ConnectWise Automate vs N-able N-central comparison

ConnectWise and N-able are both solutions in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category. ConnectWise is ranked #10, while N-able is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4. ConnectWise holds a 7.7% mindshare in RMM, compared to N-able’s 9.2% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of ConnectWise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of N-able users who would recommend it.

ConnectWise Automate

Read 15 ConnectWise Automate reviews

1,152 Views
883 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

N-able N-central

Read 9 N-able N-central reviews

1,516 Views
1,139 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ConnectWise Automate

N-able N-central

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

ConnectWise Automate and N-able N-central compete in the remote monitoring and management space. ConnectWise Automate excels with lower pricing and automation features, while N-able N-central is favored for its security and value proposition.

Features: ConnectWise Automate offers extensive automation capabilities, integrating various tools for seamless IT processes. Its scripting capabilities are vital and the integration with ScreenConnect facilitates efficient remote control. N-able N-central shines in asset tracking, robust security integrations, and a comprehensive patch management module, targeting large-scale environments with its scalable solutions.

Room for Improvement: ConnectWise Automate could enhance its interface usability and simplify initial setup procedures. Additional improvements in documentation and support for newer integrations would be beneficial. N-able N-central would gain from further refining its complexity in navigation, enhancing real-time monitoring capabilities, and expanding flexibility in custom reporting options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ConnectWise Automate offers various deployment options but can involve a complex setup requiring substantial resources. It features supportive customer service to assist users during deployment. N-able N-central facilitates a more streamlined deployment process, paired with reliable customer service that supports quick and smooth implementations.

Pricing and ROI: ConnectWise Automate is often more budget-friendly with impactful ROI, especially for automation-focused businesses. N-able N-central may have higher initial costs but delivers value through its advanced security features and management capabilities, potentially justifying the investment for security-concerned organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed ConnectWise Automate vs. N-able N-central Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ConnectWise Automate vs. N-able N-central

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ConnectWise Automate

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

10th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

N-able N-central

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category, the mindshare of ConnectWise Automate is 7.7%, down from 9.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of N-able N-central is 9.2%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

Featured Reviews

Sean Saeb

Partner and CIO at Caspian IT Group

Responsive, integrates well with other applications, and the technical support is helpful

There is always room for improvement. I haven't had any problems, and they're doing a great job, in my opinion. They're doing quite well. In most cases, when we discover an issue, we report it to their engineers, who then schedule a fix. Normally, when we request something, I can see it happening within three to four months. This is a raw system. Of course, it has some flaws that could be improved. But, it's something that we will have to work with to get to the point where we need this, we request it and they do their best to make it happen. There is a lot of integration with other applications through Automate, and I believe they are working with all of the industry leaders to get the integration going. I am very pleased to be working with them.

Read full review

Dimitri V G

Team Manager Fiber & Backhaul Solutions Center & South at Telenet BVBA

Maximizing operational efficiency with comprehensive monitoring and automation capabilities

There are areas in N-able N-central that could be improved. We always started it from the basic purpose of monitoring hardware, where vendors such as HP and Dell try to sell their own services which monitor and provide a dashboard, which is their logic. They want to make their own recurring revenue on that. We notice that SNMP has had a good run and still sometimes is used, but it's becoming an issue to maintain the same capabilities because HP makes it unreliable or even removes certain features that we used to be able to validate redundant array of independent disks. Our service that has been running for 15-20 years suddenly is not working anymore because HP decided in generation 10 plus and above, or generation 10 hardware in servers, storage controllers particularly, they just didn't put the SNMP OIDs anymore. We are now following that market change or business change in hardware monitoring and the future is Redfish, REST API, IPMI type of monitoring with the REST API and Redfish being most common. We have to do the effort ourselves because Enable is not really strategically going there because I assume there's not much money to make to improve that or to convince customers to start with their product. That issue could be better if they would be more prepared for that change and give us customers more tools, preconfigured, pre-available custom services for Redfish, REST API, where we just have to put a few items username, password and address and some dots and commas, but that we don't have to reinvent the wheel, which we are doing at the moment. We are using HP iLO commandlets and REST APIs for Aruba. Dell is making it very hard to monitor their hardware. If it has an iDRAC, I can manage it and monitor it, but if it's something that's less common or due to the portfolio, they have done a good job at not exposing information about health. We would just want to have a red or a green dot that indicates if this device is healthy or not healthy. Since nobody's investing in SNMP because it's a liability in security, they should invest in making a REST API and preferably also do the work on making it easy to pull or push information. That's something that the industry in general and Enable in particular could do a significant job to help us monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very scalable."

