Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks comparison

Cisco and Arista are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cisco is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.8, while Arista is ranked #26. Cisco holds a 10.5% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Arista’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Arista users who would recommend it.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Read 121 Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reviews

10,528 Views
9,370 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Mojo Networks

Read 17 Mojo Networks reviews

686 Views
665 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Mojo Networks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mojo Networks compete in the wireless LAN market, with Cisco Meraki appearing more user-friendly due to its comprehensive cloud management features.

Features: Cisco Meraki offers centralized cloud management that simplifies configuration and enhances network visibility. Its dashboard allows easy monitoring of multiple devices, along with real-time analytics for network optimization. Meanwhile, Mojo Networks, integrated with Arista, is known for its robust security, including WIPS, and excels in high-density environments with advanced guest analytics.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki could benefit from more advanced features typical of non-cloud solutions and enhanced GDPR compliance while Mojo Networks might improve its user interface and dashboard integration. Both could enhance their support models for consistency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki is praised for versatile cloud deployment options and strong support through multiple channels, whereas Mojo Networks provides both cloud and on-premises options with a direct support line. Mojo's support can sometimes be inconsistent but is generally acceptable.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki is relatively expensive with additional licensing costs but offers good ROI through its ease of use and advanced features. Mojo Networks, on the other hand, stands out for its cost-effectiveness and robust functionality, providing a significant cost advantage for budget-conscious buyers.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Ranking in Wireless LAN

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

4.5

Number of Reviews

121

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mojo Networks

Ranking in Wireless LAN

26th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is 10.5%, down from 13.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mojo Networks is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN	10.5%
Mojo Networks	0.6%
Other	88.9%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

MiguelDe Bique

Independent Information Technology and Services Professional at a non-profit with 1-10 employees

Provides robust remote configuration and reliable support for managing wireless networks

The best features of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN include the excellent reporting; the dashboard reporting aids us a lot in troubleshooting issues, and the platform is very robust. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is very stable, and the performance is there, as we normally do throughput tests that align with the manufacturer's specs. We use Meraki's Layer 7 application traffic shaping. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN has helped optimize network traffic very effectively, as we do prioritization for streaming and web conferencing apps, resulting in a clear, visible improvement in performance. The capability to configure network policies remotely is the most important aspect for our organization, as we are an MSP providing remote support for all our clients. We monitor network performance with Meraki's real-time analytics. We find client performance metrics most useful to know how the wireless clients are receiving service and the quality of service.

Read full review

Robert Wambani

CTO at JabJabGroup

Offers great control and visibility to users, along with availability on the cloud

The other solutions did not offer the visibility that Mojo Networks offered. During the rolling out of the installation process, you have to go through the on-premises model to be able to make some changes. If somebody needs to make necessary changes, you must go to the on-premises model with the initial product. With the cloud solution, you don't have to go for the on-premises model, as you can make the changes over the cloud. The stability offered by Mojo Networks is better than the other products available in the market since, with other tools, you need to keep restarting them frequently, and it may be required once or twice a day, especially if it is used as an enterprise solution or in an enterprise environment, where the traffic is too high, causing the build-up of a lot of cache memory, fill-ups, and SRAM, a reason why one will have to restart such products.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The interface makes it easy to manage."

"The most important feature is flexibility."

"It is cloud-based. You can manage it remotely from anywhere in the world, and you don't have to be on-site, which is a very big advantage."

"With Cisco products and third-party products, integration of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is good."

"I would recommend Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN simply because of the ease of deployment and its reliability."

"The solution's most valuable features at that time were the ease of managing on the cloud without having a server and the authentication using RADIUS integrated with the server on the cloud."

"Cloud managed wireless LAN product that's stable and scalable. It's an easy to deploy and easy to troubleshoot solution."

"The settings of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN can be very granular. You can lock down and block devices with the controls. For example, we have four different wireless settings, such as guest, employee, security, and backup. For example, the settings for the employees, if they use laptops, they're required to have certain settings, such as an antivirus installed. If they do not then Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN will not let them connect. This is very good protection because the network works on the bringing your own device(BYOD) principle. It's a BYOD environment now, and you also don't want them to bring infection into the environment because these people are connecting to the LAN via wireless connections. We have to be careful because we're managing it, we have to be very strict with regards to the rules and policies."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pros

"It is a hundred percent scalable product since its functionalities are good...It is a very stable product."

"We can see what the network is being used for or where problems may be."

"Mojo Networks (Arista WiFi) is extremely secure with WIPS, built-in wireless."

"The security is a valuable feature."

"The configuration is simple and the reports can be automated."

"Their Cognitive WiFi analytics (Mojo Aware) is the biggest feature on their dashboard. It helps us know where the problem, so we don't have to spend time with the customer diagnosing it."

"The technical support for the solution is very helpful."

"The cloud-based architecture of the controller is valuable because it obviously saves on my hardware costs."

