Centreon vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Centreon and Juniper are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Centreon is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.7, while Juniper is ranked #53 with an average rating of 8.0. Centreon holds a 1.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to Juniper’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

9,804 Views
7,745 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Read 3 Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reviews

2,483 Views
2,384 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Centreon

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Centreon and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant compete in network monitoring and assistance. Marvis appears to have the upper hand with its AI-driven features offering advanced analysis and automation.

Features: Centreon provides robust monitoring, intuitive alerting, and extensive reporting capabilities with customizable dashboards and various integrations for user flexibility. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant stands out with real-time troubleshooting, AI algorithms for predictive analysis, and advanced network optimization features that enhance proactive network management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centreon's on-premise deployment offers extensive customization options, and although it demands more technical resources, its documentation supports effective deployments. Marvis, with its cloud-based deployment, simplifies setup and requires lower infrastructure investment, complemented by interactive guidance through its assistant, creating a user-focused support experience.

Pricing and ROI: Centreon's pricing model is flexible, offering satisfactory ROI in line with its comprehensive features. In contrast, Marvis's pricing may be higher due to its innovative AI features. However, this is balanced by substantial long-term ROI facilitated by enhanced network efficiency and advanced problem-solving capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

24th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (27th), Cloud Monitoring Software (22nd)

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

53rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.1%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.1%
Marvis Virtual Network Assistant	0.5%
Other	98.4%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

IhorShtanko

Technical Consultant Of Juniper Networks Division at MUK

AI assistant has transformed network troubleshooting and now reduces downtime and support tickets

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant has resolved all problems that network administrators face, making it challenging to identify areas for improvement. Marvis provides good analytics, recommendations, and problem resolutions. One potential enhancement would be to add different languages for different countries because Marvis currently uses only English. For example, since I live in Ukraine, it would be beneficial to communicate with Marvis in Ukrainian because not all administrators know English.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The single-pane view provides us a view of all of our network infrastructure, and it is one of the most important tools that we use to see the status of our customers' networks."

"I can't point to one valuable feature. All of Centreon is good."

"What I like most about Centreon is that it is very flexible and customizable, based on the user and/or business needs. Centreon is very flexible when it comes to monitoring parameters. We can use scripts found on the internet or scripts created by our infra/apps team. Also, the data visualization features are very simple and straightforward, yet very informative."

"What we like about it is that, whereas with Nagios, by design, if you have five or six data centers, you have to open five or six web pages to see what's going on, In Centreon, this is all included in one page, a single site, one dashboard. You don't have to jump from one specific dashboard to the other."

"Centreon provides timesaving and costsaving benefits as it lets us manage multiple devices on a single platform."

"I find the product's scalability to be one of the most valuable features since it allows us to add unlimited devices for monitoring and to set up additional polling servers without additional license cost or downtime in our monitoring."

"This product provides comprehensive reporting for our top management."

"Once everything is set up correctly, it reduces our MTTR by 50 percent."

More Centreon pros

"I believe the pricing of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is reasonable because it allows for a decrease in the quantity of network administrators needed and reduces operational costs."

"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."

Cons

"The most important issue is the capability to interconnect with other systems."

"Now that we got it, I haven't had time to work on it since it is a paid solution that is quite expensive."

"Improvements are needed in the area of cloud monitoring, as that's a newer feature."

"Centreon technical support is only available during Central European business hours. When it comes to critical business solutions, there should be a 24/7 hotline that customers can rely on."

"I would like to see a better UI, one which is more responsive."

"The reporting has room for improvement."

"Centreon supports officially 10,000 services per poller. That is not much for larger customers, because this limit is reached very quickly. We use it with three times the limit without any problems, but Centreon says, "Okay, we are only supporting it with 10,000 services." We are aware that increasing the limit has different impacts because they need to support it. However, for most customers, it would be be very good if they could increase the limit of services."

"Centreon introduced network discovery in the most recent update. However, it doesn't work well. Our previous monitoring tool could discover networking equipment on the network and identify the relationships between the devices."

More Centreon cons

"One potential enhancement would be to add different languages for different countries because Marvis currently uses only English."

"It should add real-time application visibility."

"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Their licensing model is really easy. You have one license and you have access to all the features, compared to other tools where you have to purchase add-ons."

"The pricing starts at around 5000 euro. However, this depends on: Your environment, the size of your host, how many hosts you have, how many remote pollers you have, and if you want to use the Monitoring Business Intelligence or Centreon MAP functionalities."

"Centreon is an open source product. Thus, there is no need for licensing."

"The price is not too high. Licensing is driven by how many hosts you monitor, but because you can run the agentless version, you don't have to declare every host to Centreon, one at a time. That means you can drive your infrastructure supervision with a very low number of declared hosts."

"The solution is very effective, despite the low price."

"If you need basic monitoring without dashboards, just monitoring, the plugins are very useful and really cheap. If you want a more complete solution with dashboards and reporting, the EMS solution is great and it is not that much more expensive. It's a good value. Really good."

"It is perfect and very cheap if you are a little company or startup. After that, it is quite expensive for a big company."

"Centreon is better than Nagios XI in regards to cost and support response times, when you have a problem. If you have a problem, it costs money to contact the Nagios XI support."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

Not all customers use Marvis Virtual Network Assistant because it represents an additional cost as a subscription service. Mist Cloud is a microservices platform, and to use it, customers must purc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is primarily used for fast troubleshooting and identifying root problems across the entire network. It has decreased the quantity of tickets that customers can open...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 11% of the time

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 8% of the time

NETSCOUT Network & Application Observability vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 6% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 6% of the time

More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

October 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

October 2026

Download Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant delivers AI-driven solutions for network management, providing intelligent insights and automation to drive operational efficiency and enhance user experience.

Marvis uses machine learning and natural language processing to offer seamless network operations. It contextualizes issues, automates support tasks, and provides actionable insights to help IT teams make informed decisions. This leads to improved network performance and reliability, fostering a proactive approach in managing network environments.

What are the key features of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

AI-driven Insights: Leverages AI to analyze network data and identify patterns, helping in quick issue resolution.
Natural Language Processing: Simplifies user interactions by interpreting natural language queries.
Automated Support: Automates common network tasks, reducing manual intervention.
Contextual Recommendations: Provides suggestions based on network context and usage patterns.

What benefits should be considered in reviews?

Reduced Operational Costs: Automation reduces the need for extensive IT resources.
Enhanced User Experience: Quick issue detection and resolution improve network reliability.
Informed Decision Making: Actionable insights help in strategic network planning.
Increased Efficiency: Automation and AI streamline network management tasks, saving time.

Industries such as healthcare and education implement Marvis Virtual Network Assistant to ensure secure, reliable connectivity. In healthcare, it supports essential communication and patient data management, while in education, it ensures seamless access to digital learning platforms, optimizing both environments effectively.

Juniper

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

November 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.