"ConnectWise Automate's interface is pretty easy to use. It's pretty intuitive to get around and navigate it. It does what I need, which is usually connecting to the client and customers systems."

"The most value we get from this solution is that everything is on a patch cycle."

"It allows us to manage all client requests, jobs and invoicing."

"This product saves us a lot of time and increases our efficiency."

"The database is great. It's a nicely ordered database."

"It's definitely improved the help-desk servicing, et cetera."

"It's a very good IT tool for a company that provides IT services. It is very helpful for technicians to work with the tool to see all of the customers in one place and then manage all of the computers in one place."

More ConnectWise Automate pros

"It's a very robust product. They're continuing to invest and put new enhancements into the product. They're very open about what their roadmap is, which is very good for us because then as a business, we can plan."

"The solution's service is good."

"The support is at a good level. So normally, we can always get to a solution when we are stuck with some monitoring problems that we encounter."

"The most valuable feature of N-able N-central is the many options it has."

"N-able N-central is very scalable."

"The most helpful features of N-able N-central include providing a single pane of glass for many insights in an environment regarding their patching, their assets, their devices in general, and the active issues that they show."

"The most valuable features of N-central are its ease of deployment and ease of use."

"N-able N-central is an easy tool to implement with customers."

More N-able N-central pros

Cons

"I have a problem with the reports available on the solution. I don't understand how to work with the reporting functionality. For example, when I want to give a report for a specific machine, ConnectWise doesn't seem to have this as an option. I'm not sure if I'm missing something, or if the reporting functionality is just poorly conceived."

"They always change the GUI to some dumb-down version of tiles which are more "user-friendly", but slows my team down in the end."

"They could use some automated alerts particularly when we're talking about an MSP that might shoot over."

"Their support needs to be better."

"Technical support was helpful."

"In Patch Manager, there should be more reportability so that it is easier to see the updates that I have applied to a machine and when the next update will happen. A lot of times, it seems like all the information is kind of thrown all over the place, and you can't really see it all at the same time. There should be a simplified patch data view that allows us to quickly confirm that our various clients are getting patched as they should be."

"The fixed client for Automate is slow. The web client is not very intuitive."

"There could be better linkages between ConnectWise Automate and Manage from a ticketing perspective. Automate and Manage each has its own ticketing system. We use the one in Manage, but it'd be nice if they were linked directly to the one in Automate."

More ConnectWise Automate cons

"We have to do the effort ourselves because Enable is not really strategically going there because I assume there's not much money to make to improve that or to convince customers to start with their product."

"At this moment, we encounter stability issues with N-able N-central from time to time."

"The industry has moved towards Redfish for out-of-band and in-band monitoring, yet N-able N-central still relies on older protocols like SNMP."

"N-central has limited mobile device management (MDM) support, specifically for Android devices. This limitation affected a deal with a client who had numerous Android devices to manage. It would be beneficial if N-central could expand its MDM support to include Android devices."

"There is room for improvement in the development of custom monitoring services."

"The solution's overall integration should be improved."

"The support from our direct team is very good, but the support from their day-to-day ongoing help desk isn't that good. They have still got some work to do on that, but they have been focusing on that a lot over the last number of years. So, it has gotten a lot better than it was."

"Involving AI in the platform could improve it further."

More N-able N-central cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I pay $85 a month per user for a ConnectWise package that contains multiple solutions."

"From what I've overheard, it is pretty comparable to other solutions in terms of price."

"Pricing and licensing are reasonable."

"I believe Automate is available for around $2."

"N-able N-central is not an expensive solution."

"The pricing and licensing are average, almost six out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

27%

Computer Software Company

12%

Performing Arts

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about N-able N-central?

