Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks comparison

Cisco and Arista are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cisco is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.8, while Arista is ranked #24. Cisco holds a 10.2% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Arista’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Arista users who would recommend it.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Read 123 Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reviews

12,822 Views
11,540 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Mojo Networks

Read 17 Mojo Networks reviews

1,809 Views
1,773 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Mojo Networks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mojo Networks are competitors in cloud-managed wireless networking solutions. Meraki is favored for its ease of deployment and robust integration, making it appealing for less technical users, while Mojo is recognized for its strong security features, which may be more attractive to those prioritizing network protection.

Features: Cisco Meraki offers comprehensive visibility into network issues via its centralized dashboard, easy deployment, and good device integration capabilities, which appeal to users seeking streamlined management. Mojo Networks, recently acquired by Arista, is distinguished by its advanced security features, like Wireless Intrusion Prevention System (WIPS), guest WiFi capabilities, and robust analytics tools that provide detailed insights into network usage and performance.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki could improve on the granularity of data logs and simplify complex rule configurations, as users find these areas challenging. Additionally, its licensing model and customer support have been flagged as problematic, with support seen as sometimes slow. Mojo Networks would benefit from a more intuitive management portal and a more integrated dashboard experience to streamline network monitoring and configuration. Users also desire expanded application security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mojo Networks provide easy deployment through cloud-based solutions, but the customer service experiences differ. Cisco Meraki's support is generally fast and effective, though inconsistent at times. Mojo Networks is praised for its responsive technical support, making it easier for users to engage with support teams for problem resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is known for premium pricing that reflects its high-quality performance, though the cost of licensing can be high if licenses expire. Despite this, many users report a positive ROI due to reduced administrative overheads. Mojo Networks offers competitive pricing compared to major brands like Meraki and balances cost with strong features. Its pricing is appealing to those valuing security and ease of use, providing significant ROI by lowering operational expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,858 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Ranking in Wireless LAN

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

4.7

Number of Reviews

123

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mojo Networks

Ranking in Wireless LAN

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is 10.2%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mojo Networks is 1.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN	10.2%
Mojo Networks	1.5%
Other	88.3%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

reviewer2847906

Senior Network at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Wireless management has become efficient with rich client visibility for troubleshooting

In terms of specific challenges with hybrid environments, I face no issues. I assess the operational efficiency of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN in my IT environment as pretty efficient for the most part. I would rate it at approximately 80%. I have had some issues with the dashboard itself and as far as switch management goes, but that is not necessarily on the wireless side of things. The wireless side has been quite good. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN optimizes the experience in a hybrid or distributed enterprise setup. My impression of the end-to-end visibility offered by Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that it is quite good. I function as an admin. What stood out to make me choose Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that I already leverage many products with Cisco. I have Catalyst switching, ACI infrastructure, and use them for my core and edge routers. I would give this review an overall rating of 8 out of 10.

Read full review

Robert Wambani

CTO at JabJabGroup

Offers great control and visibility to users, along with availability on the cloud

The other solutions did not offer the visibility that Mojo Networks offered. During the rolling out of the installation process, you have to go through the on-premises model to be able to make some changes. If somebody needs to make necessary changes, you must go to the on-premises model with the initial product. With the cloud solution, you don't have to go for the on-premises model, as you can make the changes over the cloud. The stability offered by Mojo Networks is better than the other products available in the market since, with other tools, you need to keep restarting them frequently, and it may be required once or twice a day, especially if it is used as an enterprise solution or in an enterprise environment, where the traffic is too high, causing the build-up of a lot of cache memory, fill-ups, and SRAM, a reason why one will have to restart such products.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's simple to manage when there's a problem."

"We use this product for the branch network connecting with the core application in the data centers of our main customers, providing Wi-Fi and secured internet connections for the customer branch as an entry point to excel in other value-added services, since connectivity is the base of our internet provider service."

