CloudStack vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Apache and OpenText are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Apache is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.2, while OpenText is ranked #46. Apache holds a 2.2% mindshare in CM, compared to OpenText’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

CloudStack

Read 34 CloudStack reviews

4,483 Views
4,349 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Read 6 OpenText Cloud Service Automation reviews

1,943 Views
1,671 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudStack

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

OpenText Cloud Service Automation and CloudStack compete in the cloud services sector, aiming to enhance cloud management capabilities. OpenText appears to have the advantage in pricing satisfaction and support quality, while CloudStack stands out with its robust feature set.

Features: OpenText Cloud Service Automation offers advanced automation capabilities, orchestration of service delivery, and a comprehensive service catalog. CloudStack provides flexibility and scalability through multi-cloud support, hypervisor agnosticism, and broad compatibility with various hypervisors such as Xen, KVM, vSphere, and Hyper-V.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance user interface customization, increase integration options with third-party tools, and improve documentation comprehensiveness. CloudStack may benefit from more streamlined setup processes, improved personalized support, and enhanced interoperability features for better integration with complex environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Cloud Service Automation is known for its straightforward deployment process and strong customer service that eases integration into existing infrastructures. CloudStack offers a flexible deployment model requiring more setup; its community-driven support provides a vast knowledge base but less personalized assistance.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Cloud Service Automation incurs higher initial setup costs but promises significant ROI through automation efficiencies and lower long-term operational expenses. CloudStack features a more budget-friendly setup with cost advantages but relies on strategic deployment for achieving optimal returns.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudStack vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudStack

Ranking in Cloud Management

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Ranking in Cloud Management

46th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudStack is 2.2%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Cloud Service Automation is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CloudStack	2.2%
OpenText Cloud Service Automation	1.2%
Other	96.6%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Tharun Kumar Reddy Thamatam

Senior Infrastructure Consultant at Infosys

Achieving seamless infrastructure management with optimized network and user access controls

I believe enhancements could be made in CloudStack, particularly in the management servers. I had the opportunity to collaborate with one of the Apache CloudStack developers, leading to the installation of additional agents for better information retrieval from hypervisors. We implemented configurations, ensuring consistency across hosts and VMs. We also utilized Ansible or YAML files to automate password upgrades during patching activities and database management, showcasing our customization efforts for improvement. For future releases, it would be beneficial if Apache enhanced CloudStack by integrating alerting systems directly. We've had instances where hypervisors experienced overloads without prior alerts, so proactive alerts within the tool would better prepare us for addressing issues swiftly, preventing disruption in business operations. A portal summarizing system metrics alongside alert capabilities would greatly enhance our operational efficiency.

Read full review

SunpritSingh

Test Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

A user friendly solution that makes it easy to submit and view jobs

The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user-friendly the solution is. Traditionally, when we use a mainframe system to submit jobs, we have to see the spool or any error we might get in the spool. It is very command-based and uses a green screen, which is not user-friendly. Micro Focus enterprise makes it easy to submit and view jobs. We just have to log into the particular portal, go to the catalog and view any files we want. The same can be said about submitting jobs. We know what JCL we want to submit, give it the path, and then submit it with no command required. It is very user-friendly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CloudStack, by default, gives us a zone-based setup which makes it easier to manage datacenters located in different geographical areas."

"We like the virtualization capabilities."

"When compared to OpenStack, CloudStack is also an open-source platform that is continuously improving its features and capabilities with each new version release. Having worked with CloudStack 4.7, 4.14, and most recently, 4.17, I have noticed significant enhancements in the platform's features and customer experience, such as the introduction of a new user interface in the latest release. Notably, the latest versions have made major improvements to VM live migrations, making them more efficient and effective."

"CloudStack is highly stable."

"In general I would say CS is a stable solution and, in my opinion, it will solve problems with administration of VMs."

"CloudStack supports every operating system that supports hypervisors, which makes the product more attractive, compared to vCloud Director or Azure."

"It works, and pretty much always has, and reliability and support for enterprise features, with a multi-tenant interface, makes CloudStack a very compelling solution."

"I liked the separation of the isolated network versus the shared network."

More CloudStack pros

"We really look at infrastructure as a service as the major trend in IT, at least for a service provider like us, for the next 3 to 4 years, so we really want to have a precise, clearly defined, but very dynamic and flexible private cloud where we can easily provision and deploy infrastructure as a service to our end customers."

"Scalability is the most valuable feature to us."

"The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management."

"These products let us integrate multiple tools together and help to automate the processes by cutting down time and effort through the modules and reusable contents."

"The ability to tie the pieces together, supporting multiple providers across both HPE and non-HPE products, is crucial in a heterogeneous environment composed of many different commercial and in-house developed components."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user friendly the solution is."

Cons

"Environment is sensitive, so, unlike VMware, you can not afford middle-skilled engineers, they will ruin everything."

"After Citrix divested CloudPlatform to Accelerite, commercial support was absolutely atrocious."

"The Windows hosts do not get their hostnames from cloud-init."

"We did encounter issues with stability, and the main issue was secondary storage. When it is not available, XenServers and hypervisors are affected. And CS doesn’t do anything to reboot, or fix. Come to think of it, maybe it shouldn’t, considering their approach – CS just orchestrates everything else on the hypervisor and storage level."

"VPN P2S is cutting all connections except the CloudStack environment for the user when he is connected. I would like to have VPN like Cisco's AnyConnect."

"The upgrade process can be improved further."

"I would like to see support for native VLAN, and fault-tolerance."

"The stability is problematic, in part, because there is no support."

More CloudStack cons

"Deployment has been extremely painful for the production environment. This was mostly due to the decision to use our internal Microsoft-based Certificate Authority (CA)."

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support."

"I’d like to see better monitoring visibility. We have to rely on HPE Technical Services to tell us when those challenges and problems occur."

"I would like fewer restrictions as a software tester."

"I haven't found very user friendly things, some are a little tricky."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a 100% open-source solution needing just an Apache license. Also, there are no hidden fees to be paid."

"The Apache CloudStack is open source, so you do not have licenses to purchase."

"There is no license, so the product is free unless you are buying professional technical support services."

"CloudStack is an open-source product."

"CloudStack is an open source solution, so you don't need to pay anything for it. When our company develops something specially for CloudStack, it is donated to the Apache Software Foundation and provided to anyone that wants to use it."

"The solution is open-source and free."

"Give an effort to planning. If possible, contract a specialized consultant company for the initial setup and knowledge transfer."

"As far as I know, CS is still free of charge. If you want to pay some money, Citrix Cloud Platform is based on CS, I think. As for hypervisors – everything as usual, you need to pay for VMware and vCenter. As for XenServer, recently they changed the free feature list, so you may need to pay some money to get useful features like XenMotion."

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation's pricing is average."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

17%

Construction Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudStack?

CloudStack is open-source, so there is no cost apart from learning. Billing solutions, if outsourced, come at a moderate cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudStack?

Enhancements for CloudStack can focus on integrating more hypervisors, as mentioned regarding current features. We're working on a new feature that will allow for certain limited functions, but ove...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudStack?

My usual use cases for CloudStack involve an AWS style private cloud or public cloud. I can deploy an AWS style cloud using the open source tool that is CloudStack. The use case depends on the cust...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

VMware Aria Automation vs CloudStack

Compared 9% of the time

OpenNebula vs CloudStack

Compared 9% of the time

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs CloudStack

Compared 6% of the time

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure vs CloudStack

Compared 5% of the time

Persistent Intelligent Cloud (PiCloud) vs CloudStack

Compared 5% of the time

More CloudStack Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 11% of the time

VMware Cloud Director vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 8% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 5% of the time

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 5% of the time

CloudSphere vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack

October 2026

Download CloudStack product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Cloud Service Automation

October 2026

OpenText Cloud Service Automation report

Download OpenText Cloud Service Automation product report

Also Known As

Vmops, Cloud.com

Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation, Cloud Service Automation Manager, HPE Cloud Service Automation

Overview

CloudStack offers an easy-to-manage platform compatible with multiple hypervisors, enabling seamless networking and efficient workload scaling. Its advanced APIs and open-source nature facilitate automation and customization, making it ideal for extensive cloud environments.

CloudStack is recognized for ease of setup, robust networking, and hypervisor compatibility. Supporting a range of workloads, it scales efficiently, offering flexible features like VM migration, private networking, and multi-zone support. Its user-friendly open-source design aids troubleshooting and customization, making it ideal for managing broad cloud deployments. Despite needing upgrades in interface and integration with third-party vendors and container technology, CloudStack remains a strong choice for businesses seeking effective virtualization solutions. Improvements in documentation, regional management, and emerging tech support would enhance usability and performance.

What are CloudStack's notable features?

Hypervisor compatibility: Supports diverse virtualization technologies for flexible deployment.
Robust networking: Ensures reliable and scalable network infrastructure management across zones.
Advanced APIs: Facilitates automation and integration to streamline cloud operations.
VM migration: Enhances operational flexibility with seamless virtual machine relocations.
Private networking: Provides secure and isolated network environments for critical tasks.
Multi-zone support: Offers scalable solutions for distributed cloud management.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Open-source model: Allows extensive customization without licensing costs, enhancing ROI.
Ease of management: Simplifies operations, reducing time and resources spent on maintenance.
Scalability: Enables growth and adaptability, fostering agility in expanding businesses.
Flexibility: Supports various workloads and environments, meeting diverse operational needs.

CloudStack is implemented across industries, used in managing virtual environments, offering IaaS in public, private, and hybrid cloud models. Companies use it for internal virtualization and customer service, integrating with hypervisors across data centers to orchestrate virtual machines and support development and testing globally.

Apache

OpenText Cloud Service Automation streamlines cloud management by offering scalability and flexibility, allowing businesses to automate processes and reduce manual intervention. This solution empowers organizations to manage resources efficiently and optimize operations.

By leveraging OpenText Cloud Service Automation, companies can automate deployment, management, and scaling of cloud services. It supports integration with existing workflows and ensures efficient resource utilization. Businesses benefit from simplified IT operations, reduced overhead, and enhanced agility. This solution allows for seamless cloud orchestration and offers support for hybrid environments, helping organizations stay ahead in a competitive market.

What are the most valuable features?

Scalability Management: Automates scaling of resources to meet demands without manual input.
Cost Optimization: Provides insights into cost management, reducing overall expenses.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with existing tools for seamless workflows.
Hybrid Cloud Support: Offers flexibility in managing both public and private cloud resources.
Resource Automation: Automates provisioning and lifecycle management for better efficiency.

What benefits should be evaluated?

Improved Efficiency: Reduces manual tasks and automates processes.
Cost Savings: Lowers operational costs through optimized resource management.
Enhanced Agility: Accelerates deployment times and improves time-to-market.
Operational Visibility: Provides detailed insights into resource usage and performance.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail successfully implement OpenText Cloud Service Automation to ensure compliance, enhance customer services, and manage transactions efficiently. The adaptability of the platform supports implementation across diverse business models.

OpenText

Sample Customers

GreenQloud, Exoscale, TomTom, ASG, PC Extreme, ISWest, Grid'5000

China Merchants Bank, Osiatis

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation

November 2026

Free Report: CloudStack vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudStack vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudStack vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.