Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Claroty Platform vs Zscaler Cloud IPS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Claroty Platform
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (8th), Vulnerability Management (22nd), Operational Technology (OT) Security (2nd), Cyber-Physical Systems Protection (2nd)
Zscaler Cloud IPS
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Network Security Systems solutions, they serve different purposes. Claroty Platform is designed for Cyber-Physical Systems Protection and holds a mindshare of 40.5%, down 42.9% compared to last year.
Zscaler Cloud IPS, on the other hand, focuses on Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS), holds 1.7% mindshare, up 0.8% since last year.
Cyber-Physical Systems Protection Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Claroty Platform40.5%
Armis36.6%
Verve Security Center10.0%
Other12.900000000000006%
Cyber-Physical Systems Protection
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Zscaler Cloud IPS1.7%
Fortinet FortiGate12.6%
Darktrace11.2%
Other74.5%
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
 

Featured Reviews

AP
Senior Consultant at Payatu
Passive scanning excels and support proves invaluable
Regarding the cons of the Claroty Platform, it is not about the deployment, but rather the identification. The Claroty Platform becomes too noisy when it gives numerous CVEs related to vendor match. Sometimes, these CVEs are not actually related to the device in the firmware at the site. The Claroty Platform identifies effectively but sometimes identifies many CVEs which might not be the actual issue in certain scenarios.
Utpal Sinha - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr Network Engineer at Momentive
Stable product with valuable SSL inspection features
We use Zscaler Cloud IPS for threat protection, full SSL inspection, and data center scalability. It integrates with multiple products, including cloud firewalls, cloud sandboxing, Cloud Security Broker (CSB), and Data Loss Prevention (DLP). It helps us allow or block specific TCP or UDP ports…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool's best feature was the UI and the simplicity it offers."
"I have had a very good experience with the Claroty Platform."
"The main advantage of Claroty, when compared to its competitors, is integrated secure remote access."
"I appreciate the active coding, deep inspection of packages, and data retrieval. The tool covers information about assets and attack vectors, which I find superior to other tools. Based on alerts, I create reports detailing how an attacker can penetrate the plant, both externally and internally."
"Claroty is very beneficial for learning and adds value to your resume."
"Customer service is number one and the best."
"The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts."
"The platform ensures security without imposing significant delays."
"The best feature is that Zscaler allows for a separation between cloud applications and URL filtering. For example, under the cloud application segment, I can bypass Microsoft Office 365 without the need to add URLs manually. It's one click, so that's handy."
"The initial setup process is easy."
"Cloud IPS integration is seamless, and it uses a Zero Trust model. It also simplifies overall user access management."
"The product's most valuable feature is complete SSL inspection."
"The initial setup is straightforward and easy in comparison with other solutions."
 

Cons

"I've reported four bugs and three feature requests so far. The main area of focus should be on how attacks are detected. The attack vector information needs to be more detailed. For example, it's not enough to state that an SMB v1 version open can lead to a WannaCry attack. A more detailed explanation should help clients understand the various ways an attack could occur."
"Introducing an AI chatbot to assist you when you have doubts could be beneficial."
"The Claroty Platform becomes too noisy when it gives numerous CVEs related to vendor match. Sometimes, these CVEs are not actually related to the device in the firmware at the site."
"There should be AI security solutions implemented."
"The product could be improved in terms of user interface design."
"Claroty Platform only gives the vulnerabilities based on the make and model of the devices, so it doesn't provide any resolution or any detailed explanation of how one can resolve such issues."
"For improvement, I think the training could be more practical. We have external training, but they're mostly theoretical. I want the solution to provide hands-on lab experience to help users learn better."
"I think the only issue is that the hardware Claroty uses is expensive."
"We recently had a significant issue with Zscaler. I think they have too many customers and some of their connection edge nodes went down because there were too many requests. I think they aren't scaling enough to keep up with the demand in some areas. That's one thing they should improve."
"When it comes to scalability, the IPsec could be improved."
"They have given limited free access for a year. Instead, they should increase the file size and give limited free access for around two months. It will allow engineers to evaluate the product."
"There is always room for improvement."
"We encounter issues sharing IP addresses with other companies using the software."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is quite expensive."
"It's a bit expensive compared to other solutions."
"The licensing for physical devices is cheap, but the software version is expensive. The software version costs around 26-28 dollars. I was surprised and even double-checked. It was shocking."
"The software has become more expensive at present."
"Zscaler has so far been solely responsible for all the sales we have done with it, so it would be more suited than us to address any issues concerning the pricing."
"The product is not affordable for small and medium enterprises."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cyber-Physical Systems Protection solutions are best for your needs.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Healthcare Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
University
10%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise11
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Claroty Platform?
The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts.
What needs improvement with Claroty Platform?
Regarding the cons of the Claroty Platform, it is not about the deployment, but rather the identification. The Claroty Platform becomes too noisy when it gives numerous CVEs related to vendor match...
What is your primary use case for Claroty Platform?
My clients are using the Claroty Platform for asset identification, finding CVEs and threat intel. I am aware of the continuous threat detection feature of the Claroty Platform, and even if it is g...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rockwell Automation
Zenith Live, Azure, Carlsberg Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Armis vs. Claroty Platform and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.