More Mojo Networks pros

Cons

"The solution cannot be looked upon for one year or short term because you will pay back all the discounts they offer the next time you pay for renewal."

"We have used technical support for some issues but not many times."

"The technical support from Cisco is good, but they can improve themselves in some areas. Sometimes it takes a while to provide a solution or an answer to our problem."

"When it comes to switching, Meraki lacks categories of features."

"The initial setup of the solution can be improved and made easier."

"The most important improvement needed is to eliminate the limitation of uplinks."

"The price could be slightly lowered to make it more competitive in the market."

"We're are not fully utilizing the features of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN to know a more in-depth analysis of what areas need to be improved. However, the security could improve. It would be a benefit to be able to lock out particular clients that are trying to connect from outside the building."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN cons

"The RF signalling and data analytics parts should be improved."

"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."

"Something that could be improved is the ability to easily and quickly see what speed someone is on and if there are any issues on the network. We are using the older software technology, so maybe their newest version is able to do that."

"The solution is a bit pricier than Cisco."

"Compared to other OEMs, Mojo Networks or Arista faces a little bit of coverage issues. So, if we put the same dBm, the power of the other OEMs indicates much more extensive coverage compared to Mojo or Arista."

"The customer service and support took a lot of time to come on the troubleshooting call."

"The distribution can be improved, particularly in this part of the world."

"My only complaint about this product is its availability. Not many people can stock it and ordering from overseas is a challenge."

More Mojo Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is super expensive for what you get. You also have to buy a license every year. Otherwise, it stops working."

"The price is good, but it could be improved."

"The platform is highly priced."

"Higher subscription fee may be necessary if extra features are required."

"It could be more affordable than other solutions."

"As is always the case, the price could be better, although I do not recall exactly how much this comes out to."

"I haven't conducted a price comparison yet, but based on information, it appears to be more affordable than the current environment. Therefore, I consider the price to be reasonable."

"At this price point, I would not mind seeing a four-way channel, instead of a 3x3 or a 4x4, like they do in the Cisco Aironet system with their other brand. For the same price point in this other Cisco brand, it is a lot cheaper, and you can get a slightly better throughput than you can with these."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pricing and cost advice

"Of every solution we looked at, every wireless solution, Mojo was a minimum of six figures cheaper. Minimum. Most of them were double, which again is unheard of. Not only do you get all the feature benefits, like everything is there, everything just works, but at the same time, it was a no-brainer, because of the cost. It's almost like you hit the lottery."

"The license is provided per access point, so you buy an access point and you use it."

"The pricing was a good value and substantially less than some of the other products that we looked at. In some cases, with some of the big names, this product was even close to half the price."

"In Australian dollars, we buy it for five years at $1,200."

"We have a term that is renewed every three years."

"Since they have only the cloud and on-premises platform, the price looks good compared to the other OEMs like Cisco and Ruckus. For one of the Wi-Fi 6 access points for five years, they might be charging 20,000 to 25,000 INR."

"The cost is a one-time fee."

"It requires a license and that's a recurring cost and that has a really high cheque value."

More Mojo Networks pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	69
Midsize Enterprise	26
Large Enterprise	31

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?

Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...

See all answers

Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...

See all answers

How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mojo Networks?

I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. People are not used to cloud-based Wi-Fi solutions. When it comes to cloud-based Wi-Fi sol...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Mojo Networks?

The product's initial setup phase and configuration are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required. Those who are not familiar with the product might not be able to set it up p...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mojo Networks?

Most of our company's clients use the product in enterprise settings. In terms of the security features, I feel the firewall is present in the product and it works pretty well for enterprise-sized ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 33% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 11% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 5% of the time

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Competitors

Mist AI and Cloud vs Mojo Networks

Compared 17% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 16% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Mojo Networks

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 11% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Mojo Networks

Compared 11% of the time

More Mojo Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

January 2026

Download Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN product report

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks

January 2026

Download Mojo Networks product report

Also Known As

MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN

Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware

Overview

Cisco Meraki access points are built from the highest grade components and carefully optimized for a seamless user experience. The outcome: faster connections, greater user capacity, more coverage, and fewer support calls. The Cisco Meraki dashboard gives visibility into the network users, their devices, and their applications. Armed with rich analytics, administrators can quickly create access control and application usage policies, optimizing both the end-user experience and network security.

Cisco

Mojo is revolutionizing WiFi through the power of the cloud and open standards. We liberate networks from proprietary hardware and utilize the full power of the cloud to deliver cognitive WiFi: a self-driving network that makes things remarkably simple and reliable at massive scale. Mojo WiFi is not just secure itself but also secures your wired network and IT assets from wireless attacks. Mojo Network’s innovations provide superior WiFi experience, effortless troubleshooting and empowers IT with better user experiences, more options, and more velocity, all at much lower costs.

Arista

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins

Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

December 2025

Free Report: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.