"The most amazing part is that their Access Points have the ability to connect to multiple conference devices at different times, and it shows you the very in-depth Wi-Fi analytics through their dashboard."

"The interface is excellent. We've been really happy with it."

"The product's most beneficial feature impacting network security is the ability to provide centralized security management."

"It's been extremely reliable and I've been happy with it."

"Its ability to be cloud-managed is the most valuable feature so if there's a reconfiguration or an issue, we have excellent visibility into the network and we can usually resolve the problem online without having to go onsite."

"This is a product that we recommend over other similar ones by other vendors."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pros

"The features that I like the most are the visibility and the firewall, which is very good."

"If you go with Mojo, you're not going to be sorry."

"The technical support for the solution is very helpful."

"The most important feature is ease of use. We can simply take an access point and plug it in, then it is automatically configured for us."

"It does everything we need it to do, and it scales well, it's stable and offers good security."

"The pricing was a good value and substantially less than some of the other products that we looked at, and in some cases, with some of the bigger names, this product was even close to half the price."

"We just plugged it in and it worked. That just doesn't happen. We plugged it in and it worked and all 100 kids got on the test and started testing."

"Initial setup was straightforward."

More Mojo Networks pros

Cons

"In the next release, I would like to see the central control plane have the flexibility to control and distribute policies to all LAN networks, balance the traffic, and the performance based on application monitoring."

"The solution could improve the licensing structure and the price is expensive. The subscription model needs to improve because when the subscription expires the solution stops working and you are not able to use the product."

"The price of Meraki Wireless should be reduced to make it more affordable."

"Its licensing is the most painful."

"It would be useful to have a service management platform integrated within this solution where we can measure the customer experience."

"Its licensing can be better."

"I would like to see them improve their support where an assigned engineer can take the case all the way to closure. Usually, you get a different engineer calling regarding the same ticket."

"The pricing structure could be improved."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN cons

"Technical support could be more helpful. They are lacking a bit in that regard."

"The price should be lowered. It is too high for our country."

"The product's initial setup phase and configuration are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"The user interface could use improvement, and Mojo is working on it. The features and functions are in two different places, and they are in the process of moving them into one place."

"The RF signalling and data analytics parts should be improved."

"The user interface needs improvement. It could be a little bit more user-friendly."

"The solution is a bit pricier than Cisco."

"The setup was complex."

More Mojo Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its licensing is on a yearly basis. It can be for three, five, or ten years. I'm happy with the pricing. You basically pay for what you get. It is that simple. When you look at Ubiquiti or Aruba, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN far outweighs what you get. If you're in the UK, Ubiquiti gives a three-year or five-year warranty, whereas here in the UAE, they only give a one-year warranty, which is no good to me. Who buys a piece of equipment with only one year warranty on it? It doesn't make sense."

"The cost of both the hardware and licensing is high, and it is more than what I would prefer to spend currently."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The solution is pretty expensive."

"I would say that they have adequate pricing."

"The pricing is based on a subscription and is a bit high at the moment."

"The price/benefit ratio is great."

"This solution is slightly more expensive than others, such as Ruckus Wi-Fi."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pricing and cost advice

"I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Of every solution we looked at, every wireless solution, Mojo was a minimum of six figures cheaper. Minimum. Most of them were double, which again is unheard of. Not only do you get all the feature benefits, like everything is there, everything just works, but at the same time, it was a no-brainer, because of the cost. It's almost like you hit the lottery."

"Pricing includes the planning tools, management, security, analytics, and advanced guest WiFi capabilities. It's always better to buy the longest term available for the best ROI. However, device will continue to function without valid cloud license."

"The pricing was a good value and substantially less than some of the other products that we looked at. In some cases, with some of the big names, this product was even close to half the price."

"There are other solutions, like Ubiquiti, that have lowered their prices, which sometimes makes the argument to go with them. However, we do not bake in the WiFi for other vendors into our managed services, because they do not meet our standard offering."

