Centreon vs Grafana Enterprise Stack comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Centreon and Grafana Labs are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Centreon is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.7, while Grafana Labs is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.6. Centreon holds a 1.5% mindshare in IM, compared to Grafana Labs’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Grafana Labs users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

9,143 Views
6,400 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Read 14 Grafana Enterprise Stack reviews

2,890 Views
2,861 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Centreon

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Centreon and Grafana Enterprise Stack compete in the IT monitoring and data visualization category. Centreon appears to have an advantage for comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring, whereas Grafana is preferred for its robust visualization capabilities and ease of use.

Features: Centreon offers real-time monitoring, customizable dashboards, and flexible integration capabilities. It supports unlimited devices at no extra cost and provides a wide range of plugins for various vendor software. Grafana Enterprise Stack excels in graphical representation and intuitive dashboards. It supports numerous data sources and boasts advanced visualization options to cater to detailed data insight requirements.

Room for Improvement: Centreon could improve the setting of downtime for multiple devices and enhance web application and cloud service monitoring. Users also reported a need for better automation and alert accuracy. Grafana Enterprise Stack's setup complexity and integration with orchestration tools can be improved. Its documentation and alerting features could be more robust, along with implementing AI capabilities for enhanced functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centreon is popular in on-premises and hybrid environments, offering dedicated support but with some regional limitations. Its traditional support structures might be viewed as expensive. Grafana Enterprise Stack, used both on-premises and in hybrid environments, leans on community support. Few users report direct support experiences, reflecting a reliance on its substantial community resources.

Pricing and ROI: Centreon's pricing model, tied to the number of devices, is generally satisfactory although concerns arose with licensing changes. It offers cost savings through its consolidated monitoring capabilities. Grafana's open-source model includes optional paid services for enterprise-level support, making it cost-effective for smaller setups. Its adaptable pricing strategy allows flexibility between free and paid offerings, contrasting Centreon’s more structured approach.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

25th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (22nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (19th)

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.5%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Grafana Enterprise Stack is 0.8%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Grafana Enterprise Stack	0.8%
Centreon	1.5%
Other	97.7%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

Rajan M

Test Lead at Calpine Group

Efficient monitoring and alerting enhance operational insights

With Grafana Enterprise Stack, we can identify issues that New Relic cannot help with. While New Relic requires purchase and supports frontend and backend components, Grafana Enterprise Stack helps identify where issues are occurring. When we need to deep dive into issues, we use New Relic to trace transactions and determine where maximum impact occurs, whether in core size, DB side, or frontend components that slow performance. We first evaluate with Grafana Enterprise Stack, then move to New Relic if we identify performance degradation, such as DB queries taking too much time. Grafana Enterprise Stack responds to queries within 6 to 12 hours. They contact users through email immediately when available. Similarly, New Relic follows the same pattern, responding immediately when requests are raised and resolving issues promptly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This product provides comprehensive reporting for our top management."

"Centreon enables us to proactively take action on issues before they even become incidents, which significantly reduces business disruptions resulting from controllable factors."

"Centreon is a solution, and it is very good and efficient if you put all your infrastructure inside."

"If they have the same issues that we had, which means a lot of pollers spread across the whole infrastructure and no central view to look at the entire status with the need to manage everything together, then it is a good solution."

"Centreon's user-friendly dashboard and minimal resource requirements lead to significant time and cost savings."

"Centreon's most valuable features are preventative maintenance and cost-efficiency. Everything is monitored, and we get a log before the system fails. We have an opportunity to fix the issue and avoid downtime."

"Centreon allowed us to do it without having to look for another solution."

"We are alerted on service impacts and not when something is down. We have saved a lot of time on non-business-hours intervention."

More Centreon pros

"Grafana's most valuable feature is its ability to provide a graphical representation of data collected from various sources."

"The dashboards are pretty good."

"It is truly reliable."

"The ability to graph actual, live, or on-the-fly activity is valuable; it is an added value to work with Grafana Enterprise Stack and to display results or logs, which are huge in nature, in graphical characters."

"Grafana's full observability stack, known as LGTM, is highly valuable."

"Compared to other packages, Grafana Enterprise Stack is user-friendly and easy to configure quickly."

"The most valuable features of Grafana for data visualization are its ability to create intuitive dashboards and its wide range of visualization options like graphs, charts, and tables."

"It is very easy to deploy and integrate with any application or infrastructure layer."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack pros

Cons

"Now that we got it, I haven't had time to work on it since it is a paid solution that is quite expensive."

