Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks comparison

Cisco and Arista are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cisco is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.7, while Arista is ranked #24. Cisco holds a 10.2% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Arista’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Arista users who would recommend it.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Read 122 Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reviews

10,390 Views
9,247 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Mojo Networks

Read 17 Mojo Networks reviews

991 Views
971 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Mojo Networks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mojo Networks compete in the wireless LAN market, with Cisco Meraki appearing more user-friendly due to its comprehensive cloud management features.

Features: Cisco Meraki offers centralized cloud management that simplifies configuration and enhances network visibility. Its dashboard allows easy monitoring of multiple devices, along with real-time analytics for network optimization. Meanwhile, Mojo Networks, integrated with Arista, is known for its robust security, including WIPS, and excels in high-density environments with advanced guest analytics.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki could benefit from more advanced features typical of non-cloud solutions and enhanced GDPR compliance while Mojo Networks might improve its user interface and dashboard integration. Both could enhance their support models for consistency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki is praised for versatile cloud deployment options and strong support through multiple channels, whereas Mojo Networks provides both cloud and on-premises options with a direct support line. Mojo's support can sometimes be inconsistent but is generally acceptable.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki is relatively expensive with additional licensing costs but offers good ROI through its ease of use and advanced features. Mojo Networks, on the other hand, stands out for its cost-effectiveness and robust functionality, providing a significant cost advantage for budget-conscious buyers.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Ranking in Wireless LAN

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

122

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mojo Networks

Ranking in Wireless LAN

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is 10.2%, down from 12.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mojo Networks is 1.1%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN	10.2%
Mojo Networks	1.1%
Other	88.7%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

DolfKrikke

Senior Network Architect at Previder

Centralized management has simplified remote branch control and improved network visibility

Cisco Meraki Wireless is very powerful and very easy to manage. The solution is also integrating Cisco Catalyst Wireless products into their portfolio, and they are managing the Catalyst switches as well. The seamless roaming capabilities function well. I monitor network performance with Meraki's real-time analytics. The most useful metrics to my team are the internet performance metrics, as there is a lot of information in the dashboard that I can access. All auditing and event logs are centralized in the dashboard. When I need to apply to compliance requirements or other regulatory needs, I can have my auditing in one place, which is an advantage. I use Cisco Meraki Wireless's Layer 7 application traffic shaping with the MX and the Meraki MX Firewalls.

Read full review

Robert Wambani

CTO at JabJabGroup

Offers great control and visibility to users, along with availability on the cloud

The other solutions did not offer the visibility that Mojo Networks offered. During the rolling out of the installation process, you have to go through the on-premises model to be able to make some changes. If somebody needs to make necessary changes, you must go to the on-premises model with the initial product. With the cloud solution, you don't have to go for the on-premises model, as you can make the changes over the cloud. The stability offered by Mojo Networks is better than the other products available in the market since, with other tools, you need to keep restarting them frequently, and it may be required once or twice a day, especially if it is used as an enterprise solution or in an enterprise environment, where the traffic is too high, causing the build-up of a lot of cache memory, fill-ups, and SRAM, a reason why one will have to restart such products.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I really don't have any problems with the stability of the product."

"Tracking the usage of staff, access points, switches and routers becomes an insanely easy thing and so do producing reports for your Exec team."

"The Dashboard, with its centralized cloud interface, is the most valuable feature of Meraki and provides the perfect solution for smaller organizations, those with a small IT staff, and those with basic wireless needs."

"With Cisco products and third-party products, integration of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is good."

"Multiple access ID capabilities, meshing, and the quality of the product itself are all valuable features."

"The stability of the Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is very good."

"It is cloud-based. It has a GUI rather than a command line, and it just works."

"The solution's most valuable features at that time were the ease of managing on the cloud without having a server and the authentication using RADIUS integrated with the server on the cloud."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pros

"The pricing was a good value and substantially less than some of the other products that we looked at, and in some cases, with some of the bigger names, this product was even close to half the price."

"The cloud-based architecture of the controller is valuable because it obviously saves on my hardware costs."

"It has given us a huge leg-up when competing with other managed service providers who use different vendors because of the visibility it gives us to customers' traffic for troubleshooting purposes."

"The Mojo has proved to handle these high-density requirements and perform better than many competitive devices."

"We just plugged it in and it worked. That just doesn't happen. We plugged it in and it worked and all 100 kids got on the test and started testing."

"If you go with Mojo, you're not going to be sorry."

"The technical support for the solution is very helpful."

"It's scalable. You don't have to configure an access point. Literally, if I needed a new one, I just take it right out of the box, go plug it into our network. It finds our Mojo network, and then it talks to the other access points that are close to it, and then it literally adopts the policies, and meshes itself in our network."

