Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs CloudBees comparison

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Read 20 CloudBees reviews

5,362 Views
804 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2026

CloudBees and Check Point WAF compete in the realms of continuous delivery and web application security respectively. CloudBees has the upper hand in integration and automation, whereas Check Point WAF triumphs in advanced security and compliance features.

Features: CloudBees provides flexibility, integrating with numerous tools and environments seamlessly, along with pipeline visualization, enabling users to streamline deployment processes easily. Check Point WAF excels in AI-based threat prevention, real-time threat detection, and offers automated updates from threat intelligence.

Room for Improvement: CloudBees can enhance configurations, resolution times, support channels, and error visibility. Check Point WAF could improve its interface, documentation, pricing competitiveness, and anti-bot features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudBees offers flexibility across cloud models with responsive support through CloudBees University. Check Point WAF has flexible deployment but faces initial setup challenges, yet maintains excellent support aligned with SLAs.

Pricing and ROI: CloudBees delivers robust ROI despite its pricing, valued for security audit features. Check Point WAF, though expensive, is seen as competitive and valuable, specifically for security-centric businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. CloudBees Report (Updated: August 2026).

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. CloudBees

Download the complete report

Helped 911,493 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.3

Check Point WAF increases ROI by reducing costs, improving efficiency, enhancing security, and offering a pay-as-you-use model.

Sentiment score

6.7

CloudBees offers reliable support and automation, enhancing ROI and efficiency in deployments and security audits over Jenkins.

When we are attacked, we can understand how important the solution is.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.

Thanos Constantopoulos

Manager, Managed Security Services at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the CloudBees report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.6

Check Point WAF's customer support is praised for responsiveness, though some suggest improvements for complex issue handling and 24/7 availability.

Sentiment score

6.4

CloudBees offers responsive customer service and technical support, though some users report recurring issues and suggest prioritizing user needs.

They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

I also received full technical support, especially during the implementation.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the CloudBees report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.3

Check Point WAF excels in scalability, adapting to diverse cloud environments with a flexible licensing model and SaaS deployment.

Sentiment score

7.5

CloudBees efficiently scales across environments, supporting microservices and integrations, with users praising its operational flexibility and adaptability.

If I need to scale, I open a Whatsapp group with the director and the team, and we quickly proceed to do so.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

They have sufficient resources, and there are no challenges from a scalability perspective.

Mantu Shaw

Project Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Check Point CloudGuard WAF's scalability is very good.

Ruben Ruiz

Sr. VP of Creative & Development at a non-tech company with 51-200 employees

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the CloudBees report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.2

Check Point WAF is highly stable and reliable, with users praising its consistent performance and minimal issues.

Sentiment score

6.6

CloudBees stability is generally rated high, but setup, upgrades, and scaling present challenges affecting overall user satisfaction.

It is very stable.

RicardoFernandes1

Team Leader, Cloudops & Cloud Architect at a consultancy with 501-1,000 employees

It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.

Rui Dias

Sysadmin at a government with 501-1,000 employees

I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.

Charalampos Symeou

Information Technology - Infrastructure and Security at Cyprus Development Bank

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

The deployment can take a couple of hours or a couple of minutes.

For more quotes and insights, download the CloudBees report

Senior Qe Lead at Cognizant

Room For Improvement

Check Point WAF needs UI simplification, better integration, improved documentation, and enhanced AI features for improved user experience.

CloudBees users seek improved error previews, faster resolutions, better UI, AI integration, and enhanced tool integration and performance.

The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

Future releases should include better bot mitigation, behavioral anomaly detection, compliance templates, advanced threat intel integration, and streamlined multi-cloud support to boost protection and usability.

Kresimir Mikolcevic

Senior Cyber Security Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

A machine learning-based adaptive mode could help the WAF learn over time and auto-tune policies.

reviewer2702679

Technical Support Executive at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

If possible, we could sort the logs so we can get the exact error on one page.

For more quotes and insights, download the CloudBees report

Senior Qe Lead at Cognizant

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers find Check Point WAF pricey but valuable for its features, though pricing complexity varies by company size.

Enterprise users justify CloudBees' high pricing due to valuable benefits, appreciated licensing model, and core product features.

It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

It is less costly than Cloudflare, Fortinet, and other vendors.

Mantu Shaw

Project Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.

Baruch Peretz

Ciso at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the CloudBees report

Valuable Features

Check Point WAF excels in AI threat detection, seamless cloud integration, user-friendly interface, and minimizing false positives.

CloudBees excels with user-friendly interface, strong integrations, scalability, security, and features, ideal for complex CI/CD management.

Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.

Domenico Cacciari

Security Administrator at Regione Marche

The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively.

Charalampos Symeou

Information Technology - Infrastructure and Security at Cyprus Development Bank

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

The integration part is good. We can use multiple things by integrating with CI/CD pipelines, and this is very feasible for us.

For more quotes and insights, download the CloudBees report

Senior Qe Lead at Cognizant

Categories and Ranking

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Ranking in DevSecOps

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (5th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (8th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (5th)

CloudBees

Ranking in DevSecOps

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (7th), Configuration Management (9th), Value Stream Management Software (2nd), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (2nd), Feature Management (1st), AI Software Development (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the DevSecOps category, the mindshare of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is 4.4%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudBees is 3.4%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

DevSecOps Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)	4.4%
CloudBees	3.4%
Other	92.2%

DevSecOps

Featured Reviews

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

Consistent automation has improved deployments and supports efficient client-facing workflows

Senior Qe Lead at Cognizant

Deployment and other processes are feasible for me, making this a smooth process. The integration part is good. We can use multiple things by integrating with CI/CD pipelines, and this is very feasible for us. This allows us to do our work easily. The productivity is very good. CloudBees is a good and efficient tool. We can work in client-facing scenarios, and since clients have provided these types of tools, we are able to work on them effectively.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which DevSecOps solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

911,493 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	56
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	36

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive with leaders such as Palo Alto.

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better. This all depends on how the rules are customized and configured, and it c...

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The main purpose is to have network security through machine learning, which can offer threat detection and intelligence for my endpoints, and I am looking for application security. I am looking fo...

What needs improvement with CloudBees?

For CloudBees, I can suggest that the log is very high, which is very hectic for us when trying to find which error is coming. This creates complexity. If possible, we could sort the logs so we can...

What is your primary use case for CloudBees?

We use CloudBees for deploying the code in higher environments, such as QA, C2, staging, and production.

What advice do you have for others considering CloudBees?

We can upload the JAR file and deploy at the Jenkins level during our deployment. These types of labels and IDs can be deployed using CloudBees. Once we click to start the build, it automatically r...

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Comparisons

Compared 7% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Competitors

GitLab vs CloudBees

Compared 7% of the time

AWS CloudFormation vs CloudBees

Compared 6% of the time

Digital.ai Release vs CloudBees

Compared 6% of the time

HashiCorp Terraform vs CloudBees

Compared 5% of the time

Harness vs CloudBees

Compared 5% of the time

More CloudBees Competitors

Product Reports

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) product report

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Download CloudBees product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

No data available

Overview

Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.

Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.

What are the main features of Check Point WAF?

AI and Machine Learning: Preemptively blocks threats without signature reliance.
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and reduces costs.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security posture against zero-day attacks.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup with user-friendly interface.
Comprehensive Protection: Guards against SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

What benefits should be considered by users?

Reduced False Positives: Minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces management overhead.
Insightful Reporting: Enables swift response to threats.
Seamless Integration: Enhances security processes with existing tools.

Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.

Check Point Software Technologies

CloudBees provides a highly scalable and secure platform that supports seamless integration and automation across multiple environments. It excels in managing Jenkins instances and offers flexible deployment options, enhancing efficiency for large teams.

CloudBees is recognized for its integration with Jenkins, SonarQube, and Ansible, allowing companies to leverage its robust automation capabilities for continuous integration and deployment. With its strong support for Docker and Kubernetes, teams benefit from streamlined code management and operational efficiency. Its scalable architecture, real-time feedback, and premium vendor support help manage large-scale applications and microservices. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with pipeline setup, service availability, and GUI accessibility, which suggest room for improvement in these areas.

What are the key features of CloudBees?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies navigation and improves workflow efficiency.
Robust scalability: Supports growth and large-scale application management.
Advanced security: Ensures data security and compliance.
Integration capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with Jenkins, SonarQube, and Ansible.
Flexible deployment: Adapts to different infrastructure needs across environments.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Enhanced efficiency: Automation reduces manual workload.
Real-time feedback: Provides immediate insights into pipeline performance.
Vendor support: Offers assistance for troubleshooting and growth.
Scalable architecture: Accommodates business expansion requirements.

In tech and software industries, companies implement CloudBees for managing complex CI/CD pipelines. Its integration with DevOps tools facilitates automation and workflow optimization. Industries with large teams managing thousands of microservices use CloudBees to maintain high availability, streamline processes, and ensure security compliance, driving efficient production workflows.

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

Capital One, PEGA, vistaprint, HSBC, BOSCH, Starbucks Coffee

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. CloudBees