Datamatics TruBot vs Nintex RPA comparison

Datamatics and Nintex are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. Datamatics is ranked #29 with an average rating of 7.0, while Nintex is ranked #21 with an average rating of 5.7. Datamatics holds a 0.8% mindshare in RPA, compared to Nintex’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Datamatics users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

Datamatics TruBot

Read 3 Datamatics TruBot reviews

669 Views
649 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nintex RPA

Read 30 Nintex RPA reviews

2,328 Views
2,281 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Datamatics TruBot

Nintex RPA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Datamatics TruBot and Nintex RPA compete in the automation software market. Datamatics TruBot is often favored for pricing and support, while Nintex RPA stands out due to its broader capabilities and perceived value.

Features: Datamatics TruBot integrates with legacy systems, provides detailed analytics for process improvement, and is intuitive to use. Nintex RPA features extensive pre-built connectors, a powerful scripting tool for complex workflows, and customizable automation capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Datamatics TruBot offers straightforward deployment and responsive customer service for fast turnaround. Nintex RPA provides comprehensive deployment options, delivering greater scalability with dedicated support, suitable for extensive enterprise solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Datamatics TruBot is competitively priced, reducing setup costs with favorable ROI for smaller projects. Nintex RPA requires a significant initial investment; however, it provides substantial ROI over time for larger implementations due to its efficiency gains.

To learn more, read our detailed Datamatics TruBot vs. Nintex RPA Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Datamatics TruBot vs. Nintex RPA

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Datamatics TruBot

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

29th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nintex RPA

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of Datamatics TruBot is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex RPA is 2.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nintex RPA	2.2%
Datamatics TruBot	0.8%
Other	97.0%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

Iqbal-Siddique

Business Head at MCS india

Offers good UI but needs to improve its integration capabilities

Speaking about how the tool is useful in automating repetitive tasks in our company, I would say that my company started to collect data with the help of Datamatics while also using its GPS tracking features. The tool's UI is much better than the ones offered by other similar products in the market. I recommend the product to others who plan to use it. I suggest that others use their own method of interrogation since it will help them achieve more growth in their organizations through the use of the tool. I rate the tool a seven and a half out of ten.

Read full review

JonathanNg

Global Automation Lead - Customer Operations at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Helped us identify areas where frontline staff aren't following standard procedures or using unexpected systems, giving us better insight into our end users' workflows

To analyze and make sense of the data generated by Kryon process discovery can be a lot of effort. It's not as automatic as some might think. It really depends on how many processes you have and how actively you use them. But the scalability aspect isn't necessarily about deployment or technical maintenance. It's really about how you analyze and gain insights from the data gathering. I'd rate the scalability a seven out of ten because the solution has been scaling well for a long time. It's very easy to deploy. But getting value out of it at scale can be a challenge, just like with any deployment. We use it mainly for process discovery. We actually proceed it from different teams. So, we have 15 licenses that we rotate with different people, actually through different teams. So, we do discovery for the online team; we gather the results after about two weeks to a month. We analyze those results, and then we deploy them again on the analytics team. We regularly deploy it to different teams. So, it's in constant use. It just runs on the systems through discovery mode most of the time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Ability to calculate the ROI on the jobs that are running."

"We believe that the value and the cost of the Datamatics TruBot really fits financial institutions' budgets much better than what we'd call the big three, the Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, UiPath."

"The solution is inexpensive compared to many other solutions in the market."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward and easy to use."

"All our users have no technical background. But Kryon is really simple and intuitive. Our business adapted very quickly and easily. This is the main thing and it's why we love the system so much. It's why we are always trying to put more processes into the system and make more use cases: because of the simplicity and the intuitive nature of the system."

"The recording capability is valuable because of the amount of data it captures automatically. It's quite good. It means less development, and fewer configuration settings to fill in after you're done."

"It has been helpful in reducing the manpower and error rate since we are able to run tasks 24/7 without interruptions. As humans definitely take breaks and there may be absenteeism that is unexpected, the solution provides continuous work. Humans tend to make errors once in a while, but the solution has almost zero percent errors."

"The thing that we find the most value in is the Process Discovery component and the ability to really see what users are doing on a day-to-day basis. We're starting to make sense of the processes that they're doing and getting visibility into what they're doing. Overall, the Process Discovery is very good."

"Attended automation has diverted 34 percent of training calls to our tech support centers."

"We are able to cope with our clients's demands. No matter how much volume they throw at us, we are able to get it done quickly."

