D-Link Wireless vs ExtremeWireless comparison

D-Link and Extreme Networks are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. D-Link is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while Extreme Networks is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. D-Link holds a 2.1% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Extreme Networks’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of D-Link users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Extreme Networks users who would recommend it.

D-Link Wireless

Read 17 D-Link Wireless reviews

2,035 Views
2,035 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

ExtremeWireless

Read 30 ExtremeWireless reviews

1,841 Views
1,694 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

D-Link Wireless

ExtremeWireless

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

ExtremeWireless and D-Link Wireless are two major players in the wireless networking market. ExtremeWireless tends to have an upper hand with its sophisticated features for enhanced network control, while D-Link Wireless attracts those looking for cost-effective solutions with solid performance.

Features: ExtremeWireless includes robust security protocols, advanced network management tools, and seamless connectivity. D-Link Wireless offers easy network scalability, diverse compatibility, and centralized controller management for VLAN and multiple SSID integration.

Room for Improvement: ExtremeWireless could improve in aspects like simplifying configuration steps, ensuring smoother integration in hospitality environments, and reducing setup complexity for non-specialist IT users. D-Link Wireless might enhance its customer support reach, streamline firmware updates, and bolster security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtremeWireless boasts a comprehensive deployment model with professional installation options and excellent customer service with quick response times. D-Link Wireless offers a streamlined setup process ideal for small to medium-sized enterprises, with reliable customer service, albeit with fewer options.

Pricing and ROI: ExtremeWireless demands a higher initial setup cost, justified by its advanced functionalities, resulting in a greater ROI for businesses focused on long-term value. D-Link Wireless provides a more affordable entry point, appealing to budget-conscious buyers or those with restricted budgets, making it a practical choice for immediate cost savings.

To learn more, read our detailed D-Link Wireless vs. ExtremeWireless Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

D-Link Wireless vs. ExtremeWireless

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

D-Link Wireless

Ranking in Wireless LAN

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ExtremeWireless

Ranking in Wireless LAN

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of D-Link Wireless is 2.1%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtremeWireless is 2.3%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ExtremeWireless	2.3%
D-Link Wireless	2.1%
Other	95.6%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

NadirShahzad

System Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Wireless projects run smoothly with more access point support and competitive pricing

D-Link Wireless offers more supported APs to the WLC with the default license compared to other brands like Cisco. With Cisco, only four to five APs are connected with the default license, but D-Link Wireless provides more flexibility. Local support in Pakistan is necessary for those with limited budgets, creating a reach in the market.

Read full review

Karel Ondracek

Network Administrator at THK Co Ltd

We manage complex networks with seamless guest and user access while ensuring device authorization

I use enterprise connections where users need to be authorized against radius servers. This feature is common across various products, including ExtremeWireless. Generally, the network management is valuable to me. However, I am unsure how the security architecture enhances our network protection as we typically use the latest firmware for access points. Nonetheless, we had some troubles with roaming, requiring me to install specific firmware to avoid issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The connectivity is good."

"The tool supports new technologies."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"It's scalable, user friendly, and easy to manage."

"The most valuable feature of D-Link Wireless is its durability."

"D-Link Wireless is a tool that is used since it is an easy and user-friendly product."

"It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"This product is user-friendly and we can manage it as per the requirements of the user."

More D-Link Wireless pros

"The cloud-based management system is valuable."

"The customer service and support provided by Extreme are excellent."

"Based on my experience, I would recommend ExtremeWireless to others."

"The platform's most valuable feature is the ability of its access points to adapt and self-heal."

"The product's price is competitive. It is an impressive and reliable product."

"The monitoring system is integrated with AI features."

"The initial setup was easy."

"The most valuable feature is the cloud-managed aspect."

More ExtremeWireless pros

Cons

"The solution doesn't have hotspots. Users can't set it up so that visitors can log in via Facebook or social media as they can at, for example, airports. D-Link should include hotspots that offer integration with social media. That way, visitors don't need to be asking people for passwords. They can just use Facebook."

"Sometimes we configure the SSID with a password but the same AP shows two WiFi connections with the same SSID name (one is protected by a password and another one give access without a password)."

"D-Link has some catching up to do in terms of advancing and improving its technology."

"Sometimes, the solution needs to be restarted."

"The solution's performance could be improved."

"D-Link Wireless should include the 'cleaner' feature similar to Cisco's APs. This feature reduces signal interference with access points."

"The only issue is with the controller visibility of the devices connecting to the network."

"The performance offered by D-Link Wireless can be a bit problematic at times, owing to which it is an area that can be considered for improvement."

More D-Link Wireless cons

"The ExtremeWireless WiNG Access Point on-premise is not as good as the cloud and many of my customers are switching. It is easier for my clients to manage everything from the cloud. I currently use a model of the controller that does not support any cloud functionality."

