Checkmarx One vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition comparison

Checkmarx and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category. Checkmarx is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while PortSwigger is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0. Additionally, 88% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

In the category of cybersecurity tools, Checkmarx One and PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition are prominent contenders. Checkmarx One appears to have the advantage due to its comprehensive language support and static scanning features, though Burp Suite shines in dynamic web application security.

Features: Checkmarx One provides comprehensive code scanning without needing compilation, extensive language support, and precise vulnerability identification. It integrates with common repository formats and supports customizable rules. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition excels in dynamic scanning, ease of use, and extensibility through numerous extensions, focusing primarily on web application security and automated scans.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One should address false positives, expand language support, and improve user integration and dashboard functionality. Enhancements in its setup complexity and cloud scalability are also needed. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition should improve stability, decrease false positives, and enhance SAST and mobile security scanning to increase competitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One offers deployment options across private, public, and on-premises environments, with commendable customer service praised for quick responses. PortSwigger Burp Suite focuses on on-premises deployment and provides solid support but lacks cloud deployment flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One is perceived as high cost with a complex licensing model, yet its broad features justify the investment for enhanced security. PortSwigger Burp Suite offers more economical licensing options, including a professional edition, which appeals to smaller firms, though it's considered slightly high-priced for smaller setups.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qualys TotalCloud

Featured Reviews

Robert Orłowski

IT Security Expert at Alior Bank S.A.

Unified risk scoring has improved our cloud visibility and simplifies remediation priorities

Qualys TotalCloud provides unified vulnerability and threat assessment across both IAS and SaaS. This solution provides a single prioritized view of risk, which helps reduce the work I would have to do. We are no longer based on CVSS; we are based on Qualys risk scoring, which is based on CVSS plus internal findings made by Qualys, and then assigns its own score. The TruRisk insight feature has found a small number of assets with high vulnerability scores, though I am cautious since some information is classified. Qualys TotalCloud has positively impacted our bank's performance, and we have definitely seen benefits after implementing this solution.

Read full review

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

Oussama Ben Taher

Studiant at Edifixio

Enables time-saving automated scanning and brute force attacks

The most appreciated functionality of PortSwigger Burp Suite is its ability to perform brute force attacks automatically. Its automated scanning feature saves time. Additionally, using this tool provides significant security insights, making our testing process more efficient and comprehensive, leading to considerable time savings, which in turn translates to financial benefits.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Qualys TotalCloud has significantly reduced our workload in terms of managing risks, helping us to be more efficient and save substantial resources."

"The dashboards are particularly valuable as they offer a comprehensive view of the environment, highlighting any misconfigurations."

"It is a cloud-native app that integrates with both IaaS and SaaS. It seamlessly integrates with other platforms."

"I would definitely recommend Qualys TotalCloud to other users."

"I would recommend Qualys TotalCloud to other users because it is cost-efficient and has a good return on investment."

"TotalCloud provides the easiest and the best approach for cloud infrastructure management."

"Qualys TotalCloud's most valuable feature is its ability to link clusters of assets, providing a clear model of deployments, vulnerabilities, and statuses."

"Qualys TotalCloud has helped us view our risk structure, vulnerabilities, and security posture."

More Qualys TotalCloud pros

"Checkmarx One has positively impacted my organization because in the past, when Checkmarx One scan was not implemented, we faced a lot of issues finding vulnerabilities inside the repository, but now, since we have integrated Checkmarx One into our repository, we can smoothly and very easily find vulnerabilities and manage those effectively."

"The consistency of code showed our team where they are inconsistent or where they have made simple omissions."

"We use the solution to validate the source code and do SAST and security analysis."

"We have been using this product extensively for a lot of applications to identify as well as employ proper remediation which makes the application secure including information issues which might get neglected with a manual code review process."

"The license is fairly costly but worth the investment."

"Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%."

"One of the most important tools in our building process."

"After scanning, it shows in-depth code of where actual vulnerabilities are, which helps us to analyze them."

More Checkmarx One pros

"Parallel scans can be done with PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition."

"The solution's extensions really expand the capabilities and features offered by the installation."

"The most valuable part of it was probably the ability to intercept and modify calls."

"I like normal dynamic scanning, general web applications scanning, and vulnerability assessments."

"The most valuable features of PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition are the vast amount of options and ease of use. They frequently improve the solution every six months to a year. Additionally, if we want any more features we can upload a custom script to meet our needs."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Its automated scanning feature saves time."

"We are in the early stage of using the solution making it difficult to fully determine the best features. However, we have noticed the CMDB and device discovery features look valuable at this time."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition pros

Cons

"An area for improvement would be to focus on risks related to AI, such as large language models and potential data leakage."

"The support process is inefficient due to the excessive number of replies required when submitting tickets."

"A feature improvement could be the inclusion of Windows OS support for container security, as it is currently only supported for Linux."

