Cybereason Endpoint Detection &amp; Response vs Lookout comparison

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Lookout

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.5%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 1.2%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lookout is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.5%
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response	1.2%
Lookout	0.8%
Other	94.5%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Ivan Burke

Head of Research Development and Innovation at CSIR

Offers useful threat hunting and response capabilities but struggles to justify cost for smaller deployments

I mostly work with incident response, so I work with a bunch of them interchangeably, but mostly with the EDR components; I also get involved with some of the XDR components, especially for the cloud. Regarding analysis features, such as deep behavioral detection, I do use it sometimes; I usually don't use the automated version of it, as I prefer threat hunting directly, depending on if the season is available. I know some of them have pretty good analytics engines, but I tend to do the threat hunting on my own. I manage incident response for a bunch of companies, so some of them have Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response integrated into Sentinel, some into Fortinet, and others into various tools. When considering cost-effectiveness, their pricing structure works such that if you're a large organization with more than a thousand endpoints to deploy to, then Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is worthwhile. But for anything less than 300, it's too expensive; obviously, the more you buy, the better the price, making it cheaper for you. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response best fits enterprise-level businesses such as huge corporations; however, we are in the process of removing it from many of our endpoint clients because it's not really showing enough value for them at the moment. We're trying to see how we can improve it with some of our clients, but at the moment, it's struggling compared to other EDR solutions that we have deployed. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response a six.

Read full review

David Baynton

IT Manager at NHS Trust

Enhanced mobile security with visibility into app and website usage, but installation challenges remain

We use Lookout for mobile devices, such as phones It has reduced our risk around mobile devices. I like the security features and being able to see what apps and websites people are using. There is nothing we have come across that we've desired. We have been using Lookout for one year. The…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Since they've done their most recent update, the ease to isolate endpoints is valuable. If we find one where there is a virus on it, we can easily isolate it. We don't even have to contact the user. We don't have to manually take them off the network. We can easily isolate them."

"The stability is pretty good except for one or two cases, and based on the performance, it's been okay with pretty high performance, no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze."

"Cortex XDR lets us manage several clients from the same console, and its endpoint defense is more advanced than traditional antivirus."

"Stability is one of the features we like the most."

"The solution allows control over the user and his machine through Cortex XDR security policies."

"The one feature of Palo Alto Networks Traps that our organization finds most valuable is the App ID service."

"The product has an intuitive dashboard."

"The product's most valuable features are massive user and feature intelligence exploit detection."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The solution is efficient."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"We like that it is a hybrid; it’s flexible, you can really do whatever you need to do, the initial setup is not overly complicated, the solution can scale, and it is stable and reliable."

"Cybereason's threat hunting and investigation are the most valuable features. Threat hunting is a user-friendly feature that keeps you safe. Investigation offers an added value that I haven't seen with other EDR services. It allows you to find specific policy problems within your environment."

"With Cybereason, we can never fail any business type because of the antivirus detection."

"Cybereason absolutely enables us to mitigate and isolate on the fly. Our managed detection response telemetry has dropped dramatically since we began using it. It's very top-of-mind. We were running some tabletop exercises and none of the detections were getting triggered by the managed security services provider. So we needed to find a solution that would trigger high-fidelity alerts. That was Cybereason and it dramatically changed our landscape from the detection and response perspective."

"The most valuable feature is the capability of the command used by the machine so that we see the kind of performance that is running."

"The dashboard is very good and you can consider it as an interactive UI."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros

"The most valuable features are the antivirus as a whole, the anti-malware, and all of the protection features that scan our enterprise devices."

"The protection offered by the product is the most valuable feature. It detects vulnerabilities or traps on our users' phones and then prompts them to clean up their devices. Tools we used previously would only discover, which required us to gather information on the backend, so Lookout is a welcome upgrade."

"We have not had any issues with bugs or breakdowns."

Cons

"Dashboards do not allow everyone to see what's happening."

"It'll help if customization was easier."

"Cortex XDR could improve its sales support team, including better commission structures and referral programs."

"The GUI could be improved."

"If they had pulse rate detection, it would be better."

"The MAC agent is not as robust feature-wise as the PC version."

"I would like to see some additional features related to email protection included."

"It is not very strong in terms of endpoint management. It should have additional features like DLP, encryption, or advanced device control. Currently, Cortex is good in terms of the security of the endpoints, but it is not as good as other vendors in terms of the management of the endpoint."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"We are in the process of removing it from many of our endpoint clients because it's not really showing enough value for them at the moment."

"The product's reporting isn't great."

"While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper."

"There can be problems with the EDI."

"I feel that the product lacks reporting features and needs improvement."

"Its Microsoft PowerShell protections still need some compatibility improvements. We have run across just a few. It is compatible with 90% of what we have in our network, but there is that 10% that we are still struggling with as far as compatibility with the type of PowerShell scripts needed to run our day-to-day business."

"The reporting feature needs improvement."

"The deployment on individual endpoints is more geared toward larger organizations. It might prove to be a bit too complicated for a smaller organization. You need to know what you're doing when you're deploying the sensor."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons

"The initial setup requires a little bit of experience with configuration."

"We just submitted an enhancement request reflecting the main area we want to see improvement in; the APIs. Currently, we're able to build dashboards, but it's somewhat backward because we use our MDM API to create them. Lookout should provide API to customers so we can query our data and use it in our cloud, and this is the only outstanding area for improvement with the product right now."

