CloudSEK XVigil vs Recorded Future comparison

Read 18 Recorded Future reviews

9,235 Views
2,678 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudSEK XVigil

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Recorded Future and CloudSEK XVigil compete in the threat intelligence platform category. Recorded Future offers more extensive features, while CloudSEK XVigil presents a more cost-effective solution.

Features: Recorded Future offers bidirectional intelligence flows through open-source integration, browser plugins, and customizable dashboards. CloudSEK XVigil provides user-friendly portals, deep and dark web monitoring for brand protection, and STIX and TAXII modules for seamless integration with security systems.

Room for Improvement: Recorded Future could enhance automation, reduce complexity, and lower costs for better accessibility. CloudSEK XVigil might improve attack surface monitoring, alert prioritization, and integration features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Recorded Future is deployable on public and private clouds, offering reliable customer service. CloudSEK XVigil supports deployments across public, private, and on-premises environments with responsive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Recorded Future is a premium option with significant ROI when used efficiently, while CloudSEK XVigil provides cost-effective pricing and appeals to a broader range of companies, with ROI tied to user proficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudSEK XVigil vs. Recorded Future Report (Updated: June 2026).

CloudSEK XVigil vs. Recorded Future

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudSEK XVigil

Ranking in Digital Risk Protection

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Recorded Future

Ranking in Digital Risk Protection

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Digital Risk Protection category, the mindshare of CloudSEK XVigil is 3.1%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Recorded Future is 10.3%, down from 22.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Digital Risk Protection Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Recorded Future	10.3%
CloudSEK XVigil	3.1%
Other	86.6%

Digital Risk Protection

Featured Reviews

NishantKandpal

Information Security Manager at Varun Beverages Ltd

Proactive monitoring has strengthened our credential leak detection and brand protection

CloudSEK XVigil is a strong platform, but it can be improved in several areas. Alerts may sometimes include low-risk mentions, duplicate findings, and non-actionable leaks. Therefore, it can improve through better alert prioritization, smarter risk scoring, and stronger AI-based filtering. The second area for improvement is deeper integration with asset inventory and auto-tagging of critical assets. If we integrate this with our SOC platform, the team needs to understand technical alerts better. They could focus more on business-focused reporting and executive-friendly dashboards. Overall, the platform is strong in external threat visibility, but improving automation, contextual intelligence, and alert precision can make SOC operations even more efficient.

Read full review

Derek Lewis

Account Manager at Chevron

Continuous threat intelligence has improved brand monitoring and protects against leaked credentials

Some of the areas that need improvement in Recorded Future include email reports that can show unrelated content. Sometimes alerts pop up for articles that have been published years ago but were just recently discovered by Recorded Future. For the browser extension, since the main purpose is to present information regarding IPs, I think it would be best to provide us with an idea of where the IP originates or some additional information about the organization it belongs to. API capabilities in Recorded Future are improving, but there are still some features that are missing and some errors that are hard to handle and understand. The price of Recorded Future is a bit high, especially for smaller teams working on a tight budget, but it is very effective and relatively competitive for large organizations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In the past three years, we have taken down more than 1000 pages, monitored more than 700 credential leaks, and identified at least around 300 code leaks using CloudSEK XVigil."

"CloudSEK XVigil has positively impacted our organization by being easy to use for our small tier organization."

"CloudSEK XVigil's threat intelligence is advanced compared to other solutions I have seen or used, and no other tool provides the solutions CloudSEK XVigil does, making it a great product."

"CloudSEK XVigil is very advanced with automated features and AI capabilities."

"CloudSEK XVigil has positively impacted my organization by automating processes that were previously manual, which we struggled with due to our large network, and since integrating CloudSEK XVigil, it has dramatically changed our workflow and reduced the manpower needed."

"CloudSEK XVigil helps organizations detect cyber threats outside their network before the attackers exploit them internally."

"CloudSEK XVigil positively impacted my organization, allowing us to initiate a lot of takedowns for applications with our brand and logo that were wrongly listed on third-party websites, and thankfully, those were removed."

"I have seen a return on investment as I explained earlier, it reduces the investigation time from days to minutes, and that is the biggest ROI; on a team of ten people that use it, one request can take you from three days to minutes."

"The features and capabilities of Recorded Future that I have found the most valuable are its AI-driven capabilities that make a significant impact."

"Recorded Future has positively impacted my organization by allowing our analysts to work less on doing IOC enrichments."

