Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cisco and Kaseya are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Cisco is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.5, while Kaseya is ranked #77. Cisco holds a 0.9% mindshare in NMS, compared to Kaseya’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Read 62 Cisco Secure Network Analytics reviews

10,379 Views
4,359 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Kaseya Traverse

Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews

2,887 Views
2,454 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Kaseya Traverse

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Kaseya Traverse and Cisco Secure Network Analytics compete in the network monitoring and security solutions category. Cisco Secure Network Analytics seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, which is beneficial for users prioritizing advanced functionalities over cost.

Features: Kaseya Traverse offers robust performance monitoring, network visualization, and predictive analytics, along with cost-effectiveness and easy integration. Cisco Secure Network Analytics provides powerful threat detection, extensive security intelligence, and streamlined network telemetry. Kaseya focuses more on network performance management, whereas Cisco emphasizes security and threat intelligence.

Room for Improvement: Kaseya Traverse could enhance its security features, expand its integration with third-party platforms, and improve detailed reporting capabilities. Cisco Secure Network Analytics could simplify its deployment process, offer more user-friendly interfaces, and reduce the complexity of integrating with existing systems. Each product has specific areas where improvements can be made to enhance their offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaseya Traverse provides a user-friendly deployment model with straightforward setup and efficient support, appealing to those looking for quicker implementation. Cisco Secure Network Analytics may require a more complex deployment focusing on thorough security architecture but benefits from Cisco's strong tech support. Kaseya's simplicity is attractive to smaller teams, whereas Cisco offers depth suitable for extensive security needs.

Pricing and ROI: Kaseya Traverse is recognized for its budget-friendly setup costs, delivering excellent ROI for small to medium-sized enterprises focusing on network monitoring. Cisco Secure Network Analytics, with a higher initial investment, provides substantial ROI through its enhanced security capabilities, appealing to larger organizations needing intricate security measures. Kaseya is more cost-conscious, while Cisco offers extensive security benefits that justify the additional cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Kaseya Traverse

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (5th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (6th), Cisco Security Portfolio (9th)

Kaseya Traverse

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

77th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (53rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Cisco Secure Network Analytics is 0.9%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Secure Network Analytics	0.9%
Kaseya Traverse	0.6%
Other	98.5%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Harun-Owr-Roshid

CEO at BRIGHT-i SYSTEMS LIMITED

Have streamlined network visibility and troubleshooting while seeing benefits from AI integration

In terms of improvements for Cisco Secure Network Analytics, from the implementation point of view, now that AI is in use, some other features need to be upgraded considering AI solutions. Proper management of the database is also important; it should be centralized for easier data collection from a single database. When precise manual analysis is needed, it's sometimes difficult, so having a centralized database will allow network admins to find actual scenarios more effectively, especially since some information may not be visible on the GUI. Cisco should upgrade their hardware part to run the database, because sometimes it cannot handle the load while all features are running in the network. The database management should indeed be centralized because while AI runs behind the systems, central management is essential. For example, in a network with 100 Cisco switches, a few routers, firewalls, and access points, all data generated should be preserved in a central database. This approach simplifies management and analysis for troubleshooting, as GUI interfaces may not always provide visible information. Centralizing the database will allow for better understanding of which information is preserved for each specific device.

Read full review

AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN

Technical Consultant at a university with 11-50 employees

Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive

Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Cisco Secure Network Analytics is the Threat Intelligence integration."

"Using the Cognitive Analytics feature, we have complete visibility that we didn’t have before."

"Visibility. The ability to look East and West. To see what is passing through your circuits, where it is coming from, and how big it is."

"When we saw what Lancope can do, not just from a visibility perspective, but from a network and security perspective, we jumped on board."

"There's nothing like it and a dream to operate, very intuitive."

"Being able to identify specific date closed across the network is invaluable."

"The most valuable features of this solution are its reporting and mitigation capabilities."

"Being able to look at the Layer 7 application and get information about intrusion attempts is the most valuable feature for us."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics pros

"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."

"In terms of most valuable features, we are happy with everything so far, and maybe in a year's time I'll have a different opinion on what can change, what can be better, but for now it's the perfect solution."

"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."

"The remote support and data collection features are great."

"It's a simple and humble tool."

"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."

"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."

"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."

More Kaseya Traverse pros

Cons

"Many of these tools require extensive on-premises hardware to run."

"I'm not really sure it gives us a true picture."

"If they can make this product more web-based, that would be amazing."

"The licensing costs are outrageous, but Stealthwatch has a good time to value."

"We would like the solution to make more advances in the way that Extreme Networks has been doing."

"I think the interface is a little lacking. The interface seems like it just needs to be modernized. It's been the same interface now, ever since I've seen it probably four years ago."

"We've run into some issues with the configuration."

"It's a good solid solution but integration with Network Access Control products with Cisco ISE would be good."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics cons

"With my most recent experiences on the solution, I can say that it isn't currently stable; there are a lot of glitches and bugs and the reliability just isn't there right now."

"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."

"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."

"Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also."

"The support for the solution needs some improvement. In my experience, the response time to answer a query is slow."

"I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully assess what it has."

"Reporting is a bit difficult."

"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."

More Kaseya Traverse cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing costs are outrageous."

"Pricing is much higher compared to other solutions."

