Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Kaseya Traverse Logo

Top 10 Kaseya Traverse Alternatives

Vendor: Kaseya
3.3 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Kaseya Traverse Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Kaseya Traverse based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, and SolarWinds NPM. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Kaseya Traverse surpasses its competitors by offering advanced network monitoring, proactive issue resolution, and seamless integration capabilities, empowering businesses with real-time analytics and comprehensive control over their IT environments to enhance efficiency and performance.

Kaseya Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Kaseya, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Zabbix offers a flexible, customizable monitoring solution with open-source benefits, ideal for those with technical expertise, while Kaseya Traverse provides a comprehensive, customer-centric dashboard with a predictable cost, suited for traditional IT needs. In comparison, Kaseya Traverse ensures structured support and straightforward deployment.
Download Kaseya Traverse vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix typically incurs a lower setup cost compared to Kaseya Traverse, which can require a higher initial investment for implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix typically incurs a lower setup cost compared to Kaseya Traverse, which can require a higher initial investment for implementation.
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Kaseya Traverse Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is noted for rapid deployment, scalability, and affordability, appealing to businesses seeking ease of use. In comparison, Kaseya Traverse excels in integration, comprehensive device monitoring, and centralized management, beneficial for troubleshooting and managing complex IT environments.
Download Kaseya Traverse vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with no initial costs, whereas Kaseya Traverse involves a more complex setup with associated costs, highlighting a distinct difference in ease of deployment and upfront investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with no initial costs, whereas Kaseya Traverse involves a more complex setup with associated costs, highlighting a distinct difference in ease of deployment and upfront investment between the two solutions.
Kaseya Traverse Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
Kaseya Traverse Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
SolarWinds NPM attracts those needing in-depth network management with its comprehensive modular features, albeit at a potentially high cost due to required multiple modules. In comparison, Kaseya Traverse offers competitive pricing with an inclusive feature set, emphasizing service provider needs and ease of deployment.
Download Kaseya Traverse vs. SolarWinds NPM Report
SolarWinds NPM has a straightforward setup cost, while Kaseya Traverse involves a higher initial setup investment, highlighting differing approaches to cost structuring.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds NPM has a straightforward setup cost, while Kaseya Traverse involves a higher initial setup investment, highlighting differing approaches to cost structuring.
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers advanced monitoring with AI and seamless cloud integration. In comparison, Kaseya Traverse is noted for its straightforward monitoring and user-friendly design. Splunk attracts tech buyers with its comprehensive features, while Kaseya appeals with competitive pricing and simplified operations.
Download Kaseya Traverse vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a straightforward setup process, while Kaseya Traverse involves a more complex installation, highlighting the ease-of-use difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a straightforward setup process, while Kaseya Traverse involves a more complex installation, highlighting the ease-of-use difference between the two solutions.
Kaseya Traverse Logo
ThousandEyes
4.1 out of 5
Kaseya Traverse Logo
ThousandEyes
4.1 out of 5
ThousandEyes offers extensive network features and Cisco integration. In comparison, Kaseya Traverse provides a clear IT stack view with strong remote support and data collection. ThousandEyes is costly, suiting larger businesses, while Kaseya Traverse's competitive pricing includes features, impacting perceived ROI.
Download Kaseya Traverse vs. ThousandEyes Report
ThousandEyes offers high initial setup costs without hidden fees, whereas Kaseya Traverse provides a customizable pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
ThousandEyes offers high initial setup costs without hidden fees, whereas Kaseya Traverse provides a customizable pricing structure.
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Nagios XI offers open-source monitoring and plugin customization, appealing for scalability and community support, though installation can be complex. In comparison, Kaseya Traverse provides straightforward infrastructure visibility and a customer-friendly dashboard, but lacks integrated reporting and advanced configuration management.
Download Kaseya Traverse vs. Nagios XI Report
Nagios XI incurs a lower initial setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious organizations, whereas Kaseya Traverse comes with a higher upfront expense, indicating a more significant investment in setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios XI incurs a lower initial setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious organizations, whereas Kaseya Traverse comes with a higher upfront expense, indicating a more significant investment in setup.
Kaseya Traverse Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
Kaseya Traverse Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
LogicMonitor excels with robust dashboards and granular insights, appealing to those needing advanced customization. In comparison, Kaseya Traverse provides basic monitoring with cost-effective pricing, making it suitable for organizations seeking essential features without advanced customization needs.