"The tool is helpful in vulnerability assessment of zero-day vulnerabilities and phishing domains. The solution provides information on any domains of the organization that has undergone phishing or any other cyberattacks."

"It can collect data from various sources, including social media and the dark web."

"The tool can integrate with a lot of security control and proactive protection devices."

"The intel that they were providing us over the emails was very good. If it found any hashtag in our organization's name on the dark web, a rogue IP, or a marketplace, it would send us an email and notify us that this is being mentioned, and if we want, they can take some action."

"After implementing Recorded Future, I can point out two positive impacts: first, the tool helps our SOC team save 30 to 40 percent of effort due to the reduction of manual threat detection and false positives, and second, the quality of our threat hunting has improved considerably, leading to a better understanding of the threat landscape."

More Recorded Future pros

Cons

"CloudSEK XVigil is a strong platform, but it can be improved in several areas."

"I feel that some improvements in alerts and notifications can be really useful."

"CloudSEK XVigil can be improved by focusing more on vulnerabilities like open redirection, broken access control, and OWASP Top 10, which need to be enhanced and made more accurate."

"The dashboard is good, but I want to make it more mature with additional features so that we can view all the services we use and all critical notifications in a unified platform."

"I give it nine out of ten because sometimes I need to coordinate with the backend team for the takedown process."

"I think CloudSEK XVigil could improve its B-Vigil suite, particularly regarding attack surface monitoring application headers as compared to Bitsight, which provides a good amount of data that could be included in CloudSEK XVigil."

"Lacks sufficient visibility of malware and international APT attacks."

"The price of Recorded Future is a bit high, especially for smaller teams working on a tight budget, but it is very effective and relatively competitive for large organizations."

"Recorded Future is a very expensive solution, and its pricing could be improved."

"A possible improvement for Recorded Future would be better filtering options, particularly when dealing with large datasets."

"The documentation and support resources provided by Recorded Future are bad."

"The customer support is frustrating and not efficient. They always request logs and screenshots that seem irrelevant."

"While I don't think the tool is weak, its position isn't as dominant as it once was. Other companies like CrowdStrike and Mandiant are now challenging them in many areas. One downside is that Recorded Future can be complex for customers to use and understand. This isn't easy for clients to navigate."

"The solution could improve in reducing the false positives. However, most of the other tools on the market have false positives. If they enhance their data algorithm, it could improve the accuracy of results and minimize false positives. Identifying patterns of false possibilities can aid in developing better reporting features that could potentially eliminate them in the future. This recording feature tool could benefit from adopting similar techniques utilized by other tools to enhance its functionality. By doing so, it could minimize the need for manual efforts in distinguishing true positives from false positives, ultimately reducing the workload."

More Recorded Future cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I would rate the solution’s pricing a seven out of ten."

"The price of the solution is worth it. The overall performance of the solution outweighs the cost."

"There appear to be up to five different levels, with the most expensive version costing around $95,000 to $105,000 a year for subscription services."

"The biggest disadvantage of Recorded Future is the cost here in Eastern Europe. The solution is correctly priced for big companies who have the money to invest in such solutions. Also, the solution is useless on its own, which means that you have to invest in other solutions with which Recorded Future can be integrated. At present, Recorded Future can cost 60,000 euros per year. I am able to offer my clients a 5% to 10% discount, but in this region, the cost is still prohibitive even with the discount. If Recorded Future were more flexible in terms of price, there would be better sales opportunities in Europe and Eastern Europe, in particular, because we have more small- and medium-sized companies here."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Risk Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Legal Firm

16%

Insurance Company

10%

Retailer

10%

Media Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudSEK XVigil?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very easy, and there were not many challenges, so it was fine.

What is your primary use case for CloudSEK XVigil?

My main use case for CloudSEK XVigil is as a digital risk platform and digital risk protection service. This is for a threat intelligence platform that helps the organization protect the company's ...

What advice do you have for others considering CloudSEK XVigil?

Regarding measurable improvements especially after using CloudSEK XVigil, there are some measurable improvements around proactive threat visibility and faster incident response. Some of the outcome...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Recorded Future?

The price of Recorded Future is a bit high, especially for smaller teams working on a tight budget, but it is very effective and relatively competitive for large organizations.

What needs improvement with Recorded Future?

I cannot think of a way that Recorded Future can be improved. I don't have anything to add about the needed improvements, even small things such as interface tweaks or integrations.

What is your primary use case for Recorded Future?

