Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks comparison

Cisco and Arista are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cisco is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.0, while Arista is ranked #24. Cisco holds a 9.3% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Arista’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Arista users who would recommend it.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Read 122 Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reviews

11,464 Views
10,203 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Mojo Networks

Read 17 Mojo Networks reviews

1,434 Views
1,405 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Mojo Networks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mojo Networks are competitors in cloud-managed wireless networking solutions. Meraki is favored for its ease of deployment and robust integration, making it appealing for less technical users, while Mojo is recognized for its strong security features, which may be more attractive to those prioritizing network protection.

Features: Cisco Meraki offers comprehensive visibility into network issues via its centralized dashboard, easy deployment, and good device integration capabilities, which appeal to users seeking streamlined management. Mojo Networks, recently acquired by Arista, is distinguished by its advanced security features, like Wireless Intrusion Prevention System (WIPS), guest WiFi capabilities, and robust analytics tools that provide detailed insights into network usage and performance.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki could improve on the granularity of data logs and simplify complex rule configurations, as users find these areas challenging. Additionally, its licensing model and customer support have been flagged as problematic, with support seen as sometimes slow. Mojo Networks would benefit from a more intuitive management portal and a more integrated dashboard experience to streamline network monitoring and configuration. Users also desire expanded application security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mojo Networks provide easy deployment through cloud-based solutions, but the customer service experiences differ. Cisco Meraki's support is generally fast and effective, though inconsistent at times. Mojo Networks is praised for its responsive technical support, making it easier for users to engage with support teams for problem resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is known for premium pricing that reflects its high-quality performance, though the cost of licensing can be high if licenses expire. Despite this, many users report a positive ROI due to reduced administrative overheads. Mojo Networks offers competitive pricing compared to major brands like Meraki and balances cost with strong features. Its pricing is appealing to those valuing security and ease of use, providing significant ROI by lowering operational expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Ranking in Wireless LAN

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

122

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mojo Networks

Ranking in Wireless LAN

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is 9.3%, down from 12.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mojo Networks is 1.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN	9.3%
Mojo Networks	1.4%
Other	89.3%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

DolfKrikke

Senior Network Architect at Previder

Centralized management has simplified remote branch control and improved network visibility

Cisco Meraki Wireless is very powerful and very easy to manage. The solution is also integrating Cisco Catalyst Wireless products into their portfolio, and they are managing the Catalyst switches as well. The seamless roaming capabilities function well. I monitor network performance with Meraki's real-time analytics. The most useful metrics to my team are the internet performance metrics, as there is a lot of information in the dashboard that I can access. All auditing and event logs are centralized in the dashboard. When I need to apply to compliance requirements or other regulatory needs, I can have my auditing in one place, which is an advantage. I use Cisco Meraki Wireless's Layer 7 application traffic shaping with the MX and the Meraki MX Firewalls.

Read full review

Robert Wambani

CTO at JabJabGroup

Offers great control and visibility to users, along with availability on the cloud

The other solutions did not offer the visibility that Mojo Networks offered. During the rolling out of the installation process, you have to go through the on-premises model to be able to make some changes. If somebody needs to make necessary changes, you must go to the on-premises model with the initial product. With the cloud solution, you don't have to go for the on-premises model, as you can make the changes over the cloud. The stability offered by Mojo Networks is better than the other products available in the market since, with other tools, you need to keep restarting them frequently, and it may be required once or twice a day, especially if it is used as an enterprise solution or in an enterprise environment, where the traffic is too high, causing the build-up of a lot of cache memory, fill-ups, and SRAM, a reason why one will have to restart such products.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For small to medium-sized businesses, I think it's the best."

"All of the compliances are available with Cisco Meraki; for example, you have all of the HIPAA compliance, Cisco Meraki is HIPAA compliant, and because of HIPAA compliance, it can be used in the pharmaceutical industries, and I like cloud-based monitoring."

"The most valuable features are the management tools, including monitoring and reporting."

"The most valuable feature is that the solution is friendly to manage."

"The most valuable aspect of this solution is the single pane of glass management and reliability."

"I like the status page Cisco added that shows you the health of the wireless connection."

"The interface makes it easy to manage."

