Kaseya Traverse vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

Kaseya and Zenoss are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Kaseya is ranked #78, while Zenoss is ranked #75. Kaseya holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Zenoss’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Kaseya users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zenoss users who would recommend it.

Kaseya Traverse

Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews

1,258 Views
1,044 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Zenoss Cloud

Read 8 Zenoss Cloud reviews

2,607 Views
1,225 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kaseya Traverse

Zenoss Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Zenoss Cloud and Kaseya Traverse compete in IT infrastructure monitoring solutions. Zenoss Cloud has an edge with its cloud-based features, whereas Kaseya Traverse excels in scalability and comprehensive monitoring.

Features: Zenoss Cloud offers a cloud-native architecture, event management, and real-time data analysis. Its predictive analytics is notable. Kaseya Traverse includes customizable features, service-level management, and capacity planning. Its dynamic thresholds and root cause analysis are distinguishing.

Room for Improvement: Zenoss Cloud could benefit from simplifying the learning curve, enhancing scalability, and increasing feature integration. Kaseya Traverse can improve in user interface design, reducing complexity for full potential usage, and expanding integration options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zenoss Cloud offers simple deployment via its SaaS model with robust technical support. Kaseya Traverse provides a flexible hybrid model suited for varying infrastructures with solid customer support but requires effort to fully optimize.

Pricing and ROI: Zenoss Cloud's premium pricing corresponds with its advanced features and significant ROI. Kaseya Traverse presents a budget-friendly model with competitive ROI, offering scalability and extensive features despite Zenoss Cloud's higher costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Kaseya Traverse vs. Zenoss Cloud Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse vs. Zenoss Cloud

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kaseya Traverse

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

78th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

49th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zenoss Cloud

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

75th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

42nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (26th), Event Monitoring (13th), Server Monitoring (24th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (51st), Container Monitoring (7th), AIOps (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Zenoss Cloud	0.7%
Kaseya Traverse	0.5%
Other	98.8%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN

Technical Consultant at a university with 11-50 employees

Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive

Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.

Read full review

ClaudiaChen

Cloud Architect - Senior Technology Architect at Telstra

Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features

As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."

"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."

"The remote support and data collection features are great."

"It's a simple and humble tool."

"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."

"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."

"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."

"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."

More Kaseya Traverse pros

"The custom built integration is one of the most valuable features because you can see all the especially critical items."

"They have also accommodated many state-of-the-art technologies like Docker and ZooKeeper."

"The product offers good documentation that helps with initial training."

"Its Docker Container concept is mind blowing."

"The most valuable feature is the flexible discovery mechanism."

"Zenoss is more complex than LogicMonitor, but scalable and hugely customizable."

"It's easy to use."

"What I like most about Zenoss Service Dynamics is that it monitors the devices and gives close to real-time alerts. For example, in case the device is not available, Zenoss Service Dynamics generates an alert so my team can resolve the issue."

More Zenoss Cloud pros

Cons

"Reporting is a bit difficult."

"Improvement is needed in making it cheaper."

"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."

"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."

"However, the issue lies in the adequacy of the responses to my questions, which are usually not up to par."

"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."

"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."

"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."

More Kaseya Traverse cons

"It would be ideal if the product offered sound alerts."

"The AI aspect needs to improve."

"Now it is stable, but they should design threshold parameters in percentage instead of raw values."

"Technical support is 3/10, poor: Incomplete and poor documentation Undocumented processes Inconsistent solutions to problems depending on source"

"As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor."

"The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement."

"There is room for improvement with the administrative part. They introduced Control Center to manage things in Zenoss 5. The services that Zenoss provides remained the same, but the administrative part, since they introduced Docker, etc., has become a little complex"

"There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring."

More Zenoss Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."

"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."

"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."

"There are additional costs you'll have to pay apart from the license fee for Zenoss Service Dynamics. I can't remember exactly how much my company is paying because I don't handle the finance part, but the cost is paid annually. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I'm rating the solution three out of five."

"It depends on the customer, what he wants."

"The pricing depends on the environment, the number of services, and the size of the data center. It can go from $100,000 to a million dollars."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

11%

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

10%

Performing Arts

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kaseya Traverse?

If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kaseya Traverse?

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. As Kaseya sellers, we always promote Kaseya first. If the price is more competitive, then I think it will be better. It's a main pain point for us as a resel...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 7% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 7% of the time

Zabbix vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 6% of the time

More Kaseya Traverse Competitors

Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

SCOM vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Dynatrace vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More Zenoss Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse

March 2026

Download Kaseya Traverse product report

Buyer's Guide

Zenoss Cloud

February 2026

Download Zenoss Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics

Overview

Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

Kaseya

Zenoss Cloud revolutionizes IT infrastructure monitoring with a service-centric approach, prioritizing the overall health of services and applications. Harnessing the power of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AIOps), Zenoss Cloud offers end-to-end visibility across servers, networks, storage, and applications. Real-time monitoring, event correlation, and automated remediation ensure immediate insights and efficient issue resolution. The customizable dashboards empower users to tailor visualizations to their needs, while scalability accommodates diverse infrastructures. Zenoss Cloud guarantees improved application performance, reduced downtime, and enhanced IT efficiency, making it an ideal choice for businesses of all sizes, from small enterprises seeking simplicity to large corporations requiring advanced scalability. Experience unified monitoring and proactive management with Zenoss Cloud, a comprehensive solution that transforms IT infrastructure optimization in today's complex environments.

Zenoss

Sample Customers

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse vs. Zenoss Cloud

March 2026

Free Report: Kaseya Traverse vs. Zenoss Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Kaseya Traverse vs. Zenoss Cloud and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kaseya Traverse vs. Zenoss Cloud report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.