"The friendliness of the software is good because people without any technical background can start off on it. This solution makes it easy for us to use it, as there is no learning curve. With no learning curve, the development time turnaround decreases."

"Errors have reduced by 80 percent based on the processes that we have automated by the sheer fact that we don't have people touching so many of them."

More Nintex RPA pros

Cons

"There is a learning curve, and some training could be included to bring users up to speed."

"I'd like to see more additions to the library, which I believe currently has 200 plus items."

"Would like to see more additions to the library."

"The stability of the product has certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The product requires some more time in development. It still has some bugs and some things to work out."

"It could be more reliable in spying HTML."

"We need better training and community support in Indonesia."

"The process discovery tool of Kryon RPA could be improved because of its limitations."

"We need stronger governance to know, when a transaction is done, whether it worked or failed; strong logging."

"Kryon RPA's integration with other solutions could be more seamless."

"I would expect that in the first year there is no ROI. It has to be measured over three or five years."

"We would like to see having a little more specific documentation, or some of the examples be easier to find."

More Nintex RPA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is expensive."

"We're paying in the neighborhood of about $66,000 a year. The cost is fairly similar to its competitors' costs. It might have been a little bit more reasonable than the others, and that cost was with Process Discovery in addition."

"We have been able to alleviate two FTEs, which was a big savings for us. We were able to reuse those resources in other locations. It is over 5000 hours a year in total savings."

"Kryon is slightly more expensive compared to UiPath."

"The price is affordable."

"The product has reasonable pricing."

"It is very cheap. I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"They license per robot and we have 25 robots. You get so many robot licenses and can allocate those licenses to either attended, unintended, or Process Discovery bots. If you have 25 licenses, for example, you could have 20 automation bots and five process discovery. This allocation is flexible. There are also maintenance costs."

"We have a yearly license. It's about $5,000 per year."

More Nintex RPA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Datamatics TruBot?

The product's initial setup phase is straightforward and easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Datamatics TruBot?

The tool is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Datamatics TruBot?

The stability of the product has certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required. The integration capabilities of the product have some concerns and need improvements. The p...

See all answers

Best RPA tools for IBM iSeries

We have found that Foxtrot (Now NintexRPA) is a very solid solution for IBM iSeries integration using the IBM ACS 5250 emulator, in addition Datamatics TruBot is an alternative solution.

See all answers

What do you like most about Nintex RPA?

Nintex RPA often includes security features, including encryption and user access controls, which ensure the protection of sensitive data and compliance with security standards.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nintex RPA?

Although Nintex RPA is expensive, it is somewhat affordable considering its features. I would rate the cost aspect as an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Ikon vs Datamatics TruBot

Compared 13% of the time

UiPath Platform vs Datamatics TruBot

Compared 10% of the time

TIS RPA vs Datamatics TruBot

Compared 9% of the time

Tungsten RPA vs Datamatics TruBot

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vs Datamatics TruBot

Compared 5% of the time

More Datamatics TruBot Competitors

UiPath Platform vs Nintex RPA

Compared 14% of the time

Fortra's Automate vs Nintex RPA

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Nintex RPA

Compared 6% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Nintex RPA

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vs Nintex RPA

Compared 5% of the time

More Nintex RPA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

March 2026

Download Datamatics TruBot product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex RPA

March 2026

Download Nintex RPA product report

Also Known As

TruBot

Kryon RPA

Overview

TruBot is a proprietary product for Robotic Process Automation. It is a team of virtual assistants that automates repetitive and rule-based processes without any manual intervention. When powered with Artificial Intelligence, it can recognize and replicate human actions, creating a smarter bot that can make informed decisions. TruBot is sector agnostic and can be deployed across Banking, Healthcare, Insurance, Manufacturing, and Logistics.

Datamatics TruBot - https://trubot.datamatics.com/

Datamatics

Using Nintex RPA, enterprises can leverage trained bots to quickly and cost-effectively automate routine tasks without the use of code in an easy-to-use drag and drop interface. Users are now equipped with a comprehensive, enterprise-grade process management and automation solution that streamlines processes fueled by both structured and unstructured data sources.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Aditya Birla Sunlife Insurance Company, IndusInd Bank

Amazon, Audi, Chevron, Toyota, Uber, Walmart

Buyer's Guide

Datamatics TruBot vs. Nintex RPA

March 2026

Free Report: Datamatics TruBot vs. Nintex RPA

Find out what your peers are saying about Datamatics TruBot vs. Nintex RPA and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Datamatics TruBot vs. Nintex RPA report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.