"One of the things which bugs me about Lancope is the licensing. We understand how licensing works. Our problem is when we bought and purchased most of these Lancope devices, we did so with our sister company. Somewhere within the purchase and distribution, licensing got mixed up. That is all on Cisco, and it is their responsibility. They allotted some of our sister company's equipment to us, and some of our equipment to them. To date, they have never been able to fix it."

"Licensing is on a yearly basis."

"We pay for support costs on a yearly basis."

"This is an expensive product. We have quit paying for support because we don't want to have to upgrade it and keep paying for it."

"There are additional licenses needed for the number of so-called network flows. It's hard to plan the number of flows you need in the network, this is a problem. The price of the Cisco Stealthwatch is relatively inexpensive"

"The solution is expensive. It costs several hundred thousand dollars per year (depending on how many flows you are collecting)."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics pricing and cost advice

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."

"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	52

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Stealthwatch?

Regarding cost, for the Bangladesh context, Cisco Secure Network Analytics is a little bit high-priced because we are a developing country, making it tough to manage affordable solutions. However, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Stealthwatch?

Several features often look very promising during evaluation or implementation but end up being used only lightly in day-to-day operations. Advanced reporting and scheduled compliance reports look ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Stealthwatch?

My main use case for Cisco Secure Network Analytics has been network visibility and anomaly-based threat detection within the enterprise environment. In security operations and VAPT-related activit...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kaseya Traverse?

If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kaseya Traverse?

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. As Kaseya sellers, we always promote Kaseya first. If the price is more competitive, then I think it will be better. It's a main pain point for us as a resel...

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 7% of the time

Vectra AI vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 4% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 3% of the time

NetWitness Platform vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 3% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 4% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 4% of the time

DX Spectrum vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 3% of the time

More Kaseya Traverse Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

September 2026

Download Cisco Secure Network Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse

September 2026

Download Kaseya Traverse product report

Also Known As

Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco Stealthwatch Enterprise, Lancope StealthWatch

No data available

Overview

Cisco Secure Network Analytics enhances network security through integrated threat detection and detailed traffic visibility, optimizing performance with AI analytics and strong platform integrations.

Cisco Secure Network Analytics offers deep visibility into network traffic, with tools like network maps and server response times. Its AI-driven analytics help detect threats, focusing on east-west traffic. Integration with platforms such as pxGrid and ISE complements its capabilities. Reporting and telemetry help in identifying bandwidth issues, yet improvements are desired in AI for better data organization. Installation complexity and false positives present challenges, and managing network loads effectively is a recognized need.

What are the key features of Cisco Secure Network Analytics?

Deep Visibility: Provides comprehensive insights into network traffic and server behavior.
Network Maps: Enhances understanding of traffic flow and infrastructure layout.
AI Analytics: Uses AI for superior threat detection and anomaly recognition.
Integration: Compatible with platforms like pxGrid and ISE for enhanced security management.
Telemetry: Delivers detailed bandwidth usage and traffic analysis reports.

How does Cisco Secure Network Analytics provide value?

Enhanced Security: Elevates threat detection and response capabilities.
Traffic Insights: Identifies encrypted and anomalous network behaviors.
Compliance Support: Assists in meeting industry standards for data protection.
Endpoint Protection: Guards network endpoints against potential threats.

Industries such as banking, defense, and police rely on Cisco Secure Network Analytics for securing networks against threats. Its capability to provide insights into encrypted traffic and facilitate device auditing makes it a sought-after choice for those requiring extensive network visibility. Users appreciate its application for threat prevention and response in demanding sectors.

Cisco

Kaseya Traverse offers sustainable functionality for comprehensive network, server, and application monitoring. It supports full IT stack visibility with strong processing capabilities and an intuitive interface.

Designed for businesses needing robust remote monitoring, Kaseya Traverse handles networks, servers, and applications with ease. It ensures comprehensive management with features like automated workflows, effective troubleshooting, remote support, and detailed inventory reporting. Despite user concerns about development speed in reporting and support, absence of a CMDB, and integration issues, it remains a popular choice for managed service providers. Utilized primarily for remote maintenance, patch updates, and antivirus management, it connects customer endpoints to manage infrastructure efficiently.

What are the key features of Kaseya Traverse?

Comprehensive Monitoring: Supports network, server, and application oversight.
Robust Processing: Manages multiple devices and infrastructures seamlessly.
Automation Workflows: Simplifies management tasks and improves efficiency.
Remote Support: Offers effective tools for troubleshooting and assistance.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures easy navigation and accessibility.

What benefits should users expect from Kaseya Traverse?

Increased Efficiency: Automation and remote capabilities streamline processes.
Enhanced Visibility: Provides a complete view of IT infrastructure.
Improved Troubleshooting: Quick identification and resolution of issues.
Cost Management: Despite pricing concerns, it supports competitive offerings.

Managed service providers leverage Kaseya Traverse for monitoring data centers and cloud environments across industries. It's particularly effective in networking, storage, and server management for enterprises, offering configuration assistance and link monitoring to optimize operations.

Kaseya

Sample Customers

Edge Web Hosting, Telenor Norway, Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana, Webster Financial Corporation, Westinghouse Electric, VMware, TIAA-CREF

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Kaseya Traverse

September 2026

Free Report: Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Kaseya Traverse

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Kaseya Traverse report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.