"I think the IoT integration is the most valuable. I started applying IoT solutions 12 years ago on location-based services. Aruba had implemented this at the time. So I think the integration, particularly into the applications and stuff, is pretty interesting in Meraki."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pros

"The Mojo has proved to handle these high-density requirements and perform better than many competitive devices."

"At certain points, there are hardware updates and they send notifications before they do the updates."

"Their Cognitive WiFi analytics (Mojo Aware) is the biggest feature on their dashboard. It helps us know where the problem, so we don't have to spend time with the customer diagnosing it."

"The security is a valuable feature."

"It is a hundred percent scalable product since its functionalities are good...It is a very stable product."

"For support, we do not have to deal with a whole phone menu tree. You get to talk to an engineer right away."

"If you go with Mojo, you're not going to be sorry."

"The solution is very stable."

More Mojo Networks pros

Cons

"Documentation could be improved, but everything else has been spot-on."

"The solution could improve the licensing structure and the price is expensive. The subscription model needs to improve because when the subscription expires the solution stops working and you are not able to use the product."

"Initially, I liked some of the filtering features, but that's one of the components that we ran into problems with."

"It would be nice to have licensing that stays in place while the system is being renovated or changed."

"The technical support from Cisco is good, but they can improve themselves in some areas. Sometimes it takes a while to provide a solution or an answer to our problem."

"There needs to be some work done on security because, with time, some viruses may emerge that one may not know about."

"The logging sometimes doesn't give us the granularity needed."

"We would like to see Wi-Fi 6 support for devices sold in the Middle East, however, Meraki has introduced WiFi-6 where we would strategize our GTM plans for WiFi 6, where we would offer WiFi 6 to specific customers with extensive needs of high WiFi availability in KSA."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN cons

"The solution is a bit pricier than Cisco."

"They could use more additional application security and network security features. They could add on to the WiFi as a selling point. It would be nice to be able to say to the WiFi users, "We will protect you against viruses and malware, so you don't have to purchase that.""

"Needs greater simplicity in the management portal. Currently, the Mojo portal presents different apps to configure the devices, create splash pages, configure security settings, and monitor the network."

"The renewal costs that come with it are very expensive."

"Needs greater simplicity in the management portal. Currently, the Mojo portal presents different “apps” to configure the devices, create splash pages, configure security settings, and monitor the network. This can be confusing, although Mojo has made great strides in combining these into “Aware”."

"The customer service and support took a lot of time to come on the troubleshooting call."

"The implementation could be simplified. Right now it's a bit complex."

"The RF signalling and data analytics parts should be improved."

More Mojo Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is overpriced and more expensive than Hauwei."

"I haven't conducted a price comparison yet, but based on information, it appears to be more affordable than the current environment. Therefore, I consider the price to be reasonable."

"The box itself is very cheap. The question here is about the subscription because this is what you will pay every year. In the initial year, for purchasing, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN gives you an attractive price. While during renewal, we are not given much discount."

"Negotiate the deal put in front of you!"

"The platform is more expensive than other solutions."

"Cost could be better."

"It's a pretty good value, but not great. Pricing is on a yearly basis for the Meraki solution."

"At this price point, I would not mind seeing a four-way channel, instead of a 3x3 or a 4x4, like they do in the Cisco Aironet system with their other brand. For the same price point in this other Cisco brand, it is a lot cheaper, and you can get a slightly better throughput than you can with these."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pricing and cost advice

"They have been a great price competitor against some of the other big brands, like Meraki, especially for cloud-based WiFi. However, Meraki has been more expensive. They beat Meraki on features for the WiFi, which makes them a better choice even if the price is the same."

"There are other solutions, like Ubiquiti, that have lowered their prices, which sometimes makes the argument to go with them. However, we do not bake in the WiFi for other vendors into our managed services, because they do not meet our standard offering."

"Pricing includes the planning tools, management, security, analytics, and advanced guest WiFi capabilities. It's always better to buy the longest term available for the best ROI. However, device will continue to function without valid cloud license."

"Of every solution we looked at, every wireless solution, Mojo was a minimum of six figures cheaper. Minimum. Most of them were double, which again is unheard of. Not only do you get all the feature benefits, like everything is there, everything just works, but at the same time, it was a no-brainer, because of the cost. It's almost like you hit the lottery."