Download Kaseya Traverse vs. LogicMonitor Report
LogicMonitor's setup cost is lower, offering a straightforward implementation process, while Kaseya Traverse requires a higher initial investment for setup.
View comparison
Pricing
LogicMonitor's setup cost is lower, offering a straightforward implementation process, while Kaseya Traverse requires a higher initial investment for setup.
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Auvik Network Management (ANM)
4.4 out of 5
Kaseya Traverse is appreciated for affordability and easy deployment, making it attractive for immediate ROI and straightforward management. In comparison, Auvik Network Management, with automated configurations and cloud-based scalability, appeals to those seeking comprehensive, future-proof network management.
Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Kaseya Traverse Report
Kaseya Traverse has a higher initial setup cost, while Auvik Network Management (ANM) offers a more affordable setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaseya Traverse has a higher initial setup cost, while Auvik Network Management (ANM) offers a more affordable setup.
Kaseya Traverse Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
Kaseya Traverse Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
WhatsUp Gold appeals to budget-conscious buyers with its intuitive interface and comprehensive monitoring. In comparison, Kaseya Traverse offers advanced analytics and automation, appealing to those needing extensive features. WhatsUp Gold ensures straightforward deployment, while Kaseya Traverse justifies its higher cost through feature richness.
Download Kaseya Traverse vs. WhatsUp Gold Report
WhatsUp Gold setup cost is lower, making it budget-friendly for small businesses, while Kaseya Traverse requires a higher initial investment, potentially offering more comprehensive capabilities suited for larger enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
WhatsUp Gold setup cost is lower, making it budget-friendly for small businesses, while Kaseya Traverse requires a higher initial investment, potentially offering more comprehensive capabilities suited for larger enterprises.
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics
4.1 out of 5
Kaseya Traverse targets budget-conscious buyers with real-time monitoring and customizable alerts, offering agile solutions and swift deployment. In comparison, Cisco Secure Network Analytics provides advanced threat detection and network analysis, appealing to those prioritizing robust security despite complex deployment and higher costs.
Download Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Kaseya Traverse Report
Kaseya Traverse has lower setup costs compared to Cisco Secure Network Analytics, which involves higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaseya Traverse has lower setup costs compared to Cisco Secure Network Analytics, which involves higher initial expenses.
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Kaseya Traverse Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
IBM SevOne NPM provides advanced monitoring and scalability for large networks, appealing to those needing comprehensive features. In comparison, Kaseya Traverse offers essential data collection and remote support, ideal for basic needs and cost-effective solutions, yet lacks the depth of monitoring SevOne provides.
Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Kaseya Traverse Report
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) involves higher setup costs compared to Kaseya Traverse, which offers a more cost-effective initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) involves higher setup costs compared to Kaseya Traverse, which offers a more cost-effective initial deployment.
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Kaseya Traverse Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management
4.1 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management provides robust global monitoring with scalable features and extensive flexibility for varied environments. In comparison, Kaseya Traverse emphasizes wide-ranging processing capabilities with competitive pricing suited for smaller setups, offering simplified deployment processes ideal for budget-conscious organizations seeking reliable monitoring solutions.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Kaseya Traverse Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management setup costs are typically higher than Kaseya Traverse, offering a robust infrastructure monitoring solution. In contrast, Kaseya Traverse features more affordable pricing with a tailored approach suitable for smaller operations.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management setup costs are typically higher than Kaseya Traverse, offering a robust infrastructure monitoring solution. In contrast, Kaseya Traverse features more affordable pricing with a tailored approach suitable for smaller operations.
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Zenoss Cloud appeals with comprehensive features and scalable offerings. In comparison, Kaseya Traverse stands out for its integration capabilities. Zenoss offers ease in deployment, while Kaseya delivers in-depth network insights. Zenoss is cost-effective, whereas Kaseya promises valuable ROI through performance analytics.
Download Kaseya Traverse vs. Zenoss Cloud Report
Zenoss Cloud has higher setup costs compared to Kaseya Traverse, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. Kaseya Traverse's lower setup fees may appeal to budget-conscious users exploring IT monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Zenoss Cloud has higher setup costs compared to Kaseya Traverse, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. Kaseya Traverse's lower setup fees may appeal to budget-conscious users exploring IT monitoring solutions.
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Kaseya Traverse Logo
NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights
4.3 out of 5