"Qualys TotalCloud has the potential to improve by integrating a hybrid platform for comprehensive management of both on-premises and cloud infrastructures."

"The patching process with Qualys Patch Management, which is part of TotalCloud, does not cover installing certain prerequisites on the servers or workstations. This shortcoming means we must rely on SCCM when any service stack updates or additional prerequisites are needed."

"TotalCloud could improve its scanning of niche devices like Wi-Fi dongles and USB modems because they are often untested. It covers everything else, like laptops, mobile devices, and Bluetooth IoT devices. They can improve on the small IoT devices because hackers and testers use these."

"We would like to see Windows-based sensors available in Qualys, as this would make the platform more versatile and support a broader range of environments."

"Although TotalCloud is a helpful tool, some of its advanced features are still under development."

More Qualys TotalCloud cons

"If it is a very large code base then we have a problem where we cannot scan it (if more then ~ 30 mb zip file provided - scan is crashes or takes a lot of time)."

"I would like the product to include more debugging and developed tools. It needs to also add enhancements on the coding side."

"Integration into the SDLC (i.e. support for last version of SonarQube) could be added."

"When we have many applications to check, I need to wait a long time in the queue."

"There are some downtimes when Checkmarx One is being upgraded to the latest version or some improvement is there."

"Licensing models and Swift language support are the aspects in which this product needs to improve. Swift is a new language, in which major customers require support for lower prices."

"We have received some feedback from our customers who are receiving a large number of false positives."

"Dynamic testing. If it had that feature I would have liked to see more consideration of framework validations that we don't have to duplicate. These flags are false positives."

More Checkmarx One cons

"There's definitely room for improvement. There are lots of false positives. Once I do the manual assessment, it comes as a false positive. They need to improve the Enterprise Edition, especially the part that gives false positives."

"It would be beneficial if Burp Suite provided predefined payloads for each attack category, such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting, to automate some tasks more effectively."

"The stability of the scans could be improved."

"It would be better if the solution is cloud-based."

"There are features or functionality missing, but PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition does try to update frequently to alleviate the shortcomings."

"It's not a stable product. Sometimes, it takes a lot of time to scan."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition should incorporate a static code analysis feature. One main issue we encounter is false positives. False positives can be challenging for developers."

"The implementation of the solution is quite complicated and could be easier."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is comparable. It is built into our other product, so I cannot piecemeal it. It is a part of our subscription."

"The cost is high, but it meets our organizational needs."

"Although Qualys TotalCloud is relatively expensive due to its unique automation features, its cost-effectiveness is rated an eight out of ten, with ten being the most costly."

"Qualys TotalCloud is cost-efficient and was selected for its value compared to other products."

"Qualys TotalCloud is expensive, but it offers a premier solution with no headaches."

"Qualys TotalCloud is expensive."

"As a middle management member, I do not have direct pricing knowledge, but based on the knowledge from our meetings, its pricing is competitive."

"It isn't cheap, but it's reasonable. It helps us to manage things with very few resources."

More Qualys TotalCloud pricing and cost advice

"We have a subscription license that is on a yearly basis, and it's a pretty competitive solution."

"The average deal size was usually anywhere between $120K to $175K on an annual basis, which could be divided across 12 months."

"If you want more, you have to pay more. You have to pay for additional modules or functionalities."

"Checkmarx is not a cheap scanning tool, but none of the security tools are cheap. Checkmarx is a powerful scanning tool, and it’s essential to have one of these products."

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

"It is the right price for quality delivery."

"The pricing was not very good. This is just a framework which shouldn’t cost so much."

"Be cautious of the one-year subscription date. Once it expires, your price will go up."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is expensive compared to other solutions."

"For Professional, it's about $400 per year."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable and costs around 400 dollars per year."

"Although the solution can be a bit expensive for small companies, its pricing is fairly reasonable for its capabilities."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is neither a cheap nor an expensive product. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is a good tool for companies."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys TotalCloud?

The price is very expensive, actually.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys TotalCloud?

Areas that need improvement in every solution include the remediation part. The remediation steps should be simple en...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys TotalCloud?

Our use case involves the assets that we have under cloud, the assets exposed to the internet, and the internal appli...

See all answers

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as ...

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?

According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed Ap...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additi...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition?

I am using the Community Edition, which is free, however, I understand there might be extra expenses for additional f...

See all answers

What needs improvement with PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition?

It would be beneficial if Burp Suite provided predefined payloads for each attack category, such as SQL injection and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition?

