Centreon vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Centreon and IDERA are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Centreon is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.7, while IDERA is ranked #86. Centreon holds a 1.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to IDERA’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IDERA users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

9,143 Views
7,223 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure...

Read 5 IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor reviews

2,539 Views
1,930 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Centreon

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Centreon and IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor are competitors in IT infrastructure monitoring. Centreon seems to have the upper hand due to its flexible pricing and robust support, although IDERA offers compelling value because of its feature set and reliability.

Features: Centreon offers extensive customization capabilities, advanced reporting, and robust alerting functionalities. It integrates seamlessly with third-party tools, providing enhanced monitoring functionalities. IDERA provides comprehensive infrastructure monitoring with in-depth insights into network performance using historical data analytics. It highlights detailed network visibility and analytics strength.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centreon is known for straightforward deployment, supported by effective systems that aid in smooth integration and operation. IDERA provides a streamlined installation process with efficient customer service and proactive engagement, which may enhance ease of use.

Pricing and ROI: Centreon is recognized for flexible pricing, leading to favorable ROI over time, appealing to budget-conscious users. IDERA may have a higher initial cost; however, it promises robust long-term returns due to its superior features. Both offer significant ROI, with Centreon appealing for cost-effectiveness and IDERA providing greater economic value through extensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,262 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

22nd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

25th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (19th)

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

86th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

69th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.2%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.2%
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor	0.5%
Other	98.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

Nafiu Garba

Special Assistant to the Governor ICT COO at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

It offers different licensing types that allow you to extend the services to clients; it lets you look into device performance and optimization and helps apply best practices

What I like best about IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is that it offers different licensing types. Hence, it allows my organization to extend the services to clients and not just use the solution within the organization. My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides visibility into the network."

"Centreon's most valuable features are preventative maintenance and cost-efficiency. Everything is monitored, and we get a log before the system fails. We have an opportunity to fix the issue and avoid downtime."

"What I like most about Centreon is that it is very flexible and customizable, based on the user and/or business needs."

"Centreon is a solution, and it is very good and efficient if you put all your infrastructure inside."

"For servers and for applications, it was very, very efficient."

"Centreon's real-time monitoring, despite having some manual aspects, supports us in managing our operations effectively."

"The most valuable feature is that we can manually configure everything we need. After it comes inside the interface of Centreon, you can display it. Because the interface is quite user-friendly, you can manually configure the configuration very deeply, which is very pleasant and useful because you can monitor and see everything on your service list, dashboard, or MAP. The most useful feature for me is that you can create your own plugin and monitoring query."

"The dashboards are valuable because they ease troubleshooting and viewing. It becomes easier to locate the source of a problem... The dashboards make it easier to communicate with our clients. They don't want to see the alert console, they want to see a beautiful dashboard representing their network and their business and to watch it in case something is wrong in their environment."

More Centreon pros

"Customer Service: 5 stars! Excellent. Technical Support: 5 stars! Excellent."

"Easy to setup and begin monitoring."

"My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices."

"Now with the features given through up.time we have over 300 + monitors constantly checking every environment that we have and also checking databases for errors."

Cons

"It is necessary to improve service monitoring of database services in the free version."

"Improvements are needed in the area of cloud monitoring, as that's a newer feature."

"Centreon introduced network discovery in the most recent update. However, it doesn't work well. Our previous monitoring tool could discover networking equipment on the network and identify the relationships between the devices."

"Release management and quality of testing need improvement, because with each major upgrade we have many issues coming in. Then, it takes several minor upgrades to get rid of them."

"The most important issue is the capability to interconnect with other systems. It already exists for some of them. For example, the Stream Connector is something we use to populate data in another system. This kind of facility for connecting should exist for all products that it makes sense to have connected to a monitoring solution."

"The reporting has room for improvement."

"I would like to see more plugins. That is something it needs. There is also room for improvement through dynamic thresholds, or self-discover thresholds. I would also like to see a discovery feature that could map the whole network environment and automatically suggest things."

"I think Centreon's security could be improved by leveraging AI. That's where things are heading in the industry."

More Centreon cons

"While you can restrict particular users to only see subsets of the reports, it isn't as easy as it could be."

"What I want to improve in IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is the community aspect, where IDERA would provide customers with updates on functionalities, what comes next, what IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor upgrades would be released, etc. I also want the sustainability of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to improve."

"Maintenance windows need to be streamlined."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You purchase a package. You have a support contract (there is also a platinum support contract) and it is per module. That means you have to pay, e.g., for the MBI module or the BAM module. Or, if you want to save a lot of money, you can pay for IMP, which is the complete package."

"Centreon is an open source product. Thus, there is no need for licensing."

"Centreon is better than Nagios XI in regards to cost and support response times, when you have a problem. If you have a problem, it costs money to contact the Nagios XI support."

"The solution is very effective, despite the low price."

"In terms of licensing, you have to think through if the components that need licensing are really needed. For example, the Map module: If you don't need a map to be shown, I don't see a point in paying for those licenses, if you just use it a couple of times a month or a couple of times a week... You can use the Centreon free version and get the main features. The licensing part is, I would say, only for bigger customers who have the option to pay more and who really need those kinds of modules, fancy reports, etc."

"If you need basic monitoring without dashboards, just monitoring, the plugins are very useful and really cheap. If you want a more complete solution with dashboards and reporting, the EMS solution is great and it is not that much more expensive. It's a good value. Really good."

"Their licensing model is really easy. You have one license and you have access to all the features, compared to other tools where you have to purchase add-ons."

"I would like to see improvement in the licensing model. You can purchase X number of licenses, up to 1,000 devices or 1,000 instances. Your next batch is 2,000. But what if you only need, say, 1,200? The model could be changed a little bit."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

"I'm based in Nigeria, and the conversion rate affects the pricing for IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor, but globally, pricing is reasonable. I'm rating pricing for the solution seven on a scale of one to ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

28%

Construction Company

25%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

Nagios XI vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

NetFortris LiveWatch vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Compared 4% of the time

More IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

September 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

September 2026

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor report

Download IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor product report

Also Known As

No data available

IDERA UIM, uptime software up.time

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor efficiently monitors and manages IT infrastructure, offering real-time analytics and alerts to optimize performance and prevent downtime.

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor provides comprehensive monitoring for servers, apps, and networks, ensuring seamless operations. It delivers detailed insights through customizable dashboards, offering full visibility into enterprise IT health. Users benefit from automated alerting, performance metrics, and capacity planning tools that enhance reliability and reduce risks of outages.

What are the key features of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor?

Real-time monitoring: Continuously tracks system performance to detect issues immediately.
Custom dashboards: Users can configure dashboards to display critical metrics relevant to their infrastructure.
Automated alerts: Delivers instant notifications on performance problems, allowing for swift action.
Capacity planning: Analyzes trends to predict future utilization needs and support decision-making.
Comprehensive reporting: Generates detailed reports for performance analysis and capacity planning.

What benefits and ROI can reviews highlight?

Increased uptime: Continuous monitoring reduces the likelihood of system failures, enhancing operational continuity.
Improved resource management: Efficient capacity planning leads to optimized resource allocation.
Cost savings: Proactive alerts minimize the costs associated with downtime and emergency fixes.
Enhanced decision-making: Accurate data analysis enables informed strategic planning.

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail where maintaining high availability is critical. It supports IT teams in proactively managing infrastructure, ensuring systems are responsive, secure, and capable of meeting growth demands.

IDERA

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

TeleComputing; Manitoba Hydro; Blevins Inc.; City of Malmö

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

September 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.