"They have been a great price competitor against some of the other big brands, like Meraki, especially for cloud-based WiFi. However, Meraki has been more expensive. They beat Meraki on features for the WiFi, which makes them a better choice even if the price is the same."

"Since they have only the cloud and on-premises platform, the price looks good compared to the other OEMs like Cisco and Ruckus. For one of the Wi-Fi 6 access points for five years, they might be charging 20,000 to 25,000 INR."

"We have a term that is renewed every three years."

More Mojo Networks pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

14%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	69
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	33

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?

Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...

See all answers

Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...

See all answers

How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 37% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 13% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 4% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Competitors

Cisco Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

SonicWall SonicWave Access Points vs Mojo Networks

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiWLM vs Mojo Networks

Compared 5% of the time

More Mojo Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

August 2026

Download Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN product report

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks

July 2026

Download Mojo Networks product report

Also Known As

MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN

Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware

Overview

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN provides cloud-based management for remote configuration and network monitoring. It simplifies deployment and offers centralized control alongside high visibility.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ideal for managing complex networks and infrastructures without on-site controllers. It features an intuitive dashboard for seamless device integration and robust security, ensuring stable connectivity. Users can easily make network adjustments, track real-time analytics, and set multiple access IDs. While effective, areas needing enhancement include detailed logging, improved security features, more competitive licensing, and better integration with other solutions. Advanced user and support features could also see upgrades, and its dashboard functionality may benefit from improvements. Feedback indicates concerns about coverage, device management, and technical support. Customization, scalability, and compatibility limitations are noted compared to some competing solutions.

What are Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN's features?

Cloud-Based Management: Enables remote network configuration and monitoring.
User-Friendly Dashboard: Offers a seamless interface for managing network activities.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into network performance.
Robust Security: Ensures protection against unauthorized access.
Scalability: Supports large infrastructures without on-site controllers.

What benefits and ROI should users consider in reviews?

Ease of Deployment: Quick setup without expert requirements.
Centralized Control: Streamlines network management across locations.
High Visibility: Enhances understanding of network activities.
Reliable Connectivity: Ensures constant and stable network access.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses with simplified management and support.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is widely used across sectors like education, healthcare, retail, and corporate environments to manage client and guest access, secure networks, and integrate IoT devices. Schools, hospitals, offices, and data centers deploy it for its ease of deployment and centralized management. Resellers and integrators utilize it for networking and security solutions to ensure reliable connectivity in diverse environments.

Cisco

Mojo Networks delivers cloud-based architecture focusing on control, visibility, security, and reliability, with support for high-density WiFi requirements and seamless integration for expanded network environments.

Mojo Networks is renowned for its cloud-based architecture, providing robust control and visibility with strong security features like WIPS. Its autonomous capabilities and adaptive analytics, such as Cognitive WiFi, add significant value by ensuring effective guest WiFi management and diagnostics. Its intuitive installation and automated configuration facilitate network expansions, further enhancing the user experience with a mesh network. Strong security means and cost efficiency set Mojo Networks apart in the competitive market space.

What are the standout features?

Cloud-Based Architecture: Integrated system offering control and visibility.
WIPS Security: Offers enhanced wireless security features.
Cognitive WiFi: Advanced analytics for network optimization.
Autonomous Capabilities: Simplifies management with automation.
Mesh Network: Guarantees seamless connectivity.

What should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Simple installation and configuration process.
Scalability: Facilitates easy network expansion.
Reliability: Stable performance in high-density environments.
Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing across regions.
Security: Comprehensive protection against threats.

Mojo Networks is prevalent in public WiFi infrastructure and corporate guest WiFi across offices, schools, and restaurants. Its cloud-managed feature supports robust managed WiFi offerings, popularly deployed in educational institutions to ensure a secure distributed wireless environment. Businesses value its ease of management and security features with widespread application across many sectors.

Arista

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins

Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

August 2026

Free Report: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.