Kaseya Traverse appeals to businesses seeking flexible, cost-effective network monitoring with rapid deployment. In comparison, NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights offers advanced data management and scalability, appealing to enterprises focused on strategic, long-term infrastructure investments despite its higher initial investment and complex setup.
Download Kaseya Traverse vs. NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights Report
Kaseya Traverse offers lower setup costs compared to the more substantial initial investment required by NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaseya Traverse offers lower setup costs compared to the more substantial initial investment required by NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights.
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Meraki Dashboard
4.3 out of 5
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Meraki Dashboard
4.3 out of 5
Kaseya Traverse attracts buyers with customizable tools and network performance monitoring, excelling with analytics. In comparison, Meraki Dashboard appeals through seamless cloud-managed integration, facilitating simplified network management. Tech buyers might favor Traverse for flexibility and analytics, or Meraki for straightforward deployment and scalability.
Download Kaseya Traverse vs. Meraki Dashboard Report
Kaseya Traverse involves a higher setup cost compared to the more economical Meraki Dashboard, highlighting a key financial difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaseya Traverse involves a higher setup cost compared to the more economical Meraki Dashboard, highlighting a key financial difference between the two solutions.
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Catchpoint offers extensive monitoring capabilities and superior user experience insights. In comparison, Kaseya Traverse provides robust network management with a holistic approach. Catchpoint suits those prioritizing user experience. Kaseya Traverse appeals to buyers seeking comprehensive features and scalable IT management.
Download Catchpoint vs. Kaseya Traverse Report
Catchpoint incurs higher setup costs compared to Kaseya Traverse, which offers a more economical initial setup, highlighting a clear cost advantage for Kaseya Traverse in budget-conscious environments.
View comparison
Pricing
Catchpoint incurs higher setup costs compared to Kaseya Traverse, which offers a more economical initial setup, highlighting a clear cost advantage for Kaseya Traverse in budget-conscious environments.
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Pico Corvil Analytics
4.5 out of 5
Pico Corvil Analytics excels in real-time network data analysis for high-frequency trading environments. In comparison, Kaseya Traverse offers comprehensive IT management and performance monitoring. Tech buyers might choose Pico for specialized analytics or Kaseya for a broad IT infrastructure approach.
Download Kaseya Traverse vs. Pico Corvil Analytics Report
Pico Corvil Analytics has a higher setup cost compared to Kaseya Traverse, highlighting a more substantial initial investment. Kaseya Traverse's lower setup cost makes it potentially more attractive for cost-sensitive users.
View comparison
Pricing
Pico Corvil Analytics has a higher setup cost compared to Kaseya Traverse, highlighting a more substantial initial investment. Kaseya Traverse's lower setup cost makes it potentially more attractive for cost-sensitive users.
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Kaseya Traverse Logo
DX Performance Management
4.1 out of 5
DX Performance Management appeals with its real-time analytics and cost-effective support. In comparison, Kaseya Traverse attracts tech buyers with its comprehensive network monitoring and scalable capabilities, ideal for those valuing robust features and long-term customization over immediate deployment simplicity and support responsiveness.
Download DX Performance Management vs. Kaseya Traverse Report
DX Performance Management has a minimal setup cost, while Kaseya Traverse requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Performance Management has a minimal setup cost, while Kaseya Traverse requires a higher initial investment.
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Infraon IMS
4.2 out of 5
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Infraon IMS
4.2 out of 5
Kaseya Traverse appeals with advanced network performance and automation features ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Infraon IMS's robust server monitoring and asset management make it attractive. Kaseya offers strong ROI at a premium cost, while Infraon provides a cost-effective, value-driven approach.
Download Infraon IMS vs. Kaseya Traverse Report
Kaseya Traverse incurs a notable setup cost, while Infraon IMS offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaseya Traverse incurs a notable setup cost, while Infraon IMS offers a more budget-friendly setup.
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Liongard
1 out of 5
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Liongard
1 out of 5

Liongard is the only automation platform that gives Managed Service Providers complete visibility across the IT stack. With a global partner base, Liongard is changing the way MSPs manage and protect thousands of businesses worldwide.

View comparison
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Viewtinet
1 out of 5
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Viewtinet
1 out of 5
Viewtinet offers comprehensive network visibility and traffic management for various use cases. Key features include detailed analytics and efficient bandwidth optimization. Some users note room for improvement in customization options to better match diverse environments, enhancing its adaptability to specific requirements.
View comparison
Kaseya Traverse Logo
Kaseya Traverse Logo
AcuVigill Dashboard
1 out of 5

The AcuVigil dashboard is a cloud-based web portal for real-time, comprehensive network monitoring and management from a company-wide view down to the store and device level.

View comparison

Related categories

Network Monitoring Software
Cloud Monitoring Software
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability