

Microsoft Purview Information Protection and Collibra Platform are competitors in the data protection and governance category. Microsoft Purview appears to have an edge in security-focused integrations, while Collibra excels in governance and adaptability.
Features: Microsoft Purview Information Protection offers comprehensive data protection with robust DLP systems and automated labeling for regulation compliance. It integrates with cloud environments and AI, supporting multi-platform devices like iOS, Mac, and Android. Collibra Platform provides an extensive data governance suite with customizable workflows and strong data lineage capabilities, enabling detailed metadata management and data cataloging across diverse systems.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Purview can improve third-party tool compatibility, enhance reporting features, and increase pricing flexibility for individuals. It also needs to address false positives more effectively. Collibra should focus on developing more intuitive interfaces, expanding integration options, and improving metadata management. Pricing and deployment complexity may deter smaller organizations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Purview integrates well within the Microsoft ecosystem, ensuring straightforward deployments, though technical support has received mixed reviews. Collibra accommodates cloud and on-premise setups, but its complexity requires more technical expertise. Support focuses on integration, though response times could be improved.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Purview's competitive pricing benefits organizations within the Microsoft ecosystem, though complex licensing can confuse newcomers. It offers good ROI by consolidating multiple services. Collibra, while more expensive, justifies the cost with its enterprise-grade capabilities, but pricing may limit smaller companies. Both products deliver ROI through improved data management and protection.
When considering the time and effort required to build a catalog and utilize it effectively, combined with the prices, it often does not make financial sense.
Implementing Collibra Data Catalog can be cost-effective if its features align well with the business requirements.
While there are no direct cost reductions, there is significant indirect cost reduction.
Purview can do a quick scan, and it doesn't use human resources, so it gets time to do things that we need humans to focus on.
The E5 license comes with different solutions like data discovery classification, CASB, DLP solutions, and Defender for Cloud.
The cost of data loss and your data going to a competitor is potentially massive.
When using the Collibra Resident Architect program, the customer service was excellent, with issues quickly resolved.
The technical support from Collibra Governance is excellent.
I encountered some issues with data quality initially in Collibra Data Intelligence Platform, and they resolved those issues.
Sometimes, I get a fast and knowledgeable response, while other times, I've experienced delays and received no resolution.
It's hard to be an ambassador for a product when you know it will be hard to get support.
After our issues are reported, it takes a long time to find a resolution.
We were a big bank and had thousands of assets without any issues.
Collibra Lineage's performance is reliable, as the lineage harvest runs on the lineage server which operates on Collibra cloud.
I would rate the scalability of Collibra Lineage as a nine; it is a scalable solution for my business.
It can be scaled across different departments organization-wide very quickly and easily.
It can handle large collections of data without issues.
Scalability can be improved by reducing these intervals.
I rate the stability of Collibra Lineage as seven.
Once implemented, I haven't had issues with its consistency.
The product is stable, and whatever it does, it does better than any other thing.
Since identity is where everything is based, if that goes down, you're screwed.
Users often find it challenging to utilize data governance tools, with ease of use ranked as an important criterion by 2028 standards.
There should be a reduction in cost as compared to other tools.
There is an issue with Collibra Catalog's pricing model, especially for organizations with many databases, as the initial package comes with a limited number of connectors.
Effectiveness in Microsoft Purview Information Protection means enforcing the policy and making sure it works consistently across non-Microsoft products as well.
A lot of functionality in Microsoft Purview Information Protection is not exposed in an API officially yet, which has made a lot of implementation work difficult because we have to do click ops instead of DevOps.
Having a roadmap or updates about new releases would be helpful for demonstrating to clients.
Collibra has high initial costs for licensing that can be a barrier to small and medium-sized companies starting with it.
There are plans to increase license rates.
Adding modules like Privacy could become expensive.
I talked to people who had compared it to other products on the market, and they're spending five figures to get started.
The E5 license covers most of the solutions for different technologies, so that way, it is good and more affordable compared to any other solution.
Our focus is on helping customers maximize their software investment.
My experience with Collibra's collaboration tools in improving data literacy has been quite good. I think it is one of the best for helping people understand and discuss certain data sets and manage workflows.
We have saved up to 30% of manual work as a specific process or workflow became faster.
The data lineage feature is beneficial for understanding where data is coming from.
Microsoft Copilot is an advantage because it's enterprise-grade AI.
It's paramount to have a single solution for information protection.
Regardless of the education, the employee might share the information anyway, so the AI shouldn't be the first point of failure. It should be a human making good decisions.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Collibra Platform | 8.6% |
| Microsoft Purview Information Protection | 2.1% |
| Other | 89.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 55 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
Collibra Platform is preferred for workflows, data lineage, and a user-friendly interface. It enhances metadata management with robust collaboration, flexible customization, and powerful reporting, aiding organizations in effective data management.
Collibra Platform provides dependable solutions for metadata management, data lineage, and governance. It strengthens data governance with cataloging, glossaries, automation, and integration, supporting compliance and data quality management. Despite challenges with integration and metadata ingestion, the platform is vital for data governance programs, offering comprehensive AI capabilities and streamlined processes for enterprise data management.
What are Collibra Platform's key features?In industries, Collibra Platform supports IT teams through metadata management and data quality assurance. It is widely used for compliance initiatives like GDPR, speeding up digital transformation and enforcing policy management. Organizations employ it to consolidate business and technical metadata, ensuring effective enterprise-scale data management in diverse sectors.
Implement Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) to help you discover, classify, and protect sensitive information wherever it lives or travels.
MIP capabilities are included with Microsoft 365 Compliance and give you the tools to know your data, protect your data, and prevent data loss.
To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.