"Sometimes, when the GUI and some of the search fields are being reset, and I return to the page, then I have to set them again. Therefore, some improvement on the UI and the filtering is needed."

"They only sell four hour slots for support, so if you have just one question, then you need to pay for four hours."

"There is room for improvement in the area of artificial intelligence. The product gives us a lot of information, but it's only information. We want the product to do more auto-remediation."

"To get it started is a lot of work, since it comes empty. We had to push information into it to make it work."

"I would like to see a better UI, one which is more responsive."

"The product collects the information, but it fails to send them via SMS, WhatsApp or Telegram."

"The problem with the reporting is you have to configure the report, and after that, you will have the same report every month, every week, every day. You have to sync it in order to have a great report."

More Centreon cons

"I find Grafana really hard to configure. It's difficult to build the dashboard, and it's non-intuitive. In my opinion, it's very difficult to work with Grafana."

"If Grafana Enterprise Stack could display transaction queries in dashboard format similar to New Relic, it would provide more options and capabilities for users."

"Productivity has been improved with the use of Grafana Enterprise Stack, but cost savings or return on investment specifics are not clear."

"The solution should include integration with Power BI."

"The tool needs to show only fewer updates."

"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved. Currently, one needs to ingest labels and timestamps for them to be connected, however, drilling down sometimes takes time."

"Integrating AI capabilities for automated self-healing and reduced manual interventions would be valuable."

"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would like to see improvement in the licensing model. You can purchase X number of licenses, up to 1,000 devices or 1,000 instances. Your next batch is 2,000. But what if you only need, say, 1,200? The model could be changed a little bit."

"I think Centreon's pricing is fair, especially given the criticality of our system. They were cheaper than the other solutions. The licensing terms were pretty straightforward. I believe it was based on the number of hosts."

"It is perfect and very cheap if you are a little company or startup. After that, it is quite expensive for a big company."

"The pricing starts at around 5000 euro. However, this depends on: Your environment, the size of your host, how many hosts you have, how many remote pollers you have, and if you want to use the Monitoring Business Intelligence or Centreon MAP functionalities."

"In terms of licensing, you have to think through if the components that need licensing are really needed. For example, the Map module: If you don't need a map to be shown, I don't see a point in paying for those licenses, if you just use it a couple of times a month or a couple of times a week... You can use the Centreon free version and get the main features. The licensing part is, I would say, only for bigger customers who have the option to pay more and who really need those kinds of modules, fancy reports, etc."

"The tool is cheaply priced."

"Centreon is always available to develop new plugins when needed. The most important thing is that their maintenance account yearly subscription fee includes the fact that they will maintain the new plugins that you requested them to deliver."

"The solution is very effective, despite the low price."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

"I use the tool's free license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Grafana Enterprise Stack?

I am trying to think about its advanced alerting features; we do not use it too much for that. We do get it to report through to our help desk system and if a threshold gets broken, then a ticket i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Grafana Enterprise Stack?

I have switched to a different suite, focusing on customer edge solutions that are mostly Fortinet. To manage it, I use Grafana Enterprise Stack and a whole bunch of tools that we wrote ourselves. ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Grafana Enterprise Stack?

We use Grafana Enterprise Stack in all of our clients. I rate this product an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 18% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 7% of the time

AimBetter vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 6% of the time

LiveNX vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 4% of the time

Checkmk vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 4% of the time

More Grafana Enterprise Stack Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

September 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Enterprise Stack

September 2026

Download Grafana Enterprise Stack product report

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

Grafana Enterprise Stack is a powerful tool for real-time data monitoring and visualization. With its flexible and scalable features, it is widely used for creating dashboards, analyzing metrics, and gaining insights into infrastructure, databases, and applications.

Its valuable features include powerful visualization capabilities, extensive data source integrations, customizable dashboards, a user-friendly interface, and a robust alerting system. Users appreciate its flexibility, scalability, and ability to integrate with different data sources, making it suitable for a wide range of industries and use cases.

Grafana Labs

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

1. Uber 2. PayPal 3. eBay 4. Sony 5. Red Hat 6. IBM 7. Cisco 8. Adobe 9. Expedia 10. Booking.com 11. Airbnb 12. LinkedIn 13. Twitter 14. Netflix 15. Spotify 16. Pinterest 17. Slack 18. GitLab 19. Docker 20. Atlassian 21. Salesforce 22. Microsoft 23. Google 24. Amazon 25. Facebook 26. Apple 27. Intel 28. Oracle 29. SAP 30. VMware 31. HP 32. Dell

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack

September 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.