I work with security testing tools for SaaS, focusing on static application security testing and using tools like Bur...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 8% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 6% of the time

JupiterOne vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 5% of the time

Nucleus Security vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 5% of the time

More Qualys TotalCloud Competitors

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 32% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Fortify Software Security Center vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Seal Security vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 30% of the time

Rapid7 Metasploit vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 7% of the time

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 6% of the time

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 6% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 5% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qualys TotalCloud

June 2026

Download Qualys TotalCloud product report

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

June 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

June 2026

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition product report

Also Known As

Qualys TotalCloud with FlexScan

No data available

Overview

Qualys TotalCloud enhances security posture across cloud environments with continuous monitoring, vulnerability management, and risk visualization, ensuring efficient threat assessment and automated remediation for improved cyber risk reduction.

Qualys TotalCloud offers a robust suite of security tools essential for organizations managing multi-cloud infrastructures. By integrating cloud accounts and automating workflows, it supports AWS, Azure, and GCP, offering comprehensive vulnerability management and zero-day detection. The platform's user-friendly design, combined with its extensive risk management and unified threat assessment capabilities, enables organizations to prioritize and remediate vulnerabilities effectively. TruRisk Insights provides clear insights on cyber risks, while the automation options streamline patch management and scanning processes. API integration across IaaS and SaaS environments further enhances resource allocation efficiency and saves time, addressing misconfigurations across cloud environments.

What are the most important features of Qualys TotalCloud?

Accurate Vulnerability Reports: Delivers precise and actionable insights for risk mitigation.
Zero-Day Detection: Identifies and addresses zero-day vulnerabilities proactively.
Unified Threat Assessment: Offers comprehensive evaluation of threats across the environment.
Extensive Risk Management: Manages risks effectively with advanced insights and prioritization.
Continuous Monitoring: Provides non-stop surveillance for vulnerabilities and threats.
Cloud-Native Automation: Streamlines processes and reduces manual efforts using automation.
FlexScan for Internet-Facing VMs: Scans external VMs efficiently to detect vulnerabilities.
Dashboard Risk Visualization: Clear visualization helps prioritize vulnerabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances threat detection and response across clouds.
Time Savings: Automation reduces time spent on manual vulnerability management.
Resource Efficiency: Better allocation of resources through streamlined workflows.
Enhanced Risk Prioritization: Focus on critical vulnerabilities for effective mitigation.
Integrated Cloud Accounts: Facilitates seamless cloud management and security.

Qualys TotalCloud is deployed in sectors needing rigorous vulnerability management, such as finance and healthcare. Companies utilize it to secure multi-cloud environments like AWS, Azure, and GCP, focus on compliance, and integrate security into CI/CD pipelines to detect and remedy threats pre-deployment.

Qualys

Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.

Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.

What are the key features of Checkmarx One?

Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly connects with SCM, CI/CD tools to streamline security workflows.
Accurate SAST and SCA: Precisely identifies vulnerabilities down to the exact line of code.
Custom Rules Configuration: Allows tailored security measures to match specific needs.
Quick Scanning: Provides fast analysis to speed up the development process.
Automated Code Remediation: Helps in efficiently fixing code vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Security: Enhances code safety, reducing vulnerabilities efficiently.
Effective False Positivity Management: Optimizes time spent on genuine issues.
Enhanced Development Processes: Integrates smoothly to boost secure coding initiatives.
Comprehensive Language Support: Facilitates scanning in multiple programming languages, accommodating diverse needs.

Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.

Checkmarx

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is a comprehensive tool for web application security testing, emphasizing ease of use for dynamic scanning and vulnerability assessments. Its automation capabilities enhance efficiency and insights into API, web, and mobile app security.

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is designed for vulnerability assessment, web app security testing, and dynamic application scanning. It enables teams to perform thorough assessments through automated brute force and active scanning features. With extensions, CI/CD integration, and automation, it provides a scalable environment, supporting manual and automated testing seamlessly. Users benefit from effective network call logging, vulnerability interception, and customizable scripting. Organizations from sectors such as IT services and medical equipment rely on it for penetration testing and application auditing, benefiting from its frequent improvements and integration capabilities.

What are the key features of PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition?

Active Scan: Facilitates comprehensive exploration and security insights.
Automation and CI/CD Integration: Enhances efficiency through seamless workflow integration.
Extensions: Expands functionality to meet specific testing needs.
Parallel Scans: Supports high ROI by enabling multiple simultaneous tests.
Customizable Scripting: Offers tailored testing scenarios for diverse applications.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Ease of Use: Allows even beginners to conduct dynamic scanning.
Scalability: Ensures efficient assessments across large environments.
Process Optimization: Seamless integration supports streamlined workflow.
Frequent Improvements: Regular updates to address current issues and needs.

In sectors like medical devices and IT services, PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is integral for penetration testing and compliance verification. Teams use it for manual and automated testing in web and mobile applications, assessing APIs and interpreting network calls to enhance security and certification processes.

PortSwigger

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Nasa, Disney, Dow Jones, Iberia Bank, IBM, Ernest and Young, Apple, Ryanair, Thyssenkrupp, Delivery Hero

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

May 2026

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition and other solutions. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition report.

See our list of best Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) vendors and best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.