More Mojo Networks pros

Cons

"This solution could benefit from a heat mapping ability so that you can tell where the hotspots are, and where the good signals are."

"The integration options with third-party applications need enhancement."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"The most important improvement needed is to eliminate the limitation of uplinks."

"The logging sometimes doesn't give us the granularity needed. Some of the rules are a bit more complicated. The switch ports on the routers are not individually addressable, in the sense that with a switch you can tell what MAC address is on what port but with the security appliances, you can't, which would be beneficial for troubleshooting."

"The solution's pricing could be improved."

"It would be good to integrate with ISE in the future."

"I would like to see Cisco Meraki improve the accessibility by region level here in Latin America."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN cons

"Needs greater simplicity in the management portal. Currently, the Mojo portal presents different apps to configure the devices, create splash pages, configure security settings, and monitor the network."

"The user interface could use improvement, and Mojo is working on it. The features and functions are in two different places, and they are in the process of moving them into one place."

"The RF signalling and data analytics parts should be improved."

"Both further expanding the API and access to even more diagnostics, as I have found a few limitations when I am dealing with them right now."

"The implementation could be simplified. Right now it's a bit complex."

"Further expanding the API and access to even more diagnostics, as I have found a few limitations when I am dealing with them right now."

"Needs greater simplicity in the management portal. Currently, the Mojo portal presents different “apps” to configure the devices, create splash pages, configure security settings, and monitor the network. This can be confusing, although Mojo has made great strides in combining these into “Aware”."

"The product's initial setup phase and configuration are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

More Mojo Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is okay for an enterprise. Its licensing is the most painful. If you hear anything bad about Cisco, it's about that. We're supposed to be one of the resellers but had to come back down to become a user. It's really bizarre."

"Since it's been acquired by Cisco, it's an even higher cost."

"This solution is quite costly and there are costs in addition to the licensing fees."

"There are multiple licensing options including three months, six months, and one year."

"It is expensive, but it is a good product."

"Negotiate the deal put in front of you!"

"The platform is expensive."

"My client has made comments on the price, indicating it is expensive, however you do receive a lot for the money that you did spend on the solution. The price of the annual renewal of the licensing of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is a little high. We wish the price would drop."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pricing and cost advice

"The cost is a one-time fee."

"I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Since they have only the cloud and on-premises platform, the price looks good compared to the other OEMs like Cisco and Ruckus. For one of the Wi-Fi 6 access points for five years, they might be charging 20,000 to 25,000 INR."

"Pricing includes the planning tools, management, security, analytics, and advanced guest WiFi capabilities. It's always better to buy the longest term available for the best ROI. However, device will continue to function without valid cloud license."

"The license is provided per access point, so you buy an access point and you use it."

"The price of the solution is too high for our country."

"It requires a license and that's a recurring cost and that has a really high cheque value."

"In Australian dollars, we buy it for five years at $1,200."

More Mojo Networks pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Marketing Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	69
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	31

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?

Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...

See all answers

Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...

See all answers

How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mojo Networks?

I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. People are not used to cloud-based Wi-Fi solutions. When it comes to cloud-based Wi-Fi sol...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Mojo Networks?

The product's initial setup phase and configuration are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required. Those who are not familiar with the product might not be able to set it up p...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mojo Networks?

Most of our company's clients use the product in enterprise settings. In terms of the security features, I feel the firewall is present in the product and it works pretty well for enterprise-sized ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 34% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 10% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 4% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Competitors

Fortinet FortiWLM vs Mojo Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Mojo Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

SonicWall SonicWave Access Points vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

More Mojo Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

March 2026

Download Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN product report

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks

March 2026

Download Mojo Networks product report

Also Known As

MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN

Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware

Overview

Cisco Meraki access points are built from the highest grade components and carefully optimized for a seamless user experience. The outcome: faster connections, greater user capacity, more coverage, and fewer support calls. The Cisco Meraki dashboard gives visibility into the network users, their devices, and their applications. Armed with rich analytics, administrators can quickly create access control and application usage policies, optimizing both the end-user experience and network security.

Cisco

Mojo is revolutionizing WiFi through the power of the cloud and open standards. We liberate networks from proprietary hardware and utilize the full power of the cloud to deliver cognitive WiFi: a self-driving network that makes things remarkably simple and reliable at massive scale. Mojo WiFi is not just secure itself but also secures your wired network and IT assets from wireless attacks. Mojo Network’s innovations provide superior WiFi experience, effortless troubleshooting and empowers IT with better user experiences, more options, and more velocity, all at much lower costs.

Arista

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins

Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

March 2026

Free Report: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.