My main use case for Recorded Future is as a threat and vulnerability feed. In relation to my use case with Recorded Future, it is the go-to tool when it comes to checking for third-party issues, a...

ZeroFOX vs CloudSEK XVigil

Comparisons

Compared 60% of the time

IntSights vs CloudSEK XVigil

Compared 9% of the time

Cyble Vision vs CloudSEK XVigil

Compared 8% of the time

Group-IB Digital Risk Protection vs CloudSEK XVigil

Compared 7% of the time

More CloudSEK XVigil Competitors

Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs Recorded Future

Compared 6% of the time

Anomali vs Recorded Future

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Recorded Future

Compared 5% of the time

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs Recorded Future

Compared 5% of the time

ZeroFOX vs Recorded Future

Compared 4% of the time

More Recorded Future Competitors

Product Reports

CloudSEK XVigil

Download CloudSEK XVigil product report

Download Recorded Future product report

Also Known As

XVigil

No data available

Overview

CloudSEK XVigil offers digital risk protection by monitoring the internet and providing real-time threat intelligence, safeguarding businesses from potential threats.

CloudSEK XVigil is designed for proactive risk management by continuously scanning the web, dark web, and social media for potential data threats and vulnerabilities. Its comprehensive dashboard allows users to quickly identify and remediate risks, enhancing overall security postures. It effectively addresses the needs of enterprises seeking to protect their data integrity and maintain customer trust by alerting them to potential breaches and unauthorized data exposure.

What are CloudSEK XVigil’s key features?

Real-time Threat Intelligence: Constant monitoring of digital platforms for timely threat alerts.
Comprehensive Dashboard: Provides an easy-to-navigate interface for quick threat assessment.
Dark Web Monitoring: Scans the dark web for unauthorized exposure of sensitive data.
Data Leak Detection: Identifies unintentional data leaks across different channels.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Security: Strengthens cybersecurity frameworks by identifying threats early.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces potential data breach costs by preemptively managing risks.
Peace of Mind: Provides assurance through consistent monitoring and reporting.
Reputation Protection: Protects brand image by mitigating risk of data exposure.

CloudSEK XVigil can be leveraged in industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, where data protection is crucial. By addressing industry-specific vulnerabilities, it allows organizations to tailor their security measures and efficiently safeguard sensitive information, ensuring compliance with industry regulations and standards.

CloudSEK

Recorded Future offers a comprehensive platform for threat intelligence and brand monitoring, supporting real-time alerts and data mining to protect against cyber threats and enhance security insights.

Recorded Future integrates advanced threat intelligence, allowing for seamless data comparison, comprehensive monitoring of cyber threats, and the detection of dark web activities. Users receive real-time alerts, access to an expansive database, and customizable dashboards for enhanced SIEM insights. The platform's capabilities extend to leveraging social media investigations and providing personalized user experiences. Key competitors such as Mandiant and CrowdStrike create a competitive landscape. Areas for improvement include reducing false positives, refining pricing strategies for smaller markets, and enhancing email threat intelligence.

What are the key features?

Threat Intelligence: Provides detailed insights into emerging threats and vulnerabilities.
Real-Time Alerts: Alerts users to security threats and unauthorized activities instantly.
Dark Web Monitoring: Detects activities on the dark web related to brand and cybersecurity risks.
Customizable Dashboards: Offers personalized dashboards for tailored threat monitoring.
API Integration: Supports seamless integration with existing security systems for continuous monitoring.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security Insights: Leverages real-time data for better threat detection and protection.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Provides continuous monitoring of cyber threats and vulnerabilities.
Increased Protection: Assists in preventing breaches and unauthorized activities.
Brand Monitoring: Protects brand reputation through detailed monitoring and alerts.
Time Efficiency: Streamlines threat detection processes, reducing time spent on manual investigations.

Recorded Future is a reliable tool for industries focusing on threat detection and risk management. It is employed for threat intelligence, brand monitoring, and cyber risk assessments. Clients use its cloud-based capabilities for activities such as threat hunting, forensic investigations, and continuous monitoring of cyber activities and data feeds. Industries benefit from its ability to alert on security threats and vulnerabilities, offering protection and maintaining brand reputation in an increasingly digital landscape.

Sample Customers

ooredoo, HDFC, Olam, SWIGGY, gojek, Axis Bank

Fujitsu, Regions, SITA, St. Jude Medical, Accenture, T-Mobile, TIAA, Intel Security, Armor, Alert Logic, NTT, Splunk

CloudSEK XVigil vs. Recorded Future