"From the analysis that we've done, they do seem to be maybe a step behind in trying to enter the market with a new solution. But when they do pick up, they do come out with some good products."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is $55 to $90 USD per endpoint per month."

"This is an expensive solution."

"It's the most expensive solution, but features-wise, it's quite strong. It's very good for protection, so the results are very good in the case of protection. I would rate it a two out of ten in terms of pricing."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is quite an expensive solution."

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription. This is attributed to OPEX savings, as security teams spent less time trying to identify and isolate malware for analysis as a result of a reduction in malware incidents, false positives, and breach avoidance."

"It has reasonable pricing for the use cases it provides to the company."

"In terms of the cost Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very expensive because we are a Mexican company and when you translate dollars to pesos the cost is very high. The solution is very expensive for Mexican companies. I understand that they have international prices, but I do not think it offsets the price enough for many companies in countries, such as Mexico. The amount it is reduced is not a massive percentage."

"The cost depends on your chosen license type, like Pro or other licenses."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."

"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."

"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."

"The pricing is manageable."

"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."

"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."

"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice

"Lookout is definitely on the lower end when it comes to price point and that seems to be the only differentiator. The technology is in place in this space and it's really about who is coming in at the better price point now."

"The pricing is fair; it's comparable to our previous solution, and we carried out multiple POCs and POVs (proof of value). The product is worth the money we pay for it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	52

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

My main use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is mostly for incident response.

What needs improvement with Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

When it comes to advanced threats, it sometimes helps me with finding them and hunting them down with threat detectio...

What advice do you have for others considering Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

I mostly work with incident response, so I work with a bunch of them interchangeably, but mostly with the EDR compone...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lookout?

The pricing is a little expensive. We are currently looking at comparisons with other solutions, including Umbrella.

What needs improvement with Lookout?

There is nothing we have come across that we've desired.

What is your primary use case for Lookout?

We use Lookout for mobile devices, such as phones.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Comparisons

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 3% of the time

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 3% of the time

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors

Zimperium vs Lookout

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Lookout

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Lookout

Compared 5% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Lookout

Compared 3% of the time

Check Point Harmony Mobile vs Lookout

Compared 3% of the time

More Lookout Competitors

Product Reports

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report

Download Lookout product report

Mobile Threat Defense

May 2026

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond

CipherCloud

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response offers advanced threat hunting, investigation, and malicious operation visualization. Its intuitive interface and AI-driven Malop engine enhance threat detection efficiency across multiple platforms.

Focused on providing detailed real-time insights, Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is crucial for cybersecurity operations by offering comprehensive dashboards and managed detection and response services. It ensures efficient threat isolation, supports Windows, Linux, and Mac environments, and improves network activity visibility. While its AI engine enhances threat analysis clarity, technical support and deployment complexity can be improved, particularly for smaller organizations. Some challenges include integration with Microsoft, high CPU usage, minimal dashboards, and graphics. Additionally, deployment processes need refinement for stability with new OS versions.

What are the key features of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Threat Hunting: Actively searches for potential threats before they can cause harm.
Malop Engine: Uses AI to clearly visualize and analyze malicious operations.
Real-Time Visualization: Monitors malicious activities with intuitive dashboards.
Automation: Streamlines security processes by automating routine tasks.
Cross-Platform Support: Compatible with Windows, Linux, and Mac systems.

What benefits can users expect from using Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies monitoring and managing network security activities.
Operational Efficiency: Supports lightweight operations reducing resource usage.
Improved Visibility: Enhances clarity in threat detection and response.
Reduced False Positives: Accurate detections minimize unnecessary alerts.

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is widely implemented to safeguard endpoints, particularly in fields requiring rigorous security measures. Many employ it for its robust incident response capabilities in finance, healthcare, and government sectors to tackle malware, malicious operations, and unusual process detection, supporting security operations centers with powerful monitoring tools.

LevelBlue

Lookout offers a mobile EDR solution that uniquely addresses the challenges of iOS and Android security, providing comprehensive threat defense and visibility.

By utilizing AI-driven security and behavioral analysis, Lookout identifies and mitigates mobile threats before they escalate. Lookout's mobile threat defense system is tailored for modern risks, protecting employee devices from social engineering attacks such as phishing and smishing. It bridges the gap between mobile and traditional endpoint security, ensuring secure mobile productivity through the world's largest mobile security data set.

What are the key features of Lookout?

AI-Driven Threat Detection: Uses AI to identify and neutralize threats proactively.
Comprehensive Mobile Security: Protects against mobile malware, and network threats.
Behavioral Analysis: Evaluates device activities to detect anomalies and potential threats.
Advanced Social Engineering Defense: Guards against phishing, smishing, and other social engineering tactics.
Risk Alignment: Integrates mobile risk assessment with traditional endpoint security.

What benefits should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Ensures robust protection against emerging mobile threats.
Improved Visibility: Provides real-time insights for effective risk management.
Increased Productivity: Enables secure access to mobile apps and data.
AI-Powered Protection: Delivers smarter and faster threat detection.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces the need for multiple security solutions.

Lookout is widely implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and government due to its ability to secure sensitive data on mobile platforms. Financial institutions value its proactive threat detection, healthcare providers rely on its compliance capabilities, and government agencies trust its robust defense against sophisticated attacks. Lookout helps organizations maintain security while enabling mobile productivity.

Lookout

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

Information Not Available

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Lookout