Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cisco and Kaseya are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Cisco is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.5, while Kaseya is ranked #75. Cisco holds a 0.9% mindshare in NMS, compared to Kaseya’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Read 62 Cisco Secure Network Analytics reviews

11,603 Views
4,873 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Kaseya Traverse

Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews

3,356 Views
2,819 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Kaseya Traverse

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Kaseya Traverse and Cisco Secure Network Analytics compete in the network monitoring and security solutions category. Cisco Secure Network Analytics seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, which is beneficial for users prioritizing advanced functionalities over cost.

Features: Kaseya Traverse offers robust performance monitoring, network visualization, and predictive analytics, along with cost-effectiveness and easy integration. Cisco Secure Network Analytics provides powerful threat detection, extensive security intelligence, and streamlined network telemetry. Kaseya focuses more on network performance management, whereas Cisco emphasizes security and threat intelligence.

Room for Improvement: Kaseya Traverse could enhance its security features, expand its integration with third-party platforms, and improve detailed reporting capabilities. Cisco Secure Network Analytics could simplify its deployment process, offer more user-friendly interfaces, and reduce the complexity of integrating with existing systems. Each product has specific areas where improvements can be made to enhance their offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaseya Traverse provides a user-friendly deployment model with straightforward setup and efficient support, appealing to those looking for quicker implementation. Cisco Secure Network Analytics may require a more complex deployment focusing on thorough security architecture but benefits from Cisco's strong tech support. Kaseya's simplicity is attractive to smaller teams, whereas Cisco offers depth suitable for extensive security needs.

Pricing and ROI: Kaseya Traverse is recognized for its budget-friendly setup costs, delivering excellent ROI for small to medium-sized enterprises focusing on network monitoring. Cisco Secure Network Analytics, with a higher initial investment, provides substantial ROI through its enhanced security capabilities, appealing to larger organizations needing intricate security measures. Kaseya is more cost-conscious, while Cisco offers extensive security benefits that justify the additional cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Kaseya Traverse

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

32nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (5th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (7th), Cisco Security Portfolio (7th)

Kaseya Traverse

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

75th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (53rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Cisco Secure Network Analytics is 0.9%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Secure Network Analytics	0.9%
Kaseya Traverse	0.6%
Other	98.5%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Harun-Owr-Roshid

CEO at BRIGHT-i SYSTEMS LIMITED

Have streamlined network visibility and troubleshooting while seeing benefits from AI integration

In terms of improvements for Cisco Secure Network Analytics, from the implementation point of view, now that AI is in use, some other features need to be upgraded considering AI solutions. Proper management of the database is also important; it should be centralized for easier data collection from a single database. When precise manual analysis is needed, it's sometimes difficult, so having a centralized database will allow network admins to find actual scenarios more effectively, especially since some information may not be visible on the GUI. Cisco should upgrade their hardware part to run the database, because sometimes it cannot handle the load while all features are running in the network. The database management should indeed be centralized because while AI runs behind the systems, central management is essential. For example, in a network with 100 Cisco switches, a few routers, firewalls, and access points, all data generated should be preserved in a central database. This approach simplifies management and analysis for troubleshooting, as GUI interfaces may not always provide visible information. Centralizing the database will allow for better understanding of which information is preserved for each specific device.

Read full review

AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN

Technical Consultant at a university with 11-50 employees

Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive

Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Ease of deployment, once you get your ducks in a row."

"The most valuable feature is having visibility into the data segments throughout our network."

"The artifacts available in the tool provide better information for analyzing network traffic. It enables a holistic view of network traffic and general packet analysis. It's easy to identify anomalies without the use of signatures. The way in which we implemented Stealthwatch Cloud has enabled my team to analyze traffic behind proxies."

"Being able to see the actual data flows transiting the network versus what we had planned is a great sanity check for our overall design planning."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the way the net flow is being merged together in a single pane. That's been extremely useful for us, because can see what's going on with traffic in one single place."

"The solution has been beneficial because it's cut down the amount of time involved in doing complex scenarios and research."

"Stealthwatch is a great product that does DDoS detection, compromised machines, NetFlow collection, and integrates with Cisco Identity Services Engine and Firepower."

"I value the feature which enables me to detect devices talking to suspect IPs."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics pros

"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."

"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."

"It's a simple and humble tool."

"The remote support and data collection features are great."

"Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating."

"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."

"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."

"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."

More Kaseya Traverse pros

Cons

"I would like to see more and cleaner reporting. For example, if I pull up Steven and I want to look and maybe compare him to what you've done in the past week, and compare that to the past six months, the point would be to see what the difference in activity looks like over this time. I don't see that capability in reporting to date. You see that trend but you don't really see a straightforward comparison. That right there is key to what we want to see about the normal activity."

"Cisco could improve the administration for the customers."

"I think the interface is a little lacking. The interface seems like it just needs to be modernized. It's been the same interface now, ever since I've seen it probably four years ago."

"The initial setup was straightforward but required a lot of data entry, to begin with building out the server types and network types."

"We need to be able to filter out internal IPs as non-threats."

"I don't really think we really save time while using this solution."

"Cisco Stealthwatch is scalable with money. It's expensive."

"There could be better integration on the programming side, which uses Python. StealthWatch could provide a template for Python to manage the switches. For example, it would be nice if StealthWatch bounced a port automatically it detected something anomalous."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics cons

"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."

"With my most recent experiences on the solution, I can say that it isn't currently stable; there are a lot of glitches and bugs and the reliability just isn't there right now."

"Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also."

"The support for the solution needs some improvement. In my experience, the response time to answer a query is slow."

"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."

"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."

"Reporting is a bit difficult."

"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."

More Kaseya Traverse cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an expensive product. We have quit paying for support because we don't want to have to upgrade it and keep paying for it."

"There are additional licenses needed for the number of so-called network flows. It's hard to plan the number of flows you need in the network, this is a problem. The price of the Cisco Stealthwatch is relatively inexpensive"

"NetFlow is very expensive."

"The tool is not cheaply priced."

"Licensing is done by flows per second, not including outside (in traffic)."

"Licensing is on a yearly basis."

"Today, we are part of the big Cisco ELA, and it is a la carte. We can get orders for whatever we want. At the end of the day, we have to pay for it in one big expense, but that is fine. We are okay with that."

"The pricing for this solution is good."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics pricing and cost advice

"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	52

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Stealthwatch?

Regarding cost, for the Bangladesh context, Cisco Secure Network Analytics is a little bit high-priced because we are a developing country, making it tough to manage affordable solutions. However, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Stealthwatch?

Several features often look very promising during evaluation or implementation but end up being used only lightly in day-to-day operations. Advanced reporting and scheduled compliance reports look ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Stealthwatch?

My main use case for Cisco Secure Network Analytics has been network visibility and anomaly-based threat detection within the enterprise environment. In security operations and VAPT-related activit...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kaseya Traverse?

If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kaseya Traverse?

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. As Kaseya sellers, we always promote Kaseya first. If the price is more competitive, then I think it will be better. It's a main pain point for us as a resel...

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 6% of the time

NETSCOUT Network & Application Observability vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 5% of the time

Vectra AI vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 4% of the time

NetWitness Platform vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 3% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 8% of the time

NETSCOUT Network & Application Observability vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 4% of the time

DX Spectrum vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 3% of the time

More Kaseya Traverse Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

November 2026

Download Cisco Secure Network Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse

October 2026

Download Kaseya Traverse product report

Also Known As

Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco Stealthwatch Enterprise, Lancope StealthWatch

No data available

Overview

Cisco Secure Network Analytics enhances network security through integrated threat detection and detailed traffic visibility, optimizing performance with AI analytics and strong platform integrations.

Cisco Secure Network Analytics offers deep visibility into network traffic, with tools like network maps and server response times. Its AI-driven analytics help detect threats, focusing on east-west traffic. Integration with platforms such as pxGrid and ISE complements its capabilities. Reporting and telemetry help in identifying bandwidth issues, yet improvements are desired in AI for better data organization. Installation complexity and false positives present challenges, and managing network loads effectively is a recognized need.

What are the key features of Cisco Secure Network Analytics?

Deep Visibility: Provides comprehensive insights into network traffic and server behavior.
Network Maps: Enhances understanding of traffic flow and infrastructure layout.
AI Analytics: Uses AI for superior threat detection and anomaly recognition.
Integration: Compatible with platforms like pxGrid and ISE for enhanced security management.
Telemetry: Delivers detailed bandwidth usage and traffic analysis reports.

How does Cisco Secure Network Analytics provide value?

Enhanced Security: Elevates threat detection and response capabilities.
Traffic Insights: Identifies encrypted and anomalous network behaviors.
Compliance Support: Assists in meeting industry standards for data protection.
Endpoint Protection: Guards network endpoints against potential threats.

Industries such as banking, defense, and police rely on Cisco Secure Network Analytics for securing networks against threats. Its capability to provide insights into encrypted traffic and facilitate device auditing makes it a sought-after choice for those requiring extensive network visibility. Users appreciate its application for threat prevention and response in demanding sectors.

Cisco

Kaseya Traverse offers sustainable functionality for comprehensive network, server, and application monitoring. It supports full IT stack visibility with strong processing capabilities and an intuitive interface.

Designed for businesses needing robust remote monitoring, Kaseya Traverse handles networks, servers, and applications with ease. It ensures comprehensive management with features like automated workflows, effective troubleshooting, remote support, and detailed inventory reporting. Despite user concerns about development speed in reporting and support, absence of a CMDB, and integration issues, it remains a popular choice for managed service providers. Utilized primarily for remote maintenance, patch updates, and antivirus management, it connects customer endpoints to manage infrastructure efficiently.

What are the key features of Kaseya Traverse?

Comprehensive Monitoring: Supports network, server, and application oversight.
Robust Processing: Manages multiple devices and infrastructures seamlessly.
Automation Workflows: Simplifies management tasks and improves efficiency.
Remote Support: Offers effective tools for troubleshooting and assistance.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures easy navigation and accessibility.

What benefits should users expect from Kaseya Traverse?

Increased Efficiency: Automation and remote capabilities streamline processes.
Enhanced Visibility: Provides a complete view of IT infrastructure.
Improved Troubleshooting: Quick identification and resolution of issues.
Cost Management: Despite pricing concerns, it supports competitive offerings.

Managed service providers leverage Kaseya Traverse for monitoring data centers and cloud environments across industries. It's particularly effective in networking, storage, and server management for enterprises, offering configuration assistance and link monitoring to optimize operations.

Kaseya

Sample Customers

Edge Web Hosting, Telenor Norway, Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana, Webster Financial Corporation, Westinghouse Electric, VMware, TIAA-CREF

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Kaseya Traverse

November 2026

Free Report: Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Kaseya Traverse

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Kaseya Traverse report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.