbonite Server pros

"Replacing these four with Rubrik has definitely saved us a lot of money."

"The system is able to determine when it is the best time to do backups. This is SLA-driven, and if it is not possible to maintain this SLA, the system will tell you too."

"What I like about Rubrik is its strong focus on security, particularly in combating ransomware threats."

"Rubrik backup is more than twice as fast as our previous solution, and its deduplication rate is significantly better."

"There is a lot of flexibility in how it can be deployed, and where their data can be backed up (i.e. on-premise or in the cloud)."

"The feature that I found most valuable is Live Mount. You can either mount a virtual machine from a snapshot, or you can mount a volume from the snapshot. You can mount one disk to the server to retrieve data, or you can mount the whole VM, rename it, and use it as a test VM. If your VM gets corrupted, you just mount one from the snapshot, and you have your production VM's backup. So, Live Mount is definitely the best feature for me as an end-user."

"Rubrik has improved our organization by minimizing downtime (in case of an incident was to occur)."

"Implementing Rubrik has saved us time and money in managing backups, and I estimate that we've saved approximately 80% in terms of time compared to previously."

More Rubrik pros

Cons

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"I would like to see an improvement on the management user interface, as well as Kellion integrations."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"The stability has room for improvement."

More Carbonite Server cons

"The same test case in Rubrik takes more than six to seven times longer, meaning the on-premises SLA is significantly faster."

"The interface is still slightly clunky and has room for improvement."

"There is room for improvement in pricing. After the licensing, the price tends to go up as time goes by."

"The integrated reporting is not really that nicely built. The reporting functionality could definitely be a little bit more customizable from an administration perspective, with an easier to understand interface."

"It would be nice if they could work on the pricing a bit."

"They need to find a solution for SMBs. It is currently only suitable for enterprises or big customers."

"The main pain points we experienced was the stability of the system. We received a lot of instability when we have upgraded from a certain version to a new version. The newer version was completely filled with bugs and we needed to purge the system every week until we update to a newer version that was available one year later. The stability of the code is the main problem, they need to make it better."

"I would like to have a built-in index searching ability of files/system files within the Rubrik interface to determine if a file or item exists, rather than just recovering it, and then doing a search for the file afterwards."

More Rubrik cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"The solution is open source."

"Its price is reasonable."

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"There are additional costs like maintenance, and there are some features on their central management piece that don't come with our licensing."

"Rubrik's support is definitely on the expensive side, but I consider it to be top of the line. We incur no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees."

"It is a great value, but its cost is still a bit high."

"The solution is expensive for small businesses."

"We are on an annual license to use Rubrik and it is priced well."

"We do perpetual licensing... It was all based on the amount of storage we needed to use. We did a cost analysis compared to Tivoli and it was in line with other solutions."

"The cost was less than our previous provider, and this is a much better product."

"Due to this effective, faster backup and recovery solution, we are now able to focus on other creative tasks to meet our entire pipeline. So, we have seen ROI in terms of the improvement of productivity in our team. We save around one million dollars a year."

More Rubrik pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	55

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which would you choose - Rubrik or Veeam Backup & Replication?

Veeam Backup & Replication provides an easy-to-set-up solution to the issue of data storage and recovery. Setting it up is a relatively simple affair. For the most part it prompts you from scre...

See all answers

What do you like most about Rubrik?

It's easy to manage and has an innovated solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rubrik?

Regarding pricing, Rubrik is a costly solution, and I would rate it an eight.

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 3% of the time

Carbonite Safe Backup vs Carbonite Server

Compared 3% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

Commvault Cloud vs Rubrik

Compared 11% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Rubrik

Compared 8% of the time

Cohesity DataProtect vs Rubrik

Compared 7% of the time

Azure Backup vs Rubrik

Compared 4% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Rubrik

Compared 4% of the time

More Rubrik Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

May 2026

Download Carbonite Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Rubrik

April 2026

Download Rubrik product report

Also Known As

Carbonite Recover Backup

No data available

Overview

Carbonite Server offers robust disaster recovery and data protection, with efficient features for restoring and managing complex server environments.

With capabilities like Bare Metal Recovery and SQL granular restore, Carbonite Server supports AIX and AS/400 Series, making it versatile for different platforms. Its efficient replication and failover processes are particularly beneficial for maintaining business continuity. Users appreciate the straightforward setup, responsive technical support, and automatic updates. There is room for improvement in areas such as instant recovery, more granular user permissions, and enhanced cloud integration. Managed service providers find it useful for offering reliable cloud and on-premises backup solutions.

What are the key features of Carbonite Server?

Bare Metal Recovery: Simplifies full system recovery with minimal user intervention.
SQL Granular Restore: Enhances precision in database recovery operations.
Platform Support: Compatible with AIX, AS/400, VMware, vSphere, and vSAN.
Efficient Replication: Facilitates swift disaster recovery and data transfer.
Automatic Updates: Ensures current software status with less manual effort.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Disaster Recovery: Quick recovery processes improve business resilience.
Easy Verification: Simplifies compliance and data integrity checks.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes system resource usage, enhancing performance.
Reliable Support: Access to responsive technical support mitigates downtime.
Data Protection: Comprehensive solutions for cloud backups and data security.

Industries leveraging Carbonite Server enjoy its ability to support cloud backups, off-site data protection, and complex server restoration, especially in virtualized environments. It is widely used by managed service providers to deliver backup services and ensure application consistency in data transfers.

OpenText

Rubrik offers instant recovery and intuitive web interface for seamless data backup in cloud and on-premises environments. It prioritizes security with features like ransomware detection and immutable backups, supporting platforms such as VMware and Oracle for effective disaster recovery.

Rubrik is recognized for its automation capabilities, facilitating SLA management and policy integration. Its API-centric architecture allows for extensive customization and seamless integration. Robust security measures, including ransomware protection, enhance data integrity. Organizations benefit from features like Live Mount and CloudOut, which support rapid data recovery across various environments. Despite its strengths, improvements in integration for complex systems, advanced reporting, and pricing competitiveness are necessary.

What are Rubrik's key features?

Instant Recovery: Restores virtual machines and databases in seconds.
Intuitive Interface: Streamlines user interaction for ease of use.
Automation: Enables seamless SLA management and policy integration.
API-Centric Design: Facilitates customization and integration.
Robust Security: Offers ransomware detection and immutable backups.
Archival Functionality: Manages data storage efficiently, optimizing costs.

What benefits should you look for in reviews?

Data Protection: Confidence in data integrity and ransomware security.
Cost Optimization: Efficient data storage management reduces expenses.
Rapid Recovery: Swift restoration capabilities minimize downtime.
Regulatory Compliance: Supports adherence to data protection standards.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Rubrik's implementation ensures critical data is safeguarded against threats while enabling rapid backups and recovery. By supporting platforms like VMware and Microsoft, it aids in sustaining operational continuity, meeting compliance requirements, and managing long-term data storage efficiently.

Rubrik

Sample Customers

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

Driscoll's, Red Hawk Casino, Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP, Wabash National, Chateau Ste. Michelle Wine Estates, Galliker Transport & Logistics

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. Rubrik

April 2026

Free Report: Carbonite Server vs. Rubrik

Find out what your peers are saying about Carbonite Server vs. Rubrik and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Carbonite Server vs. Rubrik report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors and best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.