"It is a subscription model, so it is maybe a bit pricey."

"There is some delay in firmware upgrades for access points. When there is a problem with the firmware of one access point, the correction might be too late."

"Technical support is an area that needs to be improved."

"The performance of the access points could be improved."

"Many companies prefer Aruba over ExtremeWireless, possibly due to Aruba's broader range of products or their thorough approach to understanding customer needs."

"There are concerns regarding the stability of ExtremeWireless. It could be an area of improvement, especially when compared to previous solutions such as Motorola before their acquisition."

"The management portal is in need of improvement."

More ExtremeWireless cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"D-Link Wireless is cheaper than Ruckus or Cisco."

"The product is affordable."

"This solution is more affordable than others on the market."

"D-Link Wireless' price is the same as Aruba's. You need to pay one-time costs for the product."

"The cost can range from $100 to $400."

"D-Link pricing is very competitive when you consider other OEMs."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the pricing an eight out of ten."

"There is no licensing fee for the solution."

"The price of the solution overall is expensive. Additionally, the controller and license are expensive. We pay for an annual subscription."

"I rate the product's pricing a three or four out of ten."

"We pay approximately $30,000 per year."

"The solution is priced well and we currently are only paying for a license for maintenance."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The license cost per AP is about $150 USD."

"The purchase of 350 access points cost approximately $250,000 USD."

"ExtremeWireless isn't budget-friendly. The hardware costs around 20,000 Indian rupees. We're still using an older controller, so it doesn't require a license, unlike the newest versions of the ExtremeWireless controller."

More ExtremeWireless pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

University

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

Which wireless solution would you choose - Huawei or D-Link?

Huawei wireless is a strong and solid product that has a lot of features - and for all that it offers, it happens to be very cost effective. As a wireless solution, it is simple and its user interf...

See all answers

What do you like most about D-Link Wireless?

The tool supports new technologies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for D-Link Wireless?

D-Link Wireless is notably more affordable than Cisco and Juniper. It suits SMB needs without the financial burden of purchasing additional licenses for extended APs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ExtremeWireless?

There are concerns regarding the stability of ExtremeWireless. It could be an area of improvement, especially when compared to previous solutions such as Motorola before their acquisition. Another ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ExtremeWireless?

We mainly use ExtremeWireless ( /products/extremewireless-reviews ) for the warehouse, specifically for the Zebra handheld devices and printers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ExtremeWireless?

Overall, ExtremeWireless has a lot of room for improvement. The main concern is stability. As a user, I focus on supporting the devices and ensuring they meet my client’s needs. While I do not hand...

See all answers

Comparisons

Huawei Wireless vs D-Link Wireless

Compared 32% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs D-Link Wireless

Compared 10% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs D-Link Wireless

Compared 9% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs D-Link Wireless

Compared 7% of the time

Aruba Instant On Access Points vs D-Link Wireless

Compared 3% of the time

More D-Link Wireless Competitors

Ruckus Wireless vs ExtremeWireless

Compared 34% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs ExtremeWireless

Compared 17% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs ExtremeWireless

Compared 7% of the time

Aruba Access Points vs ExtremeWireless

Compared 5% of the time

Dell Technologies Ruckus vs ExtremeWireless

Compared 3% of the time

More ExtremeWireless Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

D-Link Wireless

February 2026

Download D-Link Wireless product report

Buyer's Guide

ExtremeWireless

February 2026

Download ExtremeWireless product report

Also Known As

D-Link WLAN

No data available

Overview

D-Link Wireless offers a wide range of robust wireless Access Points (APs) operating in both the 2.4GHz and 5GHz frequency bands, supporting the latest wireless standards including 802.11ac and 802.11n. These access points can be managed independently as standalone devices, or collectively by using Central Wi-Fi Manager, a free centralized controller software that can be installed on a Windows server or PC.

D-Link

Extreme ExtremeWireless Access Points deliver wired-like performance, at scale for high-density in every environment. Smart Access Points are equally adept for both distributed and centralized deployment models. ExtremeWireless Controllers provide advanced functionality to allow organizations to define how wireless voice/video/data traffic is processed without architectural constraints and in accordance with business needs.

Extreme Networks

Sample Customers

Metropolitan Public Defender, Mission Motorcycles

St. Xavier High School, Americatel, Diamond Light Source

Buyer's Guide

D-Link Wireless vs. ExtremeWireless

February 2026

Free Report: D-Link Wireless vs. ExtremeWireless

Find out what your peers are saying about D-Link Wireless vs. ExtremeWireless and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our D-Link Wireless vs. ExtremeWireless report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.