"The license is provided per access point, so you buy an access point and you use it."

"It requires a license and that's a recurring cost and that has a really high cheque value."

"We have a term that is renewed every three years."

"I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

More Mojo Networks pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Marketing Services Firm

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	69
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	31

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?

Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...

See all answers

Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...

See all answers

How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mojo Networks?

I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. People are not used to cloud-based Wi-Fi solutions. When it comes to cloud-based Wi-Fi sol...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Mojo Networks?

The product's initial setup phase and configuration are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required. Those who are not familiar with the product might not be able to set it up p...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mojo Networks?

Most of our company's clients use the product in enterprise settings. In terms of the security features, I feel the firewall is present in the product and it works pretty well for enterprise-sized ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 33% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 10% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Competitors

Cisco Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Mojo Networks

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiWLM vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

SonicWall SonicWave Access Points vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

Dell Technologies Ruckus vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

More Mojo Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

May 2026

Download Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN product report

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks

April 2026

Download Mojo Networks product report

Also Known As

MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN

Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware

Overview

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN provides cloud-based management for remote configuration and network monitoring. It simplifies deployment and offers centralized control alongside high visibility.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ideal for managing complex networks and infrastructures without on-site controllers. It features an intuitive dashboard for seamless device integration and robust security, ensuring stable connectivity. Users can easily make network adjustments, track real-time analytics, and set multiple access IDs. While effective, areas needing enhancement include detailed logging, improved security features, more competitive licensing, and better integration with other solutions. Advanced user and support features could also see upgrades, and its dashboard functionality may benefit from improvements. Feedback indicates concerns about coverage, device management, and technical support. Customization, scalability, and compatibility limitations are noted compared to some competing solutions.

What are Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN's features?

Cloud-Based Management: Enables remote network configuration and monitoring.
User-Friendly Dashboard: Offers a seamless interface for managing network activities.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into network performance.
Robust Security: Ensures protection against unauthorized access.
Scalability: Supports large infrastructures without on-site controllers.

What benefits and ROI should users consider in reviews?

Ease of Deployment: Quick setup without expert requirements.
Centralized Control: Streamlines network management across locations.
High Visibility: Enhances understanding of network activities.
Reliable Connectivity: Ensures constant and stable network access.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses with simplified management and support.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is widely used across sectors like education, healthcare, retail, and corporate environments to manage client and guest access, secure networks, and integrate IoT devices. Schools, hospitals, offices, and data centers deploy it for its ease of deployment and centralized management. Resellers and integrators utilize it for networking and security solutions to ensure reliable connectivity in diverse environments.

Cisco

Mojo Networks delivers cloud-based architecture focusing on control, visibility, security, and reliability, with support for high-density WiFi requirements and seamless integration for expanded network environments.

Mojo Networks is renowned for its cloud-based architecture, providing robust control and visibility with strong security features like WIPS. Its autonomous capabilities and adaptive analytics, such as Cognitive WiFi, add significant value by ensuring effective guest WiFi management and diagnostics. Its intuitive installation and automated configuration facilitate network expansions, further enhancing the user experience with a mesh network. Strong security means and cost efficiency set Mojo Networks apart in the competitive market space.

What are the standout features?

Cloud-Based Architecture: Integrated system offering control and visibility.
WIPS Security: Offers enhanced wireless security features.
Cognitive WiFi: Advanced analytics for network optimization.
Autonomous Capabilities: Simplifies management with automation.
Mesh Network: Guarantees seamless connectivity.

What should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Simple installation and configuration process.
Scalability: Facilitates easy network expansion.
Reliability: Stable performance in high-density environments.
Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing across regions.
Security: Comprehensive protection against threats.

Mojo Networks is prevalent in public WiFi infrastructure and corporate guest WiFi across offices, schools, and restaurants. Its cloud-managed feature supports robust managed WiFi offerings, popularly deployed in educational institutions to ensure a secure distributed wireless environment. Businesses value its ease of management and security features with widespread application across many sectors.

Arista

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins

Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

April 2026

Free Report: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.