Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Ekahau AI Pro comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.1
Number of Reviews
119
Ranking in other categories
Wireless LAN (4th)
Ekahau AI Pro
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
Network Modeling and Simulation (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Ekahau AI Pro aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is designed for Wireless LAN and holds a mindshare of 12.6%, up 12.3% compared to last year.
Ekahau AI Pro, on the other hand, focuses on Network Modeling and Simulation, holds 24.1% mindshare, down 40.2% since last year.
Wireless LAN
Network Modeling and Simulation
 

Featured Reviews

RezaPradipta - PeerSpot reviewer
Streamline network management with a unified dashboard for seamless device integration
The primary use case for Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is mostly for enterprise wireless, including guest Wi-Fi and enterprise Wi-Fi. I use it across various industries with a focus on retail Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN offers a single pane of glass management. It only comes with a controller on the…
Lakshmi  Narayan - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient mobile surveys with a simple setup but room for cloud improvements
As of now, almost everything is there and suitable for site requirements. However, the cloud takes a lot of time to upload the site survey, and we regularly face issues with syncing to the optimizer. There needs to be improvement in this area. Additionally, the product can be very expensive.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the application visibility, which is one of the main features."
"It will allow me to integrate another system very quickly, as we continue expanding for our client."
"Its flexibility, ease of management via the portal, and the variety of access points are the most valuable features."
"The product is super stable. I would rate the stability a ten."
"The solution is fast."
"We can deploy it and check in on our customers without having an on-site connection or an on-site infrastructure for elderly customers."
"It makes the process much easier by providing visibility and centralized control over the network."
"It is cloud-based. You can manage it remotely from anywhere in the world, and you don't have to be on-site, which is a very big advantage."
"We are satisfied with the way this product is working."
"The most valuable when it comes to this solution for me is the fact that I don't have to go out and do a site survey. With this solution, I can do it all predictably with the usual 90% accuracy."
"Ekahau Site Survey is user-friendly."
"The OEM dashboard has a lot of useful features to troubleshoot the Wi-Fi."
"The spectrum analysis capability is very good. It provides deep insights into the Wi-Fi environment. It's not just about troubleshooting interference but also optimizing access points and modifying power levels and channels."
"The ability to perform dual-band spectrum analysis while conducting the standard WiFi site survey is a tremendous time saver."
"I have found the most valuable feature is the RF interference and integration capabilities."
"Ekahau Site Survey can be crucial for troubleshooting our Wi-Fi network."
 

Cons

"The licensing model is a terrible idea."
"Initially, I liked some of the filtering features, but that's one of the components that we ran into problems with."
"It would be nice to have licensing that stays in place while the system is being renovated or changed."
"The error logs need to be much more comprehensive."
"Its price should be reduced."
"In the next release, I would like to see a third-party high tech center to connect multiple users to a particular network."
"The dashboard could be a bit better. I'd like to see more information about the whole controller and APs. It should be as simple and convenient."
"In some cases, they could include enhanced features in the product, such as a firewall console and traffic analysis."
"Ekahau would benefit by making improvements to lag time."
"I would say that the indoor site accuracy is pretty good but the outdoor one should be improved. I would say if there was a way to put trees in there and canopies, that would be great."
"Most features are there, but the network adapter support should be better. Ekahau should support all laptops and versions. There's an issue with the driver too."
"Ekahau Site Survey is an expensive solution, and its pricing should be improved."
"The support is an area in need of improvement."
"Our CTO was not real happy with their support."
"I find the power button hard to access with just one hand."
"The cloud takes a lot of time to upload the site survey, and we regularly face issues with syncing to the optimizer."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's not super expensive and it's not super cheap."
"The pricing is on the higher side."
"The price is negotiable."
"When compared to other vendors, Cisco's pricing is higher."
"The price is good, but it could be improved."
"The cost of both the hardware and licensing is high, and it is more than what I would prefer to spend currently."
"Meraki is a very good solution, but the price is quite high for small markets."
"It is super expensive for what you get. You also have to buy a license every year. Otherwise, it stops working."
"I believe that it is approximately $2,000 per year for us. I know we pay for it on an annual basis."
"9,000 Euro per year."
"We pay a licensing fee."
"That's a tricky thing. When it started off, we had one three-year license and one one-year license because we have two devices. Now, from my understanding, we can only renew every year or get a one-year license, and that cost varies. Being a government organization, we get a different cost than commercial. We have deployed it on Surface Pro tablets. So, the only other cost would be the hardware cost."
"The product is quite expensive."
"Ekahau Site Survey is a really expensive solution."
"The pricing is high."
"The pricing is quite expensive. Not all companies can afford it"
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.
856,278 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Computer Software Company
14%
Educational Organization
9%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?
Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...
Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...
How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...
What do you like most about Ekahau Site Survey?
We reviewed the maps as a team and determined if any changes needed to be made or if we could just replace APs as they are. We got into this by upgrading our access points to Meraki, and we wanted ...
What needs improvement with Ekahau Site Survey?
Ekahau could be improved by adding three-dimensional modeling, as we currently cannot view APIs in a three-dimensional perspective. They need to include backhaul features and improve the ease of in...
 

Also Known As

MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN
Ekahau Site Survey
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins
Presidio, Planet Earth, Ruckus
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Ruckus, Cisco and others in Wireless LAN. Updated: May 2025.
856,278 professionals have used our research since 2012.