You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

Top 10 Nintex RPA Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

30 reviews
91% willing to recommend

Top Nintex RPA Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Nintex RPA based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include UiPath Platform, Microsoft Power Automate, and Automation Anywhere. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Nintex Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Nintex, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

UiPath Platform

4.4 out of 5

UiPath Platform

4.4 out of 5

Oracle CRM offers powerful data management for complex enterprises, attracting buyers who prioritize integration capabilities. In comparison, Salesforce focuses on user-friendly interfaces with customizable features, appealing to those who value ease of use and flexibility in scaling their CRM operations.

Download Nintex RPA vs. UiPath Platform Report

Pricing

UiPath Platform incurs a higher setup cost with its comprehensive offerings, while Nintex RPA presents a more economical initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

UiPath Platform incurs a higher setup cost with its comprehensive offerings, while Nintex RPA presents a more economical initial investment.

Microsoft Power Automate

3.9 out of 5

Microsoft Power Automate

3.9 out of 5

Microsoft Power Automate excels in Microsoft product integration with low-code capabilities, making it ideal for non-developers. In comparison, Nintex RPA offers scalable workflows with strong error handling. Power Automate supports more deployment options, while Nintex RPA presents a drag-and-drop experience.

Download Microsoft Power Automate vs. Nintex RPA Report

Pricing

Microsoft Power Automate offers a lower setup cost compared to Nintex RPA, highlighting a cost-effective choice for businesses seeking automation solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Power Automate offers a lower setup cost compared to Nintex RPA, highlighting a cost-effective choice for businesses seeking automation solutions.

Automation Anywhere

4.2 out of 5

Automation Anywhere

4.2 out of 5

Automation Anywhere excels in advanced AI integrations and analytics, enhancing automation efficiency. In comparison, Nintex RPA offers seamless Microsoft tool integration and a low-code approach, ideal for rapid deployment. Automation Anywhere's customizable options suit complex needs, while Nintex RPA ensures quicker ROI with agile implementation.

Download Automation Anywhere vs. Nintex RPA Report

Pricing

Automation Anywhere offers a competitive setup cost with efficient onboarding, while Nintex RPA provides a flexible pricing model tailored for various business sizes, emphasizing their affordability differences in implementing robotic process automation solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Blue Prism

3.9 out of 5

Blue Prism

3.9 out of 5

Blue Prism offers comprehensive automation with features like Control Room and efficient exception handling, appealing to enterprises with robust needs. In comparison, Nintex RPA provides a user-friendly interface with drag-and-drop design, making it ideal for businesses seeking scalable, versatile solutions.

Download Blue Prism vs. Nintex RPA Report

Pricing

Blue Prism's setup costs are generally higher, requiring a substantial initial investment, whereas Nintex RPA is known for offering a more budget-friendly setup, making it an attractive option for businesses seeking lower initial costs.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

4.1 out of 5

IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

4.1 out of 5

IBM RPA's advanced orchestration and AI integration make it ideal for handling complex automations efficiently. In comparison, Nintex RPA's straightforward drag-and-drop interface and scalable cross-platform capabilities attract those seeking simplicity and quick deployment for less intricate tasks.

Download IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vs. Nintex RPA Report

Pricing

IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) offers competitive setup costs, whereas Nintex RPA is known for a relatively higher initial investment. The key difference lies in the upfront expense associated with getting started with each platform.

View comparison

Pricing

WorkFusion

3.8 out of 5

WorkFusion

3.8 out of 5

WorkFusion excels in SAP integration and complex workflows, ideal for deep integrations. In comparison, Nintex RPA offers ease of use with a drag-and-drop interface, suitable for organizations seeking user-friendly solutions, though its AI capabilities lag behind those of WorkFusion.

Download Nintex RPA vs. WorkFusion Report

Pricing

WorkFusion requires a low setup cost, appealing to cost-conscious users, while Nintex RPA presents a more significant initial financial investment with potential for comprehensive functionality.

View comparison

Pricing

WorkFusion requires a low setup cost, appealing to cost-conscious users, while Nintex RPA presents a more significant initial financial investment with potential for comprehensive functionality.

SAP Intelligent RPA

3.6 out of 5

SAP Intelligent RPA

3.6 out of 5

SAP Intelligent RPA excels with robust integration within SAP ecosystems, ideal for enterprises seeking detailed process automation. In comparison, Nintex RPA offers user-friendly deployment and versatile functionality across platforms, appealing to businesses needing adaptable and comprehensive automation solutions despite higher costs.

Download Nintex RPA vs. SAP Intelligent RPA Report

Pricing

SAP Intelligent RPA has a high setup cost, while Nintex RPA offers more affordable initial deployment. SAP's pricing reflects advanced capabilities, contrasting with Nintex's focus on cost-effectiveness for businesses seeking robust, budget-friendly automation solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Jiffy.ai Automate

4.1 out of 5

Jiffy.ai Automate

4.1 out of 5

Jiffy.ai Automate provides robust workflow capabilities with strong OCR and machine learning for data processing, appealing for complex workflows. In comparison, Nintex RPA's visual design and drag-and-drop interface target users with minimal coding skills, offering ease of use and rapid deployment.

Download Jiffy.ai Automate vs. Nintex RPA Report

Pricing

Jiffy.ai Automate offers a competitive setup cost known for its affordability, while Nintex RPA presents a higher initial expense.

View comparison

Pricing

Jiffy.ai Automate offers a competitive setup cost known for its affordability, while Nintex RPA presents a higher initial expense.

NTT-AT WinActor

3.5 out of 5

NTT-AT WinActor

3.5 out of 5

NTT-AT WinActor provides competitive pricing, reliable support, and straightforward deployment, making it ideal for cost-conscious enterprises. In comparison, Nintex RPA's advanced features and analytics offer significant long-term ROI, appealing to businesses prioritizing extensive functionality despite a higher initial investment.

Download NTT-AT WinActor vs. Nintex RPA Report

Pricing

NTT-AT WinActor has a higher setup cost compared to Nintex RPA, which is more budget-friendly, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

NTT-AT WinActor has a higher setup cost compared to Nintex RPA, which is more budget-friendly, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.

Jacada Intelligent Agent Engagement

3.5 out of 5

Jacada Intelligent Agent Engagement

3.5 out of 5

While assisted service aptly describes the human-touch component, intelligent agent engagement more accurately describes the human-touch fueled with technology to drive improved operational efficiency. Intelligent agent engagement is about transforming complex agent desktops, a variety of channels (voice, chat, email, etc) and complex processes (troubleshooting, complicated products, regulatory) into an operationally efficient customer service experience.

View comparison

Related categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Agentic Automation

Process Mining