The solution's service is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with N-able N-central?

One of my personal challenges with N-able N-central is the monitoring of services for server hardware. The industry has moved towards Redfish for out-of-band and in-band monitoring, yet N-able N-ce...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able N-central?

Our primary use case for N-able N-central is monitoring. As an administrator, I frequently work with N-able N-central for monitoring, spending approximately fifty percent of my time on it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Kaseya VSA vs ConnectWise Automate

Compared 30% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs ConnectWise Automate

Compared 17% of the time

NinjaOne vs ConnectWise Automate

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ConnectWise Automate

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs ConnectWise Automate

Compared 2% of the time

More ConnectWise Automate Competitors

Kaseya VSA vs N-able N-central

Compared 26% of the time

NinjaOne vs N-able N-central

Compared 25% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs N-able N-central

Compared 15% of the time

Atera vs N-able N-central

Compared 10% of the time

More N-able N-central Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ConnectWise Automate

June 2025

Download ConnectWise Automate product report

Buyer's Guide

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

June 2025

Download N-able N-central product report

Also Known As

LabTech for IT Service Providers, ConnectWise Automate for Corporate IT Departments, ConnectWise Automate for IT Service Providers

SolarWinds N-central, SolarWinds MSP N-central

Overview

ConnectWise Automate is an IT management tool that helps deliver IT services at the speed of business. Our remote monitoring and management (RMM) platform provides powerful automation to discover & manage devices, monitor for problems, and automate action. Deliver streamlined reactive and proactive managed services, stop putting out fires, and start focusing on what matters most. See why over 5,500 partners worldwide chose ConnectWise Automate by visiting ConnectWise.com or calling 877-522-8323.

ConnectWise

N-able N-central is a comprehensive tool for monitoring networks, managing assets, automation, remote access, patch management, and ensuring system security. It is predominantly used by managed services providers to manage systems, servers, routers, and firewalls.

N-able N-central provides robust remote management and monitoring functionalities. It offers a user-friendly GUI and strong asset tracking capabilities. Integration with ticketing systems, CrowdStrike, and N-able EDR enhances monitoring and security. Automation features allow scheduling tasks, responding to system triggers, and automating problem resolution. Users appreciate ongoing enhancements and transparency about its roadmap.

What are the key features of N-able N-central?

Remote Connectivity: Provides smooth remote control for troubleshooting and support.
Reporting Suite: Offers comprehensive reporting tools for network insights.
Patch Management: Efficiently manages system updates to maintain security.
Intuitive GUI: User-friendly interface backed by solid support.
Asset Tracking: Powerful tracking of all managed devices.
Integration: Supports ticketing systems and security tools like CrowdStrike and N-able EDR.
Automation: Schedules tasks and automates problem resolution.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in the reviews?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automation and integration streamline workflows.
Improved Security: Robust monitoring and security features protect networks.
Cost Savings: Comprehensive tool reduces the need for multiple solutions.
Ease of Use: Intuitive interface and strong support simplify management.
Scalability: Grows with business needs, managing a large number of devices.

N-able N-central is widely implemented across various industries, providing essential network management and security functionalities. It is particularly useful for managed services providers in sectors such as healthcare, finance, and education, where robust monitoring, remote access, and asset management are critical for operational efficiency.

N-able

Sample Customers

I-M Technology, Mainstay Technologies, PC Works Plus, Integrity IT, Kerkhoff Technologies Inc., Marathon Consulting, Christenberry Sales Company, EDTS, Secom Technology, Ready to View, ARRC Technology, DaVinci Digital, JNR Networks, Quinn Technology Solutions, PCIT, Liberty Technology, Capital Computers & Networks, Atlanta Technology Force, Doberman Technologies, First Column Enterprises, CisCom Solutions

Premier Technology Solutions

Buyer's Guide

ConnectWise Automate vs. N-able N-central

June 2025

Free Report: ConnectWise Automate vs. N-able N-central

Find out what your peers are saying about ConnectWise Automate vs. N-able N-central and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ConnectWise Automate vs. N-able N-central report.

See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.

We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.